I'm on the 13:06 I thought, NoWhat should recruit the second bishop instead of the second LC? Mostly because he has the initiative. You could move and control with two bishops without your next bag rotation. And by seen his new hand after the rotation its a guarantee win, you control with RG, you move bishop recruiting Merc, you take initiative, next round control bishop/control merc. Yes, there are chances to draw a bad hand, but most of the random is good for you, so chances are quite low.
At 13:06 there were already 2 LC recruited. Earlier, going bishop was a viable option however it still leaves the issue of not drawing either bishop in the next hand.
I'm on the 13:06
I thought, NoWhat should recruit the second bishop instead of the second LC? Mostly because he has the initiative. You could move and control with two bishops without your next bag rotation. And by seen his new hand after the rotation its a guarantee win, you control with RG, you move bishop recruiting Merc, you take initiative, next round control bishop/control merc.
Yes, there are chances to draw a bad hand, but most of the random is good for you, so chances are quite low.
At 13:06 there were already 2 LC recruited. Earlier, going bishop was a viable option however it still leaves the issue of not drawing either bishop in the next hand.