@@nathanjohnwade2289 That's the lie of the monophysytes to justify their heresies. Chalcedonians have condemned nestorianism, that's an insult to claim they are nestorians, nestorians don't agree and are not in communion, they believe two persons, dio/mia is two essences, not two person . diophysis is miaphysis in essence, as Chelcedon 2 affirms, it is just detailed in Chalcedon - the meaning of miaphysis, the term dio is later introduces to contrast with mono. Those that don't accept chalcedon don't affirm miaphysis in fullness and are this way in communion with monophysites ! So you are either dio or mono, mia is another name for dio, as Chalcedon 2 clarifies it ! Including the sixth council, that affirms St Cyril again, reaffirming miaphysis includes the essences, that don't mingle and are two , not one ! Those that don't believe the essence don't believe the Trinity , and lie being miaphysites, if they believe the essence as part of the miaphysite definition, they must affirm two essences otherwise they are monophysites !
Miaphysites are often labelled Monophysites by Chalchedonians, a label that they reject, basing their theology on the formula of Cyril of Alexandria that spoke of mia (one) physis, not of a mone (lone) physis. this is directly from wikipedia and the basic thing anyone should know. For an explanation please watch the video th-cam.com/video/JLCzWmg0RSE/w-d-xo.html
We are not Monophysite If you call us Monophysite so you give us the right to call you nestorian!! We are not We are Miaphysite Read and learn what our pop Cyril said
2015 Coptic film on severus of antioch called the CROWN OF THE SYRIANS
IF they are not monophysite why don't they sign chalcedon admitting diophysis ?
@@nathanjohnwade2289 That's the lie of the monophysytes to justify their heresies. Chalcedonians have condemned nestorianism, that's an insult to claim they are nestorians, nestorians don't agree and are not in communion, they believe two persons, dio/mia is two essences, not two person . diophysis is miaphysis in essence, as Chelcedon 2 affirms, it is just detailed in Chalcedon - the meaning of miaphysis, the term dio is later introduces to contrast with mono. Those that don't accept chalcedon don't affirm miaphysis in fullness and are this way in communion with monophysites !
So you are either dio or mono, mia is another name for dio, as Chalcedon 2 clarifies it ! Including the sixth council, that affirms St Cyril again, reaffirming miaphysis includes the essences, that don't mingle and are two , not one ! Those that don't believe the essence don't believe the Trinity , and lie being miaphysites, if they believe the essence as part of the miaphysite definition, they must affirm two essences otherwise they are monophysites !
There is more to that then what you think. Burden of history for one.
Miaphysites are often labelled Monophysites by Chalchedonians, a label that they reject, basing their theology on the formula of Cyril of Alexandria that spoke of mia (one) physis, not of a mone (lone) physis. this is directly from wikipedia and the basic thing anyone should know. For an explanation please watch the video
th-cam.com/video/JLCzWmg0RSE/w-d-xo.html
The History, Theology, and Spirituality of the Coptic Orthodox Church (w/ Fr. Anthony Mourad)
th-cam.com/video/-GKS8g39qdE/w-d-xo.html
We are not Monophysite
If you call us Monophysite so you give us the right to call you nestorian!!
We are not
We are Miaphysite
Read and learn what our pop Cyril said