Crossable Wormholes?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @ScienceClicEN
    @ScienceClicEN  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1107

    Beware, a little mistake has crept into my animations at 4:42. The light ray should not have been drawn as if it was "reflected" by the white hole. It should just have escaped from within the horizon.
    In fact, because it is an extension of a black hole's geometry, the white hole is still attractive, it draws things in, towards its center just like any other object. The difference is that nothing can ever reach its horizon. This is because the white hole is technically in "the past". So, because we can only travel towards the future, its impossible to go through it.

    • @thekid317
      @thekid317 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Based on my understanding, a black hole does not pull you in so hard that you can't get out of its event horizon, it removes the "out" geometrically so all directions take you to the singularity. similarly, a white hole removes the "in" curving all directions of space away from its singularity. so it's clear that there is no "reflection". the animations seem correct, the light travels through a straight line curved by the gravitational effect of the white hole.

    • @thekid317
      @thekid317 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@abstract_nonsense8683 I don't see that you're missing anything, but the thing is I highly disagree with the fact that the metric surrounding a white hole is reversing time, it is believed that a white hole does not push you out, it pulls you in exactly like a black hole and since time is running backwards the effect is played backwards too, but that's wrong because a black hole never pulls in at the first place, a black hole distorts spacetime so that all XYZ direction take you to its singularity. if a white hole is a black hole is a reversed time, it'll stay inescapable ad it'll look black, the real analogy is that a white hole distorts spacetime in a way that reveals time and all XYZ directions take you out. which means that a backwards time is not the cause of the lightpath, it's a consequence of the same effect behind the lightpath's bend, gravitations distortion

    • @Ru4444
      @Ru4444 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      4:55 "We are able to stick it underneath our original hole" I dont want anything to stick underneath my hole... 😂😂

    • @localboxcrox
      @localboxcrox 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      just wanted to point out that wormholes DEFINITELY WILL exert a huge amount of compression and/or decompression force on anything trying to enter/escape/cross it; because the liner momentum of the object's particles are along geodesics which converge and/or diverge by a huge degree. This might even give the travelers a nifty taste of some sweet sweet nuclear fusion and/or fission. Also might cause heat changes, melting/freezing the ship and the crew within.
      I highly doubt the human body, that evolved on the african savannas for hunting meaty animals, can survive such topological torments. :'(
      p.s. been a huge fan of this channel. love what u r doing.

    • @MrSofazocker
      @MrSofazocker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@thekid317 hm.. interesting, but still. If you just negate the equations, isn't that the same as just describing the system backwards in time?
      E.g. "white holes" would still look black, and objects coming out of it, but you are mapping time also into the negative. Therefore, if a ship would/was "exiting" a white hole, it's just approaching a black hole, just time reversed.

  • @gormauslander
    @gormauslander 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1985

    "We didn't like the way the math initially told us the hole would form, so we made the math tell us another way"

    • @ericfiorenzoni
      @ericfiorenzoni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +137

      That’s a very interesting thought, sometimes I wonder to what extent people have done this in other areas

    • @geradosolusyon511
      @geradosolusyon511 4 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      "It just works!"
      -guess who

    • @ericfiorenzoni
      @ericfiorenzoni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Gerado Solusyon Todd Howard lol

    • @arduous222
      @arduous222 4 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      This comment is somewhat beautiful. It's basically how science is being done (for better or worse).

    • @nescaufe1991
      @nescaufe1991 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Is this a critic, a comical portrayal of the science behind this concept, both or neither? I'm Legitimately curious

  • @lilyh4467
    @lilyh4467 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1280

    I don't understand how such a high quality video has so few views. This is excellent content, sir, truly!
    Edit: This comment was posted 8 months ago when the video only had a few thousand views. I'm glad to see that it has gained some of the attention that it deserves.

    • @Aditya-nk1iw
      @Aditya-nk1iw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I wonder the same, he has made some very good ed videos and deserves atleast a million subs

    • @mohammedbelgoumri
      @mohammedbelgoumri 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It's due to the channel's relative youth. It's a translation to English of the original channel (with the same name) that is in French.

    • @TforThought
      @TforThought 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I also once commented the same....

    • @abhiramcd
      @abhiramcd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

    • @En_theo
      @En_theo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well, the voice is kinda arrogant in the tone. It may repel some viewers.

  • @northernskies86
    @northernskies86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1198

    This channel is so underrated. This is million subscriber content right here.

    • @tepxte
      @tepxte 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I thought this was literally million subscriber content

    • @xrxnpop1222
      @xrxnpop1222 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      True

    • @monvhvj22
      @monvhvj22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      We need to help this guy

    • @Digalog
      @Digalog 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He will get there!

    • @pranjaltiwari1663
      @pranjaltiwari1663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely True!

  • @jainamdedhia8721
    @jainamdedhia8721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +309

    1000x the better explanation than a documentary on cosmos

    • @zwan1886
      @zwan1886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      because network tv is more concerned with being woke and getting diversity hires than actually putting out good content

    • @mrlolas5114
      @mrlolas5114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@zwan1886 deadass

    • @wafflebits
      @wafflebits 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@zwan1886 u say it like network tv i special in that regard

    • @anonymousdetective3786
      @anonymousdetective3786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@zwan1886 “OMG the gaes and feminists and blek peeal are literally destwoyin societee, woek badd 😡😡🤬”

    • @Coinz8
      @Coinz8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@zwan1886 uh, not that isn't the case.

  • @roy04
    @roy04 4 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    This channel deserves more recognition for its quality

    • @abdelrahman3259
      @abdelrahman3259 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      he needs to up his thumbnail game and sound a little bit more excited , he will blow up if he did so

    • @fortuna689
      @fortuna689 ปีที่แล้ว

      same.

  • @alexianodemaodici3977
    @alexianodemaodici3977 4 ปีที่แล้ว +450

    If a wormhole couldn't bring us beyond it's time of creation, is it essentially a time checkpoint that human could travel back to at the end of the world

    • @grggarro1
      @grggarro1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @Hudson Hamman Agreed. What I got from this is that a wormhole connects 2 presents in different parts of space at the same time, unless you think of them as connecting different universes which may open the possibility of having the wormhole connect to a copy of this universe but in a different timeline or timeframe.

    • @smiles9882
      @smiles9882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @Hudson Hamman technically we can very easily time travel just go really fast(light speed) in space for a few years then come back and bam your time was like 20 years and theirs is like 20 years and a day!

    • @catfan913
      @catfan913 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@smiles9882 actually far more significant. 20 years at 99.9% of the speed of light is about 447 years

    • @HomoSapienMan
      @HomoSapienMan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Question is not if we can go forward but backward? Assuming light is cosmic speed limit. Which I do not believe

    • @eggheadusa
      @eggheadusa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’ve always thought this as the way back from time dilation. Time travel

  • @misterbonzoid
    @misterbonzoid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I am going through a period of depression these days, but your videos are so beautiful and stimulating they save my sanity by transporting me to a higher plane. Like looking at a starry sky (can't see many in London). Thank you.

    • @whirledpeas3477
      @whirledpeas3477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👶

    • @mekingtiger9095
      @mekingtiger9095 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Learning Quantum Mechanics is what saved me from part of my depressive state when I had an existential crisis around determinism!

    • @atismoke
      @atismoke 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@whirledpeas3477 hes a person not a mirror

  • @radicaltronic1855
    @radicaltronic1855 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I landed on this video while executing my 10 minutes daily random video views.
    1) I am blown away by the quality of the video: script, science content, graphical representation and animations.
    2) There's a perfect balance between advanced concepts and simple explanations, context and good use of examples.
    Super happy, discovered a pearl. Fairly certain that this channel will explode with millions of subscribers...
    Also, by reading the comments, I'm super happy that the viewers are also surprised by the video quality and channel content, meaning that we all have similar quality threshold
    Made my day!

  • @rizzo-films
    @rizzo-films 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    This was amazing. You seamlessly combined concepts that other TH-cam videos cover during multiple videos, yet you did it in 15 minutes, and in a vivid, easy to understand way. Loved it!

  • @lomashbhardwaj5975
    @lomashbhardwaj5975 4 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Best channel for scientific phenomenon so far...
    Hats off to the creators.

    • @TrudeaisaWEFpuppet
      @TrudeaisaWEFpuppet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I like you profile pic of the very first homosapien to exist. Very cool!

  • @jimmurphy6095
    @jimmurphy6095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    8:13 The fact that you're so close to a huge gravity generator ensures that, even if it only takes a few days to cross the wormhole, thousands of years have passed for everyone else.

    • @CiaoBello21
      @CiaoBello21 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And the control room back on earth doesnt exist anymore. Your spaceship’s become a myth.

    • @xtar_core
      @xtar_core 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But as you cross the white hole, the negative gravity would cancel all the experienced gravitational time dilation, leading to a total of 0 time dilation experienced.

    • @OOFUS4103
      @OOFUS4103 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@xtar_corebut you can’t go back in time

    • @xtar_core
      @xtar_core 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@OOFUS4103 I said 0 time dilation experienced. Not 0 time.

  • @DunaFornVideo
    @DunaFornVideo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    This content is fantastic! Feels like "In a Nutshell" mixed with the delivery of "Ahoy". So concise and easy to receive, props man!

  • @RandyH524
    @RandyH524 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I've watched this dudes videos 4 times already. This is my go to science Channel. I love so much. Thank you for explaining physics to us dumbs.

  • @proximacentauri4106
    @proximacentauri4106 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Am a fan of science and especially theoretical physics, in fact, I have been so since my childhood, I saw thousands and thousands of sophisticated well made videos and documentaries, but this, this is a whole different level, to simplify all these complicated ideas and pack them in 15 min, that's a high-quality work 👌✨ "simplicity"

  • @painnwithat602
    @painnwithat602 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The quality of this video was incredible. You are literally the best educational TH-cam channel I have ever come across. If you keep this up, gret things are coming!

  • @awesim
    @awesim 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Truly high quality content, animation, narration and explanation of phenomenon! Well done!

    • @ScienceClicEN
      @ScienceClicEN  4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Thank you !

    • @ummekulsummasuma3575
      @ummekulsummasuma3575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScienceClicEN What's wormholes character if they appear nested within each other's throats?

    • @nikhiljajatinanda1066
      @nikhiljajatinanda1066 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@ScienceClicEN Thanks 😊 for the great knowledge

  • @kylecaid-loos1483
    @kylecaid-loos1483 4 ปีที่แล้ว +197

    ! GOD. The Quality of these videos...
    You have a Patreon or something? Somewhere I can donate??

    • @ScienceClicEN
      @ScienceClicEN  4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      Very glad you like them ! I recently started a Patreon page : patreon.com/ScienceClic

    • @alexjasat5264
      @alexjasat5264 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ima have to do the same

    • @TheRandomizerYT
      @TheRandomizerYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ScienceClicEN
      Congo m8

    • @TheRandomizerYT
      @TheRandomizerYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@ScienceClicEN
      I'm poor, can't financially help, but stand here as an OG and Determined viewer.

    • @awoowie_nate
      @awoowie_nate 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheRandomizerYT gr8 m8

  • @myusername3689
    @myusername3689 4 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    Remember the good ol’ days when we thought this world was “normal”?

    • @rajeshdevkota4376
      @rajeshdevkota4376 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      That was around 5000bc so I don’t know

    • @gileee
      @gileee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@rajeshdevkota4376 I think they believed some pretty wild, mystical stuff even in 5000bc.

    • @crim22
      @crim22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gileee What about 50,000 BC?

    • @gileee
      @gileee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@crim22 I'm not sure. You'll have to ask them.

    • @slamacatgt4296
      @slamacatgt4296 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I think that’s called ignorance.

  • @bunswaegimelon6896
    @bunswaegimelon6896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    darn. really underrated channel

  • @isazisempi2248
    @isazisempi2248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Imagine trying to cross a wormhole and getting trapped in a hellish nightmare for a quintillion years.

    • @HelloWorld-xc4xd
      @HelloWorld-xc4xd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How heart gives out automatically when we go really fast or slow so no

    • @ANTSEMUT1
      @ANTSEMUT1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      And that's why you always have your gellar field always on.

    • @TrudeaisaWEFpuppet
      @TrudeaisaWEFpuppet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ANTSEMUT1 plus we can navigate using our warp cores and dillithium crystals

    • @ANTSEMUT1
      @ANTSEMUT1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TH-camI-pu6bt dammit
      ...meddling devs.

  • @WavyCats
    @WavyCats 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love how spacetime is represented as a 3D fabric field rather than a 2D plane. It can be misleading to younger children to think that there is fixed direction in gravity.

  • @deralex4350
    @deralex4350 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Holy shit! I didn't realize how few subscribers and views this channel has until I looked at the comments.
    Wow. This is some professional content here!
    subbed and liked^^

  • @prashantb4220
    @prashantb4220 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All those fancy documentaries that i have ever seen related to space or physiscs , not a single one of them could match the videos of this channel in terms of quality and details

  • @pranjaltiwari1663
    @pranjaltiwari1663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I predict that this channel would grow exponentially in the near Future

    • @db5094
      @db5094 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup

    • @tim40gabby25
      @tim40gabby25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, leave that to kittens on Tiktok. This channel will grow much further, based on quality, but growth will be steady. In 10 years I might review this comment, if I'm spared :)

    • @Maverick56912
      @Maverick56912 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tim40gabby25 just a reminder

  • @mohamedanouaralahiane831
    @mohamedanouaralahiane831 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Badass videos without even asking people to like or subscribe.. you know they will!

  • @tensevo
    @tensevo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I like how you waited to near the end to drop the bomb that general relativity is not perfect.

  • @sharks3010
    @sharks3010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At the time of writing this comment, I can see this channel has less than 140k subs. That's just criminal! You deserve a million plus, no question. Honestly, you're probably the best source for hi quality science explanations of topics that can get very confusing, very quickly! Hats off to everyone involved. 👏👏👏

  • @nathanrey
    @nathanrey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    People watching in 2400:

    • @niclassjrslev4458
      @niclassjrslev4458 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      people who have mastered time travel, please don't spoil it for this age like we did for year 2231

    • @sebastianlondono.
      @sebastianlondono. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@niclassjrslev4458 kid you legit have a Pokémon off your not a time traveler

    • @niclassjrslev4458
      @niclassjrslev4458 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@sebastianlondono. look at this edge lord who can't take a joke.

    • @VulcanoLV
      @VulcanoLV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@niclassjrslev4458 look at the coper whos joke got btfo because it was shit :)

    • @BerriMura
      @BerriMura 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sebastianlondono. that's.....not a pokemon

  • @jupiterise
    @jupiterise 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a gem I just discovered, this is the best youtube channel I've seen for very long time

  • @tsizzler3771
    @tsizzler3771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love the channel. Makes complex concepts much easier to understand. I’ve always struggled with understanding quantum mechanics but your videos have really helped me grasp that and many other concepts. You deserve more recognition. Keep up the great work

    • @brandonweh
      @brandonweh ปีที่แล้ว

      Should’ve came w me ;)

  • @jakehobert7642
    @jakehobert7642 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @zacharyteibel8580
    @zacharyteibel8580 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I always find it fascinating that we as humans don't have our scientific curiosity as our number one priority, or else videos like this would be at a billion views.

  • @UROOZFATIMA190
    @UROOZFATIMA190 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the way you make us understand the real concept is really tremendous i appreciate your work.this is genuinely a mind boggling concept to have a wormholes in real world nontheless that einstein predicted from his equations of general theory of relativity that wormholes can exit that can connect one universe to another or one part of universe to other but still it is not MATHEMATICALLY proved that wormholes in actual world exit. Nevertheless this is just amazing and super curiositive theory.

  • @sabyasachikashyap2241
    @sabyasachikashyap2241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a content, even If one doesn't know a thing about laws of relativity, he/she can find interesting stuffs throughout the video. Excellent work, keep working on your good works.

  • @UROOZFATIMA190
    @UROOZFATIMA190 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    However we know that Einstein's general theory of relativity contravene with quantum phenomenon that occurs in quantum mechanics. However we know that if wormholes will exist in REALITY then it will be just exquisite and INCREDIBLE achievement. Because from that if all things are well and also if there is a much wide area that it can take a spaceship to go through wormholes and not having so high gravitational pulls as well and thereafter reach different universe or something .then it's gonna be super excitable. So now our work is to research and study deeply more and more in this topic and prove it MATHEMATICALLY as well .

  • @jmeno8652
    @jmeno8652 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    you explained gravity... with gravity
    great

  • @proximacentauri4106
    @proximacentauri4106 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would like to ask you the next time you put a mathematical equation to mention the meaning of its parts and components, that would help a lot in understanding the philosophy of "why" and "how". thank you, u deserve respect for this excellent work.

  • @spider853
    @spider853 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think there is some misconception that gives a lot of people mistaken idea of mass = gravity (higgs = graviton) when saying because of it's mass it distort the space time around it ( 0:45 ) , from what I understood after searchig for Higgs - graviton differences, it's the energy not the mass distorting the space-time, photons that are massless can also have gravity fields around them. Also theoretically a blackhole from photons can exist. Correct me if I'm wrong but that what I came out after searching for higgs - graviton correlation

    • @soyjakchud
      @soyjakchud 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah thats right

  • @hammertail6187
    @hammertail6187 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Commenting for the algorithm! Such masterpieces need to be heard by more people!

  • @mekillerwolf
    @mekillerwolf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    After taking a ton of math classes in college, I feel like I sort of understand now 🤯🤯🤯🤯

  • @meows_and_woof
    @meows_and_woof 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can you travel through a wormhole if you are made of particles which need a spacetime continuum in order to exist. Obviously the wormhole will start closing since you are going to be pulling the spacetime continuum with you as you attend to move inside.

  • @IAMDIMITRI
    @IAMDIMITRI 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:06 but would that be a whole or simply spacetime expanding everywhere equally? Kinda like what our universe does?

  • @nstheboss
    @nstheboss 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant video, black holes, worm holes and time dilation are some things I could talk about for hours and not get bored of it, fascinating.

  • @aerrgrey
    @aerrgrey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Extremely good and clear explanations of very tough themes, really glad, that youtube showed me this channel.

  • @shrimpsnail
    @shrimpsnail 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the first time I have heard fourthly, also the quality of this is unbelievable

  • @georgeindestructible
    @georgeindestructible 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Aside from other factors being mentioned in the video, if the space inside the wormhole is being stretched outwards from its center in order for it to exist in a valid/cross-able form, wouldn't that make, things that go through , possible to be ripped apart *depending* on the force needed to have it opened the first place and sustained?

  • @xrxnpop1222
    @xrxnpop1222 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is what i needed from longer time but don't know why it is underrated he explained very well

  • @Gustavo_St
    @Gustavo_St 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I suddenly feel *almost* smart!

  • @rekik2936
    @rekik2936 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "the only people crossing wormholes are theoretical physicists with equations as their space ships''
    so true

  • @kartikraj1779
    @kartikraj1779 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's sooo disappointing that it cannot be stable, I don't think general relativity has ever been proven wrong. And if it says it is not stable, it isn't.

  • @spicystromboli8122
    @spicystromboli8122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The idea that the Morris Thorne was probably used in Interstellar is cool. It had similar visuals to what was described in this video.

    • @The_Isaiahnator
      @The_Isaiahnator ปีที่แล้ว

      It's the first movie I thought of when this video described that type of wormhole.

  • @burieddreamer
    @burieddreamer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    When people start making up mathematical "possibilities" it ceases to be science and becomes wishful thinking. Still, it's interesting, and a fertile ground for science fiction.

    • @ReelLYFE_TV
      @ReelLYFE_TV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If its mathematically possible but hasn't been observed or proven isn't it still science because its proven to be possible with the matj

  • @You_n_mee
    @You_n_mee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel explaining so intuitive

  • @sanjuansteve
    @sanjuansteve 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Black holes are solid spheres of mass, not holes in ¨spacetime¨...

    • @chuckschillingvideos
      @chuckschillingvideos 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, it's pretty brazen how they manipulate folks' lack of understanding of the rubber sheet metaphor.

    • @MEBVishwaS
      @MEBVishwaS 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Black hole is not solid. It is just empty space with infinitely concentrated mass.

    • @sanjuansteve
      @sanjuansteve 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MEBVishwaS That´s a viewpoint not many physicists would agree with. When stars collapse into neutron stars, there[s still a super dense sphere there, it doesn´t magically disappear and it´s the same for the more dense black holes. No magic, just super dense spheres.

    • @MEBVishwaS
      @MEBVishwaS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Neutron stars r solids cause they balance their gravitational force with the strong between neutrons. But black holes exceed that limit and became infinitely concentrated to zero dimensional point. It doesn't disappear but it is shrink to zero radius but it is there. If u fall into the black hole u won't hit it's surface cause it's not solid but u will be spagettified towards singularity. Physicist doesn't say it disappear but it is there, unreachable from our vision.

    • @hacker1oo173
      @hacker1oo173 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This guy doesn't even understand spacetime and quantom physics smh

  • @fahimabrar4103
    @fahimabrar4103 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My God... this is the best video ever on youtube❤️❤️❤️❤️

    • @TforThought
      @TforThought 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where r u from
      If u would like to answer

  • @gavtriple9
    @gavtriple9 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow excellent videos! I can definitely see this channel blowing up

  • @hamzailarzeg
    @hamzailarzeg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel is something else

  • @ClemensAlive
    @ClemensAlive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I dont think that you wuld end up anywhere near a galaxy if you would exit (as radiation^^) a white whole...because it's a white whole xD
    Maybe it is because of that that they can not be seen - because light cant show it to es either...it bounces away in all directions, so there cant be light hitting us directly. The spot pointing directly at us would be infinite small.
    MAYBE...oof...this could be black matter. This is why it can not be detected...it pushes galaxies away from each other, because they can only exist between galaxies.
    They cant be detected, because spycetime is only pointing away from them. So even if you try to look at it, the light you see was bounced and comes from somewhere else... (like a good magigician - doesnt matter how hard you try to look where he exchanges cards, he always fools you to look somewhere else)
    I feel smart right now, but I am probably totally wrong xD

    • @santman3200
      @santman3200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Indeed you are completely wrong. First of all that is not how we observe, the scattering of light would make an object more visible not less, a white hole would be ostensibly bright, brighter in fact than any other object in the universe.
      How you link a white hole to dark matter is beyond me, like what?? This is being a peak layman, linking two completely different things together. It's like saying a sandwich isn't as fast as a boeing 777. Doesn't make any sense.
      Dark matter doesn't push galaxies away, in fact the only property of dark matter we know is that it gravitationally 'binds' with other matter, so the opposite of pushing. Dark energy expands the universe and causes the increasing distance between distant galaxies.

  • @micahmanley613
    @micahmanley613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. I understood maybe 2% of what you said, but felt like I had to keep watching

  • @nikolajnq
    @nikolajnq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    this channel is underrated!

  • @slim5816
    @slim5816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how you always bring up the formulas for everything

  • @TristanCleveland
    @TristanCleveland 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Another great video. Would love to see your treatment of potential shapes of the universe, since I've never been able to understand that, and I bet you'd do a great job.
    One side comment: you mention that quantum physics applies to microscopic stuff. It's funny people always say that, because electromagnetic waves can be the size of the Earth or bigger.

  • @GiulioRicciardi
    @GiulioRicciardi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3 min in. Liked and subbed. Love this 🎉

  • @rafabdc04
    @rafabdc04 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't understand how this channel doesn't have atleast 1million subs yet

  • @julianl.3857
    @julianl.3857 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Underrated Channel

  • @akashtelkar853
    @akashtelkar853 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is one of my fav channel
    Your doing a great work. Thankyou for your efforts that made us to understand quickly 💓💓

  • @lennonwhitehead1352
    @lennonwhitehead1352 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:30. One of the better visuals of the fabric of space that I’ve seen before.

  • @Gustavo_St
    @Gustavo_St 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing quality! Good visual representation can do wonders for education. Thanks a lot!

  • @theonedad7071
    @theonedad7071 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:31 the best graphic description of the fabric of space warped by gravity I've seen.

  • @maxandrelangelier7778
    @maxandrelangelier7778 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Some Physicians (i think) think that wormholes using exotic matter, which have a negative mass. Am I saying false things that make no sense or you didn't take that in consideration? Although, thanks for the beautiful and very instructive video.

    • @ScienceClicEN
      @ScienceClicEN  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks ! Indeed, I explain it at the end of the video : a stable wormhole would require negative energy / mass to exist. Matter with a negative mass (exotic matter) is thought to be impossible though.

    • @maxandrelangelier7778
      @maxandrelangelier7778 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScienceClicENNice! Thank you so much!

    • @uvofsam
      @uvofsam 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Physicists not Physicians

    • @maxandrelangelier7778
      @maxandrelangelier7778 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@uvofsam yea sry

    • @jorgepeterbarton
      @jorgepeterbarton 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeh you can put a minus sign where a plus should be. But thats not any kind of observed reality.

  • @Runs-InCircles
    @Runs-InCircles 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 5:48 I understand the logic of the spacetime journey being faster but how would you represent it in 3d? In a 3d universe wouldn't you also have those "sheets" going the other way and intersecting everything?

    • @Jebsucks
      @Jebsucks 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't really represent it in 3d in a way that makes any sense at all, as the Wormhole would be folding out into a fourth spacial dimension that we can't actually perceive.

  • @doodlebro.
    @doodlebro. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    *_so it's possible that Spore is perfectly canon?_*

  • @marcuscarana9240
    @marcuscarana9240 ปีที่แล้ว

    The gravitational lensing of blackholes, white holes and wormholes look so pretty. It's like an extraterrestrial magnifying glass floating in space. It looks almost magical and majestic as you can see the stars behind bend and transition behind it.

  • @nathanaelcard
    @nathanaelcard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wondering how you'd re-imagine this video with your new GR visualization in mind

  • @maevaedwards
    @maevaedwards 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is my new favorite channel! Thank you so much for all your amazing videos! ❤

  • @yktserea2214
    @yktserea2214 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I had a dream about this happening once and the way to get through the hole is two make a black hole made of a positive energy source and a black hole made of antimatter. Then push them together and it almost instantly resets time in the region of space and the hole is distilled at a time that is not toward or backwards

  • @donoryan5924
    @donoryan5924 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to point something out.
    12:28 - fluctuations do not in itself create a special force called Casimir, only when a difference in the wavelength of those fluctuations is created. As for negative energy by FLUCTUATIONS the only thing we can talk about is the outward push by gravity when considered as the cosmological constant.........(cause of no fall in density).
    Am I missing something?

  • @esmailkhorchaniarts1142
    @esmailkhorchaniarts1142 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Now that's some real science, well done professor

  • @felipeparreiras7152
    @felipeparreiras7152 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Entering a wormhole experience should be similar to going through a tunnel, but in 4 dimensions of space. In 3 dimensions, as what is in front of you increases, the place you came from decreases. The sphere (hole) in front of you would gradually take up part of your field of vision as you go through the hole, when you get to the other side, looking at the hole you came from, you'll see a sphere.

  • @ikaeksen
    @ikaeksen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    12:50 the siri on mac has this switching manifold lol

  • @puvididdle
    @puvididdle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    12:51 Siri is just a string theory

    • @ranjitsarkar3126
      @ranjitsarkar3126 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @tolsti1
      @tolsti1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ranjitsarkar3126 because the graphic used at that point of the video to express string theory looks like the graphic used on iPhone to express Siri.

    • @ranjitsarkar3126
      @ranjitsarkar3126 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tolsti1 ooh
      😂😂😂

  • @thomaswburkhart
    @thomaswburkhart 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    to think we never know what could become a reality in the future. we’ve had so many theories come to life, and we can never know what will be next. “everything seems impossible until it’s done,” and i’m excited at the mere thought that these things aren’t completely out of the realm of possibility. although i might never live to see it, if we can imagine it, it can be true in our minds
    keep exploring the universe, and keep exploring our minds

  • @xliv4602
    @xliv4602 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    0:16 that’s what I see when Iam on shrooms

  • @spookybubby
    @spookybubby 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    those models show a lot, yet what about accessibility, due to the worm holes originally forming because of black holes the conditions would instantly kill anybody attempting to enter. no?

  • @zertilus
    @zertilus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "our universe"

    • @nescaufe1991
      @nescaufe1991 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is this a critic on how we humans put a sort of possession label on the universe??? I kinda got confused there

    • @nescaufe1991
      @nescaufe1991 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      In which case I think the video is correct, considering that there's the parallel universes theory going around, which also states that they might have different physics than ours. And given that the latter is necessary for explaining the video's subject, I think that there's no problem in saying "our universe" since this kind of precision might be necessary. Whereas with the possession thing, it might be inherent to some imprecision in modern English. That's my take on it.

    • @jocabulous
      @jocabulous 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Soviet Anthem plays

    • @jocabulous
      @jocabulous 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      it was a joke and if you don't find it funny that's fine

  • @roukosenpai7774
    @roukosenpai7774 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man you deserve WAY more subs and views
    The algorithm really hate you

  • @noatreiman
    @noatreiman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It’s weird how sometimes you say something, and then you say the exact same thing a few seconds later with a different tone.

    • @ScienceClicEN
      @ScienceClicEN  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ahah do you have an example of this ?

    • @dudexd908
      @dudexd908 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScienceClicEN 3:39

    • @ScienceClicEN
      @ScienceClicEN  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The idea here is that the topology of space can allow holes, but if you travel towards this hole it will always close in on itself, therefore these holes are impossible to "probe" (the topological censorship states that the topology of space : its "holes", are impossible to probe)

  • @BertoldSzekeres
    @BertoldSzekeres 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You seem to know exactly what I don't quite manage to understand from other videos and show exactly what I need to get it right. There's some information about a lot of things in my head, somewhat out of place or with missing connections, and you're videos just put them in the right order, connect them together.

  • @marcoalen3823
    @marcoalen3823 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excelent animation and explanation

  • @cosmic_gate476
    @cosmic_gate476 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chill narration, great animation.

  • @deepakkumar-uj6hq
    @deepakkumar-uj6hq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Second favorite channel after sciencephile

  • @marioraianeto3775
    @marioraianeto3775 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, this video and the other one, about QFT, are quite interresting.
    Well, the metric of a Morris-Thorne Wormhole is clear, and a defined "shape function" b(r) gives you the profile of the embedding throat. But I would like to know more about the other thoats in your video, specifically those ones in 8:38 ; which papers do you studied to give us such conclusion?

    • @ScienceClicEN
      @ScienceClicEN  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you liked them ! These are just drawing without a real justification (it was just to show that there are different shapes of wormholes). However technically if you want you could imagine these shapes as spatial embeddings of wormholes, but they might not have the good qualities we require for a traversable wormhole

  • @kidzbop38isstraightfire92
    @kidzbop38isstraightfire92 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:00 I still don't understands why that means there isn't a hole? Are you saying that the blaclhole has a "bottom"? Or are you saying that the curvature I'd so intense that you can never get to the hole (I.e. you keep "falling" into the hole, never reaching the bottom)?

  • @BlackWolf6420
    @BlackWolf6420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love how logically everything is explained here 🌟

  • @Phiwipuss
    @Phiwipuss 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful. Thank you so much for creating this.

  • @ChaineYTXF
    @ChaineYTXF 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A truly superb work. Thank you.

  • @hardikkadd5114
    @hardikkadd5114 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What i imagine you showed me... Now i can think that many people think like this way... I was thinking that my thinking was wrong but THANK u...
    Keep ur good work 👍

  • @21preend42
    @21preend42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1 thing that doesn't make sense to me is traveling back in time. We all just move into 1 direction in time, at the same time ( the perception of time is different, some parts are slower than other because of gravity). If we mention going back in time, there needs to me another dimension of time. Since Space and time is connected, that to me seems impossible, having a different time means you need another dimension of space. So another universe. Going back in time will most likely be impossible in 1 universe.

  • @DeathDeserter
    @DeathDeserter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Answer me this.
    If a galaxy is 2 billion light years away that means it takes 2 billion "light years" to pass through space and time, in the end reaching to us. Wouldn't the worm hole take us 2 billon years in the past if we travel through it and reach the other side in an instant?