The only nation that wins wars with both hardware, technology and warriors is the Turkish nation. England is definitely not stronger than Turkey neither in the air nor on land or at sea. England has nuclear power, but the Turks also have a lot of nuclear warheads left over from NATO. And Russia and America have confirmed that Turkey has its own nuclear technology. That is, the Turks most likely have their own nuclear weapons. In addition, they are consciously using Britain's power. They are increasing. There are 4 powerful states in the world. These states are: Russia, China, America and Turkey. American officials, Russian officials and NATO officials stated this.
But then what do you think nato has become? Big bully who craftily pushed russia into war with ukraine. What is the motive of this big baboon? He only wants to be bigger than Russia. Human nature which always ends up in corruption. This kong should have been dismantelled long time ago. Now it's too late and the world will never recover.
You need everything. Determination doesn't matter if you have a stick and you get hit with hellfire missiles. You need air superiority, Naval power and armor, as well as superior tactics, communication and numbers.
@@francescosanseverino3365 nawet biorąc pod uwagę cyferki, to wysoko są wojska z 20-30.000 żołnierzy i są wysoko w rankingu, bo maja lotniskowiec 😆 na dzień dzisiejszy to Grecja, czy Finlandia jest silniejsza od takich Niemiec
@@dupasloniawhat? No Germany has one of the best military in the world:) the leopard 2 A 7 V is the best tank in the world. Maybe next time you use your brain
@@MoritzKluger najlepszy? typowy niemiecki arogant, który myśli, ze wszystko co niemiec to najlepsze. ile niemcy mają Leo2 2A7? 20 sztuk i zamówione 60 sztuk. ile macie wszystkich czołgów? 245. Grecja ma pond 1200 czołgów. z cyframi masz problem, wiec mózgu to ty nie używasz.
I recommend that you summarize the quantities on the screen as well, so it is easier to review. Generally, people process information faster visually than by listening.
They use global firepower index numbers. These numbers are wrong very often. For example: Russia should have 15.000 tanks today in service when it comes to global firepower. Don't know where they get those numbers from...
@@Anderixx Russia had around 3-4k running order tanks when war started, the rest were rusting outside and not runnin condition. Today they have lost thousands of tanks.
Real combat power of an army is shown on a real battlefield, no bragg no flash, only skill level and a good reason to fight. Especially when defending or attacking
what ever you have ,,you make non of it,,,,actually ,,you got nothing,,you will run out of everything ,,when war happens,,you got nothingmmyou buy everything from other countries,,,ok,,you got nothing,,,
Numbers isn´t al, there is much weight in what each asset can do war wise, but Greece numbers sure is better on paper. But Sweden also have alot of well trained personel not to "old" from the cold war and years after that ranges upp to a million personell.
Canada fights with the uk 🇬🇧 we are apart of the British empire our military is crap but we have the best trained troops in the world our special forces are better then the us even tho our gear is out dated everytime nato needs high ranking criminals taken out they call jtf2
Ok... This list is somewhat weird? I am biased because i am Finnish, but Finland in 18th spot? And behind such a powerhouses like Denmark, Netherlands, Romania, Norway, Sweden, Portugal? Finland might not have big active military but we have 900k reserve that has been in the army and most are taking part in wargames every few years while on the reserve? So why behind those said countries? If we judge only manpower and available equipment only edge those said countries have against Finland is Navy? And the equipment Finland has is on bar with anyone on the list? Like we have seen in Ukraine artillery is still the most important part of warfare and Finland has one of the strongest artillery on the EU or Nato?
900 bin Asker ?😮 900k🪖 Rezerv asker kaç yaşındalar,, 🎩emekliler ise sayılmaz… savaş 💻📱oyunlarında 😅 yer alması daha vahim,,! Ukrayna’daki Tekerlekli Topçular mı etkili,, 😆🫡🫡
This ranking can`t be taken seriously. It`s poorly evaluated and somewhat weirdly put together. It doesn`t echo the real strenght of the mentioned armies.
Well Finland should be much higher in this list, also Finland has more fighters (62) and tanks (239) thats said in this video. And almost 900 000 reserve, which is huge when compared to others.
@@patverum9051 "Everyone has an assault rifle, enough ammunition for it, a field uniform, some kind of helmet, and rubber boots." Ill bet Russia doesnt have those to their 2 million imagination army, they dont even have any mobilization system like Finland.
No one is perfect! Defend on nationalities you were all is free to tell that your country is great than others. Just saying. Make Love not War***** God bless us all! PEACE....❤❤❤❤
Australia's power in Asia has increased, and in 2024 it became the fifth-ranked power of 27 countries in Asia, officially. I dispute this as only Japan comes close IMO. Moreso, Australia`s air cover is awesome: a 72 plane F35 squadron, F18s, F22 Hornets and top pilots. Recently experienced army engagements and a superb record in engagement. A proven force.
Ναι😂😂 χωρίς αξιόπιστο ία, και εμπειρία πολέμου. Τουρκικής προέλευσης. Απαρχαιωμενα f16 , ακόμα και σήμερα χωρίς αντιεροπορικη, και αντιποιραυλικη ασπίδα , ναυτικό τις πλάκας Τουρκικής προέλευσης, καμία σχέση με τις δύσης.. με 1 ευρώ, 32 τουρκικές λίρες .. φάε ακόμα το σανο που σας ταΐζει ο ερντογαν ανόητοι.. και με ένα πληθωρισμό που θα πεινάνε ακόμα και τα εγγόνια σας 😂 περαστικά σάς.
I’m Canadian and once I saw Canada had submarines I was in instant suspicion, I don’t think those submarines are actually operational they’re a like from the 70 or something
It is going to be interesting to see the same line up in 3-5 years! My guess is that Poland, in particular, and the Nordic countries will be moving up that list like a rapid forest fire.
@@EGE3101 Nope, government numbers. NATO is, however, issuing new strength targets before the end of 2024, which we don't know, but Poland and the Nordic countries are going to be way past those in the coming years. Study the official plans, before you express your comments.
@@TheKyosanim62 You say these are Government numbers: Please provide source and publish dates. Numbers and strength are not always correlated. Where can we find a NATO strength list? Thanks.
Something is wrong here, what criteria are used to position each country? When I see what each NATO member has to offer, then Greece belongs at least 8th or at worst 9th place and not 11th.
He's most likely using global firepower which is pretty accurate however he's only listing military equipment vehicles and naval vessels he's leaving out reserve personal military infustructor and defense industries and defense spending so if he used all that some of these countries would be higher and some lower in ranking
not only personel is important, and maybe because spain has a sort of aircraft carrier and some of the finest frigates/corvettes, logistics like shiffs and cargo planes (pretty important in war), that multiplies its projection force, on the other hand, poland has more defensive capabilities and overall higher numbers in everything but what it downgrades is its soviet equipment (already upgrading) so thats why the lower "score" but it may change in near future
@@JuanGomez-wp8gm in reality Poland would beat Spain easy ...... the fact is Poles are fighters / look at history and strength of the polish people. Easy !
@andylatka6488 Será una broma.... cuando Polonia todavía no existía ya había tumbas de españoles en los 5 continentes y en todos ellos se hablaba y se sigue hablando español, deberias de guardar un mínimo de respeto cuando pretendas compararte a los países que han contribuido a que el mundo sea tal y como lo conoces.
This video refers 2024 Military Strength Ranking data based on the PoweIndex Score published. Could it be true, could it be false, could you dislike it, could you disagree but if you can't prove your opinion, it will always remain only your own personal opinion...
Would have been cool to find an overview that takes population into the equation, as well as economical situation. I checked some numbers for F35s in the US VS Norway, and i dont remember exact numbers, but for every citizen, Norway had several times more of these jets than the US. Im sure the US is still leading overall, but it would be interesting to see by how much.
How on earth is Sweden "stronger" than Greece? I mean, it doesn't make any sense, comparing the numbers. The only thing that Sweden has in larger amount compared to Greece, is a Refueling Plane... Sweden has 1 while Greece none. But Greece is ahead by far on all the rest sectors.
Tell to that to Russians, 1,000 days later in their invasion, still not fulfilled their dark territory aspirations despite having the biggest army, at the start
Your ranking is incorrect. France is the third nuclear power, after Russia and the United States. It is also the second naval power after the United States, largely thanks to the strategic presence of its overseas territories. The French Foreign Legion is deployed all over the globe, not to mention that French-made weaponry is equipped with cutting-edge technology, and that is just one example among many. It is not enough to base a country’s power on numbers alone. According to your logic, one could classify Saudi Arabia as the world’s leading power simply because it buys and possesses one of the largest arsenals of weaponry. In my opinion, the three main OTAN powers are the nuclear powers: the United States, France, and the United Kingdom.
UK Navy is superior to the French yet the French army is larger and this is natural considering the French are land locked while the UK are not. Both a very close and either could be 2nd.
US is far ahead, in Europe it's UK and France that had biggest military budgets last 30 years and are the two top military powers. The biggest European economy is the German, then it's UK and France, then Italy and Spain.
It would have been interesting to count up the total number of different NATO weapons systems at the end of the video. So now I have to torture my calculator to find out.
Even in conventional weaponry France is above Italy in any category. His aircraft carrier is a single type but is nuclear powered.... The number of submarines you registered in the case of the UK and France does not either take into account they are too nuclear powered, be they attack submarines or thermonuclear missiles launchers.... By the way you "forget" the nuclear arsenals of the three powers (USA,UK and France).
The information in this video is incorrect and incomplete for Finland. For example, the Finnish Air Force has 64 F/A18 Hornet fighters, not 55 (the old Hornets will be replaced by F-35 fighters starting next year). The biggest mistake in this assessment of the video is that it does not take into account Finland's mandatory military service. Finland's wartime strength is 280,000 soldiers, and the strength of the entire trained reserve is 870,000 soldiers. Finland definitely belongs higher in the ranking.
Spain is not what they say it has and what it appears to be. Spain is what no one says it has and appears not to have and what it could have in a few weeks.
(Automatically translated) I hope this is all a misunderstanding due to machine translation. What does “NATO's 32 most powerful armies” (as I read in the title) mean if there are 32 NATO member countries in total? It is obvious that each of them will be included among the “most powerful.” This sounds a lot like a mockery to me.
You must be joking… For example, Italy above France? France is a nuclear power…and also produces her own 4++ generation jets. Italy is strong only in navy. Sweden and Poland above Greece?? 200 modern jets and 1400 tanks. Hello???wake up friend
Poland currently spends 5% of its GDP on armaments per year, and Greece 3%, so considering that Poland's GDP is almost four times larger than Greece's GDP, Greece would have to increase its spending to 20% to catch up with Poland.
@@Marco-ns2jg ça ne sert à rien de se lancer dans un concours de celui qui Pise le plus loin, la France a versé 500 milliards pour 10 ans pour fin 2035 sur le renouvellement des armes et blinder sur 10 ans personne en Europe ne tiendra sur la lancer de la France ! vos classements sont dépassé!
Vorrei darti un'informazione che forse non conosci: l'Italia costruisce i propri F35, e grazie ad un accordo con gli Usa possiamo usare un certo numero di armi nucleari in loro possesso ma custodite sul nostro territorio, in caso di necessità
Ναι βλάκα ! Ηλιθιε! Σε στρατιωτικό δυναμικό νηστικοί μουσουλμάνοι.. αλλα σε όπλα με κανιβαλισμενα και απαρχαιωμενα μαχητικά f16. Χωρίς κάν πυραυλικη ασπίδα, ομπρέλα. Με κατι παλιό Ντροουν που πέφτουν σαν μύγες, με υποβρύχια, και πλοία τουρκικής ποιότητας , και προέλευσης.. εδω γελάει και ο καθε πικραμένος😂😂 20 παγκοσμιος και πολύ σας ειναι. Οπως στη λιβυη που δεν καταλάβατε απο που σας ήρθε απο τα ραφαλ , στρατός της πλάκας, και του μαστιγιου.. .
Fine this is a point of view, but what countries are producing or has capability to produce defence products, and what type each? isn't play any role? Because as i know some producing for other ''customers'' but in any time could use them.
@Krilluw better planes ????Greece have rafales,f16 viper and soon f35 .and they have way more at numbers .Sweden have only better rifles than Greece lol.there is not a comparison actually only the huge debt of Greece making Sweden higher ranking
121 Swedish tanks Vs 1243 greek tanks which the majority is high tech leopards 3.200 Swedish AFV VS 6200 Greek 16.000 active personnel Vs 130.000 greek personnel 48 Swedish artillery Vs 1260 greek artillery 0 Swedish rocket projectors Vs 150 greek Air power 207 Swedish Vs 633 greek 71 Swedish fighters planes Vs 188 greek 53 Swedish helicopters Vs 270 greek Zero swedish attack helicopters Vs 30 greek Sub marines 5 Swedish Vs 11 greek Zero swedish frigates Vs 13 greek and as I read Greece bought from France 4 FDI high tech frigates with one of the most high tech missiles.one of the four is already ready. So yes my friend you have totally right .the debt have zero meaning .make a better research my friend and read how the global ranking is actual working.cheers
Total wrong about Croatia. Stronger then Hungary,Bulgaria, Norwegian,Czech and proof 8 HIMARS( 300 rockets),12 Rafale,89 Bradley ( 1700 TOW 2 rockets)12 Black Hawk,15 Kiowa warrior ( 1 700 Hell fire rockets)50 2A8 Leopard we buy and for sure number will be 100,150 Patria vehicle 30 with Spike rockets and now we buying Spike rockets range more then 4 km,60 Caesar hauwitzer we buying ,15 Pzh 2000 we have 30 buying,Baryaktar 2 we buying,Jevlins(100),MATADOR ? normaly more
Nice video but be careful. Canada have maybe a small army but we have way more chit than that. We have a large sea zone to protect so there is more ship than that. Also we are right next to russia. So Canada inventory is large despite the small army. Wait until a war blow up and the effective will probably go up.
The UK and France have very similar Defence forces. They cooperate and work together constantly. Placing France in the 5th position is strange. If so - the UK should be 6th or 4th. Then again, the UK and France have nuclear deterence. Then as Dane, I am sorry, but Finland has a formidable force compared to Denmark. All-in-all an odd ranking.
Thats why tens of hundreds of thousands of innocent lives, babies, children is being slaughtered in Gaza as we speak right now., no thanks to NATO...😡🤬 Obviously NATO dont have the guts to stand on F.cking z.on.sts..🤷🏻♂. No country can stand on nato ever my .ss...
It not about hardware or look big and tough character... It about determination and mindset that will win any war...
The only nation that wins wars with both hardware, technology and warriors is the Turkish nation. England is definitely not stronger than Turkey neither in the air nor on land or at sea. England has nuclear power, but the Turks also have a lot of nuclear warheads left over from NATO. And Russia and America have confirmed that Turkey has its own nuclear technology. That is, the Turks most likely have their own nuclear weapons. In addition, they are consciously using Britain's power. They are increasing. There are 4 powerful states in the world. These states are: Russia, China, America and Turkey. American officials, Russian officials and NATO officials stated this.
Mindset will not always win a war
But then what do you think nato has become? Big bully who craftily pushed russia into war with ukraine. What is the motive of this big baboon? He only wants to be bigger than Russia. Human nature which always ends up in corruption. This kong should have been dismantelled long time ago. Now it's too late and the world will never recover.
Determination plays a minor role compared to more tangible factors. It alone won't win any wars.
You need everything. Determination doesn't matter if you have a stick and you get hit with hellfire missiles. You need air superiority, Naval power and armor, as well as superior tactics, communication and numbers.
The real power of an Army becomes visible in a real conflict, not within parades and statistics.
Dans ce cas tu ne peux faire aucun classement
I am a Scandinavian and no way Denmark is “stronger than Finland”.
Tout dépends de ce que vous appelez "fort".
@ I think in all respects really.
And Sweden 🫣😳
@@ael-brezelourFinland has 1 million trained reserve military personnel.
@@Jaktize Pour une réponse fiable, il faut analyser sur plusieurs critères.
you forget the lichtenstein, 1 general, 1 soldier
And a M16
Maybe next time you make a video like this, make sure that you have the right information. Your list is bullshit.
Qui si parla delle forze che la Nato ha non della classifica di chi detiene il meglio delle forze
@@francescosanseverino3365 nawet biorąc pod uwagę cyferki, to wysoko są wojska z 20-30.000 żołnierzy i są wysoko w rankingu, bo maja lotniskowiec 😆 na dzień dzisiejszy to Grecja, czy Finlandia jest silniejsza od takich Niemiec
USN has corvettes??? really????
@@dupasloniawhat? No Germany has one of the best military in the world:) the leopard 2 A 7 V is the best tank in the world. Maybe next time you use your brain
@@MoritzKluger najlepszy? typowy niemiecki arogant, który myśli, ze wszystko co niemiec to najlepsze. ile niemcy mają Leo2 2A7? 20 sztuk i zamówione 60 sztuk. ile macie wszystkich czołgów? 245. Grecja ma pond 1200 czołgów. z cyframi masz problem, wiec mózgu to ty nie używasz.
I recommend that you summarize the quantities on the screen as well, so it is easier to review. Generally, people process information faster visually than by listening.
We have the biggest artillery and reserve in Finland
big bear w..s
kreml ansk kreml lairin
@@kimmokorpela6762Finland is the bear 🐻 Ruzzia is the two headed eagle.
They use global firepower index numbers. These numbers are wrong very often.
For example: Russia should have 15.000 tanks today in service when it comes to global firepower. Don't know where they get those numbers from...
@@Anderixx Russia had around 3-4k running order tanks when war started, the rest were rusting outside and not runnin condition. Today they have lost thousands of tanks.
Real combat power of an army is shown on a real battlefield, no bragg no flash, only skill level and a good reason to fight. Especially when defending or attacking
Potwierdzam umiejentnosci odwaga taktyka poswiencenie do konca
NATO guardians of Democracy and Freedom! Free people must have protection!
Sie sind schlecht informiert!
@@JosefKariIl vit dans un pays libre , il est très bien informé...
Freedom to be oppressed by our fellow citizens rather than by the government.
Nato is terrorist organization
This video is BS. Finland number 18? WTF?
This video is bs for many reasons, fatal English one of them
They have not consireded reserve personnel as manpower into "strenght", only active personnel!
One of the few countries not occupied by Soviets, from that view point, laughable.
The Czech Republic, that it is stronger than Finland? Even if it were Czechoslovakia, it would be no match for the modern Finnish army!
Finns are always so touchy. Truth is that it has a small professional army, no matter how many reservists it has
Türkiye NATO'nun 2. En büyük ordusu 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Zweit größte aber nicht zweit beste 😜
@@gedientfurdeutschland3718 Zaman icinde yada Sahada guc kimde gorursunuz UMARIM/TURKIYE🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
@@gedientfurdeutschland3718yes because 1
@@gedientfurdeutschland3718 In a real war, the Turkish army is the most serious force.
вы какой страны приставляете ....?@@gedientfurdeutschland3718
You completely forget our six figured army reserve that can be pulled into service extremely fast. PERKELE! 🇫🇮
😂
Thank you for the Information 🤘🇹🇷
Hellenic air force 5 number
RAFALE F3 24
MIRAGE-2000-5 24
MIRAGE-2000 18
F-16C/D/V 154
F-4E 33
Tottal aircraft 252
F-35Α order 20+20
@@nikospapadopoulos4412
Orde + 6 RAFALE F3-F4? = 30 RAFALE 💪🏻🇬🇷
@@nikospapadopoulos4412 Türkiye nothing buy f16, f35, typhoon and orher western junk. Becausr Türkiye Asian War machine.
Chendu, sukhoi, KAAN
what ever you have ,,you make non of it,,,,actually ,,you got nothing,,you will run out of everything ,,when war happens,,you got nothingmmyou buy everything from other countries,,,ok,,you got nothing,,,
🇷🇸🇬🇷🇷🇸🇬🇷🇷🇸🇬🇷🇷🇸🇬🇷🇷🇸🇬🇷🇷🇸🇬🇷🇷🇸🇬🇷🇷🇸💪💪💪
@@BOKIBACKA
💙🇷🇸💙🇬🇷💙🇷🇸🇬🇷💙
How do you rank these countries???
The numbers do not explain Sweden and Canada being over Greece.
Yea 24k vs 142 000 is a tough one for sweden, tho we have one of the most advanced armies in the world, but a very small army.
Numbers isn´t al, there is much weight in what each asset can do war wise, but Greece numbers sure is better on paper.
But Sweden also have alot of well trained personel not to "old" from the cold war and years after that ranges upp to a million personell.
Greece army is from stoneage and everything in it is ready to be scrapped. But yes, failed to get mentioned.
Canada fights with the uk 🇬🇧 we are apart of the British empire our military is crap but we have the best trained troops in the world our special forces are better then the us even tho our gear is out dated everytime nato needs high ranking criminals taken out they call jtf2
@dudeebumblebee7197
Turkoalbani show us your pathetic army , come on 🤣
Ok... This list is somewhat weird? I am biased because i am Finnish, but Finland in 18th spot? And behind such a powerhouses like Denmark, Netherlands, Romania, Norway, Sweden, Portugal? Finland might not have big active military but we have 900k reserve that has been in the army and most are taking part in wargames every few years while on the reserve? So why behind those said countries? If we judge only manpower and available equipment only edge those said countries have against Finland is Navy? And the equipment Finland has is on bar with anyone on the list? Like we have seen in Ukraine artillery is still the most important part of warfare and Finland has one of the strongest artillery on the EU or Nato?
I am Turkish, some idiot made a list and put it on TH-cam, Fin military should be in the top 5 country according Turkish generals estimate on tv show.
Yes this list is a huge joke nothing else. 😅😅😅😅
900 bin Asker ?😮 900k🪖 Rezerv asker kaç yaşındalar,, 🎩emekliler ise sayılmaz… savaş 💻📱oyunlarında 😅 yer alması daha vahim,,!
Ukrayna’daki Tekerlekli Topçular mı etkili,, 😆🫡🫡
8 frigates🙂↔️☺️
Згоден на всі 100%! Фінляндія це є сила.❤❤❤
You underrated Finland.
This video is rife on touchy Finns that are always on the look for reasons to go to tori 😅
This ranking can`t be taken seriously. It`s poorly evaluated and somewhat weirdly put together. It doesn`t echo the real strenght of the mentioned armies.
they did it on purpose to stir people up against each other.. nato is the Devil in disguise a monster created by people.
Finland great soldiers. Very tough
8:58 the information about the helicopters is a bit obsolete.
You are absolutely right
Poland is slowly becoming a world power
Well Finland should be much higher in this list, also Finland has more fighters (62) and tanks (239) thats said in this video. And almost 900 000 reserve, which is huge when compared to others.
Real deal😅😅😅😅😅
If "fuck around and find out" were a country, it would be Finland.
Call up 900.000 men and see if they all have good kit and arms available.
@@patverum9051 "Everyone has an assault rifle, enough ammunition for it, a field uniform, some kind of helmet, and rubber boots." Ill bet Russia doesnt have those to their 2 million imagination army, they dont even have any mobilization system like Finland.
No one is perfect! Defend on nationalities you were all is free to tell that your country is great than others. Just saying. Make Love not War***** God bless us all! PEACE....❤❤❤❤
It's not about quantity, it's about quality and the balls to use it. 🇬🇧
Wow
Niet waar!!!!
You only say it's the quality when you don't have the quantity.Keeps the war short.
@petermclelland278 keeps what war short?
And every time we have “fought” the modern U.S. armed forces, we have beaten them.
Md Arif Ansari is great man power strong body man god bless you Arif
Nobody in NATO expects Spain to fight. Turkey is a wildcard. Poland is key in the future.
En qué te basas para realizar tal afirmación ???
@@joseangelbeltrangonzalez7912 You did shit in Spain when war broke out. Poland took all responsibility and was leading this terrible problem.
@@joseangelbeltrangonzalez7912 Spain won’t fight because the country is full of Spaniards.
U right. Free Catalonia !!
Dobrze powiedziane.
Australia's power in Asia has increased, and in 2024 it became the fifth-ranked power of 27 countries in Asia, officially. I dispute this as only Japan comes close IMO.
Moreso, Australia`s air cover is awesome: a 72 plane F35 squadron, F18s, F22 Hornets and top pilots. Recently experienced army engagements and a superb record in engagement. A proven force.
Hımmm anzaklardan mı bahsediyorz kesin üstünsünüz😂
η Σουηδία έχει μεγαλύτερο Στρατό από την Ελλάδα εδώ γελάμε
😂
France can destroy the planet 5 times with its 300 nuclear warheads... doesn't that count ?
Ο άνθρωπος είναι ένας ανόητος δημοσιογράφος της πλάκας! 😂
No
NO
No because they will surrender before using them
No - not in this pissing contest :)
TURKIYE BUILDS EVERYTHING MADE IN TURKEY,,,,WE HAVE EVERYTHING
Έχετε τα πάντα αλλά είστε μπουταλαδες😂😂😂
@@selinamillington4353 😂😂😂
Ναι😂😂 χωρίς αξιόπιστο ία, και εμπειρία πολέμου. Τουρκικής προέλευσης. Απαρχαιωμενα f16 , ακόμα και σήμερα χωρίς αντιεροπορικη, και αντιποιραυλικη ασπίδα , ναυτικό τις πλάκας Τουρκικής προέλευσης, καμία σχέση με τις δύσης.. με 1 ευρώ, 32 τουρκικές λίρες .. φάε ακόμα το σανο που σας ταΐζει ο ερντογαν ανόητοι.. και με ένα πληθωρισμό που θα πεινάνε ακόμα και τα εγγόνια σας 😂 περαστικά σάς.
a lot of technology licences, so everything everything... maybe not
Turkler varken diger ulkelerin yorum yapması komik😅
I’m Canadian and once I saw Canada had submarines I was in instant suspicion, I don’t think those submarines are actually operational they’re a like from the 70 or something
It is going to be interesting to see the same line up in 3-5 years! My guess is that Poland, in particular, and the Nordic countries will be moving up that list like a rapid forest fire.
@@TheKyosanim62 This list is amateur nonsense, look at NATO’s and ISW lists.
@@EGE3101 Nope, government numbers. NATO is, however, issuing new strength targets before the end of 2024, which we don't know, but Poland and the Nordic countries are going to be way past those in the coming years. Study the official plans, before you express your comments.
@@TheKyosanim62 You say these are Government numbers: Please provide source and publish dates.
Numbers and strength are not always correlated. Where can we find a NATO strength list?
Thanks.
Turkey also has one domestically produced helicopter carrier with dock. Its name is TCG Anadolu. 🇹🇷
The Hellenismus Arme ist der best army !!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
😎🇹🇷
Greetings from California USA 🇺🇸 Let's go NATO!!!
And I have so much respect for them all❤
This channel doesnt make its own rankings, it gets them from global firepower, and global firepower hasnt even released its 2025 edition
Something is wrong here, what criteria are used to position each country?
When I see what each NATO member has to offer, then Greece belongs at least 8th or at worst 9th place and not 11th.
Yeah then they put Sweden “stronger” with 20% of everything Greece has. They must have been smoking something.
He's most likely using global firepower which is pretty accurate however he's only listing military equipment vehicles and naval vessels he's leaving out reserve personal military infustructor and defense industries and defense spending so if he used all that some of these countries would be higher and some lower in ranking
Who cares? You men just want wars. Comparing your military strength as if that is making you a better nation.
I thought so too. Greece would be much higher than Sweden Canada
2004 Turkish defense exports 196 million dollars Greece 0
2010 Türkiye defense exports 853 million dollars Greece 0
2019 Türkiye defense exports 3 billion dollars Greece 0
2024 Turkish defense exports 6 billion dollars Greece 0
2030 Türkiye defense exports Türkiye approximately 12 billion dollars Greece 0
2035 Türkiye's defense exports will be 30 billion dollars Greece 0
Spanish army higher than Polish? You’ve made my day😂😂😂
not only personel is important, and maybe because spain has a sort of aircraft carrier and some of the finest frigates/corvettes, logistics like shiffs and cargo planes (pretty important in war), that multiplies its projection force, on the other hand, poland has more defensive capabilities and overall higher numbers in everything but what it downgrades is its soviet equipment (already upgrading) so thats why the lower "score" but it may change in near future
Pues no entiendo que te hace tanta gracia, en lo único que Polonia supera a España sobre el papel es en el ejercito de tierra.
😅😅😅
@@JuanGomez-wp8gm in reality Poland would beat Spain easy ...... the fact is Poles are fighters / look at history and strength of the polish people. Easy !
@andylatka6488 Será una broma.... cuando Polonia todavía no existía ya había tumbas de españoles en los 5 continentes y en todos ellos se hablaba y se sigue hablando español, deberias de guardar un mínimo de respeto cuando pretendas compararte a los países que han contribuido a que el mundo sea tal y como lo conoces.
Explain me why Greece is behind Sweden?
This video refers 2024 Military Strength Ranking data based on the PoweIndex Score published. Could it be true, could it be false, could you dislike it, could you disagree but if you can't prove your opinion, it will always remain only your own personal opinion...
please make a video of the 20 strongest militaries in Asia
1. China
2. China
3. China
3. China
They don’t have the correct uptodate data. They are useless !
Türkiye is 2. Power in the ..not UK!!!
Ok, it's number 2, are you happy now,for God's sake
putin does not stand chance against nato
Would have been cool to find an overview that takes population into the equation, as well as economical situation. I checked some numbers for F35s in the US VS Norway, and i dont remember exact numbers, but for every citizen, Norway had several times more of these jets than the US. Im sure the US is still leading overall, but it would be interesting to see by how much.
How on earth is Sweden "stronger" than Greece?
I mean, it doesn't make any sense, comparing the numbers. The only thing that Sweden has in larger amount compared to Greece, is a Refueling Plane... Sweden has 1 while Greece none. But Greece is ahead by far on all the rest sectors.
Sweden make their own fighter jets, more advance in technology for a start, not to mention it's economy.
Polish Army is in fact the third biggest army in the whole NATO. Whoever made this film didn’t check the facts.
@@fat_climber bigger ≠ stronger
US UK Turkey....it will be right
Although yep Poland is up there
Polish army ist on 4rd- 5rd but no way on 8
Tell to that to Russians, 1,000 days later in their invasion, still not fulfilled their dark territory aspirations despite having the biggest army, at the start
Your ranking is incorrect. France is the third nuclear power, after Russia and the United States. It is also the second naval power after the United States, largely thanks to the strategic presence of its overseas territories. The French Foreign Legion is deployed all over the globe, not to mention that French-made weaponry is equipped with cutting-edge technology, and that is just one example among many. It is not enough to base a country’s power on numbers alone. According to your logic, one could classify Saudi Arabia as the world’s leading power simply because it buys and possesses one of the largest arsenals of weaponry. In my opinion, the three main OTAN powers are the nuclear powers: the United States, France, and the United Kingdom.
UK Navy is superior to the French yet the French army is larger and this is natural considering the French are land locked while the UK are not. Both a very close and either could be 2nd.
Informatevi bene e capirete che è tutto giusto
US is far ahead, in Europe it's UK and France that had biggest military budgets last 30 years and are the two top military powers. The biggest European economy is the German, then it's UK and France, then Italy and Spain.
I don’t understand what you mean by France is the third Nuclear power behind USA and Russia??
@@heroicDale I mean in terms of the number of military nuclear warheads
You got the UK in the right position, Number 2, ....The most powerful in Europe, ...Also France should have been number 3.
Turkey Power ❤😊
I think you got this wrong mate l think you find Türkiye has second largest military in nato not fiddly uk
This list is about numbers not quality, outdatedness, readiness, training, tactics, ammo reserves, logistics, technological advantages etc.
if this was an accurate video, it would take 30 minutes just explaining the Turkish military. Overall, not bad.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ou 1 seconde -> propagande doublée de mythomanie
Two ear is blocked,ear is sound close,ear is clean, md Arif Ansari
A legerősebb Vaticán😊, a Svájci gárda védi.
you are human
😁
Poland and turkey active personel 🗿
Damn no France is second
It would have been interesting to count up the total number of different NATO weapons systems at the end of the video. So now I have to torture my calculator to find out.
Even in conventional weaponry France is above Italy in any category. His aircraft carrier is a single type but is nuclear powered.... The number of submarines you registered in the case of the UK and France does not either take into account they are too nuclear powered, be they attack submarines or thermonuclear missiles launchers.... By the way you "forget" the nuclear arsenals of the three powers (USA,UK and France).
France was not a reliable partener in neither one of the 1st or the 2nd World Wars History tells us not to trust them when it counts the most.
France and the UK have independent nuclear weapons too , in addition to the USA
Now make a new video about Brics Militaries, just for fun.Beside the members, NATO also have their allies like Australia or Japan among others.
The information in this video is incorrect and incomplete for Finland. For example, the Finnish Air Force has 64 F/A18 Hornet fighters, not 55 (the old Hornets will be replaced by F-35 fighters starting next year).
The biggest mistake in this assessment of the video is that it does not take into account Finland's mandatory military service.
Finland's wartime strength is 280,000 soldiers, and the strength of the entire trained reserve is 870,000 soldiers. Finland definitely belongs higher in the ranking.
Great 🇪🇺
what about finland's 900k soldier reserve
for the Italians it was enough to be above France 😂😂😂
Spain is not what they say it has and what it appears to be. Spain is what no one says it has and appears not to have and what it could have in a few weeks.
2-Türkiye
3-UK
I’m afraid not
@@quantumpartical2041 dont be affraid of the fact😂
@@quantumpartical2041 In a real war, the Turkish army is the most serious force.
(Automatically translated)
I hope this is all a misunderstanding due to machine translation.
What does “NATO's 32 most powerful armies” (as I read in the title) mean if there are 32 NATO member countries in total?
It is obvious that each of them will be included among the “most powerful.”
This sounds a lot like a mockery to me.
So wrong
Il manque les armes nucléaires.
Thank you for showing actual ‘aircrafts’ instead of adding random aircrafts for other countries.
Την Ελλάδα στην 11 θέση την αδικείς... Όταν έχεις κακούς γείτονες έχεις κανείς της ετοιμασίες σου νωρίς.❤
Why was Poland's flag omitted in the cover page of this account? Poland is, after the US, the largest spender on defense in NATO.
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti devleti ve milleti adına burdayım
Türk ordusuna ve milletine selam olsun 🇹🇷🤘🏻🐺
You must be joking…
For example, Italy above France? France is a nuclear power…and also produces her own 4++ generation jets.
Italy is strong only in navy.
Sweden and Poland above Greece?? 200 modern jets and 1400 tanks. Hello???wake up friend
Informati bene prima di commentare...fai una tua classifica e vediamo quanto è attendibile in base alle tue preziose informazioni 😂
Poland currently spends 5% of its GDP on armaments per year, and Greece 3%, so considering that Poland's GDP is almost four times larger than Greece's GDP, Greece would have to increase its spending to 20% to catch up with Poland.
@@Marco-ns2jg ça ne sert à rien de se lancer dans un concours de celui qui Pise le plus loin, la France a versé 500 milliards pour 10 ans pour fin 2035 sur le renouvellement des armes et blinder sur 10 ans personne en Europe ne tiendra sur la lancer de la France ! vos classements sont dépassé!
Vorrei darti un'informazione che forse non conosci: l'Italia costruisce i propri F35, e grazie ad un accordo con gli Usa possiamo usare un certo numero di armi nucleari in loro possesso ma custodite sul nostro territorio, in caso di necessità
@@krisfekete4940 dove hai letto che il GDP polacco è 4 volte quello della Grecia?
Italy over France? Not sure I understand…
greece has more then the country's next of her she should be in the top 10
@@timosthomo566 yunanistan en son ne zaman adam öldürdü biz hergün can alıyoruz. kasap olduk
No
2004 Turkiye defense exports 196 million dollars Greece 0
2010 Türkiye defense exports 853 million dollars Greece 0
2019 Türkiye defense exports 3 billion dollars Greece 0
2024 Turkiye defense exports 6 billion dollars Greece 0
2030 Türkiye defense exports Türkiye approximately 12 billion dollars Greece 0
2035 Türkiye's defense exports will be 30 billion dollars Greece 0
@@leventkucukler645 can you build a house propelry ?
Sweden 10 Greece 11 😅😅😅😅😅😅bro are you Sick 😱😵😵😵😵
13:35 Poland 🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱💪👍
This information tooo old and incorrect!!!
after US Turkey has the largest army!!!
Ναι βλάκα ! Ηλιθιε! Σε στρατιωτικό δυναμικό νηστικοί μουσουλμάνοι.. αλλα σε όπλα με κανιβαλισμενα και απαρχαιωμενα μαχητικά f16.
Χωρίς κάν πυραυλικη ασπίδα, ομπρέλα. Με κατι παλιό Ντροουν που πέφτουν σαν μύγες, με υποβρύχια, και πλοία τουρκικής ποιότητας , και προέλευσης.. εδω γελάει και ο καθε πικραμένος😂😂 20 παγκοσμιος και πολύ σας ειναι. Οπως στη λιβυη που δεν καταλάβατε απο που σας ήρθε απο τα ραφαλ , στρατός της πλάκας, και του μαστιγιου.. .
Fine this is a point of view, but what countries are producing or has capability to produce defence products, and what type each? isn't play any role? Because as i know some producing for other ''customers'' but in any time could use them.
Μία απορία έχω πώς ή Ελλάδα είναι στό 11 όταν αρκετά κράτη έχουν μικρότερο εξοπλισμό???
Bisogna vedere che armi producono...
Gayreek old equipment low manpower no defence industry
It's not about strongest to weakest. The point of this video is there are 32 country's in NATO with their armies
They are so powerful I like it
How Sweden is above greece is a mystery.condidering the number's greece is 3 times stronger than sweden
I looked it up and greece is a bigger army, but the swedes got more advanced military weapons, better planes, better subs and the list goes on.
@Krilluw better planes ????Greece have rafales,f16 viper and soon f35 .and they have way more at numbers .Sweden have only better rifles than Greece lol.there is not a comparison actually only the huge debt of Greece making Sweden higher ranking
121 Swedish tanks Vs 1243 greek tanks which the majority is high tech leopards
3.200 Swedish AFV VS 6200 Greek
16.000 active personnel Vs 130.000 greek personnel
48 Swedish artillery Vs 1260 greek artillery
0 Swedish rocket projectors Vs 150 greek
Air power 207 Swedish Vs 633 greek
71 Swedish fighters planes Vs 188 greek
53 Swedish helicopters Vs 270 greek
Zero swedish attack helicopters Vs 30 greek
Sub marines 5 Swedish Vs 11 greek
Zero swedish frigates Vs 13 greek and as I read Greece bought from France 4 FDI high tech frigates with one of the most high tech missiles.one of the four is already ready.
So yes my friend you have totally right .the debt have zero meaning .make a better research my friend and read how the global ranking is actual working.cheers
La France 5 ème lol il c'est trompé la France et 2 ème derrière les états unis et 6 ème mondiale
Total wrong about Croatia. Stronger then Hungary,Bulgaria, Norwegian,Czech and proof 8 HIMARS( 300 rockets),12 Rafale,89 Bradley ( 1700 TOW 2 rockets)12 Black Hawk,15 Kiowa warrior ( 1 700 Hell fire rockets)50 2A8 Leopard we buy and for sure number will be 100,150 Patria vehicle 30 with Spike rockets and now we buying Spike rockets range more then 4 km,60 Caesar hauwitzer we buying ,15 Pzh 2000 we have 30 buying,Baryaktar 2 we buying,Jevlins(100),MATADOR ? normaly more
La più potente è San Marino
Y Andorra
😁😁😁😁😁😁
DID You forget USA
….secondo me il più potente e’ città’ del VATICANO…..
A zaraz za nim Monako i luksenburg niewiem czy jak by ich wszystkich zebrac to by sie uzbierala brygada
As a dutch person I think so many countries should be higher MOSTLY FINLAND
Doesn’t Iceland have a coast guard ship? If that doesn’t counts then never mind
Don't mind hin.....he said Romania have 4 patrol ships......it has more than 4 on each port town along the Danube and Black Sea coast......
One for all all for one! 😍
do your homework the numbers for many countrys simply dont fit!!
Italy ahead of France not sure about that.
Turkey is second.🇹🇷
Turkey 🇹🇷 🦃=00000
@@antoniostsiakmakia1461 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷😄🙋♂️
have a nice dreem!!!lol
Правильно. Просто эти уроды завидуют Турция. Скоро от завида лопнуются. Турция великий держава!!!!
@@antoniostsiakmakia1461страна геов вы молчали бы😂
Nice video but be careful. Canada have maybe a small army but we have way more chit than that. We have a large sea zone to protect so there is more ship than that. Also we are right next to russia. So Canada inventory is large despite the small army. Wait until a war blow up and the effective will probably go up.
The UK and France have very similar Defence forces. They cooperate and work together constantly. Placing France in the 5th position is strange. If so - the UK should be 6th or 4th. Then again, the UK and France have nuclear deterence. Then as Dane, I am sorry, but Finland has a formidable force compared to Denmark. All-in-all an odd ranking.
No country can stand on NATO ever
Thats why tens of hundreds of thousands of innocent lives, babies, children is being slaughtered in Gaza as we speak right now., no thanks to NATO...😡🤬 Obviously NATO dont have the guts to stand on F.cking z.on.sts..🤷🏻♂. No country can stand on nato ever my .ss...
France should be 2nd or 3rd.
La France derrière l'Italie et l'Angleterre?? ?😂