The Unfinished Parable of the Prodigal Son

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @vijayachandarchigurupati6065
    @vijayachandarchigurupati6065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you Chad Bird, deepening my theological studies and preparing Sunday homily

  • @mr.drewpaintswithyou9034
    @mr.drewpaintswithyou9034 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Beautiful study! Thank you! 🙏❤️

  • @brentarnold4442
    @brentarnold4442 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Bro, this touched me deeply... i can't hold back the tears. I've loved this parable since childhood and over the years it becomes more and more clear. God has given you the gift, to teach those of us that see mentally. this description only strengthens it. I am that older brother 😭 i reject it but there are times that i succumb to the foolishness,

  • @sukirmansukirman9399
    @sukirmansukirman9399 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the explanation more enrich my understanding the grace of God. Thanks.

  • @brunet42
    @brunet42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You help the scales fall from my eyes. Thank you. God bless and you continue in my prayers

  • @mariannehebert3562
    @mariannehebert3562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    reading Nouwen 's Return of the Prodigal. This has just added to that rich discussion. thank you!

  • @altiej5213
    @altiej5213 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thanks again Pastor Bird!
    The Lord has been opening up this parable to me in so many different ways! I heard another Pastor talk about the third Son in the story…..the One that’s telling the story, Jesus Himself…..My mind went back to Seth, Adam’s 3rd. son. How do you see that?🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

  • @HeLeftThe99
    @HeLeftThe99 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Chad 🙏🏼 very helpful teaching. I appreciate how you include scriptural comparisons.

  • @navychiefpastor
    @navychiefpastor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Outstanding explanation!

  • @wadejnelson
    @wadejnelson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    just superb teaching, have listened to many, many over the last few days, in preparation for teaching, this was by far the best

  • @SixHouse77
    @SixHouse77 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shalom from NZ.

  • @DevieAnderson-ve7tx
    @DevieAnderson-ve7tx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for sharing.

  • @ILOVEYESHUA1ST
    @ILOVEYESHUA1ST 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this teaching- the Lord recently showed me how this plays out between the House of Judah being the elder son and the house of Israel being the younger kingdom. It is from the 10 north tribes Christians come from.

  • @authorcharlieg
    @authorcharlieg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    First, I must admit that until the '80s I was a Lutheran. Then I got into a heated argument with the local pastor who argued that Lutherans were WASP republicans. Being from the outcast group I had problems with that so now I'm Catholic. Not much better, but... With that in mind I viewed this video and several others you put out and their accuracy had me in tears. One recent find relates to this video and the parable of the dishonest steward. I found how much this second parable and this one presented here are so much alike. Then you present a line that formally ties them together. You argue how sometimes a father would give his son his inheritance early. In that case, the son becomes a steward of his father's estate who is liable to protect it and his father.
    Like the youngest son, charges are laid upon the dishonest steward. Luke 16 reports οὗτος διεβλήθη αὐτῷ ὡς διασκορπίζων τὰ ὑπάρχοντα αὐτοῦ. He was slandered that he was scattering his beginnings, his possessions. Both the younger son are accused of the same thing, the younger son by his brother. Like you, I found how the older son slanders his brother. I got into heated arguments with a Lutheran pastor, and many a Catholic one on this point.
    Studying some Judaism I found something interesting.
    לֹא תִשָּׂא אֶת-שֵׁם-יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ, לַשָּׁוְא.
    לֹא-תַעֲנֶה בְרֵעֲךָ עֵד לַשָׁוְא
    Or as you point out,
    יֵשֵׁב רִאשׁוֹנָה וִיחַשֵּׁב אֶת־הַהוֹצָאוֹת
    Is there a pun on יֵשֵׁב and לַשָׁוְא?
    Like you, I believed for a long time that the younger son is dishonest in the confession he makes up before he returns home. Then, as you notice, the father says, "While he was still far off." That is both physical and spiritual. He is far off in his confession and he is still far away from home. The younger son squanders his estate, διεσκόρπισεν τὴν οὐσίαν αὐτοῦ ζῶν ἀσώτως. What is ἀσώτως. ασωτηρ means unsaved. What does that mean, if anything? Therefore, am I right in saying Jesus is deliberately ambiguous here? If so, does the story end with the same thing, the father not caring about what the charges are?
    Last, and I also got into many heated conversations on this last point, the father never gives the younger son another portion. On the contrary, he tells the younger son, "Whatever I have is yours. How does this relate to the remaining story? Likewise, does Luke 16 accurately relate the charges against the youngest son? The children of this world are more prudent in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light. The younger son is a know-it-all, a hothead who thinks he can do better by investing elsewhere. He learns otherwise. Does the younger son become Baal teshuvah and if so, how does that relate to this story? www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3998473/jewish/Baal-Teshuvah.htm
    Is the real conclusion to this story, Chapter 16:8?
    This video is old, but if you do see it, please give your thoughts. You are the only person I've found so far who found, and gave more detail to my reading than I had before.

  • @natashaschedrivaya8513
    @natashaschedrivaya8513 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My favourite parable , and I believe it is story of repentance!!.> because prodigal son's eyes opened in the midst of pigs)) He realised his father was kind and good and not controlling and harsh ( as he thought initially and as the older son thought) . And also because 2 short parables previousely talking and emphasising the fact of repentance of the ONE ( sheep or coin) who was lost! and also the words of the father of the prodigal - my son was dead and is not alive , lost and now found - it is about repentance, radical repentance. Father did not go after his soon until his son was ready to turnaround - repent! It changes everything! the father rejoices over the change of heart of his sons and daughters!

  • @mumenrider2481
    @mumenrider2481 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent lesson! I want to add a thought to the subject of him wanting to be a day laborer. Yes he would have freedom, but a master has obligations to feed and care for a slave. He has no obligations to a hired man. Also, slaves are part of the household, hired men are not part of the household.

  • @garysweeten5196
    @garysweeten5196 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The one goal of Jesus was to show the critics that God wanted them to fellowship with sinners.

  • @tango-bravo
    @tango-bravo ปีที่แล้ว

    Do the brothers in this sense represent born again believers, but the older is trusting heavily on works for righteousness and the younger repents from being backslidden, or are both brothers unsaved when the story starts? Does the younger brother “get saved” by returning with humility to his father or was he already saved?

    • @chadbird1517
      @chadbird1517  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The beginning of Luke 15, where this parable is introduced, tells us, “Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him. And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, ‘This man receives sinners and eats with them.’” That strongly suggests who the 2 brothers represent.

  • @LaynesMomma
    @LaynesMomma ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The law of no pigs at the table was then demolished when God made clean the unclean (Gentiles). There was no longer a necessity to learn a lesson of keeping away from the unclean bc God has made everyone clean who comes to Him

    • @wadejnelson
      @wadejnelson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Odd comment

  • @Vailsec
    @Vailsec 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video. Thank you for this. Question, doesnt the robe, the ring, sandals, and calf all have meanings as well?
    The way i have read it before is that the robe represented the father covering his son. As the son would have more than likely been dirty. Its a symbol of God covering our sinfulness.
    The ring represents the father giving the son identity. As the Father gives us an identity seals our identity with the Holy Spirit.
    The sandals were used as a way of showing the son was on a new path. Much like we are when we come to Christ.
    Lastly, the fattened calf, as these types of calfs, were often used for sacrifice, was a representation of Christ.
    Do you have a video where you touch more on these? As I am not 100% sure I am correct?
    Thanks again!

  • @Benoni101
    @Benoni101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Christ said Matthew 15:24 “I was sent only to help God’s lost sheep--the people of Israel.” Now go read the prodigal son parable
    Shalom

  • @anthonyfernandes4663
    @anthonyfernandes4663 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro Chad so we as NT CHRIST INS shouldn't eat pork meat....pls let me know...so why does Scripture say that everything God created is good and is supposed to be taken if received with thanksgiving ....pls . explain

    • @chadbird1517
      @chadbird1517  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We in the new covenant are no longer under the dietary restrictions of the old covenant, so we are free to eat pork. See Mark 7:19, where Jesus declared all foods clean.

    • @rroot01
      @rroot01 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chadbird1517what? Mark 7 was about eating with unwashed hands, a tradition of the fathers, a man made instruction added to Gods teachings. They were actually walking out a Torah example of picking grains and eating them without filling up their pockets and then suddenly Jesus says “Oh you don’t have to keep Torah anymore”. The Old Covenant was the “you shall keep” the New Covenant is the “ I shall cause you to keep” it’s the same Torah only different in its execution. It’s the wedding vows that Israel failed to follow and will be keep perfectly in the future.
      The mixed multitude and Israel received One Torah, in the wilderness. God, our perfect Father, did not make a mistake and tried to separate Israel from the Gentiles. This was explained to Peter in his vision, and God did not say “ Do not call unclean what I have called clean” He said “ Do not call Common what I have called clean” Big difference. Common is for the Temple not outside the Temple.

    • @rroot01
      @rroot01 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, didn’t realize this was old post.