Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics book 6 | Prudence or Practical Wisdom | Philosophy Core Concepts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ค. 2024
  • Check out the Aristotle on the Moral Virtues class (starting April 13) - reasonio.teachable.com/p/aris...
    Request personal videos on Cameo - www.cameo.com/gregorybsadler
    Get Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics - amzn.to/2g9t0UU
    Support my work here - / sadler
    Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
    Take classes with me - reasonio.teachable.com/
    This video focuses on Aristotle's work, the Nicomachean Ethics, and examines his discussion of the intellectual virtue of Phronesis - translated as "prudence" or "practical wisdom".
    Prudence is one of the most important of the virtues or dispositions, and provides a key linkage between the various moral virtues, such as justice, courage, or temperance, and the intellect. It provides the ability to deliberate well about means to ends, and to adapt general principles to specific situations.
    If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
    You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/ReasonIO
    If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Aristotle! - click here: reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
    We also offer affordable, content-packed, on-demand courses on Philosophy in the ReasonIO Academy - reasonio.teachable.com/
    This video is one component in a set of online courses covering Aristotle's entire Nicomachean Ethics. These include 94 lecture videos, 45 downloadable handouts and worksheets, 10 quizzes, 39 lesson pages, and other resources. Check it out in the ReasonIO Academy here - reasonio.teachable.com/p/arist...

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @MrMarktrumble
    @MrMarktrumble 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you again.

  • @MrMarktrumble
    @MrMarktrumble 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you again.

  • @BarerRudeROC
    @BarerRudeROC 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for the great body of work you're putting out. It's incredibly helpful.

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're welcome - glad you're finding the videos useful!

  • @Retrogamer71
    @Retrogamer71 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You could say under Aristotle that 'prudence' is the most accomplished of the rational abilities. This is where virtue ethics gets interesting.

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like that - "This is where virtue ethics gets interesting." And I'd say, you're right

    • @dixie8418
      @dixie8418 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Educative comments by viewers as the same manner of the video. A double thanks.

  • @John-iq2zt
    @John-iq2zt 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr. Sadler, do you think you could do a short video on St. Thomas' understanding of prudence, especially the "integral" and "potential" parts of prudence? I think it would be helpful for many others out there too in understanding this key virtue in ethics. Thanks for considering. I think it is ST II-II Q.48 & 51.
    If you can't, could you briefly answer these questions: Q1.) When Aristotle and St. Thomas speak about the "common law" under "synesis" regarding prudence, what is this "common law" they are referring to? Are they referring to state law, or any just law established by any kind of community, not necessarily the state? Q2.) And would they both agree that most of the time this should be kept, unless "EXTRAordinary" situations come up? Hence, equity. Q3.) In regards to "shrewdness" in both writers, they say that it is "an easy and rapid conjecture in finding the middle term". Can you please expound on this?

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here's my video about video requests - th-cam.com/video/vkXKtxleGA8/w-d-xo.html
      As to the rest, you're asking complex questions about Thomistic moral theory, better worked through in a tutorial session. If you're interested in that, here's my site - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutorials/

  • @eogh
    @eogh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does Aristotle believe that a person really can obtain prudence as you described (in all aspects of life).
    I’m using your videos as I read the Ethics thank you very much.

  • @thomasabbott1757
    @thomasabbott1757 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Dr. Sadler,
    Do you have a video explaining the differences between Socrates' idea of the relationship between practical wisdom and the virtues and Aristotle's? I've read and reread Book 6 chapter 13 and I'm still having a difficult time understanding. Thank you

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do not. That's more of a topic for an individual tutorial session

    • @thomasabbott1757
      @thomasabbott1757 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GregoryBSadler Is that something you offer? And if so, how should I go about signing up?

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thomasabbott1757 The link is right there in the video description.
      First openings would be next week

  • @ShakeAndBakeGuy
    @ShakeAndBakeGuy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You mentioned that these virtues cannot be reduced to a science, but couldn't prudence, in a functional application, be more generallyreduced to practical intelligence as opposed to theoretical intelligence within the psychological context?

    • @ShakeAndBakeGuy
      @ShakeAndBakeGuy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great piece once again by the way

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No - not if you're talking about what Aristotle (and other virtue ethicists) mean by prudence.
      Perhaps if there's some reductive view of "practical intelligence" in A (not THE, since there's quite a few of them out there) psychological theory, you can engage in that sort of reduction - but then you're using "prudence" to name something quite different

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you enjoyed it

  • @axelbatalha2830
    @axelbatalha2830 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle defines prudence as a state (εξις) of deliberating well. However, in the De Anima he puts prudence side by side with opinion and epistheme. This leads me into believing that prudence is not a virtue, but one of three types of hypolepsis (suppositions). Confusing, to say the least.

    • @axelbatalha2830
      @axelbatalha2830 ปีที่แล้ว

      To make things worse, opinion is said to discriminate (γνωριζει), whereas prudence perceives (κρινειν) without discriminating.

    • @axelbatalha2830
      @axelbatalha2830 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe prudence is a final stage of the deliberative part, i.e., everything after opinion. Since opinion is not deliberation yet, prudence excludes opinion and is a virtue of the higher deliberative part where deliberation happens de facto.

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you’re more confusing yourself by expecting that everything fit neatly together rather than trying to think these matters through

  • @coleforness3534
    @coleforness3534 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think I have seen this dude in a few Tarantino movies.

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      When I was a high school kid, people thought I looked like Travolta

  • @123keepitsimple97
    @123keepitsimple97 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍