Looking Under the Hood of JavaScript
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ม.ค. 2025
- Ever wonder what in the world is going on with JS? Well in this we deep dive into v8, into the internals to figure out WTF IS GOING ON WITH SETTIMEOUT???
SMI in v8?? v8.dev/blog/po...
Aleksei: / the_kozy
Twitch
Everything is built live on twitch
Twitch : bit.ly/3xhFO3E
Discord: discord.gg/ThePrimeagen
Spotify DevHour: open.spotify.c...
Editor
All my videos are edited by Flip. Give him a follow! / flipmediaprod He is also open to do more editing, so slide deeeeeeeeep into his dms.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theprimeagen
Links
Linode: linode.com/prime
/ discord
Twitch: / theprimeagen
Insta: / theprimeagen
Twitter: / theprimeagen
VimRC & i3: github.com/The...
Keyboard 15% off bit.ly/Prime360 USE CODE PRIME360
#coding #neovim #typescript #programming #vim #softwareengineering #codinglife #webdesign #webdevelopment #webdev #javascript #rustlang #rust #twitch #twitchstreamer #programmerhumor #codinghumor #software #softwareengineer #softwaredeveloper #softwaredevelopment
I really enjoyed making this video. Its more of a new style for me, do you like it? Should I do more of this style? (send the algorithm signals!!!)
Yes
It's super complicated and i didn't understand most of it.
But i liked it bc i wanna learn more about js--> c++ stuff
I loved the video. It's really difficult to give content like this that deep dive into the internals
Duh
Yes please, I really like that the content is aimed towards explanation for intermediary stuff. Especially the fact that you’ve posted a link for further explanation and I can go and see things I don’t understand. There’s already content on TH-cam code space aimed towards beginners and people with an agenda to obscure info to sell a course. It’s why I mostly avoid TH-cam these days and just focus on odin project.
this shows that JS is BLAZINGLY fast. It executes a code that is supposed to take infinitely long time in just an instant.
Blazingly fast
It has done executing while Rust hasn't even compiled!
Or is it infinitely fast?
@@wlockuz4467 I just thought...
You have an algorithm written in both JS and Rust (both in source form). You enter commands "node program.js" and "cargo build && ./target/debug/program" respectively and measure time from pressing enter to the program returning.
How large the input must be (the N in big O notation) for rust to win? Then check how building for production changes the results.
@@igorordecha I made this test some time ago with python and it really depends on the operation and performance of the machine. Using an 7th gen Intel core i7 and a simples multiplication operation, even with compilation rust executed faster than Python. I assume that JavaScript has a performance similar, if not worse, than python
@@igorordecha cargo run**
To summarize (please correct me if I misunderstood):
- The infinity case is just special handling where it's treated the same as 0
- Any other number gets casted to a 32 bit integer so some of the bigger numbers get truncated to small or even negative values
- Negative values are handled effectively the same as 0
What I don't understand is if you're making a special case for infinity why would you run it immediately instead of simply not scheduling it at all?!
@@funnyav "This is the way"
@@ricardoamendoeira3800 As far as I understood, the converting of Infinity to 0 has nothing to do with `setTimeout`. Rather, `Infinity` converts to 0 if you try to treat it as an integer. If you do `Infinity | 0` you get 0.
@@funnyav divide by zero would be NaN. Weird stuff
@@nathanhedglin931 setTimeout with NaN also executes immediately. Fun huh?
Excellent video. This video has less of a "look how shitty JS is" vibe and is more just a great deep dive into the internals of V8.
thats the point!
no need to bag on JS, its been bagged on enough, its more "why" does it do something
👍👍
@@ThePrimeagen Actually I think this was more the "how it happens", in the future it would be nice to include the discussions on why some decisions were made (from issue trackers, PR's, etc.
For example why choose to treat infinity as 0 instead of not scheduling the callback at all.
So basically, it is V8 that is shitty.
For me it's not completely the first thing about V8 that I have watched around the subject of data types. I forgot which video it was, but it was some years ago and they had a very detailed explanation about the V8 engine and how you could write your code smarter to become more high performant.
They also talked about SMI numbers and how using arrays of SMI's where the most efficient ones to use (because of preventing those extra pointers and memory allocations), also how important it was in general not to mixup several types in the same array. For example 1 object or string inside your array also containing numbers makes the whole thing based on extra pointers and allocations (in other words, the whole array becomes a boxed one).
It's also true the language has a ton of initial design problems. But other languages also have their issues. C and C++ have their own huge problems for example (being very unsafe and vulnerable for example).
It's great that powerfull JS engines exist these days. I would like to know more about the Firefox JS engine as well. Because V8 is not the only workhorse one that exists.
this type of content on programming is what we need more!!!
Facts
@@chrismuga
Massive props to the v8 devs for making a garbage (collecting) language actually performant, these optimizations are just insane.
Also SO to the people working at JSC and SpiderMonkey
yayay! its nuts that v8 team is so talented they took a language that is TERRIBLE for perf and made it semi decent. its ackshually nuts.
Love love love this video. This is the kind of stuff that really gives so much insight into what's going on behind the scenes. Thanks a ton for taking the time, not only to figure out why, but also to explain it so well.
:) ty bud !!
More videos like this one please!
ya!
@@ThePrimeagen And make them pretty LongLongLong xD
Diving into internals is always fun ! When everything gets demystified after a long and arduous journey of grepping and filling your brain with as much as you can, it's sooooo satisfying.
Saddens me that not more people are doing videos like this and there are some concepts you go through very quickly but nevertheless I like how you explained a single thing in detail quickly while throwing in knowledge and remarks about how things work
Great video! Love seeing in-depth JS stuff! It's crazy impressive how much work V8 does to make JS run faster
This is really important to teach that! Don't be afraid to understand the internals and check the source code. Amazing video
I also didn't fight anyone, i got a stye, a duct in my eye closed and eff'd me for a few days...
hmmmm, your last sentence "he is the best Engineer I have ever worked with" sounded kinda sus. Blink twice with the other eye if you need help!
Hey, it was a chance to use the old “you should see the other guy” joke ...
I know we are kinda making fun of JavaScript but.. its so educational it just makes me love JavaScript more. You're great at doing this type of content. Definitely do more.
I said we as in we made this video together apparently. I don't know why I typed that.
btw, i am not trying to make fun of javascript, just trying to have fun with it :)
and try to explain things in a fun way!
classic case of stockholm syndrome
@@ThePrimeagen you killin it, thanks for the good content. 👍
Yo... You love JS? Are you alright? Do you need therapy?
/s
I really enjoyed this video, this kind of content is great, is beautiful to see how "high-level" code, works all the way down and spot this kind of tricky things.
:)
I just found you, Prime, and man I became a fan BLAZINGLY FAST!
LETS GO!!!
Very informative and interesting, please more of those videos when you brake the javascript code into c++ code!
This is amazing! You crushed this new format 🔥
oh bash... stawp
It’s actually refreshing to see a JS dev with a good understanding of under-the-good mechanics. We need more like that.
Brilliant Video. Absolutely more, please!
I am so happy that I stumpled across this channel. You are such an inspiration, your videos are so well made, funny and you are very authentic. Love it! Thank you very much for your content!
This is so entertaining as well as informative. Learned a lot! Found you from the vim and algorithm courses on frontend master . Huge fan of your teachings
Really enjoyed this video! Love covering these details that are much more in depth than what you regularly see. Thanks! :D
This really is some next level sh*t! Thank you very much. I was already enjoying your content a lot. But this teaches people how to find out stuff by themselves, along with providing a very deep understanding of this specific topic. Again, thanks alot! MORE! :D
yayaya
That’s quite deep indeed
Amazing video and thanks for sharing your knowledge!
yayaya
You are the senior I'd like to have in my life...
Awesome video!!! ❤
hio! ty bud :)
More of this, please. I've never seen what "under the hood" of JS before this video, and this was an awesome introduction to the WHY behind the weirdness.
This video was awesome. I'd love more stuff like it, and also more stuff on your learning process and how you set about getting such in-depth knowledge on nitty-gritty stuff like this.
Loved the new format!
lets go!
i am gonna have to rewatch it a couple of times to understand it, my brain is not cooperating today . Thank for this video.
Love these deep dives! Keep them going please. :)
I loved this!! Would really enjoy seeing more intricate and technical details of the browser’s implementation. You have a great instructional style
Awesome video, short and full of interesting information and analysis!
sometimes idk wtf ur talking about Prime but it’s soothing to hear ur voice
Love your videos❤
hey thanks stefan :)
Wow awesome video :3 the more technical the content the more prime shines
This video is beyond amazing!
oh well ty :)
This was actuall very interesting, I was building a project for university with Rust to Webassembly and a lot of the ideas that you explained here to interface JS with C++ actually apply directly or similarly to wasm-bindgen, including how there is a wrapper struct for passed and returned JS values.
Super interesting! Would love to see more content like this
That is some juicy ass content. Loved this format, you keep getting better and I'll keep coming to you (wat?)
LETS GO, KEEP COMING BABE!
Thanks for that video !
Props for Westbrook usage :D
So in the first few seconds my mind already jumped to "32 bit signed integers" and it turns out that was right, but I didn't know the default behavior for something larger was 0. The spec is really fascinating, especially since it includes so much stuff that JS users (like me) would love to see changed, but it can never change because JS has to be backwards-compatible forever. There's always a _logical_ explanation for JS weirdness that made sense at one point in time, but that doesn't mean it's always rational in 2023 (except for typeof null, which was just an accident, but now we're stuck with it).
I loved this video. It explains the situation really well.
This video is pure gold, I learned how to research things.
I love this video, I'd like to see more of this type.
God I love these videos. Thanks prime.
Reviewing an example of chromium doing something seemingly unexpected while on Firefox, truly a chad move
Absolutely love this kind of content!
Follow-up question: what does the spec say? Is this Google’s interpretation, or do all browsers implement SetTimeout this way?
I had a look at the MDN page (probably the most readable description I could find), and apart from warning about non-numbers being implicitly coerced into numbers, it says nothing like this. There are situations where delays may last longer than expected, but they should never be shorter.
So it seems like this is some kind of weird Chrome/Chromium bug.
@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 MDN is not a specification… I believe ECMA-262 is the authority for this behavior.
I found the answer: the W3C HTML5 standard says “if timeout is an Infinity value, a Not-a-Number (NaN) value, or negative, let timeout be zero.” So this is behavior is by design.
@@Vim_Tim But that doesn’t say that large values should overflow.
It it interesting to consider edge cases like in this video, but hopefully this issue shouldn't arise too often.
It's kind of scary the number of assumptions or best guesses a web browser does. The last time I dove in Chromium code was to find out why it was trying to autocomplete a random text field in my form as a credit card number. Lots of obscure heuristics.
its crazy out there :)
This style of video is pure gold 🔥🔥🔥
Thank you, Mr. ThePrimeagen!
This was simultaneously interesting and confusing. I'm not smart enough for this, should I be ashamed? lol
i think you have achieved a victory?
I like understanding stuff like this by inspecting the source code. Very nice video, thanks :)
a fascinating piece of knowledge I'm never gonna need
I really liked this one. Keep it up.
I just watch your course about vim on frontend masters and I love it.
So in summary, setTimeout expects a 32 bit signed integer and overflows . Thanks for the video. I actually didn't know that
I hate js, I am doing challenges to write web apps without touching js, but this deep dive is just great. Makes appreciating it much easier (it's still hard tho), thank you really much!
I loved this Deep dive. Been working with JS for the past 10 years I never knew about this :) I'd love more of this and would perhaps now start looking into the chromium source code myself as well! Thanks the swolleyeagen
love your videos (waiting on your rust ergonomics vid btw 🥺)
This time i finally could understand a little c++ in production.
you sir are just different! in a very awesome way!
I'm a little stopped up in the ears tonight, and a lot hearing impaired every night, and the speakers on my laptop are lousy. @ 2:40 I thought you said "ideologue" which certainly could figure in philosophically between the loosy-goosy world of JS and the cold, heartless metal of C calls ;-) -- oh, you actually said IDLong
Nothing like pulling out the ole 2's complement to see some jaws hit the floor
def looking forward to more of these
Liked for the instance promotion. Thanks prime
What do u mean it gets translated to cpp? Its just v8 interpreter using binary code that was compiled from cpp
It does it immediately because it’s blazingly fast.
We need more of this type of content...
Nice investigation, many thanks!
As someone who has read into the JavaScript spec, these kinds of things don't surprise me too much
I really loved this video!
This style reseembles a lot with what I do at my job, but without SAP frameworks… fortunately for the rest of the viewers. Pls do more!
my mind is exploded from this explanation😵
hopefully in a good way
@@ThePrimeagen HAHA right
an programmer youtube with a huge charisma??? YES I AM INNNN
Really special content 💖
i feel special sometimes
Good video, do whatever you want dude.🙏
This is hilarious. Reminds me of an ancient Sinclair calculator, very cheap, which got things wromg; the fun was to work out why.
Lack of RAM - can't deal with edge cases, oh well, WTF.
Javascript does not have that excuse.
hah, i like investigations, they are funny
You're a friggin genius.
just a man with curiosity
I didn't know gimp can be used to create tutorial videos like this. This is amazing.
Is there a way to prevent that 'immediately' and 'never' behavior? If we are dynamically writing a value, it can lead to a bug that may be impossible to find
Please do more of this......awsome content
The infinity thing I can understand, but the rest is just integer overflow which can happen in most languages including rust
never looked into what the code for v8 looks like... looks interesting
its rough.
You’re rough
More! More you son of a bitxh!!! More content like this, it’s absolutely amazing ❤❤❤
beautiful, prime
Amazing drawing skills!
Amazing vid, may have to watch again but neat
Even worst issue I found in JavaScript is that +0 & -0 are different concepts and in some situations give different results.
so... that is a funny thing. -0 and +0 is the IEEE standard, not js :)
@@ThePrimeagen Yes it's IEEE standard but only in JS we see it's worst implementation.
For example, these 2 expressions give different results.
Math.atan2(-0, -1)
Math.atan2(0, -1)
@@avinashthakur80 As they should. It would be clear for anyone that has studied limits in Calculus classes
@@softwarelivre2389 Limits don't apply here.
Limit(x→-0) f(x) is different and not equivalent to f(-0) or f(0)
In Math, there's no concept of "-0", it is equal to "0".
@@avinashthakur80 0- and 0+ are literally lim x-> 0- x and lim x->0+ x
Great video, thanks!
Yes, entertaining and knowledgeable 💥
Bah gawd! The SwoleEyeAgen strikes again!
This sparks joy!!!!!!!!!!!
this is an awesome channel
Awesome type of vídeo! I want to see more
man, it's blazingly amazing)
So basically half of time the V8 engine is checking if we wrote something stupid?
yes
This is great, on my next interview when they ask me if I have any questions, Ima hit the interviewer with this question. Instant hire
Thanks really amazing and informative video