taking off and landing lol...after 16hrs from my country to LAX..and back in couple months..why 16 cuz i fly to Doha and then 16hrs to LAX..so yea i love the time i arrive finally lol..
The Musk Jet, developed by Tesla (might be in cooperation with SpaceX) is an advanced electromagnetic propulsion system that uses no fuel but air and electricity. It can be used on supersonic and even hypersonic passenger planes, and it’s twice as efficient as normal jet engines. Possibly an MHD? It will have a cool plasma exhaust, and you should not stick your head to any of these engines while they are on.
TIMESTAMPS: The Biking Downhill Effect 0:29 How air can cause problems with controlling a plane 1:19 When a Boeing 747 survived a fall at supersonic speed 🛬 4:10 Passenger planes that fly faster than sound 5:09 ... and why we don't use them now 6:07 Btw, it's for the best. Wanna know why? 👉 6:52
Yeah until someone and you want to teleport to the same location and at the same time... Your molecules would appear there and theirs aswell. 1 has to go otherwise 2 molecules at the same place wont work. So what happens is the 2 of you would fuse together and either become a monster or die
For me, affordable price rates (plane tickets) comfortable and convenient. No delays (4-5hrs delays or cancelled flights) 😂 As long as I will reached to my destination safe and sound (vice versa).
Thanks for making the video. Also one of the reasons super-sonic commercial planes didn't last long was due to the sonic boom which made the planes restricted to only trans-Atlantic flights.
I learned something new! But I have claustrophobia and flying is out of the question. I like to drive anyway. I remember the Concorde when I was younger. Thanks for posting this. I always learn something whenever I watch one of you videos.
I swear almost every time I see an upload on here it’s the same video I saw on another popular channel a month or two ago. Used to love this channel, now not so much
I had the opportunity to walk through a Concorde at the Seattle Museum of Flight. There is no way more seats could be added. Unless you want to sit on someone's lap. And if you have claustrophobia forget flying on that bird. I felt like an ant in a narrow pencil!
What are you saying, @@dongrainer6405: that the seats are so close to each other that there's about 0 inches or centimeters of room between the average knee and the next seat?
@@HelloKittyFanMan. What I meant is that the plane just isn't big enough for more seats to be added. If you moved the existing ones closer together there wouldn't be much leg room between them for it be comfortable even for a short flight.
So then see, @@dongrainer6405? Maybe it _is_ big enough for them to add seats to it if they moved existing rows close enough together. But then it would be interesting to see how many more rows they could add, and how many more seats that would add. But it sounds like they certainly wouldn't be able to get that many more in there to make it even worth the compaction process.
Yup, imagine if I want to take a flight to for overseas to have fun then I will pay anything within my budget as long as can reach my destination that I want to go without disappointment for my own money and wasted it for no reason.👍
Aerodynamics for supersonic flight is radically different than subsonic flight. In subsonic flight the airplane rides on the air in front of the wings whereas in supersonic flight the airplane flies ahead of the shock wave in a nose down position. This change in the lift requires that the plane be able to shift it's center of gravity aft to balance the plane and likewise when returning to subsonic flight goes the need to shift the center of gravity aft. This is normally accomplished by shifting fuel fore and aft. Also, the flight controls become less functional since the air slip stream moves aft when reaching supersonic which then flows over, instead of across, the flight controls. Aircraft that fly supersonic have have larger flight controls that move into the slip stream instead of flight surfaces like elevators and ailerons. Many years ago, during the age when airplanes were being designed for supersonic flight, engineers discovered the benefit of moving engines closer together to allow the plane to stay supersonic if one engine failed. When the engines are out on the wings the power between left and right side of the airplane needed to be maintained. Lose power on one left engine then you pull back on the opposite engine to avoid a yaw motion but in cutting power back the plane soon drops to subsonic and you need to update your fuel balance to keep the center of gravity correct. Subsonic is so much easier and simpler to design and maintain.
Flight lengths also vary on the direction and strength of the wind and could possibly make differences in the hours. Boeing plans to fix any issues with its current models before moving on to the next generation of aircraft, but Boeing is making great strides in partnership with NASA to be expand the horizons of space travel and the newly announced Artemis program to bring humans back to the moon and on to Mars.
I usually use flightradar and scope out flights around the pacific, i see a few airlines (korean air, cathay pacific bound for SFO or LAX, cruising at around 650mph, why is that?
It's much faster than it was when the 707 first was introduced. It took nearly 2 days to get from Australia to Britain because they had to land and refuel every couple of hours and that meant over an hour to on the ground each time (no in flight movies then).
I recently took my first long-haul business class flight. Loved it, all 8 hours of fully reclining seats, real drinking glasses and utensils, gourmet foods (and sometimes, seconds!)... nope I'm happy at 600 mph
Concorde: 1) The original program cost of £70M soared to £1.3B along with numerous delays meaning fewer planes were built. Only Air France and British Airways purchased and operated the aircraft...seven each. 2) Due to the increased unit price, a round trip from New York to London in 1997 was $7,995 USD ($12,780 USD today) making it cost prohibitive for all but the rich. 3) The sonic boom limited where the plane could fly which meant only ocean crossings. London, Paris, New York, Dulles in Virginia, and Barbados were the only airports used by the two airlines. 4) Consumer confidence decreased sharply with the crash at the Paris airport in 2000. All 100 passengers and 9 crew members were killed on takeoff. 5) Concorde last flew in 2003 due to the downturn in airline travel post Sept 11th and the end of the Airbus maintenance contract. Side bar: Back in 1980 I was sitting in a British Airways 737 waiting for takeoff from Heathrow in London. The captain informed us that we would be delayed while the Concorde took off. Even inside the 737 I had to plug my ears with my fingers because Concorde was SO LOUD. The 737 shook and I could feel the rumble in my chest. The only other aircraft I saw with the same power was an SR-71 taking off from Boeing's Payne Field after an airshow in the late 80s. I'm very thankful I got to see both magnificent birds in flight before they were retired.
I may be wrong, but watching old documentaries about pioneers of flying and test pilots, they indeed mentioned sound barrier as a major factor of all troubles to fly a plane very close to the speed of sound, but they also were saying that reaching the speed of sound was very risky and dangerous, but the moment they have reached and crossed that barrier the fly changed completely, and they reported it to be smooth and without any turbulence. Strange then to see you talking about an experience of running among the crowd of people. Never mind. Have a good day. Cheers.
The real reason is that the simulation we're in can't render viewing distance any faster for that many people at once in one sector. Any faster and people would crash.
I used to fly Concorde. It was great getting to London in just over 3 hours. Yes it was expensive, but definitely worth it. I don't care how comfortable a 777 cabin is, I don't want to sit in it for extended periods of time. Speed is king.
Diving in a plane will not produce multiple G forces (towards the rear of the plane as depicted). Pulling out of the dive may have produced multiple G’s, but it would have been towards the floor.
That part about the China flight was so factually inaccurate. They made it sound like the plane fell out the sky. The pilots did a rapid descent deliberately so they could restart engine no.4.
Well, no. He's not using the full question form with 'do'. Like when you ask "why people hate spiders?" Instead of "why do people hate spiders? Both are correct.
The passenger planes cannot fly faster because of 2 reasons: 1: They were designed this way 2: The engines arent have enough power to go with those speeds
At 3:21, . . . "Planes usually reach supersonic speed far from city airports . . ." Back during the 1950s and 1960s. it was common for military aircraft to cross the U.S. at supersonic speed. So, an occasional sonic boom was normal and was no big deal.
Besides the sonic boom issue, there's the issue of safe air traffic control. The 1960 crash over New York City between a DC-8 and a Constellation airliner caused the FAA to change rules on air traffic control all over the USA, and as such it actually slowed down transcontinental flights as pilots had to maintain very strict separation and flight route controls.
Well, in the 70s, it's quite easy to build a supersonic military aircraft, I don't see why it's hard to adapt the technology for civilian aircraft. Boeing at the time have plan for Boeing 2707, which used the engine based on the XB-70, which have been proven to be capable of cruising at Mach 3 back in the early 60s.
@flip inheck To be fair, material science doesn't advance along well with the engine/fuselage design. XB-70's cruising speed is cited as "Mach 3.0" and its top speed is cited as "Mach 3.1." It can sustain that speed because it use a lot of titanium and sandwich-structured composite panels. The XB-70 program, actually all supersonic bombers were, made obsolete by the ICBM. Not that the aircraft doesn't work as intended. No aircraft can maintain a speed above Mach 2.25 for a sustained period of time without using a lot of titanium. Concorde and most supercruise-capable aircraft were limited to less than Mach 2.25, it's basically a cutoff of when the aircraft would need to be built extensively out of stronger materials to fly safely. The US already have a successful aircraft that can cruise at Mach 2 in the 60s, and it have made a world record of the longest supersonic flight, the B-58 Hustler, and it was made out of pretty standard materials for the aircraft. The reason why the US couldn't make a Concorde clone is because it set its goal too high. It's not like that Concorde's design was that much of a secret, after all, people have managed to steal military secrets from the USSR before. Sorry for the long comment, just having too much fun with nerd mode.
If the engines stop working and the plane is making a free fall, how could you get slammed against the back wall of the plane? Wouldn't you just be freefalling inside the plane untill the plane has reached its maximum speed, after which you'll fall to the front? (Assuming the plane is vertical). I mean, you'll fall relative to the earth too, but only without the air resistance. Could someone please explain this to me if and why I'm wrong?
@@Devond085 no it's not....wait really? I mean you can differentiate between an artificial voice and a regular one......like between the twitch's artificial voice and a regular voice
@@red_wing yeah I've been around the block a few times. But in this particular case in another video by the same group, his voice glitched enough for it to be noticeable if you're closely paying attention. I dont remember the exact video it was thouugh
@@Devond085 with all my respect to your opinion but I'm not really convinced enough by it cuz the voice has been changing tones like any human would have done during a particular conversation with every word , sentence and question which is theoretically too complex to be artificial in my opinion
Hey there, BrightSiders! What’s your favorite part about flying by plane?
food
The hard landings :) coughs* ryanairs landing
taking off and landing lol...after 16hrs from my country to LAX..and back in couple months..why 16 cuz i fly to Doha and then 16hrs to LAX..so yea i love the time i arrive finally lol..
selfies
Im the 7th commect
Here’s the fast answer. Planes fly at the most efficient speed. It’s a business move, save as much fuel as possible.
Meh meh meh emh mrh blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Exactly
Exactly
Thats right
Title: why can't plane fly fast
Eleon musk: I can change that
The Musk Jet, developed by Tesla (might be in cooperation with SpaceX) is an advanced electromagnetic propulsion system that uses no fuel but air and electricity. It can be used on supersonic and even hypersonic passenger planes, and it’s twice as efficient as normal jet engines.
Possibly an MHD? It will have a cool plasma exhaust, and you should not stick your head to any of these engines while they are on.
A fan here 😍
ele on
NOOOOOOOO, DON’T DO IT ELON
*ELEON MUSK*
Makes sense. Is it strange that I actually like flying? Kick back, watch some movies, read.. I really enjoy it.
Awesome
Especially when you're flying for 19 hours one way to Asia, it's not the most pleasant experience.
Ikr, I am scared af of heights, but on a plane is relaxing
Not if you are 193cm and can't stretch your legs and don't have movies on a plane.
@@David-os3ps yeh that's tall.
TIMESTAMPS:
The Biking Downhill Effect 0:29
How air can cause problems with controlling a plane 1:19
When a Boeing 747 survived a fall at supersonic speed 🛬 4:10
Passenger planes that fly faster than sound 5:09
... and why we don't use them now 6:07
Btw, it's for the best. Wanna know why? 👉 6:52
First
Hey bright side, i think that you should stop copying channels videos who actually know what they are taking about
really??
The B747 is Actually CI006 or China airlines flight 006
Bright Side: Why can't planes fly faster?
Elon Musk: Tesla Planes coming right up!
lol
It's cuz the risc of stalling
Solar planes
@@DemetriusFN still planes need a lot of power
Yes daddy
Probably the best graphic show on TH-cam.. the narrative style is way too good. Keep it up🔥
Love from India
I'm glad that I got a like from bright side
This made my day❤️💯
Bad thing is, in a lot of the vids, the information is made up instead of actually doing research
yooooo congrats the first person to get a heart on this channel
I like this Guy’s voice 🤘🏻 and his manners of narrative skills
I hate his voice so much i have to mute the video and watch subtitles instead
@@brianlam257 why
Bcuz he’s subscribed to morgz
@@dylon2543 lol that makes sense Xd
Marry him
Why passenger planes can't fly faster?
Simple: so passenger can maximized their netflix subscription.
That doesn't make sense
gamerblood20 it does, its a joke
@@Chris-uu9ce Ur not really a gamer cuz gamerz gets any joke even non gaming jokes
@Matthew (Student) Agonoy , at times of Concorde there was no Netflix 🤣
@@b4kadom865 watashiwa ki sinai :D
Thank you so much for adding Metric Measurements in Brackets along with the imperial ones. REALLY helpful!
Teleportation is the best way to transport
says my Alien friend. 😁
Yeah until someone and you want to teleport to the same location and at the same time... Your molecules would appear there and theirs aswell. 1 has to go otherwise 2 molecules at the same place wont work. So what happens is the 2 of you would fuse together and either become a monster or die
@@moracta7090 it is a topic related to quantum mechanics,he will not understand
@@madhavanguha2626 alright then, tell me what you know about quantum mechanics without copying from Wikipedia?
Hey,
BRIGHT SIDE
do you work in team for this channel or alone..
Me too
Dumpasses its a team that makes just money and a lot i cant explain and they uaually lie or steal other peapoles stuff
@@randomplayer3340 Roasting Brightside and some of your spellings are wrong
Team
Team
Every dollar count in my book!! Being a flight attendant we get paid by flight hour!!! The slower the better!!!
The hand weavers said something similar when the mechanical loom was invented.
With your attitude we would still be using horses and carts.
Luddite.
Interesting. Approximately how much money do flight attendants make? This sounds like an exciting career choice.
@@forestdenizen6497 i'd be a flight attendant just so i can fly
@@Saijansfavorites me too😂
@@echoman4202 a bit rude to ask for salary so i'd just google it mate.
Cool video 😎
Safety is the most important things in life. I rather wait for 7-9hrs travel rather than less time but not safe.
I hate long flights
@@RestIess.Gambler I love it
I.m a aviation fan my dream is becoming a pilot
Concorde was extremely safe dude
@@JonathonBonjovious na
For me, affordable price rates (plane tickets) comfortable and convenient. No delays (4-5hrs delays or cancelled flights) 😂
As long as I will reached to my destination safe and sound (vice versa).
3:44 Since when are the Caribbean islands located right next to Quebec? Thought we wouldn't notice, heh?
Hey bright side please keep on posting aviation vids. Btw your vids are amazing
Thanks for making the video. Also one of the reasons super-sonic commercial planes didn't last long was due to the sonic boom which made the planes restricted to only trans-Atlantic flights.
Bright side : why passenger plane can't fly faster
Concorde : am i a joke to you?
Yeaahh hahahaha
Yeaaahhh hahahaha
Lol
No, ur a fireball.
Ba dum tish
Concorde hasn’t flown in decades
4:30 can't imagine how painful this is for the ears 😰
Not too painful, actually, barley any pain, actually none, if the cabin wasn’t depressurized
Noam Aharonovitch use beats
I learned something new! But I have claustrophobia and flying is out of the question. I like to drive anyway. I remember the Concorde when I was younger. Thanks for posting this. I always learn something whenever I watch one of you videos.
Video was very nice. All planes are subsonic, still they are very fast☺️☺️
2:55 Yes I heard how loud it is it makes a SONIC BOOM once you break the BARRIER
Remember The "Concord"...Hmm
Its concorde
@MUHAMMAD RASHDAN BIN MD RIDZUAN Moe if it's supposed to be called 'concorde' then why say 'concord'
Not concord its concorde
Nice presentation.....though you skipped to mention the deadly accident in Roissy Airport that put Concord to a stop
I swear almost every time I see an upload on here it’s the same video I saw on another popular channel a month or two ago. Used to love this channel, now not so much
Well, is Concorde too small to narrow the space between seats to fit many more into there?
I had the opportunity to walk through a Concorde at the Seattle Museum of Flight. There is no way more seats could be added. Unless you want to sit on someone's lap. And if you have claustrophobia forget flying on that bird. I felt like an ant in a narrow pencil!
What are you saying, @@dongrainer6405: that the seats are so close to each other that there's about 0 inches or centimeters of room between the average knee and the next seat?
@@HelloKittyFanMan. What I meant is that the plane just isn't big enough for more seats to be added. If you moved the existing ones closer together there wouldn't be much leg room between them for it be comfortable even for a short flight.
So then see, @@dongrainer6405? Maybe it _is_ big enough for them to add seats to it if they moved existing rows close enough together. But then it would be interesting to see how many more rows they could add, and how many more seats that would add. But it sounds like they certainly wouldn't be able to get that many more in there to make it even worth the compaction process.
I remember when the comments were actually about the video, instead of just like beggars
I'd rather sub to your brother peyton I'm a super fan of his but I like you too
I know right Can Eli Manning get 2000 subscribers with videos? And plus, you don’t really watch TH-cam that much do you
Yup, imagine if I want to take a flight to for overseas to have fun then I will pay anything within my budget as long as can reach my destination that I want to go without disappointment for my own money and wasted it for no reason.👍
And I’m a giants fan with a rookie Eli poster on the wall behind me as a I type this, and still; eat a pink frank
There are a lot but most are fine
Aerodynamics for supersonic flight is radically different than subsonic flight. In subsonic flight the airplane rides on the air in front of the wings whereas in supersonic flight the airplane flies ahead of the shock wave in a nose down position. This change in the lift requires that the plane be able to shift it's center of gravity aft to balance the plane and likewise when returning to subsonic flight goes the need to shift the center of gravity aft. This is normally accomplished by shifting fuel fore and aft. Also, the flight controls become less functional since the air slip stream moves aft when reaching supersonic which then flows over, instead of across, the flight controls. Aircraft that fly supersonic have have larger flight controls that move into the slip stream instead of flight surfaces like elevators and ailerons.
Many years ago, during the age when airplanes were being designed for supersonic flight, engineers discovered the benefit of moving engines closer together to allow the plane to stay supersonic if one engine failed. When the engines are out on the wings the power between left and right side of the airplane needed to be maintained. Lose power on one left engine then you pull back on the opposite engine to avoid a yaw motion but in cutting power back the plane soon drops to subsonic and you need to update your fuel balance to keep the center of gravity correct.
Subsonic is so much easier and simpler to design and maintain.
Flight lengths also vary on the direction and strength of the wind and could possibly make differences in the hours. Boeing plans to fix any issues with its current models before moving on to the next generation of aircraft, but Boeing is making great strides in partnership with NASA to be expand the horizons of space travel and the newly announced Artemis program to bring humans back to the moon and on to Mars.
Awesome bro
OK... So we can go faster if we wanted... But we not gonna do it because of the dangers?.... That makes me feel so much better
I usually use flightradar and scope out flights around the pacific, i see a few airlines (korean air, cathay pacific bound for SFO or LAX, cruising at around 650mph, why is that?
Airspeed and Groundspeed are different. With backwind, they can fly mich faster without breakink soundbarrier.
When will high speed trains come to the U.S. ???
Bullet Trains they are already here
@@evyonekuster9701
RE: "Bullet Trains they are already here"
Where?
This is a very useful video. Nice of you to give credit to the Taiwan pilots for outstanding skill.
Somebody will read this comment, one day.
Today
@@assassineforever442 that sure was quick no one ever reads my comments.
@Gwo Gaming that sure waz fast
Hiiiiiiii
XD
Thank you so much for the information.... Amazing !
*Things I'm still waiting for:* Flying Cars • Hover Boards • Cyborgs • Light Speed • Time Travel • Portals • Lightsaber • and Blasters.
But most of all, I'm still waiting for *Jesus.*
The only thing I'm waiting for is the Time Machine
Hi@Eyelash Says I'm working on it....
@@Trulylatino I guess you will be waiting for a while just like me.....LOL...
I'm just waiting on Elder Scrolls 6.
It's much faster than it was when the 707 first was introduced. It took nearly 2 days to get from Australia to Britain because they had to land and refuel every couple of hours and that meant over an hour to on the ground each time (no in flight movies then).
Sorry my 1year baby types anything like jdtxyxhxbhzbznxnzjz xbhxhxhx zjjj
I am not buying this. The Concord Passenger Airline flew at a speed of 1334 mph or Mach 2.2
Hey..
Can i get some subscribers plz 🙏🏻🤗🙏🏻🤗🙏🏻
Your math is off. If the speed of sound is 760+ mph then mach 2 would be over 1500mph
@@CaptainRudy4021 that's if travelling at sea level. Mach 2.02 at 60000ft which is concordes max altitude is around 1334mph
Wrong on February 7th 1996 it went at speed of 1,350 = 1.759487 Mach
@@CaptainRudy4021 Your fact is of. The speed of sound isnt constant.
I recently took my first long-haul business class flight. Loved it, all 8 hours of fully reclining seats, real drinking glasses and utensils, gourmet foods (and sometimes, seconds!)... nope I'm happy at 600 mph
How to tumble down the stairs:
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4, 5, 7, 9, 10...
Aww man I don't have 10 steps I have 11 that sucks
@@H_Lenoble so we back in the mine
Where is step 8
@@aawqaq620 ok I didn't mean to make the revenge meme ok.
@@H_Lenoble ok
Concorde:
1) The original program cost of £70M soared to £1.3B along with numerous delays meaning fewer planes were built. Only Air France and British Airways purchased and operated the aircraft...seven each.
2) Due to the increased unit price, a round trip from New York to London in 1997 was $7,995 USD ($12,780 USD today) making it cost prohibitive for all but the rich.
3) The sonic boom limited where the plane could fly which meant only ocean crossings. London, Paris, New York, Dulles in Virginia, and Barbados were the only airports used by the two airlines.
4) Consumer confidence decreased sharply with the crash at the Paris airport in 2000. All 100 passengers and 9 crew members were killed on takeoff.
5) Concorde last flew in 2003 due to the downturn in airline travel post Sept 11th and the end of the Airbus maintenance contract.
Side bar: Back in 1980 I was sitting in a British Airways 737 waiting for takeoff from Heathrow in London. The captain informed us that we would be delayed while the Concorde took off. Even inside the 737 I had to plug my ears with my fingers because Concorde was SO LOUD. The 737 shook and I could feel the rumble in my chest. The only other aircraft I saw with the same power was an SR-71 taking off from Boeing's Payne Field after an airshow in the late 80s. I'm very thankful I got to see both magnificent birds in flight before they were retired.
Feeber Izer this guy gets it, I do my flight training out of Paine field
Hi hope you respond! I love your videos keep up the good work!😊✨
5:20 did you know what type sharp edges of supersonic aircraft named su 47?
Well 540 mph or faster is fast enough for a airliner and in fact it's really fast
Hey..
Can i get to some subscribers plz 🙏🏻🤗🙏🏻🤗🙏🏻
Airforceproud95 can prove ya wrong.
Lol swiss001 will prove you wrong
Both of you are right
Use the f*cking metic system
Please
Very very very good video!👍
Title: Why Planes Don't Fly Faster
Concorde: So you forgot about me?
I DIDN'T FORGOT CONCORDE
I may be wrong, but watching old documentaries about pioneers of flying and test pilots, they indeed mentioned sound barrier as a major factor of all troubles to fly a plane very close to the speed of sound, but they also were saying that reaching the speed of sound was very risky and dangerous, but the moment they have reached and crossed that barrier the fly changed completely, and they reported it to be smooth and without any turbulence. Strange then to see you talking about an experience of running among the crowd of people. Never mind. Have a good day. Cheers.
The real reason is that the simulation we're in can't render viewing distance any faster for that many people at once in one sector. Any faster and people would crash.
4:56 The plane shown is an Ilyushin 797 jumbo.
Bright Side FTW!!! Love it! Hope everyone is having an amazing evening! :D
Very useful and interesting _ use to watch most of the videos @ thanks for the information 5min...
When this guy has never heard of the concord. Rip
Amazing video 💯
I used to fly Concorde. It was great getting to London in just over 3 hours. Yes it was expensive, but definitely worth it. I don't care how comfortable a 777 cabin is, I don't want to sit in it for extended periods of time. Speed is king.
My parents flew on Concorde sometime in the 90s, they said it was awesome.
It wasnt worth it for 10k dollars sadly
Great video. So succinctly explained
why fly when you can teleport
..
btw (made in 2080)
Ok
(1 day ago)😆
You cant teleport
@@gominecraft5869 she meant Teleportation In 2080
@Jason Leon Gabriel r/wooooshwith4os r/ihavereddit
Great 👍 video excellent
My favorite way of traveling:
Scottie beam me to London...
Very cool video. Thanks for posting and have a nice day too.
Diving in a plane will not produce multiple G forces (towards the rear of the plane as depicted). Pulling out of the dive may have produced multiple G’s, but it would have been towards the floor.
That part about the China flight was so factually inaccurate. They made it sound like the plane fell out the sky. The pilots did a rapid descent deliberately so they could restart engine no.4.
excellent explanation...hats off to the speaker and the animator as well
Is it me or is bright side posting more and more airplane vids
My parents flew to Europe on the Concord, what a masterpiece of engineering
"Why planes don't fly faster?"
I think it should be "why don't planes fly faster?"
Well, no.
He's not using the full question form with 'do'. Like when you ask "why people hate spiders?" Instead of "why do people hate spiders?
Both are correct.
No 1 channel youtube i like watch... Nice info i can study here
4:28
I feel bad for whoever was using the toilet.
LOL
R. I .P
Yeet almost late phew i love this video your amazing:D
you make concorde sound bad even though it was amazing
your videos are very excellent ! thank you
The passenger planes cannot fly faster because of 2 reasons: 1: They were designed this way
2: The engines arent have enough power to go with those speeds
Cool video!
4:31 the reason the plane dived was because the engineer forgot he left bleed air on
At 3:21, . . . "Planes usually reach supersonic speed far from city airports . . ." Back during the 1950s and 1960s. it was common for military aircraft to cross the U.S. at supersonic speed. So, an occasional sonic boom was normal and was no big deal.
I don't have to *imagine* a plane going faster tha the speed of sound...I just *remember* Concorde
Besides the sonic boom issue, there's the issue of safe air traffic control. The 1960 crash over New York City between a DC-8 and a Constellation airliner caused the FAA to change rules on air traffic control all over the USA, and as such it actually slowed down transcontinental flights as pilots had to maintain very strict separation and flight route controls.
There would be no extra G forces due to the jet being in free fall...
Boy that beast is back
Planes don't fly faster, cause their wings would get tired.
At 8:50 , how u can hear the engines when u go faster than the sound ?
9:39 that day will come on Sep 20th
Do you mean the storm to area fifty one?
you are the best info youtuber
Concorde was always in trouble due to American protectionism
How is it there fault of America when the Concord is a British and French plane?
@flip inheck if I was Britian or France, I would tell the United States to rub rock salt. And in American. 🤣
Well, in the 70s, it's quite easy to build a supersonic military aircraft, I don't see why it's hard to adapt the technology for civilian aircraft. Boeing at the time have plan for Boeing 2707, which used the engine based on the XB-70, which have been proven to be capable of cruising at Mach 3 back in the early 60s.
@flip inheck
To be fair, material science doesn't advance along well with the engine/fuselage design. XB-70's cruising speed is cited as "Mach 3.0" and its top speed is cited as "Mach 3.1." It can sustain that speed because it use a lot of titanium and sandwich-structured composite panels. The XB-70 program, actually all supersonic bombers were, made obsolete by the ICBM. Not that the aircraft doesn't work as intended. No aircraft can maintain a speed above Mach 2.25 for a sustained period of time without using a lot of titanium. Concorde and most supercruise-capable aircraft were limited to less than Mach 2.25, it's basically a cutoff of when the aircraft would need to be built extensively out of stronger materials to fly safely. The US already have a successful aircraft that can cruise at Mach 2 in the 60s, and it have made a world record of the longest supersonic flight, the B-58 Hustler, and it was made out of pretty standard materials for the aircraft. The reason why the US couldn't make a Concorde clone is because it set its goal too high. It's not like that Concorde's design was that much of a secret, after all, people have managed to steal military secrets from the USSR before. Sorry for the long comment, just having too much fun with nerd mode.
Is there a video on why i can't get from Boston to phoenix any faster in a CAR these days?
They are not allowed to fly faster than the speed of sound over the US, by law.
Very true but Air Force jets do brake it as they go around 760mph
@@nickstumpf9387
Jet fighters fly at subsonic speed for most of the time, they don't allow pilots to fly at supersonic except in a rare circumstance.
wait jhon doe isnt that a roblox mystery thats still not explained
he was banned i think i heard but idk watching a vedio would be more truthful
Educative video. Nice
The Concorde was a technological marvel, but an economical lemon.
more like onion
If the engines stop working and the plane is making a free fall, how could you get slammed against the back wall of the plane? Wouldn't you just be freefalling inside the plane untill the plane has reached its maximum speed, after which you'll fall to the front? (Assuming the plane is vertical).
I mean, you'll fall relative to the earth too, but only without the air resistance.
Could someone please explain this to me if and why I'm wrong?
maybe the video is wrong but they only mention 1 engine failure, the other engines were probably full on while being vertical
i dont think a plane could go supersonic if it's just a vertical free fall
The thinking in 2019 sounds like that of 1919. Fortunately, they managed to figure out the solutions.
I reckon the Concorde could have been a succes with a couple tweaks. Such a shame we seemingly gave up on the supersonic passenger plane.
I just got a Heathrow andn less than 24hrs ago I was at San Francisco now I'm at London ;_;
U know wht, love examples in ur knowledge full videos 💐👍
Can u just show us how u look like
He is not specifically a gaming channel to have a face cam
Its an artificial voice
@@Devond085 no it's not....wait really?
I mean you can differentiate between an artificial voice and a regular one......like between the twitch's artificial voice and a regular voice
@@red_wing yeah I've been around the block a few times. But in this particular case in another video by the same group, his voice glitched enough for it to be noticeable if you're closely paying attention. I dont remember the exact video it was thouugh
@@Devond085 with all my respect to your opinion but I'm not really convinced enough by it cuz the voice has been changing tones like any human would have done during a particular conversation with every word , sentence and question which is theoretically too complex to be artificial in my opinion
Love the vids
I would pay more to save time because I can't sleep on planes and get distracted reading.
I love you Bright side when you explain because you explain easy and funny I can understand I love you 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Last time I was in an airplane ✈️ from Madrid to Miami, plane was traveling at 620 mph. At least that’s what it said on the screen in front of me.
Thanks for explaining