ESPN NFL LIVE | Minnesota Vikings Will DECIDE Whether Or Not To Move On From Sam Darnold By March
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2025
- ESPN NFL LIVE | Minnesota Vikings Will DECIDE Whether Or Not To Move On From Sam Darnold By March
#nfllive #nflnews #minnesotavikings
lol we don’t have a win now roster. We need to let Sam go so we can build our trenches to win now.
The SOONER JJ McCarthy gets ON THE FIELD, the SOONER he will get experience. Caleb Williams didn't sit and Jaden Daniels didn't sit, and they both looked FINE to me!!! He will be surrounded by good players ( and hopefully upgraded offensive line ) by next year, so he should be ready to ROCK and ROLL! Sam Darnold can GO FISHING with Kirk Cousins!!! 😆
Like I been saying stick to the a Plan play JJ this year this is why we drafted him
Noway he coming back.
Dump Purdy and get Sam 😂
I’d want that only for the drama and conversations. Haha. Pro sports are the ultimate reality soap opera
@ haha I thought I’d get people fired up no takers 🤣
Honestly no one wants to talk about these teams in February right now. It’s a bummer.
@ you mean Eagles VS Chiefs or any other team beside the Chiefs. I was bummed you covered every other coaching change but the Jags when it was the funniest one 🤣
Haha you know, I was going to cover it but I just skipped it. Not intentional. Just happened. But I mean look how great my patriots video is doing! I'm going viral!
Vikings would be crazy to move on from Sam Darnold. 14-3 seasons don't happen all that often, no matter WHO the team is. When you have a season that good with a player who showed what Darnold showed, you don't abort that abruptly. You keep it going and see how long that type of thing can last
Vikings have their qb in JJ. Darnolds collapse to end the season cost him. The Vikings have too many other needs to pay Darnold the amount he's going to need to stay.
Agreed!!!
@@JesusSaves373yeah but the pressure cooker of the contract weighed him down and not all of that collapse was on Sam. If he had a contract and he was just playing he’d likely of played those last two games better even if they didn’t win either
@Zangyaks I know it wasn't all on Darnold. They need to strengthen up their o-line in order for any qb to do well. They can't do that and keep Darnold. Especially with the fact they need to improve the d-line, secondary, and rb room. With all these needs, they just can't afford to pay Darnold when you have a qb on a rookie contract to build around. If they stout up the line and get a solid rb, there is absolutely no reason JJ can not be successful and win at least 10 games.
@@JesusSaves373 it depends what he wants. If he takes a Bakerish deal it’s a no brainer with a 3 year contract and an out with no guaranteed money in the 3rd year. Basically a two year contract