Sir my question is in this judgement supreme court said that no one can change basic structure of constitution so what about the Indira Gandhi change to add words in preamble like socialist and secular
@@abhaypatel4292 preamble is preface of constitution Preamble can be amended, subject to the condition that no amendment is done to the ‘basic features’
Sir , can you make a detailed video on , What was the judgement of highcourt in Indira Gandhi case. What malpratices did the high court found. What were the allegations by raj narain. Electoral malpractice is a big term it contains many things , so as to understand what was the malpractice found by the high court in its decision.
Nicely explained! Thanks for making this video :)
Difference between this case and kesvanand case?
Glad I found this page.
Good man 😊 ur explanation
It is art 329
your stating wrong article it is 329 A (4)
Totally loved the editing !!
Well explained boy!
Please clear it is either 392A or 329A
Maine Suna h ki Indira Gandhi ka character bahutooooooot achha tha 😅
It's 329(A) not 392(A)
Superb video man. Keep going.
Bro it's no 392-A
It's 329-A .
Sir my question is in this judgement supreme court said that no one can change basic structure of constitution so what about the Indira Gandhi change to add words in preamble like socialist and secular
@@abhaypatel4292 preamble is preface of constitution Preamble can be amended, subject to the condition that no amendment is done to the ‘basic features’
Sir , can you make a detailed video on ,
What was the judgement of highcourt in Indira Gandhi case. What malpratices did the high court found. What were the allegations by raj narain.
Electoral malpractice is a big term it contains many things , so as to understand what was the malpractice found by the high court in its decision.
392?
Nonsense