reminds me of the one that exploded in denmark many years ago. that one was a lot worse as debris went everywhere and i think even flew over some houses.
Why was it the only one spinning? WInd only blowing behind it? Heard it may have been hit by lightning, but why would that weaken the post? I read when the wind hits about 50mph the safety clutch disengages & blades free spins so as not to over spin & blow the generator motor up! All this stuff is great if there is wind, solar panels if there is sun. Otherwise, they just sit there. And the blades are not recyclable! There are piles of them sitting in AZ like the old planes.
The sound showed all too well that there was a very strong wind blowing - TOO STRONG for the turbines. In all of them the emergency brake worked, in this one it didn't. Effect? The eccentricity of the propellers resulted in a destructive overload of the pylon. Effect on the clip. This is the whole truth about windmills: too little wind: no electricity produced. Too strong a wind: the windmill destroyed. ONE lightning strike on one windmill can destroy several in one shot. Electricity from windmills is more expensive than electricity from nuclear power plants. In addition, this current is ONLY present when the wind happens to blow at the appropriate speed and it is not necessarily related to the demand for energy... And I have a question: do we already know who will bear the costs of disposing of this crap when in just a few years they will become hopelessly marring the landscape, unproductive scrap?
A few things here. 1) There are very small motors inside to pivot the blades and also the top section. If one of these breaks then it cannot slow down or turn the direction that it points to or away from the wind. 2) The blades do not spin freely, there is also a brake on them, once turned out of the direction of the wind (sideways) the blades slowdown, then a brake comes on to hold them. 3) The blades are re-cyclable, its only glass fibre and resin, they are cut down, smashed up and added to new turbine blades. 4) There are piles of them, and they are getting re-cycled. 5) Currently they produce about 50% of the UKs electricity (average over the year), many days its around 60 to 70%
The broken blades were out of balance, causing a beat, which added to the tail wind, and finally broke down the tower. You noticed, the machine was facing down wind, which put the fragile trailing edges in the lead. That fractured them (the pieces you found) and caused the imbalance that ended up destroying the tower. My personal opinion, is that the machine was broken down already, and it was just "unlucky" enough, that the wind was blowing from directly behind it. The band brake, normally used to lock the rotor only works in the forward direction. It works by putting tension on a spring, so the harder it tries to turn, the band brake tightens itself. In reverse, the rotor torque overcomes, rather than assists the spring, allowing the rotor to turn backward. Normally, a functioning turbine feathers out the pitch of the blades, and yaws to face into the wind. This machine was broken, and could not protect itself. Had it not blown down, the slipping brake might have caught fire!
Why are they called Turbines? That implies a strong Venturi or wind like you’d need harnessing Venus winds at hundreds of kph. I don’t understand the minimal thin three blades generating much when every ‘functional’ windmill I grew up around was festooned with fins like a sunflower capturing wind. Why do they need diesel and tap power grid to run? Makes no sense, unless it’s making money somewhere.
Etymologically, the word can be traced to spinning wheels from ancient times, hence the modern usage. The word turbine existed long before the modern venturi tube systems used to boost automobile engine combustion, which also borrow their name from the fact they have a spinning wheel within them. The confusion is due attaching and conflating the pressure differential effect of the venturi or the pressure boost effect for its intended use with the etymologicality of the system's base functionality, being a rotating wheel. Larger blades having a greater surface area would enact too great forces upon the trunk of the system, being tall to capture the greater energy than that nearer the ground. Diesel gens aren't necessary for wind turbines, but in situations where the owner does not have a battery backup system in place a diesel generator would be used to provide electricity when the local wind speed is too low to supply adequate energy to turn the blades. They don't tap grid power to run, they tie to the grid to supply energy into and for the grid. The exception is where an owner has a grid-tied system which receives energy directly from the grid if the windmill is not producing energy, the same as a battery or diesel gen backup. And, if the system has both a diesel gen and grid tie then it could be designed to use whichever source is cheaper depending on each's energy supply cost where grid energy fluctuates depending upon the time of day.
The three long blades are used to produce torque, or turning force, because the generator inside is hard to turn when producing electricity. The other kinds of windmill blades you see are water pumping windmills. The many small blades don’t need to produce so much torque, and actually the design is kind of self-regulating, as all those small blades are kind of “getting in each other’s way” so to speak. So they really can’t spin too fast. The wind turbine blades need to take advantage of as much wind as possible, to produce as much torque as possible. Think helicopter blades. Long thin blades lifting a heavy body. The wind turbines also have built-in speed regulation, mostly in the form of controllable pitch blades, where they turn along their axis to catch more or less wind as required by the generator load. There are other systems inside that help, such as over speed shutdown devices.
There's no way that I would climb up inside that thing. I think it needs a few diagonal braces inside to made it a bit more rigid. Surely F.E analysis should have picked up on this?
Not good but one turbine out of a wind farm is no great loss to the system and reasonably easy to replace quickly at no great cost.... UNLIKE a coal station turbine failure. One in Queensland Australia exploded in June 2021. Major system outage! While two of the three remaining turbines were reasonably quickly back online the other two damaged turbines are still not fully returned to service (early 2024) - costing MILLIONS (as much as $400 MILLION).
@@paradiselost9946 You really should find out how coal plants work . It did NOT supply 24/7 ... ever! AND - perhaps you should find out who built and PAID for those stations.
Not saying wind is the best but all forms of energy have failure. Nuclear plants can have meltdowns, natural gas lines explode, coal releases horrible toxins into the air, and the miners can get black lung... Solar panels can crack and catch fire. Geothermal & fracking can cause earthquakes... Is there any form of safe energy?
So, you're purposefully discounting all the massive oil spills, refinery explosions, pipeline explosions, leaking pipelines, off-shore drilling rig disasters, etc to attack a wind turbine accident caused by a lightning strike?
Wouldn’t you need electricity for a blender to work? They are the quickest,cheapest,easiest and cleanest way of producing your electricity…..perhaps you don’t want that ? Perhaps you like increasing petrol prices,giving billions in profits,oil spills,increasing world temperatures and climate change….if so,you are a fool !
Wenn so ein Teil kaputt geht, neigt sich der Propeller gen Boden um anfallende Reparaturen einfacher zu machen.
Das Windrad verneigt sich in Demut vor der Energiewende. Ist doch toll soviel Dankbarkeit.
If you look at the very beginning, there is also another one spinning, but it is not facing the wrong way, and it’s facing the right way
In Germany we say: Hoffentlich ist da noch Garantie drauf.
That’s a new improvement they added to facilitate maintenance repairs. It’ll pop up when the fan is turned on. You’ve seen them at tire stores.
Creative :D
Oh! Snap!!
Nice😏
reminds me of the one that exploded in denmark many years ago. that one was a lot worse as debris went everywhere and i think even flew over some houses.
2:19 That would make a nice souvenir ! Aarre Peltomaa
Czy to są te "doskonałe" turbiny Siemensa, które Niemcy chcą koniecznie wtrynić Polsce za grube miliardy?
Akurat to firma vestas (duńska) więc nie bardzo
@@pawec3554 Zatem równier "dobre"...
That would make me wonder about the rest of them if they're of the same design and construction.
Bremse und Blattverstellung kaputt? Normal dreht sich das bei Sturm aus dem Wind.
No pitch control or not working ?.
Why are all the other blades still?
They shut down when the wind gets too powerful, whilst that one was malfunctioning.
this one looks like its going backwards and the brake must be broken
Is that a Vestas model? and what happened to the tower? did it got hit by the blade?
Why was it the only one spinning? WInd only blowing behind it? Heard it may have been hit by lightning, but why would that weaken the post? I read when the wind hits about 50mph the safety clutch disengages & blades free spins so as not to over spin & blow the generator motor up! All this stuff is great if there is wind, solar panels if there is sun. Otherwise, they just sit there. And the blades are not recyclable! There are piles of them sitting in AZ like the old planes.
The pole was cracked or something
It was spinning the wrong way and the brake probably failed
The sound showed all too well that there was a very strong wind blowing - TOO STRONG for the turbines.
In all of them the emergency brake worked, in this one it didn't. Effect? The eccentricity of the propellers resulted in a destructive overload of the pylon. Effect on the clip.
This is the whole truth about windmills: too little wind: no electricity produced. Too strong a wind: the windmill destroyed. ONE lightning strike on one windmill can destroy several in one shot. Electricity from windmills is more expensive than electricity from nuclear power plants. In addition, this current is ONLY present when the wind happens to blow at the appropriate speed and it is not necessarily related to the demand for energy...
And I have a question: do we already know who will bear the costs of disposing of this crap when in just a few years they will become hopelessly marring the landscape, unproductive scrap?
A few things here.
1) There are very small motors inside to pivot the blades and also the top section. If one of these breaks then it cannot slow down or turn the direction that it points to or away from the wind.
2) The blades do not spin freely, there is also a brake on them, once turned out of the direction of the wind (sideways) the blades slowdown, then a brake comes on to hold them.
3) The blades are re-cyclable, its only glass fibre and resin, they are cut down, smashed up and added to new turbine blades.
4) There are piles of them, and they are getting re-cycled.
5) Currently they produce about 50% of the UKs electricity (average over the year), many days its around 60 to 70%
The broken blades were out of balance, causing a beat, which added to the tail wind, and finally broke down the tower. You noticed, the machine was facing down wind, which put the fragile trailing edges in the lead. That fractured them (the pieces you found) and caused the imbalance that ended up destroying the tower. My personal opinion, is that the machine was broken down already, and it was just "unlucky" enough, that the wind was blowing from directly behind it. The band brake, normally used to lock the rotor only works in the forward direction. It works by putting tension on a spring, so the harder it tries to turn, the band brake tightens itself. In reverse, the rotor torque overcomes, rather than assists the spring, allowing the rotor to turn backward. Normally, a functioning turbine feathers out the pitch of the blades, and yaws to face into the wind. This machine was broken, and could not protect itself. Had it not blown down, the slipping brake might have caught fire!
I wouldn’t pick the parts up since the fiberglass could cause splinters but it may not be the same material so I don’t know
Yah, that debris looks _really_ environmentally friendly... NOT!
OH YOUR GERMAN I THOUGHT THERE WAS SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU !
he not germany he is a usa
Think you missed the joke mate @@MahhanJBLfan
Cool video.
ps. Don't touch the blade like that. Those composites have micro-fibres that can really get in and under your skin and do a lot of harm.
Wrong direction and spinning backwards?
Why did the tower collapse? These things don't happen today.
Break failure -> overload. What are you even trying to say with "These things don't happen today."?
Ja wirklich krass, wenn man so etwas life erlebt.
"L'aumento quantitativo di un fenomeno determina il cambiamento qualitativo radicale del paesaggio" Hegel. N O E O L I C O
2 windy wind
If this happens to one of the wind turbines in California, I’m straight up going to take a picture of it
Youre right. Thats absolutely worth the comment!
This is a vestas wind turbine!😱
Why are they called Turbines? That implies a strong Venturi or wind like you’d need harnessing Venus winds at hundreds of kph. I don’t understand the minimal thin three blades generating much when every ‘functional’ windmill I grew up around was festooned with fins like a sunflower capturing wind. Why do they need diesel and tap power grid to run? Makes no sense, unless it’s making money somewhere.
🎯
Etymologically, the word can be traced to spinning wheels from ancient times, hence the modern usage. The word turbine existed long before the modern venturi tube systems used to boost automobile engine combustion, which also borrow their name from the fact they have a spinning wheel within them.
The confusion is due attaching and conflating the pressure differential effect of the venturi or the pressure boost effect for its intended use with the etymologicality of the system's base functionality, being a rotating wheel.
Larger blades having a greater surface area would enact too great forces upon the trunk of the system, being tall to capture the greater energy than that nearer the ground.
Diesel gens aren't necessary for wind turbines, but in situations where the owner does not have a battery backup system in place a diesel generator would be used to provide electricity when the local wind speed is too low to supply adequate energy to turn the blades. They don't tap grid power to run, they tie to the grid to supply energy into and for the grid. The exception is where an owner has a grid-tied system which receives energy directly from the grid if the windmill is not producing energy, the same as a battery or diesel gen backup. And, if the system has both a diesel gen and grid tie then it could be designed to use whichever source is cheaper depending on each's energy supply cost where grid energy fluctuates depending upon the time of day.
🤡
The three long blades are used to produce torque, or turning force, because the generator inside is hard to turn when producing electricity. The other kinds of windmill blades you see are water pumping windmills. The many small blades don’t need to produce so much torque, and actually the design is kind of self-regulating, as all those small blades are kind of “getting in each other’s way” so to speak. So they really can’t spin too fast. The wind turbine blades need to take advantage of as much wind as possible, to produce as much torque as possible. Think helicopter blades. Long thin blades lifting a heavy body. The wind turbines also have built-in speed regulation, mostly in the form of controllable pitch blades, where they turn along their axis to catch more or less wind as required by the generator load. There are other systems inside that help, such as over speed shutdown devices.
Oh no! The wind turbine collapses
What is tumbling?😂😂😅
The accountant strikes again.
The parts look flimsy.
The blades a flimsy and light they need 9mph winds to start on most turbines
There's no way that I would climb up inside that thing. I think it needs a few diagonal braces inside to made it a bit more rigid. Surely F.E analysis should have picked up on this?
Yes, we built like half a million of these things but no one ever had that idea.
6:40 ?????????? 😢
Even Michael Moore figured out that "green" energy is a scam.
You need oil to make the blades.
Oil is used for the blades ≠ oil is necessary for the blades
Thank god you have your camera on, otherwise they will charge you with this murder.
Oh my go
What a waste.
The hell oh no that's not good
Not good but one turbine out of a wind farm is no great loss to the system and reasonably easy to replace quickly at no great cost.... UNLIKE a coal station turbine failure. One in Queensland Australia exploded in June 2021. Major system outage! While two of the three remaining turbines were reasonably quickly back online the other two damaged turbines are still not fully returned to service (early 2024) - costing MILLIONS (as much as $400 MILLION).
@@paradiselost9946 You really should find out how coal plants work . It did NOT supply 24/7 ... ever! AND - perhaps you should find out who built and PAID for those stations.
What kind of steel is used for these? Is it recycled steel?
Likely Chinesium.
2:700 ?
My gosh
Bisschen Sport wäre nicht schlecht
Too windy, built to fail, made in China parts.
Vestas is a Danish company, right?
Wow
Oops 😬
thats China tech at its best
Drill baby drill
Happy ending
😮
And this is what the clinmate change alarmists want us to use. Yeah right!😂
Not saying wind is the best but all forms of energy have failure. Nuclear plants can have meltdowns, natural gas lines explode, coal releases horrible toxins into the air, and the miners can get black lung... Solar panels can crack and catch fire. Geothermal & fracking can cause earthquakes... Is there any form of safe energy?
Ever seen an oil refinery explosion?
Texas has a long history of those. Countless lives impacted and many killed. Really unfortunate. @@Poison_Eevee
I like nuclear power plants, and wind turbines
So, you're purposefully discounting all the massive oil spills, refinery explosions, pipeline explosions, leaking pipelines, off-shore drilling rig disasters, etc to attack a wind turbine accident caused by a lightning strike?
The Green Lie
& the first of several paid GOP trolls rears their ugly, pustulant heads . . .
These things are such a waste.
Petrol doesn't do that.
right? it just just completely fucks over our whole planet slowly. But who cares about that
You've never seen an oil refinery explosion, huh?
HA HA HA 🤣🤣
So ein klump 😅
It's satisfying seeing these bird-blenders failing like this.
Wouldn’t you need electricity for a blender to work?
They are the quickest,cheapest,easiest and cleanest way of producing your electricity…..perhaps you don’t want that ? Perhaps you like increasing petrol prices,giving billions in profits,oil spills,increasing world temperatures and climate change….if so,you are a fool !
Based nature. Fuck windmills.
Thanks for using the appropriate microphone in this video. I just love all the wind noise. Moron!