A 12:35 we can see the journalist Jacques Chancel asking her about the Ravel /Debussy thing. It means that it's probably taken from his show called "Le grand échiquier", where he guested artists and musicians. Incredible to think that in the seventies, at 8:30 pm on a major media, the general french public could see Lefébure speaking about Ravel... Another world.
@@kristinegerard485 Quelle chance que vous avez, je pense que vous avez passé des moments magiques à ses côté, moi qui étudie le piano j'aurais aimé être à votre place, continuez vous à jouer? Au plaisir de vous relire.
So apparently Ravel wrote stuff that were not supposed to be read the way he wrote them? I mean... what can we do with that information... I don't know anymore.. what should we do? Read it the way it is and hope for the best, or interpret what we read and hope for the best?
Try to look for clues in sources (this video IS a source, for example) and learn from them how one should read a particular composer's music. This happens with everyone, not only with Ravel.
clearly communicating the nuances of your ideas is by far the hardest part of composition. especially when it might mean something different depending on the time, place and person the piece came from. this is why as a performing musician you have to do research on the stuff you're playing, like watching this video. ravel would also play his pieces at a higher tempo than notated
J'adore! 🔥 Mon professeur de piano au Conservatoire de Genève, Louis Hiltbrand, était de la même trempe! 🔥 Il aurait réussi à faire jouer à un caillou Ravel et les autres! Souvenirs de 🔥
Well, it isnt awful. She's brilliant, but not even close to Michelangeli. Even compared to Argerich, he's impeccable. I implor you all to watch and listen to Michelangeli's performance. Perfection.
@@frink32J'en ai marre marre marre des comparaisons continuelles, c'est épuisant, cette manie. Quant à Michelangeli, si hysteriquement vénéré (je l'ai entendu de son vivant), désolée de comparer pour une fois moi aussi: en termes de 🔥 Yvonne Lefébure le surclasse, et de loin!
A 12:35 we can see the journalist Jacques Chancel asking her about the Ravel /Debussy thing. It means that it's probably taken from his show called "Le grand échiquier", where he guested artists and musicians. Incredible to think that in the seventies, at 8:30 pm on a major media, the general french public could see Lefébure speaking about Ravel... Another world.
I’ve never seen such arm movements and brilliant technique with energy saving and intense contact to the keyboard. She was outstanding
Such a wonderful clip. . . Lefebure was fortunate enough to have had Ravel tutor her. The final part is too precious.
incredible
What a wonderful sound she gets from the piano in Jeux d'eau!
I SWEAR, bro. That’s one of the most beautiful performances I’ve heard in the 7 years I’ve been playing the piano.
Juste de la passion, la Vie, l'Excellence. Merci pour ce moment parmi les Grands.
She was my master's master.. Such a magnificient lady!
Thank you very much for this beautiful movie.
She really is such an underrated master. Thank you for sharing.
“Transmettez la tradition !” Quel rigolo ce Ravel; je l’adore
Merci pour le partage ❤
Merci beaucoup pour le paryage de cette sublime vidéo. Une archive très précieuse à mes yeux !!!!
Pour moi aussi,je fus son élève
@@kristinegerard485 Quelle chance que vous avez, je pense que vous avez passé des moments magiques à ses côté, moi qui étudie le piano j'aurais aimé être à votre place, continuez vous à jouer? Au plaisir de vous relire.
Divine pianiste et quelle personnalité !
Wow! Quel feu! Quel volcan!
🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 !!!
thanks for the upload
What a pianist !! At 3:10, the conductor is the brother of Pierre Cochereau, or from his family ?
He's his son
At last ! The synchronise one , thank you very much ! I always fascinated by ravel's intrepretation from yvonne lefebure
So apparently Ravel wrote stuff that were not supposed to be read the way he wrote them? I mean... what can we do with that information... I don't know anymore.. what should we do? Read it the way it is and hope for the best, or interpret what we read and hope for the best?
Try to look for clues in sources (this video IS a source, for example) and learn from them how one should read a particular composer's music. This happens with everyone, not only with Ravel.
clearly communicating the nuances of your ideas is by far the hardest part of composition. especially when it might mean something different depending on the time, place and person the piece came from. this is why as a performing musician you have to do research on the stuff you're playing, like watching this video. ravel would also play his pieces at a higher tempo than notated
Do your research
please tell us where is the rest of this!!
07:51 jeux d'eau
Daniel Ekasaputra O thanks 😂
Yes, who is playing?
@@christianspillemose4074 Mario Duchemin, a canadian pianist.
Moi, c'est la taloche à 0:51
J'adore! 🔥
Mon professeur de piano au Conservatoire de Genève, Louis Hiltbrand, était de la même trempe! 🔥
Il aurait réussi à faire jouer à un caillou Ravel et les autres!
Souvenirs de 🔥
What is the piece at 0:10 ?
Never mind, I found it. Alborada del gracioso from Miroirs.
It is "Alborada del Gracioso" (= "Dawn Serenade of the Buffoon", a work of Spanish inspiration), the fourth piece from the suite "Miroirs" (1905).
awful 👎
Why?
Well, it isnt awful. She's brilliant, but not even close to Michelangeli. Even compared to Argerich, he's impeccable. I implor you all to watch and listen to Michelangeli's performance. Perfection.
🤡
@@frink32well, whatever your opinion, I find these an excellent case study.
@@frink32J'en ai marre marre marre des comparaisons continuelles, c'est épuisant, cette manie.
Quant à Michelangeli, si hysteriquement vénéré (je l'ai entendu de son vivant), désolée de comparer pour une fois moi aussi: en termes de 🔥 Yvonne Lefébure le surclasse, et de loin!