Love the channel? Love supporting things? Check out the Patreon page: 💸 Patreon: patreon.com/thelivingphilosophy ⌛ Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction: A Map of Reality 01:44 What are the four quadrants? 2:34 Q1 - Internal Individual 3:09 Q2 - External Individual 4:22 Q3 - Internal Collective 7:07 Q4 - External Collective 9:00 As a map of knowledge 11:27 As defuser of intellectual conflicts
Of all eight thousand million persons currently residing on this planet, you are undoubtedly the MOST holy, wise and enlightened of them all, Sir! So obviously, you are VEGAN, since it would be extremely incongruous for a great sage such as yourself to be an animal-abusing criminal, correct? 😁
@@ReverendDr.Thomas I am vegetarian, but not vegan, because all vegetarian things can be produced without causing suffering, being vegan is like not using words, because others use words in order to cause suffering, it's pompous and pretentious, unless vegan is someone's actual taste. I'm not sure what does that have to do with this comment section though.
@@ricardosantos6721 The term "VEGAN" refers to the philosophy of avoiding undue harm to any animal life, as far as practical, whilst "vegetarian" is merely someone who consumes a plant-based diet. Therefore, veganism is NOT a diet but a moral or ethical position against animal exploitation of any kind. 🌱 So, you ADMIT that you’re an animal-abusing criminal, Mr. Cow-teat-suckler? 😬🙄😬
This must be the FIRST time I've ever watched anyone trying to be as objective as they can be, trying to combine different perceptions and find the separate truths of each viewpoint while attempting to integrate them in a respectful way!
Haha that's a good way of putting it Eternal! It's something that always stuck with me from Wittgenstein - combining snapshots to form the fullest sketch of the truth which is the closest we will get - the more perspectives the better (if we can organise them of course)
🐟 03. CONCEPTS Vs THE TRUTH: The term “TRUTH” (“satyam”, “tathya”, “tattva”, or “siddhānta”, in Sanskrit) is one of the most greatly-misused words in the English tongue. Anything that has ever been written or spoken, by even the greatest sage or Avatar (incarnation of Divinity), including every single postulation within this Holiest of Holy Scriptures, “F.I.S.H”, is merely a CONCEPT and not “The Truth”, at least in the Absolute sense of the term. A concept is either accurate or inaccurate. Virtually all concepts are inaccurate to a degree. However, some concepts are far more accurate than others. For example, the personal conception of Ultimate Reality (God or The Goddess) is inaccurate to a large extent (see Chapter 07). The concept of Ultimate Reality being singular (“All is One”) is far more accurate. The transcendence of BOTH the above concepts (non-duality) is excruciatingly accurate. However, none of these concepts is “The Truth” as such, since all ideas are relative, whilst The Truth is Absolute. A BELIEF is an unhealthy and somewhat problematic relationship one has with a certain concept, due to misapprehension of life as it is, objectively-speaking. Attachment to beliefs, particularly in the presumption of individual free-will, is the cause of psychological suffering. It is VITALLY important to distinguish between relative truth and Absolute Truth. Relative truth is temporal, mutable, subjective, dependent, immanent, differentiated, conditioned, finite, complex, reducible, imperfect, and contingent, whilst Absolute Truth is eternal, immutable, objective, independent, transcendent, undifferentiated, unconditional, infinite, non-dual (i.e. simple), irreducible, perfect, and necessary. Absolute Truth is the ground of all being (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit), and is prior to any mind, matter, name, form, intent, thought, word, or deed. Good and bad are RELATIVE - what may be good or bad can vary according to temporal circumstances and according to personal preferences. For example, there is absolutely no doubt that citrus fruits are a good source of nutrients for human beings. However, it may be bad to consume such beneficial foods when one is experiencing certain illnesses, such as chronic dysentery. ‘One man's food is another man's poison.' Because of the relative nature of goodness, anything that is considered to be good must also be bad to a certain degree, since the extent of goodness is determined by the purpose of the object in question. As demonstrated, citrus fruits can be either good or bad, depending on its use. Is drinking arsenic good or bad? Well, if one wishes to remain alive, it is obviously bad, but for one who wants to die, it is obviously good. However, beyond the dichotomy of good and bad, is the Eternal Truth, which transcends mundane relativism. Therefore, the accomplishment of life is to rise above the subjective “good” and “bad”, and abide in the transcendental sphere. A qualified spiritual preceptor is able to guide one in the intricacies of such transcendence. Such a person, who has transcended mundane relative truth, is said to be an ENLIGHTENED soul. When making moral judgements, it is more appropriate to use the terms “moral”, “amoral”, or “immoral”, rather than “good/bad” or “right/wrong”. As the Bard of Avon so rightly declared in the script for one of his plays, there is nothing that is INTRINSICALLY either good or bad but “thinking makes it so”. At the time of writing (early twenty-first century), especially in the Anglosphere, most persons seem to use the dichotomy of “good/evil” rather than “good/bad” and “holy/evil”, most probably because they consider that “holiness” is exclusively a religious term. However, the terms “holy” and “righteous” are fundamentally synonymous, for they refer to a person or an act that is fully in accordance with pure, holy, and righteous principles (“dharma”, in Sanskrit). So a holy person is one who obeys the law of “non-harm” (“ahiṃsā”, in Sanskrit), and as the ancient Sanskrit axiom states: “ahiṃsā paramo dharmaḥ” (non-violence is the highest moral virtue or law), and “ahiṃsā param satyam” (non-violence is the highest truth). See the Anuśāsana Parva of “Mahābhārata”, 13.117.37-38. The ONLY Real Truth in the phenomenal manifestation is the impersonal sense of being, that is, the sense of “I am” (“aham”, in Sanskrit). Everything else is merely transient and unreal (“unreal” for that very reason - because it is ever-mutating, lacking permanence and stability). This sense of quiddity is otherwise called “Infinite Awareness”, “Spirit”, “God”, “The Ground of Being”, “Necessary Existence“, “The Higher Self”, as well as various other epithets, for it is the very essence of one’s being. Chapters 06 and 10 deal more fully with this subject matter. Of course, for one who is fully self-realized and enlightened, the subject-object duality has collapsed. Therefore, a fully-awakened individual does not perceive any REAL difference between himself and the external world, and so, sees everything in himself, and himself in everything. If it is true that there are none so blind as those who don’t WANT to see, and none so deaf as those who don’t WANT to hear, then surely, there are none so ignorant as those who don’t WANT to learn the truth. Obviously, in the previous sentence, and in most other references to the word “truth” within this book, it is meant “the most accurate concept possible”, or at least “an extremely accurate fact”. For example, as clearly demonstrated in Chapters 21 and 22, it is undoubtedly “true” (accurate) that a divinely-instituted monarchy is the most beneficial form of national governance, but that is not the Absolute Truth, which is the impersonal, never-changing foundation of all being. So, to put it succinctly, all “truths” are relative concepts (even if they are very accurate) but the Universal Self alone is REAL (Absolute) Truth. “In the absence of both the belief ‘I am the body’ and in the absence of the belief that ‘I am not the body’, what is left is what we really are. We don’t need to define what we really are. We don’t need to create a thought to tell us what we are. What we are is what TRUTH is." ************* “God is not something ‘out-there, looking-in’, but God (or Source) has BECOME all of This. So, God is the Underlying Principle of all of this - the Energy or the Consciousness. The (psycho-physical) manifestation has arisen within Consciousness as an imagination in the mind of Source.” Roger Castillo, Australian Spiritual Teacher, 15/07/2015. “I am the TRUTH...” “...and the TRUTH shall set you free”. Lord Jesus Christ, John 14:16 and 8:32.
I've long been aware that science has its limitations; the mind is more than just a composition of flesh, fat, and bones, and emotions extend beyond mere muscle and tissue. I understood that various philosophies address these aspects individually, but it now becomes clear that a comprehensive understanding requires a range of diverse philosophies, rather than a single unified theory. This perspective helps me appreciate the complexity of the human experience.
You mention going to a foreign county looking at a culture but not being inside of it. Looking at it as an outsider. For sure I spent most of my life as a sort of outsider in my own culture. And still to this day I feel like a bit of an outsider. I've never embraced patriotism, never made sense to me, and I spent 15 years seeking answers to life's big questions rather than just going with the flow of whatever my surrounding culture told me to think and do. I was even accused of having autism once. It's not that I can't engage, I can. It's that I chose not too for a variety of personal reasons involving multiple tragedies that left me feeling cold. I experienced first hand the brutality of my species and the coldness of an unemotional universe. We live in a world of dichotomies. Seemingly the ones screaming loudest about positivity and inclusion are only too willing to be negative and exclude those who disagree with them. We talk of human rights and protecting the vulnerable while we demonize those on the margins of our society and slaughter the unborn by the thousands in this country each year. We speak of animal rights and are appauled at a man kicking a dog but scoff down burgers and ribs by the truck loads. I've worked in slaughterhouses. I've seen the terror and misery those animals endure in their last moments. But we would almost turn the men who do the killing into national herpes because they preserve our lives. What people really seek is personal certainty and personal success but most are deeply confused and understand the issues they bark on about only at the most basic level. We create boogey men out of our enemies and heroes out of those who confirm our prejudices. The reality is a lot more mundane and also a lot scarier. Likened to the Holocaust it was a mundane daily activity of the grossest violence towards our own species we've ever seen in history. The Incas probably came close though. They incorporated human sacrifice into their daily lives and I'm pretty sure mothers went on loving their children and father's provided a living while they watched their fellow beings slaughtered by the thousands to appease the gods. I can't help but feel that in spite of our best efforts we are still deeply irrational creatures with the few of us trying extremely hard to make sense out of it all, and coming to differing conclusions and fighting each other over it...
When I looked at clip I first thought it was a political compass before I read the title. Einstein as an authoritarian right winger. Freud as an authoritarian left winger. Nietzsche as a left libertarian. Marx as a right libertarian. It gave me a chuckle.
libertarian left is nooooooot a thing. see mr irish men theyre racist, keep freud out yo mouth hes daddy to the surrealist who unfortunately claimed anarch socialist but died millionaires while members starved, where's my 3rd mansion bernie
I don't know, literally, how you take in all this stuff... everything you talk about on this channel, there is a limit to thinking...but you seem to live independent of it. That 'is' a compliment.
An easy search: BIBLE + FREEMASONRY, through which lies and truth becomes easy listed. So far i have listed 28 lies and 28 truth. Have you started to dig? What have you found? What do you know about masonry club? About the evil rulers of this world, masons, what you know about them?
I read 10 of Wilber's books 20 years ago. He is the most brilliant author I've ever encountered. He claimed to write while in a non-dual state. His prose was spectacular. Genius and yet he isn't a household name
Really great video. What facinates me is the dynamics between the individual and the collective, how our individual experiences are seemingly internal and exteral at the same time and all seem to cohere into some shared collective world or world view. Some people would even deny that an internal collective even exists.
I know right! And I think that is the newest field to really be penetrated by consciousness. In many ways that work only seems to have begun in the 20th century. It's so hard to grasp and I think the reason for that is that it is still so new to consciousness, we still haven't planted enough flags in this domain to really feel good there. And with the people working in this quadrant we find that a lot of their is dismissed because it's not clear enough but to my mind that's just becuase they are the pioneers into new intellectual territory and just as the first pioneers into the farther reaches of consciousness obviously lacked accuracy definitely doesn't mean that their efforts should have been dismissed
@@TheLivingPhilosophy I feel that the times our societies have spent primarily in SD Blue and Green are most focussed on Q3 over Q1. And amongst individuals, I see the bias of self-oriented & Thinker types tend towards Q1 whereas tribe-oriented & feeler types lean more to the collective Q3 (interesting that Feeling / valuing seems to draw upon collective wisdom in a memetic way, where as logical processing seems to emphasise the individual more strongly). So I suspect that Q3 is not so much novel, as it is lost. Which is why we're now (in our culture) refocusing on primitive (purple) cultures to reclaim a connection with the Q3 collective consciousness.
@@ADHDMoneyandBusiness Dang that's absolutely fascinating Tristan. And actually you are spot on with Green and I guess with the Blue idea as well. I wonder then if it could be considered that the oscillation between the individualist side of the spiral and the tribal side of the spiral could then also be seen as an oscillation between the emphasis on the upper and the lower quadrants
@@TheLivingPhilosophy I would agree with that. I think that mechanic explains the 'culture wars' quite effectively. And is a common and constant part of civilization - you could even expand on it to say that's what enables complex cultures to grow and evolve more rapidly (the increased friction, like iron on iron, or the battling of ideas). It's also sadly a large cause of great wars, and likely very strongly at play in Russia right now. But more personally, it plays out in marriage a lot, and amongst peer groups.. or philosophers.
@@ADHDMoneyandBusiness Absolutely! I'm reading a lot of Foucult at the moment and he's talking about how war is the central mechanism for how culture evolves. Knowledge is (funnily enough with your choice of metaphor) the sparks that come off the sword - something entirely different to the iron of the swords that clash - and so the power evolves. It makes sense in the context of family, society and philosophy
Wow. Just wow. I have always found my different pursuits of knowledge (biology and neuroscience to philosophy and mythology; more recently geopolitics and social justice) to be quite disparate from eachother. This, this one video made me understand which quadrants of knowledge I operate from, towards understanding the the whole. You have yourself an enthusiastic new subscriber!!
This past summer, I went through an existential crisis. A friend I hadn’t seen in YEARS reached out and actually gifted me Wilber’s Book - No Boundary. It’s been one of the best books I’ve read. I studied philosophy in Uni, and received my bachelors in 2020. Wilber’s book was some of the best philosophical material I had the pleasure of consuming. Highly recommend.
This is such a good summary of Ken Wilber's lifetime of works in a mere 13 minutes. I first read one of his books in 1985 and have maintained an interest ever since then.
With a meta-compliment, I have to compliment your TH-cam handle! It exudes the grace of a nomen abstractum, rare in the intellectually demagnetized world of social media, where vulgarity is virtually a letter of introduction, an imperial emissary, an embossed professional card of less civilly roughshod times.
This is actually a great direction and motivation to learn. I always enjoy learning new things in general but since there’s so much in formation i couldn’t necessarily put the information into one big aspect. The four quadrants should be taught in schools that way students can choose which direction of knowledge they can dive into, and it makes learning everything feel more fulfilling.
It is taught in some places (first semester for my bachelor of psychology in Denmark, the leader of the institute focused on wilberts quadrants in order to give us a better way to organise different viewpoints)
I have been teaching the science behind Astrology for 30 years. The basic concept for 4000 years of this mindful awareness labeled Astrology, is that the space around us and the space within us gives us this sphere of influence that is displayed in the four quadrants of the one, the one surrounding itself in familiarity, the two, and the two surrounding itself with familiarity. This has been defined with what is called the cardinal cross that divides the sphere into these four quadrants. All that is, is defined by the characteristics we accept in a general way. These four seasons are the essence of our existence. In each quadrant there are three sections of expression, the birth of that sector, the focus/power and the release of power with adaptation. This is done in each quadrant, but through the four areas of the above. Twelve in to total, that gives us the well detailed characteristics that make up the human mind and experiences. We are at the edge of seeing these mental processes coming to a global acceptance. Thank you for your mindful talk. Dan
2:08 II, EI, IC, EC 2:48 Frued, Stoics, Buddhist, Husserel 4:42, 5:00 Instinct - We, Water, Worldview💧 5:32 Language’s Structure 6:37 Ends of Thought, Limits of Thought 💭 Limits of World Self - I, Me, Myself Brain 🧠 It Water 💧We, Culture 7:38 Exterior Collective 8:19 Outside background, -Intimate Interior- 9:01 Quadrants review 9:44 The Thinkers Mapped 11:44 Application of the Quadrants
The model reminds me of David Howe's Taxonomy of Social Work philosophy. Yes I think you are correct in saying they are useful in helping us to take a step back to see where in the scheme of thought a speaker is positioned. Very well explained. Thank you again.
Ken Wilber’s ideas have profoundly influenced me. From The four quadrants, to “Spiral Dynamics” theory, and ego development, to his ‘6 minutes to enlightenment’ TH-cam video, and non-dual philosophy. I always imagine the third axis from the base intersection of the four quadrants that the spiral dynamic development theory grows from, or the tree of Kabbalah grows in to the inner with its roots in the outer, or when considering an issue, spiraling around the quadrants for an integral perspective. More important than all this has been seeing the inner “I Am,” and realizing that we are not the objects of awareness, perceptual or conceptual; but, that we are pure consciousness, existence, bliss / spirit; and that transcendently, we are all one in consciousness. Peace, love, unity, respect! Ps. One of the best summaries of one of KW’s topics that I’ve heard!
This is a great way to explain the four quadrants! I will say although that for anyone to fully grasp the full context of the quadrants, watch the whole video, as watching the whole video, "allows us to take a step back and to give a more balanced appraisal of the situation."
Everything is connected. All the main studies of the human experience from Psychology, Philosophy, Anthropology, and Sociology all serve it's purposes on their own but if you attempt to draw knowledge from only one source as your main perspective, your worldview becomes rigid, stale, and limited. It's always best to learn from them all because when combined not only do you learn from one particular area you may have lacked understanding in and it teaches you wisdom that allows you to fully become whole as an individual
You might not read this, but let me just say: This is the definition of objectivity, we are all the same yet so different. ❤ Don't point fingers -MN Love you man. First vid I've watched from your channel.
If other videos are like this, I think I have found my new favourite channel. You tackle the most interesting topics, have clearly done great research while also having a calm manner about it. Many seem to be bitter when philosophy -politics-religion are on the line. But this video was very calm. Only new information to be absorbed. Awesome!
Thank you! I would say that the production value on this one is higher and something I'll be striving for more in future. The tone seems to be the same though (or so I think anyway)
Thanks for this. It's a helpful solution to the common problem of people " arguing past each other" Excellent brakedown in such a short amount of time.
Thank you for sharing. After a few hours of thinking, here is how I conceptualized it. 1. Knowledge of internal experience. 2. Knowledge of external experience. 3. Knowledge of aggregated effects of internal experience. 4. Knowledge of aggregated effects of external experience.
I got frustrated with Wilber when he started colour coding things and I moved on but this reminded me that the guy is an actual genius and his work will probably stand the test of time. Great graphics work BTW. It really helps.
Yes right! There's gold in his work for sure but yeah some of it just needs a bit of touching up or something. Thanks for noting the graphics I spent FAR more time than I intended working on them but I'm proud of how they turned out it definitely makes the information go down easier when it can be done right
@@_VISION. It's a reference to another model that Wilber uses a lot called Spiral Dynamics which is a developmental model comparable to Foucault's Traditionalist/Modernist/Postmodernist sequence but with more stages of evolution before and after
@@_VISION. ah I see. No idea. I wasn't too keen on wilber changing the colours after he fell out with Cowan but personally quite like the colour system in general so Peter will have to answer that himself
The topic of human knowledge is a great topic in philosophy and this video explains many of the great perspectives. I found myself attracted to each topic and saw how only being focused on one quadrant leads to much hostility in society.
Great video but he didn't mention what transcends and unites and all the quadrants, i.e. pure Spirit. Only when you get a taste of 'that' can you really start to balance out all of the separate quadrants.
this is by far the most astonishing philosophy video I ever watched on TH-cam, Your quadrants synthesis would make everyone understand human behaviour. very creative, objective, and innovative. well done !
That was a wonderful presentation. Great and easy to understand. It’s amazing that I instinctively knew all of theses four quadrants without even knowing I have been incorporating them my whole lives 😽
FORMIDABLE .KNOWLEDGE AND INTELLECTUAL REACH...YOU HAVE MANAGED ..TO FOCUS MY MIND ..AT A TIME WHEN I FELT SPREAD VERY THIN... WHAT A JOURNEY YOU HAVE STARTED .......!!....WISHING YOU the best..patience .resilience . Mental reach..wisdom and Energy to continue with this Journey....Your Contribution will be acknowledged felt and appreciated by Humanity at large and of scholars
As I continue to make sense of this complex world, it helps to have the help from people that are different than I am, that are at different points in their lives, and that are trying to do the same. Great video!
A truly balanced perspective presented in this video regarding multiple schools of thought that are often shown to be strongly opposed to one another. Well done!
You know I wasn't sure what I was expecting to find here as it was just something handed in by algorithm but by God this is some good stuff! Sufficiently explains a model for dealing in knowledge quadrant by quadrant of what they are and some examples. Quality work! I hope you'll blow up someday since this is a fine video
Its cool to see that every corner has its own fields of science, showing the nuance behind scientific philosophy. The First Quadrant is all about your mind; examinations of emotion and feelings. This would be the domain of sciences such as psychology, which directly focuses on how the mind works. The Second Quadrant focuses on the material world, and how to come to conclusions about it. Unsurprisingly, this is the domain of the hard sciences (as you pointed out): biology (the study of living organisms and how they change), chemistry (the study of matter and its properties), and physics (the study of the behavior of matter and energy). The Third Quandrant deals with culture and interpersonal values. This is the realm of the majority of the soft sciences, such as anthropology (the study of humans), archaeology (the study of history), and sociology (the study of culture). The Fourth Quadrant deals with the objectively measurable aspects of a society, such as poverty rates, its size, the demographics, etc. This doesn't just apply to human societies, but ecosystems as well. This is the domain of political science, such as geography (the study of the land and its inhabitants), economics (the study of currency), and politics (the study of government). If I were to reduce it down to single words, I'd do it like this: Q1 = Mind Q2 = Body Q3 = Culture Q4 = Society
I think another good example of a philosopher focused on Q3 that wasn't mentioned is Slavoj Zizek. His philosophy is primarily centered around what he calls ideology, the invisible force behind everything in our physical, exterior, and collective experiences, and how that invisible ideological force impacts, molds, and influences the individual. If I understood it correctly, Q3 seems to be observing exactly what Zizek comments on, hidden or concealed individual experiences that come as a product of the external world.
Ah good stuff! I was just reading an article by him this morning. I really enjoy the guy and am looking forward to learning more about him in future but as of now I still don't know enough to say where he fits so I appreciate the comment and it makes me want to study him all the more
@@TheLivingPhilosophy hes a great read! definitely puts something new on the table when it comes to philosophy and culture criticism--not just his ideas in themselves but the way in which he arrives at those ideas is totally mindboggling. every page makes you scream to yourself, "how could i be so dumb, this stuff has been right under my nose and i couldn't see it until now!". shilling for zizek aside, your video was amazing and one of the first videos ive actually given a thumbs up on in a good while. keep it up, good shit man :)
This is like the pinnacle of your work. All of your videos merging into one meta perspective. Speaking of meta, perhaps Ken Wilber is the core meta-modernist we need today?
Thank you! The metamodernism of Hanzi Freinacht actually developed out of Wilber's work and I would even describe it as a secularising of Wilber's work in a more generally appealing and relevant form - though it's more focussed on the developmental part than it is on this map but yeah delighted you enjoyed it and it is indeed a great merging of all I've been talking about! It took a while to put it together but it was worth doing so to get it right!
Jordon Peterson is vocal about individuals taking responsibility for there actions in life. I really enjoyed how you compartmentalized the different internal and external realms of reality. Keep it up!
Thank you for your hard work creating this content. I like to see some longer videos or longer podcasts, cause I definitely like to hear more and go deeper in these subjects that you talk about. Good Luck
Thanks a million Amir! There are podcasts on the horizon I am excited about getting into deeper and longer chats but I'm just trying to get in control of the creating videos bit for now because I'm still running into a lot of my personal hangups around creative process in this work but I'm hoping next year I can start dialoguing with the great minds out there
This is the first of your videos that's been recommended to me. I took a look through your channel and I have to say it looks very interesting. I'll definitely be sticking around.
Thank you sir, it's been a while since I see quality content that wraps up the whole human experience in an entertaining format with good edition. Congratulations. Hi from Colombia
Wow, this video really shed some light on things for me! Thanks a bunch for sharing this. I'm definitely going to give it another watch to let it all sink in. It's amazing how certain content can really resonate and leave you wanting more. Can't wait to dive back in!
This is incredible. Aligns so much with Carl Jung. He invented the ideas of extroversion and introversion as well as the idea of the collective/Individual unconscious
Life is so short and its conditions together with our own physical limitations does a whole lot to really boost the value of developing a single satisfactorily balanced thought or understanding of some principle or another. This is a truly beautiful tool and I'm incredibly grateful to have had its value demonstrated to me in such a concise and eloquent manner, as well as to its developer, Ken Wilber, of course. Thanks so much, Mr. Cussen. You rock.
Language speaks: The limits of my language means the limits of my world because the world is my ideas and their representations since what I believe about life and the universe becomes true for me for god is the dreamer.
I love this. A very concise way of distilling not only how we think about things, but also how conflict so easily arises. I know it's probably a dumb thing to do, but I often find myself reading comments in TH-cam videos, for instance (since we're here), and am nearly always - still - shocked at how quickly arguments occur. And they're more often than not started - and perpetuated - by people with polarized ideologies. And regardless of ideology, one can certainly see Wittgenstein's view at play: That the limits of one's language is the limit of one's world, and I'd say the reverse is clearly true as well.
What a great video. It really was a very accessible introduction to this work and the analogies were fantastic to help explain the concepts. I especially liked the river and hunger examples. I’ll be mulling this over for a while. SUBSCRIBED! Thanks 😀
Thanks for taking the time to share this model of Wilber in such a clear way. It has helped me to make sense of what is, most of the time, a confusing field of seemingly competing views and perspectives.
Learning philosophy with science, the science's great leap of the Information Era. We are at the peak of Q2 (or Q4) in the 2020s, soon everyone will become a scientist, and knowledge will become money.
Ken Wilber can be a good starting point but when one wants to get to truly integral synthesis beyond mere intellectual speculation, one can go to Sri Aurobindo's works starting with the Life Divine and the Human Cycle.
what is most often referred to as a genius is someone who expresses himself from his experiences of the world or an understanding of things from his authentic self and so therefore what the normal individual is is that basically he is like everybody else and not something unique and thinks like everybody else and merely accepts what he has read in the books without questioning them and so therefore one must be careful of reading too much for one might become too dense like a hot lava turned dry. they key is to always use your own intellect with what you read
I just watched your continental vs analytical philosophy talk, and now this one. Very nicely explained-I understood some things I hadn’t previously. Thank you!!
i just watched the video and i just wanted to say this is changing my life. im definetly going to read both books but i already know and feel the impact, it is exactly what my intuition was thriving to all the time. feeling blessed rn☝️🙏💯🤣 might come back in a few months to actually look at the difference, nah shit im definetly coming back i know i wont forget this
joyful to find this video and your channel. After learning all the siblings of concepts, I'm able to find the parents of all concepts which I can use to structure the different knowledge that I have. Thankiu ❤
Really exceptional piece of content. Structured and insightful. Can the next video be regarding mapping out how to aquire the basic fundamental knowledge for each quadrant.
Absolutely great video! I love your work. I just want to point out that when using fMRI there typically is no need for any type of dye, unless you're interested in tractography (studying the projections of neural axons between brain regions). Not needing dye is the main advantage of fMRI over PET as a neuroimaging technique. When looking at fluctuations of the BOLD signal, the way one would image the changes in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex you set as an example, all you need is a willing participant :)
Ineffective instincts (Evil) are often just habits which can be elmininated or turned into the opposite effective habit (Virtue) by patience (a good habit) and persistance (another good habit).
Excellent explanation, thank you, you are a great teacher. This is an example of the value that the internet and social media can bring to one’s life...
Great video! (Concise and wide ranging.) There are no "little corners of reality," but there are many perspectives of reality, and some of those perspectives are batshit crazy.
Love the channel? Love supporting things? Check out the Patreon page:
💸 Patreon: patreon.com/thelivingphilosophy
⌛ Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction: A Map of Reality
01:44 What are the four quadrants?
2:34 Q1 - Internal Individual
3:09 Q2 - External Individual
4:22 Q3 - Internal Collective
7:07 Q4 - External Collective
9:00 As a map of knowledge
11:27 As defuser of intellectual conflicts
maybe if you have a speech disability don't narrate shit?
Of all eight thousand million persons currently residing on this planet, you are undoubtedly the MOST holy, wise and enlightened of them all, Sir!
So obviously, you are VEGAN, since it would be extremely incongruous for a great sage such as yourself to be an animal-abusing criminal, correct? 😁
@@ReverendDr.Thomas I am vegetarian, but not vegan, because all vegetarian things can be produced without causing suffering, being vegan is like not using words, because others use words in order to cause suffering, it's pompous and pretentious, unless vegan is someone's actual taste.
I'm not sure what does that have to do with this comment section though.
@@ricardosantos6721 The term "VEGAN" refers to the philosophy of avoiding undue harm to any animal life, as far as practical, whilst "vegetarian" is merely someone who consumes a plant-based diet.
Therefore, veganism is NOT a diet but a moral or ethical position against animal exploitation of any kind. 🌱
So, you ADMIT that you’re an animal-abusing criminal, Mr. Cow-teat-suckler? 😬🙄😬
hello!
This must be the FIRST time I've ever watched anyone trying to be as objective as they can be, trying to combine different perceptions and find the separate truths of each viewpoint while attempting to integrate them in a respectful way!
Haha that's a good way of putting it Eternal! It's something that always stuck with me from Wittgenstein - combining snapshots to form the fullest sketch of the truth which is the closest we will get - the more perspectives the better (if we can organise them of course)
I appreciate objectivity and care put into this presentation. My first experience with his work. Subscribed.
🐟 03. CONCEPTS Vs THE TRUTH:
The term “TRUTH” (“satyam”, “tathya”, “tattva”, or “siddhānta”, in Sanskrit) is one of the most greatly-misused words in the English tongue.
Anything that has ever been written or spoken, by even the greatest sage or Avatar (incarnation of Divinity), including every single postulation within this Holiest of Holy Scriptures, “F.I.S.H”, is merely a CONCEPT and not “The Truth”, at least in the Absolute sense of the term.
A concept is either accurate or inaccurate. Virtually all concepts are inaccurate to a degree. However, some concepts are far more accurate than others. For example, the personal conception of Ultimate Reality (God or The Goddess) is inaccurate to a large extent (see Chapter 07). The concept of Ultimate Reality being singular (“All is One”) is far more accurate. The transcendence of BOTH the above concepts (non-duality) is excruciatingly accurate. However, none of these concepts is “The Truth” as such, since all ideas are relative, whilst The Truth is Absolute.
A BELIEF is an unhealthy and somewhat problematic relationship one has with a certain concept, due to misapprehension of life as it is, objectively-speaking. Attachment to beliefs, particularly in the presumption of individual free-will, is the cause of psychological suffering.
It is VITALLY important to distinguish between relative truth and Absolute Truth. Relative truth is temporal, mutable, subjective, dependent, immanent, differentiated, conditioned, finite, complex, reducible, imperfect, and contingent, whilst Absolute Truth is eternal, immutable, objective, independent, transcendent, undifferentiated, unconditional, infinite, non-dual (i.e. simple), irreducible, perfect, and necessary.
Absolute Truth is the ground of all being (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit), and is prior to any mind, matter, name, form, intent, thought, word, or deed.
Good and bad are RELATIVE - what may be good or bad can vary according to temporal circumstances and according to personal preferences. For example, there is absolutely no doubt that citrus fruits are a good source of nutrients for human beings. However, it may be bad to consume such beneficial foods when one is experiencing certain illnesses, such as chronic dysentery. ‘One man's food is another man's poison.'
Because of the relative nature of goodness, anything that is considered to be good must also be bad to a certain degree, since the extent of goodness is determined by the purpose of the object in question. As demonstrated, citrus fruits can be either good or bad, depending on its use. Is drinking arsenic good or bad? Well, if one wishes to remain alive, it is obviously bad, but for one who wants to die, it is obviously good.
However, beyond the dichotomy of good and bad, is the Eternal Truth, which transcends mundane relativism. Therefore, the accomplishment of life is to rise above the subjective “good” and “bad”, and abide in the transcendental sphere. A qualified spiritual preceptor is able to guide one in the intricacies of such transcendence. Such a person, who has transcended mundane relative truth, is said to be an ENLIGHTENED soul.
When making moral judgements, it is more appropriate to use the terms “moral”, “amoral”, or “immoral”, rather than “good/bad” or “right/wrong”. As the Bard of Avon so rightly declared in the script for one of his plays, there is nothing that is INTRINSICALLY either good or bad but “thinking makes it so”. At the time of writing (early twenty-first century), especially in the Anglosphere, most persons seem to use the dichotomy of “good/evil” rather than “good/bad” and “holy/evil”, most probably because they consider that “holiness” is exclusively a religious term. However, the terms “holy” and “righteous” are fundamentally synonymous, for they refer to a person or an act that is fully in accordance with pure, holy, and righteous principles (“dharma”, in Sanskrit). So a holy person is one who obeys the law of “non-harm” (“ahiṃsā”, in Sanskrit), and as the ancient Sanskrit axiom states: “ahiṃsā paramo dharmaḥ” (non-violence is the highest moral virtue or law), and “ahiṃsā param satyam” (non-violence is the highest truth). See the Anuśāsana Parva of “Mahābhārata”, 13.117.37-38.
The ONLY Real Truth in the phenomenal manifestation is the impersonal sense of being, that is, the sense of “I am” (“aham”, in Sanskrit).
Everything else is merely transient and unreal (“unreal” for that very reason - because it is ever-mutating, lacking permanence and stability).
This sense of quiddity is otherwise called “Infinite Awareness”, “Spirit”, “God”, “The Ground of Being”, “Necessary Existence“, “The Higher Self”, as well as various other epithets, for it is the very essence of one’s being. Chapters 06 and 10 deal more fully with this subject matter.
Of course, for one who is fully self-realized and enlightened, the subject-object duality has collapsed. Therefore, a fully-awakened individual does not perceive any REAL difference between himself and the external world, and so, sees everything in himself, and himself in everything.
If it is true that there are none so blind as those who don’t WANT to see, and none so deaf as those who don’t WANT to hear, then surely, there are none so ignorant as those who don’t WANT to learn the truth.
Obviously, in the previous sentence, and in most other references to the word “truth” within this book, it is meant “the most accurate concept possible”, or at least “an extremely accurate fact”.
For example, as clearly demonstrated in Chapters 21 and 22, it is undoubtedly “true” (accurate) that a divinely-instituted monarchy is the most beneficial form of national governance, but that is not the Absolute Truth, which is the impersonal, never-changing foundation of all being.
So, to put it succinctly, all “truths” are relative concepts (even if they are very accurate) but the Universal Self alone is REAL (Absolute) Truth.
“In the absence of both the belief ‘I am the body’ and in the absence of the belief that ‘I am not the body’, what is left is what we really are.
We don’t need to define what we really are. We don’t need to create a thought to tell us what we are. What we are is what TRUTH is."
*************
“God is not something ‘out-there, looking-in’, but God (or Source) has BECOME all of This.
So, God is the Underlying Principle of all of this - the Energy or the Consciousness.
The (psycho-physical) manifestation has arisen within Consciousness as an imagination in the mind of Source.”
Roger Castillo,
Australian Spiritual Teacher, 15/07/2015.
“I am the TRUTH...” “...and the TRUTH shall set you free”.
Lord Jesus Christ,
John 14:16 and 8:32.
thats the m goal for me
We need to hang out like minded. Individuals. The ones who are wierd are the most interesting 🧐
I've long been aware that science has its limitations; the mind is more than just a composition of flesh, fat, and bones, and emotions extend beyond mere muscle and tissue. I understood that various philosophies address these aspects individually, but it now becomes clear that a comprehensive understanding requires a range of diverse philosophies, rather than a single unified theory. This perspective helps me appreciate the complexity of the human experience.
The objective is an abstraction of the subjective, not the other way around;)
@planetsaturnclub
How can we be aware of something there is no evidence for?
I was desprately in search of a Channel that could provide me with these kind of knowldge & intellectual based mental stimulation. & Now I Got It
You mention going to a foreign county looking at a culture but not being inside of it. Looking at it as an outsider. For sure I spent most of my life as a sort of outsider in my own culture. And still to this day I feel like a bit of an outsider. I've never embraced patriotism, never made sense to me, and I spent 15 years seeking answers to life's big questions rather than just going with the flow of whatever my surrounding culture told me to think and do. I was even accused of having autism once. It's not that I can't engage, I can. It's that I chose not too for a variety of personal reasons involving multiple tragedies that left me feeling cold. I experienced first hand the brutality of my species and the coldness of an unemotional universe. We live in a world of dichotomies. Seemingly the ones screaming loudest about positivity and inclusion are only too willing to be negative and exclude those who disagree with them. We talk of human rights and protecting the vulnerable while we demonize those on the margins of our society and slaughter the unborn by the thousands in this country each year. We speak of animal rights and are appauled at a man kicking a dog but scoff down burgers and ribs by the truck loads. I've worked in slaughterhouses. I've seen the terror and misery those animals endure in their last moments. But we would almost turn the men who do the killing into national herpes because they preserve our lives. What people really seek is personal certainty and personal success but most are deeply confused and understand the issues they bark on about only at the most basic level. We create boogey men out of our enemies and heroes out of those who confirm our prejudices. The reality is a lot more mundane and also a lot scarier. Likened to the Holocaust it was a mundane daily activity of the grossest violence towards our own species we've ever seen in history. The Incas probably came close though. They incorporated human sacrifice into their daily lives and I'm pretty sure mothers went on loving their children and father's provided a living while they watched their fellow beings slaughtered by the thousands to appease the gods. I can't help but feel that in spite of our best efforts we are still deeply irrational creatures with the few of us trying extremely hard to make sense out of it all, and coming to differing conclusions and fighting each other over it...
Your intuition hasn't misled you. Culture is not our friend and there is no need to play along with it.
wow thanks for taking the time to write this!
When I looked at clip I first thought it was a political compass before I read the title. Einstein as an authoritarian right winger. Freud as an authoritarian left winger. Nietzsche as a left libertarian. Marx as a right libertarian. It gave me a chuckle.
libertarian left is nooooooot a thing. see mr irish men theyre racist, keep freud out yo mouth hes daddy to the surrealist who unfortunately claimed anarch socialist but died millionaires while members starved, where's my 3rd mansion bernie
poser
damn 😂
me too
Funny because everyone is wrong
I was watching a Ken Wilbur interview and I came back here to understand him better before continuing!
Thanks Dean! Was it the one with David Fuller? Glad this could be a resource for you
@@TheLivingPhilosophy yes, exactly! Yes, thanks so much!
@@doyle6000 Ah good stuff. Not sure what Wilber was thinking with his hair in later videos but it's certainly distinctive and his chat makes up for it
I don't know, literally, how you take in all this stuff... everything you talk about on this channel, there is a limit to thinking...but you seem to live independent of it. That 'is' a compliment.
An easy search: BIBLE + FREEMASONRY, through which lies and truth becomes easy listed.
So far i have listed 28 lies and 28 truth.
Have you started to dig? What have you found?
What do you know about masonry club?
About the evil rulers of this world, masons, what you know about them?
I read 10 of Wilber's books 20 years ago. He is the most brilliant author I've ever encountered. He claimed to write while in a non-dual state. His prose was spectacular. Genius and yet he isn't a household name
Really great video. What facinates me is the dynamics between the individual and the collective, how our individual experiences are seemingly internal and exteral at the same time and all seem to cohere into some shared collective world or world view. Some people would even deny that an internal collective even exists.
I know right! And I think that is the newest field to really be penetrated by consciousness. In many ways that work only seems to have begun in the 20th century. It's so hard to grasp and I think the reason for that is that it is still so new to consciousness, we still haven't planted enough flags in this domain to really feel good there. And with the people working in this quadrant we find that a lot of their is dismissed because it's not clear enough but to my mind that's just becuase they are the pioneers into new intellectual territory and just as the first pioneers into the farther reaches of consciousness obviously lacked accuracy definitely doesn't mean that their efforts should have been dismissed
@@TheLivingPhilosophy I feel that the times our societies have spent primarily in SD Blue and Green are most focussed on Q3 over Q1. And amongst individuals, I see the bias of self-oriented & Thinker types tend towards Q1 whereas tribe-oriented & feeler types lean more to the collective Q3 (interesting that Feeling / valuing seems to draw upon collective wisdom in a memetic way, where as logical processing seems to emphasise the individual more strongly). So I suspect that Q3 is not so much novel, as it is lost. Which is why we're now (in our culture) refocusing on primitive (purple) cultures to reclaim a connection with the Q3 collective consciousness.
@@ADHDMoneyandBusiness Dang that's absolutely fascinating Tristan. And actually you are spot on with Green and I guess with the Blue idea as well. I wonder then if it could be considered that the oscillation between the individualist side of the spiral and the tribal side of the spiral could then also be seen as an oscillation between the emphasis on the upper and the lower quadrants
@@TheLivingPhilosophy I would agree with that. I think that mechanic explains the 'culture wars' quite effectively. And is a common and constant part of civilization - you could even expand on it to say that's what enables complex cultures to grow and evolve more rapidly (the increased friction, like iron on iron, or the battling of ideas). It's also sadly a large cause of great wars, and likely very strongly at play in Russia right now. But more personally, it plays out in marriage a lot, and amongst peer groups.. or philosophers.
@@ADHDMoneyandBusiness Absolutely! I'm reading a lot of Foucult at the moment and he's talking about how war is the central mechanism for how culture evolves. Knowledge is (funnily enough with your choice of metaphor) the sparks that come off the sword - something entirely different to the iron of the swords that clash - and so the power evolves. It makes sense in the context of family, society and philosophy
Wow. Just wow. I have always found my different pursuits of knowledge (biology and neuroscience to philosophy and mythology; more recently geopolitics and social justice) to be quite disparate from eachother. This, this one video made me understand which quadrants of knowledge I operate from, towards understanding the the whole.
You have yourself an enthusiastic new subscriber!!
Politics, Philosophy, Psychology and Physics. Perfect! ❤
This past summer, I went through an existential crisis. A friend I hadn’t seen in YEARS reached out and actually gifted me Wilber’s Book - No Boundary. It’s been one of the best books I’ve read. I studied philosophy in Uni, and received my bachelors in 2020. Wilber’s book was some of the best philosophical material I had the pleasure of consuming. Highly recommend.
My favourite subject from each quadrant:
Q1: Zen Buddhism, Panentheism
Q2: Extended Reality, AI
Q3: Hip-Hop Culture
Q4: Digital Revolution
How is general relativity a part of Individual system?
@@Fiery_wings1q2 is individual external
@@Fiery_wings1hmmm quantum mechanics?
Interesting as current trend in the digital revolution basically mutes the Q4 connection to the individual almost entirely
Although this comment is evidence to the contrary
Thank you for making Ken Wilber " bite size" to understand and digest. This is a fantastic video. Thank you and congratulations.
Thanks a million Indrani!
This is such a good summary of Ken Wilber's lifetime of works in a mere 13 minutes. I first read one of his books in 1985 and have maintained an interest ever since then.
Ah wow thanks a million Richard that genuinely means a lot!
Good and bad are RELATIVE. 😉
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
With a meta-compliment, I have to compliment your TH-cam handle! It exudes the grace of a nomen abstractum, rare in the intellectually demagnetized world of social media, where vulgarity is virtually a letter of introduction, an imperial emissary, an embossed professional card of less civilly roughshod times.
We'll all be vegan soon brother
This is actually a great direction and motivation to learn. I always enjoy learning new things in general but since there’s so much in formation i couldn’t necessarily put the information into one big aspect. The four quadrants should be taught in schools that way students can choose which direction of knowledge they can dive into, and it makes learning everything feel more fulfilling.
You're very right. I really wish this had been taught in school
I think this should be thought in school, but not to go into one direction but to concider all of them while thinking
It is taught in some places (first semester for my bachelor of psychology in Denmark, the leader of the institute focused on wilberts quadrants in order to give us a better way to organise different viewpoints)
They'll never teach any truth in school. They dont want anybody smarter than them and overthrowing the govt
I have been teaching the science behind Astrology for 30 years. The basic concept for 4000 years of this mindful awareness labeled Astrology, is that the space around us and the space within us gives us this sphere of influence that is displayed in the four quadrants of the one, the one surrounding itself in familiarity, the two, and the two surrounding itself with familiarity. This has been defined with what is called the cardinal cross that divides the sphere into these four quadrants. All that is, is defined by the characteristics we accept in a general way. These four seasons are the essence of our existence. In each quadrant there are three sections of expression, the birth of that sector, the focus/power and the release of power with adaptation. This is done in each quadrant, but through the four areas of the above. Twelve in to total, that gives us the well detailed characteristics that make up the human mind and experiences. We are at the edge of seeing these mental processes coming to a global acceptance. Thank you for your mindful talk.
Dan
2:08 II, EI, IC, EC
2:48 Frued, Stoics, Buddhist, Husserel
4:42, 5:00 Instinct - We, Water, Worldview💧
5:32 Language’s Structure
6:37 Ends of Thought, Limits of Thought 💭 Limits of World
Self - I, Me, Myself
Brain 🧠 It
Water 💧We, Culture
7:38 Exterior Collective
8:19 Outside background, -Intimate Interior-
9:01 Quadrants review
9:44 The Thinkers Mapped
11:44 Application of the Quadrants
I've been seeing you on so many philosophical videos. Didn't you time stamp the entirety of Thus Spoke Zarathustra?
Finally, I felt you were going into this direction. Happy to have you touch on Wilber
Hahaha I've gone full Wilber Tobias 😂
The model reminds me of David Howe's Taxonomy of Social Work philosophy. Yes I think you are correct in saying they are useful in helping us to take a step back to see where in the scheme of thought a speaker is positioned. Very well explained. Thank you again.
Ken Wilber’s ideas have profoundly influenced me. From The four quadrants, to “Spiral Dynamics” theory, and ego development, to his ‘6 minutes to enlightenment’ TH-cam video, and non-dual philosophy. I always imagine the third axis from the base intersection of the four quadrants that the spiral dynamic development theory grows from, or the tree of Kabbalah grows in to the inner with its roots in the outer, or when considering an issue, spiraling around the quadrants for an integral perspective.
More important than all this has been seeing the inner “I Am,” and realizing that we are not the objects of awareness, perceptual or conceptual; but, that we are pure consciousness, existence, bliss / spirit; and that transcendently, we are all one in consciousness. Peace, love, unity, respect! Ps. One of the best summaries of one of KW’s topics that I’ve heard!
This is a great way to explain the four quadrants! I will say although that for anyone to fully grasp the full context of the quadrants, watch the whole video, as watching the whole video, "allows us to take a step back and to give a more balanced appraisal of the situation."
Everything is connected. All the main studies of the human experience from Psychology, Philosophy, Anthropology, and Sociology all serve it's purposes on their own but if you attempt to draw knowledge from only one source as your main perspective, your worldview becomes rigid, stale, and limited. It's always best to learn from them all because when combined not only do you learn from one particular area you may have lacked understanding in and it teaches you wisdom that allows you to fully become whole as an individual
Ken is a Genius he changed my life! A true master.
You might not read this, but let me just say:
This is the definition of objectivity, we are all the same yet so different. ❤
Don't point fingers -MN
Love you man. First vid I've watched from your channel.
If other videos are like this, I think I have found my new favourite channel. You tackle the most interesting topics, have clearly done great research while also having a calm manner about it. Many seem to be bitter when philosophy -politics-religion are on the line. But this video was very calm. Only new information to be absorbed. Awesome!
Thank you! I would say that the production value on this one is higher and something I'll be striving for more in future. The tone seems to be the same though (or so I think anyway)
@@TheLivingPhilosophy Good enough for me. Hope your channel grows and your new videos do well!
@@μαριοςΚαπετανοπουλος Thanks a million!
Thanks for this. It's a helpful solution to the common problem of people " arguing past each other" Excellent brakedown in such a short amount of time.
What a gem I have found here! Thank you very much for this thought-provoking video, well done!
This is a topic I didn't know that i needed to know about. Thank you for the in-depth explanation of this!
I could have woken up, watched this video, and gone back to sleep and it would have been a great day.
Thank you for sharing.
After a few hours of thinking, here is how I conceptualized it.
1. Knowledge of internal experience.
2. Knowledge of external experience.
3. Knowledge of aggregated effects of internal experience.
4. Knowledge of aggregated effects of external experience.
The thumbnail is spot on, literally the four horse men of Germany.
we're forgetting somebody 🧑🏻🎨🖼️
Freud was Austrian.
Nietzche literally solos karl marx's philosophies about life and human behavior, pretty dishonourable to german people but also shows a realistic side
This was the best one I've found in describing the four quadrants. Nicely done combo of clear explanation along with compelling video. Well done!
I got frustrated with Wilber when he started colour coding things and I moved on but this reminded me that the guy is an actual genius and his work will probably stand the test of time. Great graphics work BTW. It really helps.
Yes right! There's gold in his work for sure but yeah some of it just needs a bit of touching up or something. Thanks for noting the graphics I spent FAR more time than I intended working on them but I'm proud of how they turned out it definitely makes the information go down easier when it can be done right
Why do you care so much about colors?
@@_VISION. It's a reference to another model that Wilber uses a lot called Spiral Dynamics which is a developmental model comparable to Foucault's Traditionalist/Modernist/Postmodernist sequence but with more stages of evolution before and after
@@TheLivingPhilosophy I'm aware of what that is but what's the guys problem with it?
@@_VISION. ah I see. No idea. I wasn't too keen on wilber changing the colours after he fell out with Cowan but personally quite like the colour system in general so Peter will have to answer that himself
Probably the best video I’ve watched this year
Thanks!
Thank you Cliff!
The topic of human knowledge is a great topic in philosophy and this video explains many of the great perspectives. I found myself attracted to each topic and saw how only being focused on one quadrant leads to much hostility in society.
Great video but he didn't mention what transcends and unites and all the quadrants, i.e. pure Spirit. Only when you get a taste of 'that' can you really start to balance out all of the separate quadrants.
Man…. GREAT GREAT video my brother . Congratulations. I wish you keep this going
Absolutely brilliant video. Really rich and so much to absorb. I’ve had to watch it twice and I’m bound to come back to it.
Awesome Dylan delighted you enjoyed it!
This video really strike me alot, offcures our lives are viewed through these quadrants lets plunge in .......I really appreciate your effort THANKS
I read about this in Wilber's books years ago. It's almost criminal that more people have never heard of it.
Book name?
@@mrkipi8074 Watch the video, the author has already suggested 2 books. Theory of everything and Sex something, both by Ken Wilber.
Sex, Ecology, Spirituality… it’s a thrill to read.
This was one of the best vids I've seen in a very long time
Delighted you enjoyed it!
this is by far the most astonishing philosophy video I ever watched on TH-cam, Your quadrants synthesis would make everyone understand human behaviour. very creative, objective, and innovative. well done !
Seriously true, exceptionally articulate!
Wow... this is the best structured analysis of humans experience. Thank you very much for this usefull work
That was a wonderful presentation. Great and easy to understand. It’s amazing that I instinctively knew all of theses four quadrants without even knowing I have been incorporating them my whole lives 😽
Such a beautiful classification of Human experience. You're indeed a very educated person and nonetheless a modern day philosopher.
Very well done, mate. Such an excellent intro to the 4Q. Thanks for putting this together.
Thanks Christian!
FORMIDABLE .KNOWLEDGE AND INTELLECTUAL REACH...YOU HAVE MANAGED ..TO FOCUS MY MIND ..AT A TIME WHEN I FELT SPREAD VERY THIN...
WHAT A JOURNEY YOU HAVE STARTED .......!!....WISHING YOU the best..patience .resilience . Mental reach..wisdom and Energy to continue with this Journey....Your Contribution will be acknowledged felt and appreciated by Humanity at large and of scholars
As I continue to make sense of this complex world, it helps to have the help from people that are different than I am, that are at different points in their lives, and that are trying to do the same. Great video!
A truly balanced perspective presented in this video regarding multiple schools of thought that are often shown to be strongly opposed to one another. Well done!
You know I wasn't sure what I was expecting to find here as it was just something handed in by algorithm but by God this is some good stuff! Sufficiently explains a model for dealing in knowledge quadrant by quadrant of what they are and some examples. Quality work! I hope you'll blow up someday since this is a fine video
Haha delighted to hear it Axel and thank you for the kind words!
Yep there is is, the most unbiased video I've ever seen on TH-cam. Great video!
Its cool to see that every corner has its own fields of science, showing the nuance behind scientific philosophy.
The First Quadrant is all about your mind; examinations of emotion and feelings. This would be the domain of sciences such as psychology, which directly focuses on how the mind works.
The Second Quadrant focuses on the material world, and how to come to conclusions about it. Unsurprisingly, this is the domain of the hard sciences (as you pointed out): biology (the study of living organisms and how they change), chemistry (the study of matter and its properties), and physics (the study of the behavior of matter and energy).
The Third Quandrant deals with culture and interpersonal values. This is the realm of the majority of the soft sciences, such as anthropology (the study of humans), archaeology (the study of history), and sociology (the study of culture).
The Fourth Quadrant deals with the objectively measurable aspects of a society, such as poverty rates, its size, the demographics, etc. This doesn't just apply to human societies, but ecosystems as well. This is the domain of political science, such as geography (the study of the land and its inhabitants), economics (the study of currency), and politics (the study of government).
If I were to reduce it down to single words, I'd do it like this:
Q1 = Mind
Q2 = Body
Q3 = Culture
Q4 = Society
Grazie.
grazie mille Umberto!
I think another good example of a philosopher focused on Q3 that wasn't mentioned is Slavoj Zizek. His philosophy is primarily centered around what he calls ideology, the invisible force behind everything in our physical, exterior, and collective experiences, and how that invisible ideological force impacts, molds, and influences the individual. If I understood it correctly, Q3 seems to be observing exactly what Zizek comments on, hidden or concealed individual experiences that come as a product of the external world.
Ah good stuff! I was just reading an article by him this morning. I really enjoy the guy and am looking forward to learning more about him in future but as of now I still don't know enough to say where he fits so I appreciate the comment and it makes me want to study him all the more
@@TheLivingPhilosophy hes a great read! definitely puts something new on the table when it comes to philosophy and culture criticism--not just his ideas in themselves but the way in which he arrives at those ideas is totally mindboggling. every page makes you scream to yourself, "how could i be so dumb, this stuff has been right under my nose and i couldn't see it until now!". shilling for zizek aside, your video was amazing and one of the first videos ive actually given a thumbs up on in a good while. keep it up, good shit man :)
@@amgroblin5898 haha amazing!
Wow! Just wow!! no fluff, no garbage, no bias, awesome. Keep up the good work.
Thanks a million!
This is like the pinnacle of your work. All of your videos merging into one meta perspective. Speaking of meta, perhaps Ken Wilber is the core meta-modernist we need today?
Thank you! The metamodernism of Hanzi Freinacht actually developed out of Wilber's work and I would even describe it as a secularising of Wilber's work in a more generally appealing and relevant form - though it's more focussed on the developmental part than it is on this map but yeah delighted you enjoyed it and it is indeed a great merging of all I've been talking about! It took a while to put it together but it was worth doing so to get it right!
Jordon Peterson is vocal about individuals taking responsibility for there actions in life. I really enjoyed how you compartmentalized the different internal and external realms of reality. Keep it up!
Thank you for your hard work creating this content. I like to see some longer videos or longer podcasts, cause I definitely like to hear more and go deeper in these subjects that you talk about.
Good Luck
Thanks a million Amir! There are podcasts on the horizon I am excited about getting into deeper and longer chats but I'm just trying to get in control of the creating videos bit for now because I'm still running into a lot of my personal hangups around creative process in this work but I'm hoping next year I can start dialoguing with the great minds out there
This is the first of your videos that's been recommended to me. I took a look through your channel and I have to say it looks very interesting. I'll definitely be sticking around.
Ah awesome Blake!! Welcome aboard!!
Thank you sir, it's been a while since I see quality content that wraps up the whole human experience in an entertaining format with good edition. Congratulations.
Hi from Colombia
Delighted you enjoyed it!
Wow, this video really shed some light on things for me! Thanks a bunch for sharing this. I'm definitely going to give it another watch to let it all sink in. It's amazing how certain content can really resonate and leave you wanting more. Can't wait to dive back in!
This is incredible. Aligns so much with Carl Jung. He invented the ideas of extroversion and introversion as well as the idea of the collective/Individual unconscious
i hope you make a lengthier video on the same , giving us a deeper dive into this !! great work !
Life is so short and its conditions together with our own physical limitations does a whole lot to really boost the value of developing a single satisfactorily balanced thought or understanding of some principle or another.
This is a truly beautiful tool and I'm incredibly grateful to have had its value demonstrated to me in such a concise and eloquent manner, as well as to its developer, Ken Wilber, of course.
Thanks so much, Mr. Cussen. You rock.
Thanks Mark glad you got so much from it!
Let’s all give a thumbs up if we think this video deserves more views!
Language speaks:
The limits of my language means the limits of my world because the world is my ideas and their representations since what I believe about life and the universe becomes true for me for god is the dreamer.
Damn
I love your thumbnails! What a piece of work!!
what is the analogy to humans being more like bacteria vs cancer ? that sounds super interesting I've never heard it in that way
I think the music a person loves embodies all of the four quadrants!
I love this. A very concise way of distilling not only how we think about things, but also how conflict so easily arises. I know it's probably a dumb thing to do, but I often find myself reading comments in TH-cam videos, for instance (since we're here), and am nearly always - still - shocked at how quickly arguments occur. And they're more often than not started - and perpetuated - by people with polarized ideologies. And regardless of ideology, one can certainly see Wittgenstein's view at play: That the limits of one's language is the limit of one's world, and I'd say the reverse is clearly true as well.
What a great video. It really was a very accessible introduction to this work and the analogies were fantastic to help explain the concepts. I especially liked the river and hunger examples. I’ll be mulling this over for a while. SUBSCRIBED! Thanks 😀
This video was incredibly insightful, interesting and educational
And you’ve convinced me to read Wilber
Thank you!
Deligted to hear it Michael thank you!!
Our minds, the earth, the arts, survival.
The simplified version:
Q1 Spiritual
Q2 Scientific
Q3 Cultural
Q4 Political
Kudos!!!
One of the Best intros to Integral Four Quadrants
i_I have found in 30 years
👍🙏😻
Thanks for taking the time to share this model of Wilber in such a clear way. It has helped me to make sense of what is, most of the time, a confusing field of seemingly competing views and perspectives.
Glad it was helpful!
Learning philosophy with science, the science's great leap of the Information Era. We are at the peak of Q2 (or Q4) in the 2020s, soon everyone will become a scientist, and knowledge will become money.
Ken Wilber can be a good starting point but when one wants to get to truly integral synthesis beyond mere intellectual speculation, one can go to Sri Aurobindo's works starting with the Life Divine and the Human Cycle.
what is most often referred to as a genius is someone who expresses himself from his experiences of the world or an understanding of things from his authentic self and so therefore what the normal individual is is that basically he is like everybody else and not something unique and thinks like everybody else and merely accepts what he has read in the books without questioning them and so therefore one must be careful of reading too much for one might become too dense like a hot lava turned dry. they key is to always use your own intellect with what you read
Great job, deep and meaningful. You helped me to expand my understanding of Ken Wilber’s four quadrants.
Thank you
Delighted to be of some assistance Aziz!
Damn, never heard ANYONE talk about Quine, great work!
I just watched your continental vs analytical philosophy talk, and now this one. Very nicely explained-I understood some things I hadn’t previously. Thank you!!
Ah that's great I'm delighted to hear it Nancy!
i just watched the video and i just wanted to say this is changing my life. im definetly going to read both books but i already know and feel the impact, it is exactly what my intuition was thriving to all the time. feeling blessed rn☝️🙏💯🤣
might come back in a few months to actually look at the difference, nah shit im definetly coming back i know i wont forget this
Delighted to hear it rick that brings me a lot of joy
I'm so grateful to have come across this channel. I hope it grows more and more people can consume these beautifully presented content.
joyful to find this video and your channel. After learning all the siblings of concepts, I'm able to find the parents of all concepts which I can use to structure the different knowledge that I have. Thankiu ❤
Wow. That was an amazing video. I had known something like this for a long time. I just didn't knew there was a model to explain such complexity.
One of the best videos I have seen today.
Adam Smith wouldnt be Q4 instead of Q3 ? He studied the structural way the economy works, doesn't seem that internal to me
Really exceptional piece of content. Structured and insightful. Can the next video be regarding mapping out how to aquire the basic fundamental knowledge for each quadrant.
Absolutely great video! I love your work. I just want to point out that when using fMRI there typically is no need for any type of dye, unless you're interested in tractography (studying the projections of neural axons between brain regions). Not needing dye is the main advantage of fMRI over PET as a neuroimaging technique. When looking at fluctuations of the BOLD signal, the way one would image the changes in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex you set as an example, all you need is a willing participant :)
WOW... great video. extremely useful
thanks
This is extremely well done. You should be proud of this type of content 👏
Ineffective instincts (Evil) are often just habits which can be elmininated or turned into the opposite effective habit (Virtue) by patience (a good habit) and persistance (another good habit).
Excellent explanation, thank you, you are a great teacher. This is an example of the value that the internet and social media can bring to one’s life...
Wow Jay thank you so much that means a lot!
The mere reference to Pinker & peterson strips this work from any shred of scienctific basis
Great job, thank you! It was totally a new fascinating perspective to me. I guess I need some time in order to digest it. :0)
My pleasure! Thanks for watching!
Great video! (Concise and wide ranging.) There are no "little corners of reality," but there are many perspectives of reality, and some of those perspectives are batshit crazy.
What if all those quadrants were in a larger quadrant?
what holon would the four quadrants be a part of?