The Australian COMMUNIST PARTY CASE (1951) and the Purposive DEFENCE POWER of s 51 | AUSSIE LAW

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @AussieLaw
    @AussieLaw  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🔔SUBSCRIBE to AUSSIE LAW: th-cam.com/users/AussieLaw
    0:00 - Intro
    0:45 - Facts of the case
    1:57 - Issue and Question before the High Court of Australia
    2:58 - The Defence Power
    7:30 - Decision of the High Court
    11:12 - Bonus
    OTHER VIDEOS:
    - Methods of Constitutional Interpretation in Australia - www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6MXf...
    - The Characterisation of Laws: Identifying ‘Heads of Powers’ in the Australian Constitution - th-cam.com/video/kAWxYqNwC98/w-d-xo.html
    - Incidental Characterisation: The Incidental Power of Section 51 (xxxix) of the Australian Constitution - th-cam.com/video/ed4YXwgPkr8/w-d-xo.html
    - Purposive and Subject-Matter Heads of Power in the Australian Constitution - th-cam.com/video/ivsk9eRA85E/w-d-xo.html
    - Characterisation and Proportionality: The test to balance the "means" and "ends" of laws - th-cam.com/video/e7weyDP_Zg0/w-d-xo.html

    • @JCResDoc94
      @JCResDoc94 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      fascinating. id nvr even heard of it. -JC

  • @ct5240
    @ct5240 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Dr Costa,
    I want to say thank you for uploading these videos on Constitutional Law for free!
    I wish you were my lecturer.
    The way you explain the mechanisms behind the laws makes the bigger picture so much easier to understand.
    I have been cross-referencing my notes and case summaries against these videos to see if there are any interesting points I have missed.
    The references and quotes are particularly helpful because they really solidify the principles explained in each case, which I sometimes miss.
    Awesome work!
    I hope one day I have the same finesse to explain these concepts as eloquently as you do.

  • @Monica092083
    @Monica092083 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, you explained this case so much clearer than my lecturer :)

  • @tessmcnamara9230
    @tessmcnamara9230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please can you explain the implied freedom of political communication in the landmark cases please

  • @ganggang1667
    @ganggang1667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is there ways we can ask questions n you make videos about it?

    • @AussieLaw
      @AussieLaw  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can do it by becoming a member: th-cam.com/channels/loahlV-M4A0LIc14rmfNnw.htmljoin

  • @JCResDoc94
    @JCResDoc94 ปีที่แล้ว

    fascinating. how did i miss this? gr8 entry. _JC