I’ve been convicted, edified, & encouraged of the Lord by this ministry and the King James Bible so many times throughout my sanctification process. I somehow always manage to come across the exact sermon that I need right when I need it. Thank you for so faithfully defending the pure and preserved word of God.
I just got hired for a job, just in the nick of time. God came through for me again. I was preparing to be homeless, down to my last 2 rent payments. Thanks for your prayers, brother. Anyway, at my job two days ago, I got into a conversation with an Ethiopian co-worker. I mentioned I'm Christian, and, as usual I was asked if I'm Catholic. So, as usual too, I replied with a resounding "NO", and said I don't belong to any denomination, I'm a Christian that follows the King James Bible (I talked to her about Queen Sheba, it didn't register, then she said in her language it's pronounced as "Sa-ba").
Thank you brother Bryan for another one. It’s wild to see so many professing Christians talk about being faithful and believing but when I question them on the Bible, all I hear is the magical “but”. “The Bible is Gods word BUT”, “I’m a believer BUT”, “I think the Bible is Gods holy and divine word BUT”, etc etc. It makes me sad when I hear that stuff because it forces me to remember that a lot of people that proclaim to be in Christ won’t be making it to heaven.
I wonder though if the old testament is not Christs Father. What Christ teaches is not compatible with the god of Moses. The people of Christs time were not nearly cave men, do not underestimate the possibility of a plagurized bible.
Thanks for bringing up this topic, brother! I have always felt so stupid compared to many others in the local church that I had used to attend because I didn't know Greek or Hebrew. I have learned today that even if I did learn Greek or Hebrew like those other well educated men that I would more than likely fall into that prideful trap of using my newfound knowledge of understanding Greek or Hebrew to correct those incredibly wise and talented men who had directly translated the Greek and Hebrew texts into the KJV Bible that we love. Thank you again for taking the time to explain all of this to us!!
Canada here Bryan, you are right on target and the demons are squirming. Keep speaking the truth. More people are listening and learning than you know. God bless you and your family!❤
Amen. And concerning what you said about how people would worship the original autographs if ever they were to find them, there is no doubt in my mind that people would do exactly that. We've seen what the Catholics do with their "relics". But tying that in with Scripture, it reminds me of how Hezekiah had to destroy the brazen serpent that Moses lifted up in the wilderness (which by the way, _God told him to make)_ because Israel was worshipping _IT_ instead of _the Saviour represented by it_ (John 3:14). 2 Kings 18:4 (KJV) He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, *_and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it:_* and he called it Nehushtan. Regardless, it's no big loss anyway. _We've got a Bible that is far better than ANY ancient autographs, including the originals-_ *_the King James Bible._*
I had a kid in a coffee shop come up to me while I was reading through the KJV to give me a word of encouragement, which was nice. I gave him the first two questions I commonly ask every self-purported Christian, which are, a) do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are saved (and eternally secure) and, b) do you know that the KJV is the perfect, preserved word of God as the ark of the covenant for us today? As is common, we spent hours comparing scripture with scripture. He attempted to defend the modern versions, reasoning that things get better and we've discovered more stuff as time goes on. The usual worldly optimism. Because he lacked the language in the modern translations to explain the differences in the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God, he heavily implied that he thinks salvation can be lost. As the reader of this comment likely knows, all of the new translations give the reader an impression that Christ's work is only the beginning of their salvation and that they need to keep working in order to maintain it. They completely overlook the definition of the word "gift." Anyhow, I don't need to preach to this choir. I just wanted to say that this particular kid I'm thinking of used a ChatGPT voice program about 25 times in 3 hours to do everything but install a thought right into his brain for him. He wasn't just asking for it to call up scriptures to read... he was asking for it to compile points and provide reasoning for the points he had asked it to search out. When Bryan made a sarcastic comment about the AI generated bible study assistance, it reminded me of that. Thank God that words have meaning. There's no amount of tech or manmade philosophical workaround that can outmaneuver the straight, plain, matched-by-triangulation verses written in a KJV. Hallelujah for the objective truth & certainty of it. Man, I'd probably be dead by now if I didn't find it to be infallible every time I sought to prove Its perfection. Glory to God. Thanks for your videos, Bryan.
As hebrew believer in the Lord Jesus Christ im working on hebrew version of the kjv pls pray for me that the lord would inspire me to tranlate it with success
Wouldn’t a Hebrew version of the KJV simply be the Hebrew version of the Bible? How would you “re-translate” it to Hebrew without convoluting the message?
Messianic Hebrew, Hallelujah. As a Gentile Believer I almost attended a Messianic Synagogue but the Rabbi got caught in a relationship with his secretary. I've been studying with a KJV & a Strong's Concordance since 1980. My prayers are with you.
During my journey i was very on and off of if God was real or not and i in anger while high go figure asked out loud "where are you!" Not only did he show me but showed since the beginning hes been in control, KJV Bible was printed as we know in 1611 that number he used with Acts 16:11, the 12th word of that verse is Samothrace (Samothracia today), this mountain was used for navigation during the journey Paul and Luke went on (btw they wrote 11 of the 27; 27-(11=16) 1611 keeps showing up but whats the most interesting, is the height of that mountain which stands 1611M tall and if you were to draw a straight line it points directly to London, YHWH is so awesome
Pride, selfishness and arrogance can easily cross-over. I believe Jesus wishes us to be humble, discerning and to follow Him. Our race, ancestors‘ history and nationality don’t really matter so much. I lived in South Africa as a chid and I saw ‚pride‘ expressed in unholy ways.
@@johnhanson5943pride is the worst sin for a reason. It is the root of all human evil. Anytime someone commits an act for their own self-whether it be for pleasure, ego, being remembered, materialism, etc-it is pride. Humility is needed, always. You are correct.
Pride is never spoken of in a positive manner in the Bible. Pride is always negative, and is a sin. Proverbs 16:18 (KJV) Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall. You can be well pleased about something though.
The non KJV folks really need to read the preface by the translators of the Authorized Version and the letter to King James. That would put all to rest.
Fear not for i see a decent amount of ppl that like the kjv. I think its the similar sphere of interests that does this.. but they get it. Theyre always sober minded generally
Yes, the King James Bible is a good English translation, but it is wise to look up the original language like Greek, like parousia, which is not a rapture to heaven, but a greeting of Jesus to Earth as a welcoming of a king, who is Jesus. This is similar to welcoming Jesus with palms into a city. Gustav Adolf Deissmann (1908)[7] showed that the Greek word parousia occurred as early as the 3rd century BC to describe the visit of a king or dignitary to a city - a visit arranged in order to show the visitor's magnificence to the people.
All the Bibles added during the Short Season of Satan is why. We have had the millennium reign right after the tribulation. Jesus did return already as he said he would!
Scofield is the Judaised version in the footnotes. As far as Paul, KJV etc., my respect dor Christians is proportional to how actively they resist teaching of the pharisees. Paul I could take or leave depending on what he says. I know about him being a pharisee. The most important thing is to follow Jesus. Anything else I can forgive. It is frustrating hearing words other than his own attributed to his message though. It is incredibly alienating to be around people who disagree and will not converse. Hoping for a word of encouragement and receiving blasphemy gets old quickly. The wicked are prospering while we fight
here's what i found between both camps of kjv-only vs. modern bibles. -modern bible supporters say kjv has the flawed 'textus receptus' because of its questionable "textual criticism" and textual errors throughout those older centuries. -kjv-only supporters say that modern bibles have too many changes because of the derivative copyright law, rewording and changing meanings in certain passages. old copies becoming obsolete. i didn't like the unexplained ESV changes on their permanent 2016 version. of course i still need to look further into both camps. why are people still using the modern translation? because if our foundation is so divided within, how are we supposed to know who goes through the narrow path into heaven? is the bible lost in translation? i want to believe in our savior jesus christ, and i still do. i just want to make sure how to properly answer "so which translation do we use?" currently i'm reading the KJV, eventually i'll look at NASB1995. but from first glance, i can understand nasb faster than kjv. anyways, i want to find the truth.
Can you really “understand it faster” or is it just dumber language? Besides, just as Jesus spoke in parables during his time on earth, and the meaning were hidden to those who could only understand the surface, I believe the same is the case for the KJB.
Good question. There are no perfect versions because all translations are subject to some interpretation. Add to that the fact that not all concepts translate well into every language.
avpublications.com/freebies/ Scroll down page and see "What About Bibles in Spanish, French, Chinese, Turkish, Farsi, Swahili, German and All the Others?"
"15.1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 15.2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 15.3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 15.4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: 15.5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: 15.6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep." 1 CORINTHIANS 15:1-6 "1.6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 1.7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 1.8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." GALATIANS 1:6-8
I read the KJB every single day, and a facsimile of the 1611 is the one that I will usually read out of. There's nothing wrong with that. What _IS_ wrong however is being a "1611 onlyist" (as I call it) and attacking the subsequent editions of the KJB, claiming that they are "corrupt" and that the only pure KJV is the original 1611 edition. I have facsimiles of both the 1611 and the 1769. They both say the *_same exact thing,_* the only difference being typographical errors were corrected and spelling of certain words were standardized with the 1769. BOTH are *_the_* KJB, BOTH are God's pure and perfect word in English, because they BOTH are the exact same book. Read whichever edition you like, you can't go wrong. Stay away from any non-standard edition of the KJB though, such as the _"New Cambridge Paragraph Bible"._
@@AnthonyTuminello Thanks! I just perfer the 1611 over the 1769 becuase I love history and I've always had a pull towards it ever since I got saved. They do have some differences in text though, but nothing major. Thanks again. Glory to Christ ✝
@ That's pretty much the same reason why I like to read out of the 1611. I love history, always have. Plus I love how beautiful the book is. The differences in text is, again, typographical error. You have to realize just how primitive the Gutenberg printing press was, errors were very easily made. They literally had to place each and every single letter of every single page BACKWARDS. Funny enough though, I don't believe any of the typos in the 1611 affect doctrine in any way. God's providence there.
@@AnthonyTuminello Actually, most of the changes made weren’t originally errors. Here are some examples: Joshua 3:11: 1611: "Arke of the Couenant, euen the Lord" 1769: "ark of the covenant of the Lord" Ezekiel 24:7: 1611: "For her blood is in the middest of her: she set it vpon the toppe of a rocke, she powred it vpon the ground to couer it with dust" 1769: "For her blood is in the midst of her; she set it upon the top of a rock; she poured it not upon the ground, to cover it with dust" Jeremiah 51:30: 1611: "burnt their dwelling places" 1769: "burned her dwellingplaces" 2 Kings 11:10: 1611: "in the Temple" 1769: "in the temple of the LORD" Mark 10:18: 1611: "There is no man good" 1769: "there is none good" These are just a few of the tons of changes that they’ve made. Some of which I do agree with, but most I disagree with. But just to make things clear I’m not a “1611 onlyist” haha.
Hello Brian, this is my first post to you. I agree with the AKJB being the infallible word of God 100%. I have around 50 AKJ bibles stored away in case this crazy world someday decides to stop printing them surprising me with a "left hook" if you will. We can never underestimate the unexpected occurrences a day could bring. If I may, I have a question in the gospel of John that I'd like for you to share as a spiritual gift your take on what the scripture is indicating in John 12:28. I have what I hope is a spiritual understanding from the Father of this verse and am asking for your understanding of it to see if we are getting it from the same source. Thanks Brian and peace be unto you.... Danny
What do you think about the Elton Anomoly theory, that the KJV Bible contains a self-authentication system using '7', '7⁷', etc., occurances of important words?
While i do not see the KJV as our Lords 100% Word, as I'm a Catholic. I am happy to know that you are able to find solace and closeness to our Lord within it in a way other Bibles and denominations cannot show you. In the end we are all Gods children. We all have unwavering faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. "Denomination wars" be damned. That said! I do have my very own KJV. I am also an advocate for visiting other churches. I firmly believe we all have something we can learn from one another. Whether that be insight, ways of worship, or tradition. Tradition is a big one for me. Both the Catholic and Orthodox churches are my favorite on the tradition front.... And where i feel closest to Christ. Keep on truckin' brother. God bless.
The OG King James does include the whole Bible. It took a while for protestants to remove the "apocrypha". I think it was published together even after it was given that status until the 1800's.
@Bikeraq yes, I have noticed that all the translations in my language have translation errors or missing verses There is one good New Testament in the same text source as the KJV, but it is hard to find as it is no longer in print.
Please make video on your thoughts on the early christian gnostics. Most of their studies were destroyed once the orthodoxy became a majority over the then diverse christian sects, 3-4th century. The gnostics only surviving texts were discovered after ww2.
avpublications.com/freebies/ Scroll down page and see "What About Bibles in Spanish, French, Chinese, Turkish, Farsi, Swahili, German and All the Others?"
I have studied the king james every day for the past 13 years or better. I absolutely believe it contains all that is needed for salvation in Christ Jesus and living a life acceptable to him. I am curious your opinion why the 1611 version was changed? We both believe it was divinely inspired. I've always had a question why it was deemed needing of taking books out.
@royakard8536 look at how they joined with early church people and fabricated the Koran. The first covenant people tried to remove Jesus way more outside of the Bible into another religion. So we have a book removed that counts the Old Testament correctly. Where it's saying how many books we have for the New Testament, you must search for them now. The book of Enoch points to Jesus in everyway and it got removed by those that don't believe in Jesus. We can't be joined to the old Covenant now because of Jesus Christ. It's not so much against a Christian but hurts the J
I've been round and round the mountain with different versions, original languages, denominational perspectives, scholars, etc... There's always another argument... Someone always finds an alternate translation... Gotta pick a standard. Might as well be the King James Bible. It's proven to be reliable.
Dear Bryan, - If I may - I've recently come across an anti "KJV only" argument that I wasn't 100% certain how to handle and therefore I would (humbly) like to ask your opinion on the best rebuttal to such a question. (Note: I am well aware that the following is ultimately a variation of an old and tried argument often raised by critics regarding the multiple editions and revisions of the KJV. Have said that, anyone that's confronted such challenges as many times as I have should immediately recognize that such objections typically focus on - minor textual refinements or typographical corrections - matters that do not alter the substance or authority of God’s Word. However, the question at hand is of a different nature. Rather than dealing with those minor, classical concerns, it specifically pertains to the theological implications surrounding the Apocrypha. Making it in my opinion a far weightier matter. Hence, why I am reaching out to to Bryan...) The augment has three points and goes as follows: 1) If the KJV is truly Inspired by God, why did it originally include the Apocrypha? *How best do "KJV-only" advocates reconcile their belief in the perfection of the KJV with the fact that it initially included books we now reject as non-canonical. 2) Who Decided What to Remove? *Later editions of the KJV removed the Apocrypha, but this decision was made by publishers, not the translators. Doesn't this then imply that the KJV was initially imperfect (and) or incomplete? 3) Contradictory Doctrine: *As the Apocrypha includes teachings that Protestants reject, such as prayers for the dead (2 Maccabees 12:44-46) and salvation through almsgiving (Tobit 12:9). - what is the best refutation, too. - If the KJV is perfect, why would it include books with doctrines contrary to Protestant beliefs? I pray that you remain steadfast in your convictions, rightly dividing the word of truth, and seeking wisdom in all things. Thank you for your time and may God bless you and your family. Matthew Martin Claridge. Sydney, Australia.
Very simple. The apocrypha was never considered scripture. It was just included for literary value. It was sandwiched between the testaments. Just as some Bible editions have notes or maps or concordances etc. extra things for study or reading, but not the text
@adamthiry868 Thank you mate! ! I apologize for not writing more in response. It's 6:26 am here and I only came across your comment while clicking on some preaching to listen to while getting ready for work...
One of the verses that changed due to the Mandela Effect that bugs me the most is Genesis 3:15, where it originally said, “He will crush thy head”, it now says, “It will bruise thy head”, that is a BIG. difference. We are told to hide His Word in our hearts where it can’t be taken away from us, because a time is coming when there will be a famine of God’s Word Amos 8:11
@@riceisnice444 You can look it up online for free. Several perversions say crush. Books, songs, movies, or sermons about the Bible often quote from the new age versions and you think it's KJV because they say "The Bible says..." There is no Mandela Effect. See Bryan's free videos on the topic. Is God able to preserve his word like he promised? If he can't keep his own word, how can anyone trust him to keep their souls?
I can say this for certain, no new person who comes to Christianity is gonna be able to read and fully comprehend the KJV if that were the case I may of repented while I was sitting in a jail cell back in 2002 fast forward 21 years I was given a NLT bible in 2023 which is a literal translation and one of the easiest to read and comprehend and yes I realize there is scripture that is omitted but I can always revert back to the KJV it boggles my mind how so many people think you have to read the KJV bible to interpret God's word I have had these concersations with my pastor before he said something about the KJV manuscripts I can't exactly remember word for word what he said but he's a pastor of one of the biggest churches in my city and they give out the NLT to everybody I think he said the KJV was good in its time but the Shakespeare lingo is out of date and since we don't talk like that anymore there is no need to read that specific version and we have an older pastor who reads the NKJV I am not condemning the KJV at all or anybody who still reads it but for a new Christian it is not the best choice. ~ Brother Brax
Galatians 3 made me re-evalute vain jangling about the law, and it's actual implications. I know we are different members, but it is the same people who don't adhere to such revelations that Paul says "I now tell you even weeping that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ" "It is hard for thee to kick against the pricks" 2 Corinthians 12:6For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he seeth me to be, or that he heareth of me. 7And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure. 8For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me. 9And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Psalms 34:3O magnify the LORD with me, and let us exalt his name together. 4I sought the LORD, and he heard me, and delivered me from all my fears. 5They looked unto him, and were lightened: and their faces were not ashamed. 6This poor man cried, and the LORD heard him, and saved him out of all his troubles. 7The angel of the LORD encampeth round about them that fear him, and delivereth them. Romans 4:13For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: 15Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. 16Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all, 17(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were. 18Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be. Romans 4:3For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 5But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. 6Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, 7Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. Romans 4:13For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: 15Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. 16Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all, 17(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were. 18Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be. Collosians 2:12Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. 13And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; 14Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; 15And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it. What did Paul count but dung that he may win Christ? All things. Galatians 2: 18For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. 19For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain. Would really like to see some coverage on your end regarding the abolishing of the law of Moses for a Christian, without the righteousness of the law. As that is what Paul preached to the Gentiles. As re-affirmed in Acts 15, and throughout Ephesians, Romans 3-4, Galatians 1-5, and even John 7:38. You do a lot for truth. Thank you, much more so than the new version crowds worshiping the bourgeois paintings and defending it at "icons" Just really wish you'd help drive it home to your viewers. As this channel is primarily spiritual meat, no? They can handle it. After all, what I speak of should be milk. Too much hypocrisy in taking righteousness from the law, when under liberty. Approve that which is good, but I worry for those whom I can't meet with, and truly hope you release a better video than "what is true biblical salvation" and actually include doctrine from Galatians explaining how we CANNOT be of the works of the law. It messed up my walk, for a short while, because I figured my tutor would be well versed against false gospels, as you have demonstrated countless times. What it did was keep me under the yoke of bondage, and I'd escape by the skin of my teeth. For the furtherance of the gospel; ye have not injured me at all, but my heart hurts for those who might have to go through the same thing trying to learn from your channel. Especially first impressions, as the enmity is slain. And because of your "hard preaching" I would frustrate the grace of God through my ignorance of what Jesus has done. Ordinances/ out of the way. I look forward to the next study, Bryan. Galatians 3:9So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 11But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 12And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: 14That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. 15Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. KJV Thank you for your time, Friend.
Brother, the Bible represents everything, starting with creation through the ending of our time; there are no mine or yours but " D "and only. The KJV does overlap many missing scriptures and highlights the one I am reading currently, and I like, but if I think about, or in fact know that these books are missing from many versions of it, and how they shouldn't have been removed because they do inform you better than any restricted versions available. I am kinda concerned about who and why these scriptures were removed and relabelled by creations. I would like to know why the scriptures were removed and who felt the power or intent to remove them. Because I think they are very important to see clearly what we are dealing with. What we have done, or doing, or have been doing with no regret whatsoever, is how some of us are still trying to harness divine power and opportunities that are meant to be someone through occult practice.
❤ **Humanity's Deepest Darkest Secret** What do we truly know about what constitutes a sin? To begin, we can reflect on the original sin in Eden, where Eve, influenced by the serpent, picked the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge and chose for herself what was good and what was bad. This act represented an attempt to usurp the divine power of God over creation. The story becomes particularly compelling here, as occult practices-those used by cults-attempt to intercept creation and life in general to access or claim divine power. We understand that occult sciences are termed "occult" because they break down creation into manageable layers or instruments. These are then utilized to overlay creation with themes or narratives designed to manipulate the intended audience. I refer to "their kind" because, irrespective of color or origin, we are all one. It is essential not to fall prey to divisive concepts that label certain people as "privileged" or "less favorable," as these ideas result from manipulative practices. **Freud, Jung, and the Mind** Psychologists have demonstrated how the mind and psyche can be interpreted and influenced: **Freud's Superego**: Freud proposed that our psyche contains a moral compass known as the superego. Cultic materials often exploit their victims' psychological profiles, crafting messages in reverse or deceptive ways to keep the reader's mind submissive, effectively blackmailing them. This understanding is critical. **Jung's Collective Unconscious**: Jung introduced the concept of the collective unconscious, a shared psychological space that connects us through symbols, collective memories, and even sins. These symbols are often weaponized to manipulate individuals or groups, coercing them into submission. Cults frequently instill their guilt or sins within their followers. Recall that sin is defined as the attempt to seize divine power for selfish reasons. When Freud's superego and Jung's collective unconscious are combined, they create a powerful tool for control-what some might refer to as "the evil eye." Higher and lower entities can deceive, blackmail, or keep populations in a state of submission or captivity. While these channels can reveal personal or collective wrongdoings, when wielded with malicious intent, they become instruments of what could be termed modern slavery or advanced psychological terrorism-an immense misuse of power by humans. **The Superego and Collective Unconscious** In truth, the superego should align with the image of the Creator, while the untouched collective unconscious should adhere to moral principles that guide us. However, cults do not respect this natural alignment. Instead, they manipulate these two psychological channels using the memories and experiences of their victims, reconstructing them to fit their own "divine" order. This false divine order often seeks to establish a new age where a counterfeit divine entity could emerge-one capable of producing a false messiah (the Antichrist). Such manipulation involves overriding the mind and replacing it with a theme or order of their making. **Sorcery and Witchcraft** When someone manipulates these psychological channels, they engage in sorcery. When sorcerers unite under a single order, it evolves into witchcraft. If someone establishes control over these witches, they may reach what could be termed a "god mode." Why is this problematic, given that we are all creations? The issue arises from the fact that this mechanistic approach exploits a manmade superego, often crafted through cruelty and sadistic practices, imposing a false symbol onto the collective unconscious. This process renders individuals powerless, leading to brainwashing. The true superego is not separate from the collective unconscious; both must align with God, the Creator, at all times. Any deviation from this alignment-and any effort to substitute the divine order with human constructs-constitutes a sin and distances us from the Creator. ❤
what version does a China man who lives in the hills of China read, who does not read English? Early church had converted pagans and none of the churches had the New Testament.
avpublications.com/freebies/ Scroll down page and see "What About Bibles in Spanish, French, Chinese, Turkish, Farsi, Swahili, German and All the Others?"
@@ChantreJ you didn't answer my simple question. A Chinese person in China in the boonies who can't speak or read English, what bible translation would they be handed, or do you DEMAND they learn to read the queen's english no less?
@@Tomana_ our timeline today isn't as we are told. Your question got answered when Jesus said it was given to the whole world. Everyone knew of Jesus then.
@@Tomana_ I gave you a link for research and there's plenty more out there. I honestly do NOT have time to write studies in the comment section and hunt down websites to link only to be ignored. The Chinese people can and do read Bibles that come from the same manuscripts the KJV comes from. Study it on your own if it's important. Google "The Chinese King James Version" for a start. Read. Study. On your own. ckjvbible.wpengine.com/
...when we stand before GOD, I dont think He will ask us which translation we read...but instead, are you covered by the blood of Jesus...is your name written in the Lambs book of life...did you spend your time telling people of Jesus, or arguing about particular translations??...the written down word (paper and ink) was not nailed to the cross...JESUS was!!!...Him crucified and risen is the ONLY way home!!❤
What does the KJV say about the bible????????? Psalm 12:6&7 6. The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation foe ever. Psalm 119:89 For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven. QUESTION???????? settled in heaven or the KJV?????????
וֶהֱפִֽיצְךָ֤ יְהֹוָה֙ בְּכׇל־הָ֣עַמִּ֔ים מִקְצֵ֥ה הָאָ֖רֶץ וְעַד־קְצֵ֣ה הָאָ֑רֶץ וְעָבַ֨דְתָּ שָּׁ֜ם אֱלֹהִ֣ים אֲחֵרִ֗ים אֲשֶׁ֧ר לֹא־יָדַ֛עְתָּ אַתָּ֥ה וַאֲבֹתֶ֖יךָ עֵ֥ץ וָאָֽבֶן׃ יהוה (G-d) will scatter you among all the peoples from one end of the earth to the other, and there you shall serve other gods, wood and stone, whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced. This is Deuteronomy 28:64. As you can see here, God warns the nation of Israel not serve God's of wood and stone. If you read this thoroughly you will also see that it also says "whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced" which is clear to mean the religion of wood which is speaking about the cross (Jesus hence Christianity) and the G-d of the stone which means Islam (stone is referring to the stone on the kaaba in Meca). G-d told his people thousands of years before these 2 false religions started to stay away from them so it's not that we are "blind" it's that we are following G-d.
You have just admitted that the only way you justify your religion, is because you've seen Supernatural happenings connected with the KJV. Many people have Supernatural things happen around them that has never heard of the KJV. Use the logic that you say you have.
@BryanDenlingerKJVM no sir, didn't miss that. You explicitly said that you weren't going to listen to any evidence disputing the KJV. So didn't want to waste time. I believe you understand that the KJV isn't the most accurate translation. What I got out of your video was that you don't care, you have the faith that it's true.
KJB - Matthew, Chapter 15 "24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. 26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. 27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table." Now bark! As your masters, sons of david expect you to. xD christians. xD
@@hadeseye2297 when you study the Bible look for multiple word phrases... You can do that with that software it's free... And it adds so much more depth to understanding the word... You can't do this with any other Bible..
KJV only is almost idol worship at this point. Yes, it was a good translation for its time but still subject to human error and most of all, the shortcomings of translating from one language to another. Not all ideas and concepts translate perfectly from one language to another. Thats just a fact. The KJV is not some perfect translation. Probably the best thing we can do to delve further in Bible study is look at translations from the original Hebrew and Greek and go from there.
If there is no perfect translation, then how can there be a perfect faith? Perfect religion? Also, if you are open minded, watch some of the videos on Truth Is Christ channel and evaluate your position further.
Please look further into this. The King James Version is not the only good English translation of the Bible, and on the contrary, it makes God seem unnecessarily foreign and distant by making His word be in a version of English that is rather different from contemporary English. The original Scriptures were written in commonly spoken dialects so they would be easy to understand. The KJV-only movement is largely reactionary to bad translations such as the NIV, and has no foundation in the Scriptures themselves.✌️
The King James Bible is the very words that proceeded out of the mouth of God, written down. Jesus Christ COMMANDS us to live by those words (Matt. 4:4; Luke 4:4). So let me ask you a question: Can you really make the words of the Lord Jesus Christ an "idol"? How does that make any sense? If you praise the words of God, you're praising God Himself, for they are HIS OWN WORDS that came out of HIS OWN MOUTH. You can't have God without His words, and you can't have God's words without God Himself. Psalm 56:10 (KJV) In God will I praise his word: in the LORD will I praise his word. NOT ashamed.
Whats your heritage in accordance 🤔 I perceive youre a son of TsYahn YahuaDah yet, you may be of the northern Kingdom Y'srael...... You tell me 1:52 Greek????!🤔 😂 In both Greek and Latin Gee Sus means Earth Pig 🐖😂
Jesus described Tovia Singer perfectly in this verse: Matthew 15:14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
וֶהֱפִֽיצְךָ֤ יְהֹוָה֙ בְּכׇל־הָ֣עַמִּ֔ים מִקְצֵ֥ה הָאָ֖רֶץ וְעַד־קְצֵ֣ה הָאָ֑רֶץ וְעָבַ֨דְתָּ שָּׁ֜ם אֱלֹהִ֣ים אֲחֵרִ֗ים אֲשֶׁ֧ר לֹא־יָדַ֛עְתָּ אַתָּ֥ה וַאֲבֹתֶ֖יךָ עֵ֥ץ וָאָֽבֶן׃ יהוה (G-d) will scatter you among all the peoples from one end of the earth to the other, and there you shall serve other gods, wood and stone, whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced. This is Deuteronomy 28:64. As you can see here, God warns the nation of Israel not serve God's of wood and stone. If you read this thoroughly you will also see that it also says "whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced" which is clear to mean the religion of wood which is speaking about the cross (Jesus hence Christianity) and the G-d of the stone which means Islam (stone is referring to the stone on the kaaba in Meca). G-d told his people thousands of years before these 2 false religions started to stay away from them so it's not that we are "blind" it's that we are following G-d.
I studied Biblical Greek and Hebrew. KJV, while good for several hundred years, cannot meet the needs of communication that has evolved into our present day. The many scholars who translated the original manuscripts from the original languages into the vernacular did an excellent job. Enter NIV. Enter NAS. Enter AMP. Excellent and faithful translations from scholars who studied the original manuscripts.. KJV is NO LONGER word meanings that are spoken in today's English. This is nonsense. Thou art incorrect in thine opinion, sir. Acts 28- "He went to gather some fa%%ots." Hmmm. The above mentioned faithful translations are faithful to the original Greek Septuagent and Greek translated Old Testament available during Paul's time. I have studied theology extensively. I emphatically disagree with you Brother.
unfortunately the KJv is riddled with translational errors as most bibles are, and ignorant of Idiomatic use of verbiage but the most important point is the KJv was a product of the Masoretic text, that is a jewish(edomite) interpretation of scripture where they redacted many sections, especially in relation to Christ's prophecy written 1000 years after the Septuagint
My bible is the king Jesus bible. You my friend need to shut your lying mouth until you know what you are talking about. Jesus teaches us not you big mouth❤
@@AlSchreiner-c5v Says the fool telling an elder to "shut his lying mouth until he knows what he's talking about", as if he didn't spend 20+ years studying the Bible version issue.
@AnthonyTuminello we have more of God's wisdom in our fingernail clippings than you will ever have. Elder Schneider. If you want something sugear coated go buy yourself a box of donuts. We will do bible 101 with you any time . We don't debate. We will tell you truth and you will listen. Oh yeah you just want to argue and accuse like your father lucifer.
I know this is off topic but where do you buy the sheepskin clothing and wool you wear? Thanks for sharing this healthy discussion, don’t weaken to the comments, edify each other with the word🛶
I’ve been convicted, edified, & encouraged of the Lord by this ministry and the King James Bible so many times throughout my sanctification process. I somehow always manage to come across the exact sermon that I need right when I need it. Thank you for so faithfully defending the pure and preserved word of God.
I just got hired for a job, just in the nick of time. God came through for me again. I was preparing to be homeless, down to my last 2 rent payments. Thanks for your prayers, brother. Anyway, at my job two days ago, I got into a conversation with an Ethiopian co-worker. I mentioned I'm Christian, and, as usual I was asked if I'm Catholic. So, as usual too, I replied with a resounding "NO", and said I don't belong to any denomination, I'm a Christian that follows the King James Bible (I talked to her about Queen Sheba, it didn't register, then she said in her language it's pronounced as "Sa-ba").
Thank you brother Bryan for another one. It’s wild to see so many professing Christians talk about being faithful and believing but when I question them on the Bible, all I hear is the magical “but”. “The Bible is Gods word BUT”, “I’m a believer BUT”, “I think the Bible is Gods holy and divine word BUT”, etc etc. It makes me sad when I hear that stuff because it forces me to remember that a lot of people that proclaim to be in Christ won’t be making it to heaven.
I wonder though if the old testament is not Christs Father. What Christ teaches is not compatible with the god of Moses. The people of Christs time were not nearly cave men, do not underestimate the possibility of a plagurized bible.
Thanks for bringing up this topic, brother! I have always felt so stupid compared to many others in the local church that I had used to attend because I didn't know Greek or Hebrew.
I have learned today that even if I did learn Greek or Hebrew like those other well educated men that I would more than likely fall into that prideful trap of using my newfound knowledge of understanding Greek or Hebrew to correct those incredibly wise and talented men who had directly translated the Greek and Hebrew texts into the KJV Bible that we love.
Thank you again for taking the time to explain all of this to us!!
The truest, most faithful translation of the Word of God
Canada here Bryan, you are right on target and the demons are squirming. Keep speaking the truth. More people are listening and learning than you know. God bless you and your family!❤
Amen. And concerning what you said about how people would worship the original autographs if ever they were to find them, there is no doubt in my mind that people would do exactly that. We've seen what the Catholics do with their "relics". But tying that in with Scripture, it reminds me of how Hezekiah had to destroy the brazen serpent that Moses lifted up in the wilderness (which by the way, _God told him to make)_ because Israel was worshipping _IT_ instead of _the Saviour represented by it_ (John 3:14).
2 Kings 18:4 (KJV) He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, *_and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it:_* and he called it Nehushtan.
Regardless, it's no big loss anyway. _We've got a Bible that is far better than ANY ancient autographs, including the originals-_ *_the King James Bible._*
I had a kid in a coffee shop come up to me while I was reading through the KJV to give me a word of encouragement, which was nice.
I gave him the first two questions I commonly ask every self-purported Christian, which are,
a) do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are saved (and eternally secure) and,
b) do you know that the KJV is the perfect, preserved word of God as the ark of the covenant for us today?
As is common, we spent hours comparing scripture with scripture. He attempted to defend the modern versions, reasoning that things get better and we've discovered more stuff as time goes on. The usual worldly optimism.
Because he lacked the language in the modern translations to explain the differences in the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God, he heavily implied that he thinks salvation can be lost. As the reader of this comment likely knows, all of the new translations give the reader an impression that Christ's work is only the beginning of their salvation and that they need to keep working in order to maintain it. They completely overlook the definition of the word "gift."
Anyhow, I don't need to preach to this choir. I just wanted to say that this particular kid I'm thinking of used a ChatGPT voice program about 25 times in 3 hours to do everything but install a thought right into his brain for him. He wasn't just asking for it to call up scriptures to read... he was asking for it to compile points and provide reasoning for the points he had asked it to search out.
When Bryan made a sarcastic comment about the AI generated bible study assistance, it reminded me of that.
Thank God that words have meaning. There's no amount of tech or manmade philosophical workaround that can outmaneuver the straight, plain, matched-by-triangulation verses written in a KJV. Hallelujah for the objective truth & certainty of it. Man, I'd probably be dead by now if I didn't find it to be infallible every time I sought to prove Its perfection. Glory to God.
Thanks for your videos, Bryan.
As hebrew believer in the Lord Jesus Christ im working on hebrew version of the kjv pls pray for me that the lord would inspire me to tranlate it with success
Wouldn’t a Hebrew version of the KJV simply be the Hebrew version of the Bible? How would you “re-translate” it to Hebrew without convoluting the message?
Messianic Hebrew, Hallelujah. As a Gentile Believer I almost attended a Messianic Synagogue but the Rabbi got caught in a relationship with his secretary. I've been studying with a KJV & a Strong's Concordance since 1980. My prayers are with you.
During my journey i was very on and off of if God was real or not and i in anger while high go figure asked out loud "where are you!" Not only did he show me but showed since the beginning hes been in control, KJV Bible was printed as we know in 1611 that number he used with Acts 16:11, the 12th word of that verse is Samothrace (Samothracia today), this mountain was used for navigation during the journey Paul and Luke went on (btw they wrote 11 of the 27; 27-(11=16) 1611 keeps showing up but whats the most interesting, is the height of that mountain which stands 1611M tall and if you were to draw a straight line it points directly to London, YHWH is so awesome
It's ok to be proud of Western civilization
You mean the revived roman empire?
Turtle Chad stop being a bot for ONE DAY
Pride, selfishness and arrogance can easily cross-over. I believe Jesus wishes us to be humble, discerning and to follow Him. Our race, ancestors‘ history and nationality don’t really matter so much. I lived in South Africa as a chid and I saw ‚pride‘ expressed in unholy ways.
@@johnhanson5943pride is the worst sin for a reason. It is the root of all human evil. Anytime someone commits an act for their own self-whether it be for pleasure, ego, being remembered, materialism, etc-it is pride. Humility is needed, always. You are correct.
Pride is never spoken of in a positive manner in the Bible. Pride is always negative, and is a sin.
Proverbs 16:18 (KJV) Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
You can be well pleased about something though.
The non KJV folks really need to read the preface by the translators of the Authorized Version and the letter to King James. That would put all to rest.
KJV is the perfect word of God.
Are you claiming the KJV was inspired.
I just started reading the KJV
2 years ago and have no problem at all.
Thanks bro some times I feel like I am the only one that believes that about the kjv. It’s refreshing to hear!!
Fear not for i see a decent amount of ppl that like the kjv. I think its the similar sphere of interests that does this.. but they get it. Theyre always sober minded generally
Yes, the King James Bible is a good English translation, but it is wise to look up the original language like Greek, like parousia, which is not a rapture to heaven, but a greeting of Jesus to Earth as a welcoming of a king, who is Jesus. This is similar to welcoming Jesus with palms into a city.
Gustav Adolf Deissmann (1908)[7] showed that the Greek word parousia occurred as early as the 3rd century BC to describe the visit of a king or dignitary to a city - a visit arranged in order to show the visitor's magnificence to the people.
Amen, amen, and amen. Thank God for his perfect word in the KJB. Praise Jesus!
Every time I attempt to go away from the KJV the Holy Spirit corrects me and brings me back. He shows me error after error in all of the other Bibles.
All the Bibles added during the Short Season of Satan is why. We have had the millennium reign right after the tribulation. Jesus did return already as he said he would!
Is the KJB Christian, Christ based or Paulist letters ?
Scofield is the Judaised version in the footnotes.
As far as Paul, KJV etc., my respect dor Christians is proportional to how actively they resist teaching of the pharisees.
Paul I could take or leave depending on what he says. I know about him being a pharisee.
The most important thing is to follow Jesus. Anything else I can forgive. It is frustrating hearing words other than his own attributed to his message though.
It is incredibly alienating to be around people who disagree and will not converse. Hoping for a word of encouragement and receiving blasphemy gets old quickly.
The wicked are prospering while we fight
Is it a religion or a covenant?
here's what i found between both camps of kjv-only vs. modern bibles.
-modern bible supporters say kjv has the flawed 'textus receptus' because of its questionable "textual criticism" and textual errors throughout those older centuries.
-kjv-only supporters say that modern bibles have too many changes because of the derivative copyright law, rewording and changing meanings in certain passages. old copies becoming obsolete.
i didn't like the unexplained ESV changes on their permanent 2016 version.
of course i still need to look further into both camps. why are people still using the modern translation? because if our foundation is so divided within, how are we supposed to know who goes through the narrow path into heaven? is the bible lost in translation?
i want to believe in our savior jesus christ, and i still do. i just want to make sure how to properly answer "so which translation do we use?"
currently i'm reading the KJV, eventually i'll look at NASB1995. but from first glance, i can understand nasb faster than kjv. anyways, i want to find the truth.
Can you really “understand it faster” or is it just dumber language? Besides, just as Jesus spoke in parables during his time on earth, and the meaning were hidden to those who could only understand the surface, I believe the same is the case for the KJB.
Whats the perfect version for non english speakers?
Good question. There are no perfect versions because all translations are subject to some interpretation. Add to that the fact that not all concepts translate well into every language.
The King James Bible is the perfect version. It is the way God wanted it.
avpublications.com/freebies/
Scroll down page and see "What About Bibles in Spanish, French, Chinese, Turkish, Farsi, Swahili, German and All the Others?"
@Bikeraq So then, are all Bibles in foreign languages illegitimate?
@@ChantreJ There was no information about the Finnish Bible there and many other languages weren't there either
My denomination is!FAITH, saved by grace redeemed under CHRIST BLOOD, Born Again BY spiritual baptism without water from above.
Why you don’t believe in water baptism as well if it’s in the bible?
"Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed: but he that feareth the commandment shall be rewarded." PROVERBS 13:13.
"15.1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
15.2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
15.3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
15.4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
15.5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:
15.6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep." 1 CORINTHIANS 15:1-6
"1.6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
1.7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
1.8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." GALATIANS 1:6-8
In your opinion, Bryan, is it okay for someone to sick with the 1611 AV instead of the 1769 KJV?
ofc its just harder to read because the font and theres a few spelling errors
I read the KJB every single day, and a facsimile of the 1611 is the one that I will usually read out of. There's nothing wrong with that. What _IS_ wrong however is being a "1611 onlyist" (as I call it) and attacking the subsequent editions of the KJB, claiming that they are "corrupt" and that the only pure KJV is the original 1611 edition.
I have facsimiles of both the 1611 and the 1769. They both say the *_same exact thing,_* the only difference being typographical errors were corrected and spelling of certain words were standardized with the 1769.
BOTH are *_the_* KJB, BOTH are God's pure and perfect word in English, because they BOTH are the exact same book. Read whichever edition you like, you can't go wrong.
Stay away from any non-standard edition of the KJB though, such as the _"New Cambridge Paragraph Bible"._
@@AnthonyTuminello Thanks! I just perfer the 1611 over the 1769 becuase I love history and I've always had a pull towards it ever since I got saved. They do have some differences in text though, but nothing major. Thanks again. Glory to Christ ✝
@ That's pretty much the same reason why I like to read out of the 1611. I love history, always have. Plus I love how beautiful the book is.
The differences in text is, again, typographical error. You have to realize just how primitive the Gutenberg printing press was, errors were very easily made. They literally had to place each and every single letter of every single page BACKWARDS. Funny enough though, I don't believe any of the typos in the 1611 affect doctrine in any way. God's providence there.
@@AnthonyTuminello Actually, most of the changes made weren’t originally errors. Here are some examples:
Joshua 3:11:
1611: "Arke of the Couenant, euen the Lord"
1769: "ark of the covenant of the Lord"
Ezekiel 24:7:
1611: "For her blood is in the middest of her: she set it vpon the toppe of a rocke, she powred it vpon the ground to couer it with dust"
1769: "For her blood is in the midst of her; she set it upon the top of a rock; she poured it not upon the ground, to cover it with dust"
Jeremiah 51:30:
1611: "burnt their dwelling places"
1769: "burned her dwellingplaces"
2 Kings 11:10:
1611: "in the Temple"
1769: "in the temple of the LORD"
Mark 10:18:
1611: "There is no man good"
1769: "there is none good"
These are just a few of the tons of changes that they’ve made. Some of which I do agree with, but most I disagree with. But just to make things clear I’m not a “1611 onlyist” haha.
I'm just curious about your thoughts of the Tyndale version? I have both the KJV and Tyndale.
Tyndale never got around to completing the translation of the whole Bible
Amen, brother🙏 the KJB is my authority. Thank you for your teachings!
I hope y'all are doing well ❤
Hello Brian, this is my first post to you. I agree with the AKJB being the infallible word of God 100%. I have around 50 AKJ bibles stored away in case this crazy world someday decides to stop printing them surprising me with a "left hook" if you will. We can never underestimate the unexpected occurrences a day could bring. If I may, I have a question in the gospel of John that I'd like for you to share as a spiritual gift your take on what the scripture is indicating in John 12:28. I have what I hope is a spiritual understanding from the Father of this verse and am asking for your understanding of it to see if we are getting it from the same source. Thanks Brian and peace be unto you.... Danny
What do you think about the Elton Anomoly theory, that the KJV Bible contains a self-authentication system using '7', '7⁷', etc., occurances of important words?
It is the Book of the Lord. He preserved His Word in the Flesh, and His written Word the KJV.
Who put the Bible together?
Would be interested in your opinion on the NKJB.
Here you go:
th-cam.com/video/4Zdq_hNhu3E/w-d-xo.html
Bryan, you're so funny!! The A.I. Bible - just what we need. Come to think of it, I won't be shocked if it turns up someday.
Religion is Man made Jesus Christ is God made ❤😂
My religion is based on the KJV, too. Thank you, Bryan, for the truth. 🪽🙏🕊🙏🪽
"All battles are first won or lost, in the mind." Joan of Arc
While i do not see the KJV as our Lords 100% Word, as I'm a Catholic. I am happy to know that you are able to find solace and closeness to our Lord within it in a way other Bibles and denominations cannot show you. In the end we are all Gods children. We all have unwavering faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. "Denomination wars" be damned.
That said! I do have my very own KJV. I am also an advocate for visiting other churches. I firmly believe we all have something we can learn from one another. Whether that be insight, ways of worship, or tradition.
Tradition is a big one for me. Both the Catholic and Orthodox churches are my favorite on the tradition front.... And where i feel closest to Christ.
Keep on truckin' brother. God bless.
The OG King James does include the whole Bible. It took a while for protestants to remove the "apocrypha". I think it was published together even after it was given that status until the 1800's.
And for you, you like extra carry-ons....
Catholicism isn’t Christianity. If you’re following the traditions of man, you’re being lead to hell.
kjv is the best translation but there is not a perfect translation for all languages and I would like to read the Bible in my own language
Are you sure about that? No perfect translation? How sad.
@Bikeraq yes, I have noticed that all the translations in my language have translation errors or missing verses There is one good New Testament in the same text source as the KJV, but it is hard to find as it is no longer in print.
Bryan, thank you teaching Gods word.
Like Ruckman said, other versions are like shaving with a banana. KJV has power!
Lol! He was spot-on with that one.
The King James Bible has no copywrite. Woe to those who seek to change it. That is what it says. Seek forgiveness while you can.
Please make video on your thoughts on the early christian gnostics. Most of their studies were destroyed once the orthodoxy became a majority over the then diverse christian sects, 3-4th century. The gnostics only surviving texts were discovered after ww2.
If King James was good enough for Apostle Paul then it is good enough for me...
i wonder about the people who doesn't speak english
avpublications.com/freebies/
Scroll down page and see "What About Bibles in Spanish, French, Chinese, Turkish, Farsi, Swahili, German and All the Others?"
I have studied the king james every day for the past 13 years or better. I absolutely believe it contains all that is needed for salvation in Christ Jesus and living a life acceptable to him. I am curious your opinion why the 1611 version was changed? We both believe it was divinely inspired. I've always had a question why it was deemed needing of taking books out.
Please see his video 1611 or 1769?
th-cam.com/video/cs4Fns_yXyE/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=BornAgainBarbarian
@ChantreJ Thanks.. Obviously even watching for a good bit i haven't delved into his past content.
The people we have this most problems with in the Old Testament were in control of what was to become the Holy Bible so guess exactly how that went.
@GoHomeKamala The king james as it is has all we need to do things right and live respectable lives. The rest is up to debate imo.
@royakard8536 look at how they joined with early church people and fabricated the Koran. The first covenant people tried to remove Jesus way more outside of the Bible into another religion. So we have a book removed that counts the Old Testament correctly. Where it's saying how many books we have for the New Testament, you must search for them now. The book of Enoch points to Jesus in everyway and it got removed by those that don't believe in Jesus. We can't be joined to the old Covenant now because of Jesus Christ. It's not so much against a Christian but hurts the J
I've been round and round the mountain with different versions, original languages, denominational perspectives, scholars, etc... There's always another argument... Someone always finds an alternate translation...
Gotta pick a standard. Might as well be the King James Bible. It's proven to be reliable.
Dear Bryan,
- If I may - I've recently come across an anti "KJV only" argument that I wasn't 100% certain how to handle and therefore I would (humbly) like to ask your opinion on the best rebuttal to such a question.
(Note: I am well aware that the following is ultimately a variation of an old and tried argument often raised by critics regarding the multiple editions and revisions of the KJV. Have said that, anyone that's confronted such challenges as many times as I have should immediately recognize that such objections typically focus on - minor textual refinements or typographical corrections - matters that do not alter the substance or authority of God’s Word.
However, the question at hand is of a different nature. Rather than dealing with those minor, classical concerns, it specifically pertains to the theological implications surrounding the Apocrypha.
Making it in my opinion a far weightier matter. Hence, why I am reaching out to to Bryan...)
The augment has three points and goes as follows:
1) If the KJV is truly Inspired by God, why did it originally include the Apocrypha?
*How best do "KJV-only" advocates reconcile their belief in the perfection of the KJV with the fact that it initially included books we now reject as non-canonical.
2) Who Decided What to Remove?
*Later editions of the KJV removed the Apocrypha, but this decision was made by publishers, not the translators. Doesn't this then imply that the KJV was initially imperfect (and) or incomplete?
3) Contradictory Doctrine:
*As the Apocrypha includes teachings that Protestants reject, such as prayers for the dead (2 Maccabees 12:44-46) and salvation through almsgiving (Tobit 12:9). - what is the best refutation, too. - If the KJV is perfect, why would it include books with doctrines contrary to Protestant beliefs?
I pray that you remain steadfast in your convictions, rightly dividing the word of truth, and seeking wisdom in all things.
Thank you for your time and may God bless you and your family.
Matthew Martin Claridge.
Sydney, Australia.
Very simple. The apocrypha was never considered scripture. It was just included for literary value. It was sandwiched between the testaments. Just as some Bible editions have notes or maps or concordances etc. extra things for study or reading, but not the text
@adamthiry868 Thank you mate! ! I apologize for not writing more in response. It's 6:26 am here and I only came across your comment while clicking on some preaching to listen to while getting ready for work...
One of the verses that changed due to the Mandela Effect that bugs me the most is Genesis 3:15, where it originally said, “He will crush thy head”, it now says, “It will bruise thy head”, that is a BIG. difference.
We are told to hide His Word in our hearts where it can’t be taken away from us, because a time is coming when there will be a famine of God’s Word Amos 8:11
False.
Witchcraft, Mandela Effect, MOTB, & The Vatican: th-cam.com/video/2KkKIo0j6Ko/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=BornAgainBarbarian
I hate to, but I actually agree with you. I can’t accept the effect explanation though.
Douay-Rheims Bible-the Catholic counterpart to the King James Version-Genesis 3:15 says crush. NOT THE KJV.
@ really? but I’ve never owned one of those and I remember the verse saying crush.
@@riceisnice444 You can look it up online for free. Several perversions say crush. Books, songs, movies, or sermons about the Bible often quote from the new age versions and you think it's KJV because they say "The Bible says..."
There is no Mandela Effect. See Bryan's free videos on the topic.
Is God able to preserve his word like he promised? If he can't keep his own word, how can anyone trust him to keep their souls?
Good Job Bryan!!
I can say this for certain, no new person who comes to Christianity is gonna be able to read and fully comprehend the KJV if that were the case I may of repented while I was sitting in a jail cell back in 2002 fast forward 21 years I was given a NLT bible in 2023 which is a literal translation and one of the easiest to read and comprehend and yes I realize there is scripture that is omitted but I can always revert back to the KJV it boggles my mind how so many people think you have to read the KJV bible to interpret God's word I have had these concersations with my pastor before he said something about the KJV manuscripts I can't exactly remember word for word what he said but he's a pastor of one of the biggest churches in my city and they give out the NLT to everybody I think he said the KJV was good in its time but the Shakespeare lingo is out of date and since we don't talk like that anymore there is no need to read that specific version and we have an older pastor who reads the NKJV I am not condemning the KJV at all or anybody who still reads it but for a new Christian it is not the best choice. ~ Brother Brax
Galatians 3 made me re-evalute vain jangling about the law, and it's actual implications.
I know we are different members, but it is the same people who don't adhere to such revelations that Paul says "I now tell you even weeping that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ"
"It is hard for thee to kick against the pricks"
2 Corinthians 12:6For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he seeth me to be, or that he heareth of me. 7And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure. 8For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me. 9And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
Psalms 34:3O magnify the LORD with me, and let us exalt his name together. 4I sought the LORD, and he heard me, and delivered me from all my fears. 5They looked unto him, and were lightened: and their faces were not ashamed. 6This poor man cried, and the LORD heard him, and saved him out of all his troubles. 7The angel of the LORD encampeth round about them that fear him, and delivereth them.
Romans 4:13For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: 15Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. 16Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all, 17(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were. 18Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.
Romans 4:3For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 5But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. 6Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, 7Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.
Romans 4:13For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: 15Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. 16Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all, 17(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were. 18Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.
Collosians 2:12Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. 13And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; 14Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; 15And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
What did Paul count but dung that he may win Christ? All things. Galatians 2: 18For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. 19For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
Would really like to see some coverage on your end regarding the abolishing of the law of Moses for a Christian, without the righteousness of the law. As that is what Paul preached to the Gentiles. As re-affirmed in Acts 15, and throughout Ephesians, Romans 3-4, Galatians 1-5, and even John 7:38.
You do a lot for truth. Thank you, much more so than the new version crowds worshiping the bourgeois paintings and defending it at "icons"
Just really wish you'd help drive it home to your viewers. As this channel is primarily spiritual meat, no?
They can handle it.
After all, what I speak of should be milk. Too much hypocrisy in taking righteousness from the law, when under liberty. Approve that which is good, but I worry for those whom I can't meet with, and truly hope you release a better video than "what is true biblical salvation" and actually include doctrine from Galatians explaining how we CANNOT be of the works of the law.
It messed up my walk, for a short while, because I figured my tutor would be well versed against false gospels, as you have demonstrated countless times. What it did was keep me under the yoke of bondage, and I'd escape by the skin of my teeth. For the furtherance of the gospel; ye have not injured me at all, but my heart hurts for those who might have to go through the same thing trying to learn from your channel. Especially first impressions, as the enmity is slain. And because of your "hard preaching" I would frustrate the grace of God through my ignorance of what Jesus has done. Ordinances/ out of the way.
I look forward to the next study, Bryan.
Galatians 3:9So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 11But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 12And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: 14That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. 15Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. KJV
Thank you for your time, Friend.
Brother, the Bible represents everything, starting with creation through the ending of our time; there are no mine or yours but " D "and only. The KJV does overlap many missing scriptures and highlights the one I am reading currently, and I like, but if I think about, or in fact know that these books are missing from many versions of it, and how they shouldn't have been removed because they do inform you better than any restricted versions available. I am kinda concerned about who and why these scriptures were removed and relabelled by creations. I would like to know why the scriptures were removed and who felt the power or intent to remove them. Because I think they are very important to see clearly what we are dealing with. What we have done, or doing, or have been doing with no regret whatsoever, is how some of us are still trying to harness divine power and opportunities that are meant to be someone through occult practice.
❤
**Humanity's Deepest Darkest Secret**
What do we truly know about what constitutes a sin? To begin, we can reflect on the original sin in Eden, where Eve, influenced by the serpent, picked the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge and chose for herself what was good and what was bad.
This act represented an attempt to usurp the divine power of God over creation. The story becomes particularly compelling here, as occult practices-those used by cults-attempt to intercept creation and life in general to access or claim divine power.
We understand that occult sciences are termed "occult" because they break down creation into manageable layers or instruments. These are then utilized to overlay creation with themes or narratives designed to manipulate the intended audience.
I refer to "their kind" because, irrespective of color or origin, we are all one. It is essential not to fall prey to divisive concepts that label certain people as "privileged" or "less favorable," as these ideas result from manipulative practices.
**Freud, Jung, and the Mind**
Psychologists have demonstrated how the mind and psyche can be interpreted and influenced:
**Freud's Superego**:
Freud proposed that our psyche contains a moral compass known as the superego. Cultic materials often exploit their victims' psychological profiles, crafting messages in reverse or deceptive ways to keep the reader's mind submissive, effectively blackmailing them. This understanding is critical.
**Jung's Collective Unconscious**:
Jung introduced the concept of the collective unconscious, a shared psychological space that connects us through symbols, collective memories, and even sins. These symbols are often weaponized to manipulate individuals or groups, coercing them into submission.
Cults frequently instill their guilt or sins within their followers. Recall that sin is defined as the attempt to seize divine power for selfish reasons. When Freud's superego and Jung's collective unconscious are combined, they create a powerful tool for control-what some might refer to as "the evil eye."
Higher and lower entities can deceive, blackmail, or keep populations in a state of submission or captivity. While these channels can reveal personal or collective wrongdoings, when wielded with malicious intent, they become instruments of what could be termed modern slavery or advanced psychological terrorism-an immense misuse of power by humans.
**The Superego and Collective Unconscious**
In truth, the superego should align with the image of the Creator, while the untouched collective unconscious should adhere to moral principles that guide us. However, cults do not respect this natural alignment. Instead, they manipulate these two psychological channels using the memories and experiences of their victims, reconstructing them to fit their own "divine" order.
This false divine order often seeks to establish a new age where a counterfeit divine entity could emerge-one capable of producing a false messiah (the Antichrist). Such manipulation involves overriding the mind and replacing it with a theme or order of their making.
**Sorcery and Witchcraft**
When someone manipulates these psychological channels, they engage in sorcery. When sorcerers unite under a single order, it evolves into witchcraft. If someone establishes control over these witches, they may reach what could be termed a "god mode."
Why is this problematic, given that we are all creations? The issue arises from the fact that this mechanistic approach exploits a manmade superego, often crafted through cruelty and sadistic practices, imposing a false symbol onto the collective unconscious. This process renders individuals powerless, leading to brainwashing.
The true superego is not separate from the collective unconscious; both must align with God, the Creator, at all times. Any deviation from this alignment-and any effort to substitute the divine order with human constructs-constitutes a sin and distances us from the Creator.
❤
King James only Bible for me. To
many versions out there. Watch out. Keep looking up, our redemption draws near. 🙏🏼❤️
Bible definition. KJV only, Gods infallible word.
Amen.
Thank you for sharing
1611, 1629, 1638, 1762, or 1769 edition? Over 2000 changes
1611 or 1769?
th-cam.com/video/cs4Fns_yXyE/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=BornAgainBarbarian
what version does a China man who lives in the hills of China read, who does not read English? Early church had converted pagans and none of the churches had the New Testament.
The wise men that came to see Jesus when he was born were from Asia. It's heard
avpublications.com/freebies/
Scroll down page and see "What About Bibles in Spanish, French, Chinese, Turkish, Farsi, Swahili, German and All the Others?"
@@ChantreJ you didn't answer my simple question. A Chinese person in China in the boonies who can't speak or read English, what bible translation would they be handed, or do you DEMAND they learn to read the queen's english no less?
@@Tomana_ our timeline today isn't as we are told. Your question got answered when Jesus said it was given to the whole world. Everyone knew of Jesus then.
@@Tomana_ I gave you a link for research and there's plenty more out there. I honestly do NOT have time to write studies in the comment section and hunt down websites to link only to be ignored.
The Chinese people can and do read Bibles that come from the same manuscripts the KJV comes from. Study it on your own if it's important. Google "The Chinese King James Version" for a start. Read. Study. On your own.
ckjvbible.wpengine.com/
...when we stand before GOD, I dont think He will ask us which translation we read...but instead, are you covered by the blood of Jesus...is your name written in the Lambs book of life...did you spend your time telling people of Jesus, or arguing about particular translations??...the written down word (paper and ink) was not nailed to the cross...JESUS was!!!...Him crucified and risen is the ONLY way home!!❤
Je suis entièrement d’accord, merci pour ces précisions mon frère….
Church of England, then? Where’s your bishopric ?
Confraternity New Testament is equal to KJV but more pleasant to read.
Agree %100 ! KJV 16 11 only God bless ! Me either ! Amen !
Oh and i almost forgot. Dont take the Sunday law mark of the beast.
I use KJV lots of others change words which change meanings.
What does the KJV say about the bible????????? Psalm 12:6&7 6. The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation foe ever. Psalm 119:89 For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven. QUESTION???????? settled in heaven or the KJV?????????
MOST OF THE BIBLE WAS CHANGED!!!
So you are a loyalist..... why and not Geneva Bible ?
Proof That The Geneva Bible Is Inferior To The King James Bible
th-cam.com/video/jRjTpc05NRs/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=BornAgainBarbarian
The Lord's Prayer and Psalm 23 are all out of sync with modern derivative Bibles. Lord please direct them back to the KJV, Amen.
In Maine here as well, KJV alone!
וֶהֱפִֽיצְךָ֤ יְהֹוָה֙ בְּכׇל־הָ֣עַמִּ֔ים מִקְצֵ֥ה הָאָ֖רֶץ וְעַד־קְצֵ֣ה הָאָ֑רֶץ וְעָבַ֨דְתָּ שָּׁ֜ם אֱלֹהִ֣ים אֲחֵרִ֗ים אֲשֶׁ֧ר לֹא־יָדַ֛עְתָּ אַתָּ֥ה וַאֲבֹתֶ֖יךָ עֵ֥ץ וָאָֽבֶן׃
יהוה (G-d) will scatter you among all the peoples from one end of the earth to the other, and there you shall serve other gods, wood and stone, whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced.
This is Deuteronomy 28:64. As you can see here, God warns the nation of Israel not serve God's of wood and stone. If you read this thoroughly you will also see that it also says "whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced" which is clear to mean the religion of wood which is speaking about the cross (Jesus hence Christianity) and the G-d of the stone which means Islam (stone is referring to the stone on the kaaba in Meca). G-d told his people thousands of years before these 2 false religions started to stay away from them so it's not that we are "blind" it's that we are following G-d.
You have just admitted that the only way you justify your religion, is because you've seen Supernatural happenings connected with the KJV. Many people have Supernatural things happen around them that has never heard of the KJV. Use the logic that you say you have.
I also mentioned manuscript evidence. Did you miss that part?
@BryanDenlingerKJVM no sir, didn't miss that. You explicitly said that you weren't going to listen to any evidence disputing the KJV. So didn't want to waste time. I believe you understand that the KJV isn't the most accurate translation. What I got out of your video was that you don't care, you have the faith that it's true.
God's perfect word the KJB.
So is mine. Amen!
Excellent brother
so its based on judaism. thanks for letting us know
Modern Judaism is a rejection of the Bible.
Geneva 1599
King James 1611.
King James pure Bible search.. is good software for studying phrases... Mike Hoggard is a King James person such as you..
KJB - Matthew, Chapter 15
"24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. 26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. 27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table."
Now bark! As your masters, sons of david expect you to. xD christians. xD
@@hadeseye2297 when you study the Bible look for multiple word phrases... You can do that with that software it's free... And it adds so much more depth to understanding the word... You can't do this with any other Bible..
I resisted Enoch until realizing how it's very old and points directly to Jesus. It was hidden by who do you think?
Mine is too but I don't agree with everything else you say you have so much to learn
YES THE KJV BIBLE
wonderful
is influencing the same as prophesying? Ya , many are you, 'barbarian' . The end is soon.
The Christian faith isn’t based on a Bible, it is based on a divine person, Jesus.
💯!
KJV only is almost idol worship at this point. Yes, it was a good translation for its time but still subject to human error and most of all, the shortcomings of translating from one language to another. Not all ideas and concepts translate perfectly from one language to another. Thats just a fact. The KJV is not some perfect translation.
Probably the best thing we can do to delve further in Bible study is look at translations from the original Hebrew and Greek and go from there.
If there is no perfect translation, then how can there be a perfect faith? Perfect religion? Also, if you are open minded, watch some of the videos on Truth Is Christ channel and evaluate your position further.
Please look further into this. The King James Version is not the only good English translation of the Bible, and on the contrary, it makes God seem unnecessarily foreign and distant by making His word be in a version of English that is rather different from contemporary English. The original Scriptures were written in commonly spoken dialects so they would be easy to understand. The KJV-only movement is largely reactionary to bad translations such as the NIV, and has no foundation in the Scriptures themselves.✌️
Look further into this?
"24 Years Studying Manuscript Evidence Lead Me To Being A KJV Only Preacher" th-cam.com/video/KCoOhF9yKP4/w-d-xo.html
yeah, a lot of modern Christians make the KJV an idol. Congratulations.
I see you drank the kool-aid and have embraced those that despise the 1611 king James our forefathers loved and revered.
If you don’t submit yourself to the authority of God‘s word, you are making yourself an idol, not the scriptures.
The King James Bible is the very words that proceeded out of the mouth of God, written down. Jesus Christ COMMANDS us to live by those words (Matt. 4:4; Luke 4:4). So let me ask you a question:
Can you really make the words of the Lord Jesus Christ an "idol"? How does that make any sense? If you praise the words of God, you're praising God Himself, for they are HIS OWN WORDS that came out of HIS OWN MOUTH.
You can't have God without His words, and you can't have God's words without God Himself.
Psalm 56:10 (KJV) In God will I praise his word: in the LORD will I praise his word.
NOT ashamed.
Not possible.
All that for Jesus to say he never knew you.
Whats your heritage in accordance 🤔
I perceive youre a son of TsYahn YahuaDah yet, you may be of the northern Kingdom Y'srael...... You tell me
1:52 Greek????!🤔 😂
In both Greek and Latin Gee Sus means Earth Pig 🐖😂
Very good, AMEN Brother!
Go to Rabbi Tovia Singer. Disproves all of what he says
Jesus described Tovia Singer perfectly in this verse:
Matthew 15:14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
וֶהֱפִֽיצְךָ֤ יְהֹוָה֙ בְּכׇל־הָ֣עַמִּ֔ים מִקְצֵ֥ה הָאָ֖רֶץ וְעַד־קְצֵ֣ה הָאָ֑רֶץ וְעָבַ֨דְתָּ שָּׁ֜ם אֱלֹהִ֣ים אֲחֵרִ֗ים אֲשֶׁ֧ר לֹא־יָדַ֛עְתָּ אַתָּ֥ה וַאֲבֹתֶ֖יךָ עֵ֥ץ וָאָֽבֶן׃
יהוה (G-d) will scatter you among all the peoples from one end of the earth to the other, and there you shall serve other gods, wood and stone, whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced.
This is Deuteronomy 28:64. As you can see here, God warns the nation of Israel not serve God's of wood and stone. If you read this thoroughly you will also see that it also says "whom neither you nor your ancestors have experienced" which is clear to mean the religion of wood which is speaking about the cross (Jesus hence Christianity) and the G-d of the stone which means Islam (stone is referring to the stone on the kaaba in Meca). G-d told his people thousands of years before these 2 false religions started to stay away from them so it's not that we are "blind" it's that we are following G-d.
I studied Biblical Greek and Hebrew. KJV, while good for several hundred years, cannot meet the needs of communication that has evolved into our present day. The many scholars who translated the original manuscripts from the original languages into the vernacular did an excellent job. Enter NIV. Enter NAS. Enter AMP. Excellent and faithful translations from scholars who studied the original manuscripts.. KJV is NO LONGER word meanings that are spoken in today's English. This is nonsense.
Thou art incorrect in thine opinion, sir.
Acts 28- "He went to gather some fa%%ots." Hmmm.
The above mentioned faithful translations are faithful to the original Greek Septuagent and Greek translated Old Testament available during Paul's time.
I have studied theology extensively.
I emphatically disagree with you Brother.
unfortunately the KJv is riddled with translational errors
as most bibles are, and ignorant of Idiomatic use of verbiage
but the most important point is the KJv was a product of the Masoretic text, that is a jewish(edomite) interpretation of scripture where they redacted many sections, especially in relation to Christ's prophecy
written 1000 years after the Septuagint
Tyrant became terrible. For one.
This is an incredibly unhinged channel. You are full of rage an we know.
Not every country has got a KJV, so are they worse off? Think about it ....
Every airport in the world is required to use ENGLISH with their air traffic controllers and pilots. Think about it...
Look into the ROCOR russian orthodox church outside russia. I believe it is pure and of god.
אמת 66 א
Who's truth? Not European, nor Asian, not Indian, nor African truth.
My bible is the king Jesus bible. You my friend need to shut your lying mouth until you know what you are talking about. Jesus teaches us not you big mouth❤
you need to shut your lying mouth as you are not a Christian talking like that.
And then you put a heart at the end... ok then.
@AnthonyTuminello yeah you never heard LOVE YOU WITH THE TRUTH. STOP WITH THE KNOW IT ALL ATTITUDE !
@@AlSchreiner-c5v Says the fool telling an elder to "shut his lying mouth until he knows what he's talking about", as if he didn't spend 20+ years studying the Bible version issue.
@AnthonyTuminello we have more of God's wisdom in our fingernail clippings than you will ever have. Elder Schneider. If you want something sugear coated go buy yourself a box of donuts. We will do bible 101 with you any time . We don't debate. We will tell you truth and you will listen. Oh yeah you just want to argue and accuse like your father lucifer.
I know this is off topic but where do you buy the sheepskin clothing and wool you wear?
Thanks for sharing this healthy discussion, don’t weaken to the comments, edify each other with the word🛶
I bought all of my Shearling coats used on Ebay. They are too expensive to purchase new.
@ ok thanks