Oh, I remember her. I was on the path last year going through different communicators of this. I lost interest in her almost immediately. Actually, awakening happened after I found Tony and listened to audio from his site on my earphones before going to bed.. That's just what happened, I guess it's different for everyone. But to this day, I haven't really found anyone who is more clear and direct than Tony. But, that's just me..
To Atgunchev- First off, I'd like to say that i do not wish to offend anyone and i'm quite certain that Tony Parson's could care-less about what anyone says or thinks about him. To answer your question: I think that people find the teacher that best suites their thought/beliefs or vibrations at that specific time. But,with that said, if you're 'Q'urious for my opinion, then I would suggest you look up Jackie O'keeffe.
I wouldn't listen to other people, but rather trust my own experience. What happens when you fall asleep at night? I mean deep sleep with no dreams. That's the answer of your question. The truth is always utterly simple.
There are a few other people i would recommend but Jackie (actually she goes by Jac O'Keeffe) is the very best at articulating all this stuff. Good luck.
Are you saying Tony that Sri Ramana was arrogant? and did he say he spoke to people according to their intelligence. I believe he said he spoke to people according to their understanding - A huge difference.
Mae rik I think Tonys missed the point of Ramana asking "show me your mind "or "who am I ?" the very reason Ramana asks us to do this is to discover there is no one there to answer ! then the idea of mind,me or an I vanishes into Being.Ramana knows there is no one there, he's not dualistic at all.......... Ramana answered the Question of the grieving parents about their son in heaven,the parents were not asking about non duality.....Ramana realised they wouldn't have been helped in their moment of grief, yes,what he said was untrue as regards Nonduality but was a compassionet answer,suitable at the time,he just couldn't send them away with the fact there is no heaven and they wouldn't see their son again.They were not in a fit state to be told there is nothing,if you lose someone close you are not thinking clearly, the mind is numb with grief.Maybe at a later time they would return and ask about non duality.To call Ramana arrogant is arrogant itself perhaps egoic with Ramanas Picture on the wall behind! ,but I enjoy Tonys "talks" a great deal,but I feel he does not explain clearly enough sometimes and maybe there is a little Tony Parsons lurking in there......the cat crept in crapped and crept out again...The ego is very cunning just like a cat,be careful ,Tony....
Tony fails to say that there IS a difference if the self collapses. Greed, addiction, the huge amount if personal fear all collapse. These go hand in hand with separation. So obviously theres a huge difference human expresssion
There is a sincerity with Tony but, somehow, not completely capable of describing this whole phenomenon of being. Unfortunately he falls short of truly expressing the message.
Thanks!
I really made mashed potatoes tonight. Everyone loved it.
Tony is so uncompromisingly enlighted he is like a sledgehammer.
Oh, I remember her. I was on the path last year going through different communicators of this. I lost interest in her almost immediately. Actually, awakening happened after I found Tony and listened to audio from his site on my earphones before going to bed.. That's just what happened, I guess it's different for everyone. But to this day, I haven't really found anyone who is more clear and direct than Tony. But, that's just me..
To Atgunchev- First off, I'd like to say that i do not wish to offend anyone and i'm quite certain that Tony Parson's could care-less about what anyone says or thinks about him.
To answer your question: I think that people find the teacher that best suites their thought/beliefs or vibrations at that specific time. But,with that said, if you're 'Q'urious for my opinion, then I would suggest you look up Jackie O'keeffe.
I wouldn't listen to other people, but rather trust my own experience. What happens when you fall asleep at night? I mean deep sleep with no dreams. That's the answer of your question. The truth is always utterly simple.
David Hume also came up with such driftwood.
There are a few other people i would recommend but Jackie (actually she goes by Jac O'Keeffe) is the very best at articulating all this stuff. Good luck.
I love the expression of Jim Newman, Andreas Müller and Dana Raimann.
Jim Newman!
It's like taking off a slightly tight shoe
😂Keeping it ordinary
Are you saying Tony that Sri Ramana was arrogant? and did he say he spoke to people according to their intelligence. I believe he said he spoke to people according to their understanding - A huge difference.
Mae rik I think Tonys missed the point of Ramana asking "show me your mind "or "who am I ?" the very reason Ramana asks us to do this is to discover there is no one there to answer ! then the idea of mind,me or an I vanishes into Being.Ramana knows there is no one there, he's not dualistic at all.......... Ramana answered the Question of the grieving parents about their son in heaven,the parents were not asking about non duality.....Ramana realised they wouldn't have been helped in their moment of grief, yes,what he said was untrue as regards Nonduality but was a compassionet answer,suitable at the time,he just couldn't send them away with the fact there is no heaven and they wouldn't see their son again.They were not in a fit state to be told there is nothing,if you lose someone close you are not thinking clearly, the mind is numb with grief.Maybe at a later time they would return and ask about non duality.To call Ramana arrogant is arrogant itself perhaps egoic with Ramanas Picture on the wall behind! ,but I enjoy Tonys "talks" a great deal,but I feel he does not explain clearly enough sometimes and maybe there is a little Tony Parsons lurking in there......the cat crept in crapped and crept out again...The ego is very cunning just like a cat,be careful ,Tony....
Agree with you absolutely John :)
I wonder who you think is expressing it better, really. Because to me this is just inexpressable. I'm really qurious, who is better than him?
I am as lucky as a dead man.
Tony fails to say that there IS a difference if the self collapses. Greed, addiction, the huge amount if personal fear all collapse. These go hand in hand with separation. So obviously theres a huge difference human expresssion
That gets rid of Dzogchen then.
There is a sincerity with Tony but, somehow, not completely capable of describing this whole phenomenon of being. Unfortunately he falls short of truly expressing the message.
There is no tony,
And there is no message