3:55 "Since consciousness is infinite, it's manifestations inevitably have to be infinite." I believe this statement supports the opinion I believe is most likely to be in the ballpark of what is true. Among those with an informed opinion about philosophy the most significant disagreement, in my view, is whether or not we should or could renounce the world as opposed to having no choice but to learn how to overcome the temptations of the world which lead us into irrational behavior in falling into the deception that our individual self is at all separate from anything witnessed in our experience. In my opinion there are several irreconcilable contradictions in what is a generally accepted view of what is "Eastern" philosophy. Such as how can an individual person possibly achieve so called liberation separately from everyone else as we all share in the same being and our apparent self is just an appearance projected from and within the one True self which is the one who is aware, the knower of all things known such as our apparent selves. I can't help but notice that every person who anyone has ever claimed to be enlightened remains entangled in the apparent world with not a single plausible reason for anyone to believe that they will free themselves from this entanglement at the time of their apparent death. It seems to me obvious that every so called enlightened person continues to act in the world because they are compelled by the desire to do so and death is just another transition into a different state of mind in which a different world appears. I have yet to hear of any reason to believe a so called enlightened person will somehow after the appearance of the death of a body then their being which is the same being appearing everywhere will then no longer participate in worldly entanglements. This errant, imo, belief is the foundation for the harmful belief of karma being a ranking system of the progress of beings as determined by the state of their appearance. It's the cause of the caste system in India which to me is a practice of idolatry which has it's cousins all over the world often excused in slogans and sayings which pretend to offer reason to allow others to remain in whatever place they find themselves because their environment is a reflection of their karma when in reality all things we witness are an expression of the one self present in all environments. If we view a human cell as a microcosm of the Universe we find ourselves presently then we can infer that environments evolve infinitely within greater environments and divide infinitely, each in their kind, in a process of diversification as daughters of cells which become the mothers of new generations evidenced by the mitosis of cells each nurtured through the mitochondria which seem to relate to Eve as do the Ribosomes, subconscious, etc., as the woman who is silent in the church as to having opinions about what will be done. I'm wondering if it is correct that who we are is the unchanging being or if it may be more correct to say that we are, I am, the whole of all that we create as a reflection of our being. I am not my reflection in a mirror but it is a reflection of my appearance which is a reflection of my state of being with the equation E equals MC2 being the reflection of the Universal being when put in brackets to the infinite power as potential.
Theory of infinite universes is true from the spirituality point of view, as many of ancient saints from India were able to see infinite numbers of suns. I follow a few spiritual leaders as well, who mentioned that as per various Holy Books from different religions, there are infinite numbers of Universes. This scientific discovery of quantum physics is true. Great discovery 🙏
Multiverses is not a "discovery quantum physics". There's no evidence for it, and probably can't be. Many believe it's not even a physical theory but a physicalist metaphysics. I suggest it might be worth watching the video again.
In the quantum physics side of thinking if you pull the string when it’s taut, it will v”vibrate” or shift many times both above and below. Each of those vibrations is the string in multiple positions parallel to each other.
As a physicist, my point of view totally agree with yours Deepak Ji, when you say Shroedinger’s equation, it’s a mathematical expression of spiritual wisdon.
And when we practice what you teach in your “total meditation book”we start becoming aware of this multi dimensionally, in everything we do: observing our small I limited by the body
Thanks for clarifying the difference, Deepak! I've had the sense for a while that due to the popularization of the multiverse idea in the Marvel movies etc., people have started mixing them up. In my view Many Worlds (the QM interpretation) is one of the most preposterous ideas in all of human history, and certainly the least parsimonious. It's simply an unfalsifiable get-out-of-jail-free card for desperate physicalists, who can wave it in the air when asked about the measurement problem. If it's true then a sextillion-squared Williams of Occam are spinning in their graves. That there might be other _created_ , _intended_ universes than this one seems to me pretty much inevitable. It simply follows, imo, from the existence of this one. As you note, many sages have experienced other spacetimes (including, of course, Tom Campbell, who calls them "reality frames"; anyone who's had an NDE; etc.). I myself was once shown a mindblowingly vast vision of countless universes; and perhaps we've all experienced being in a different spacetime, because perhaps that's what dreams are.
@halfacanuck - I appreciate your point of view, especially concerning dreaming. Having gotten much from both Tom and William I'm gonna hope that if any spinning is taking place our William is taking it in stride. Be Cool.
since both are thought by a conscious mind they both are possible to experience.which one is probable is the question i guess. also quality of experince will be different to mind as u see they are fundamentally different universes .one is experinced with materalist perspective,other is by conciousness. mind can limit itself and within this limitation experince different types of dimensions. it can also choose to expand itself too. for example a prison cell is reduced options for a standart mind.but put a sadhu inside.u know what i mean :) about probability i would like to discuss more.i have different approach to the topic.
Jordan Maxwell says Bluntly: V r not alone. Who do u think is helping us cope with the present challenges v have at present n our hands due 2 hidden mischiefs. Did u know: the jabs vr a genode weaoon? N yet, v r growing. Hows that? V r being helped 2 c better. Luv: Mu.Mumbai
Deepak do you know anything about gaze response where someone has a reaction from being looked at? Furthermore have you ever encountered these responses occuring through looking at someone in video filmed in the past? thanks
@@TheChopraWell I tried to submit the question on AskDeepak but it displayed the spinning arrows but would not send. This is just some added information but I wrote a short book about this called change the past in the future - a look into the existence of time and this is the blurb - Around nine years ago now I noticed that when I look at somebody or another living being they react to it. The responses can include; a blink, raised eyebrows, a flinch, look up, look in my direction, or just a general change in trajectory. This phenomenon is known as a gaze response, and the most prominent researcher that I have come across studying it is Rupert Sheldrake. It is not understood how it happens as there is no physical medium or connection in between people as to how it could happen and so it is a non-local phenomenon (locality means that something can only effect something in direct contact/ immediate proximity with it). However, around seven years ago I noticed that the same responses were also occurring when I watch somebody in a video that was filmed in the past which raised a lot of questions that are discussed in this book. This is the first chapter of the book discussing this - The Copenhagen interpretation says the probability waves exist for a particle to appear as a particle, then the particle is observed which then demonstrates what it appears as as being the actual state (called the wave collapses/ wave-function), and the other probability waves were not the actual state, and therefore no longer exist. This therefore assumes what physically collapses as being exclusively ‘real’. In the many-worlds interpretation, it says that regardless of what collapses, the potential for it already and always does exist, which also correlates to Albert Einstein’s block universe theory - that all potential already always exists simultaneously, regardless of an interpretation or perception of linear time. With this comes the implication that the future has already ‘happened’, in the sense that the possibilities already exist and what collapses isn’t exclusively real or ‘happening’, and that the potential is as equally ‘happening’ as what collapses (the future is already happening/ whatever can appear is always already happening). Just as the potential that appeared in the 'past', it’s not the past happened and now it’s not happening, those potential waves are not currently collapsed but they still exist, or are still happening. So take a video for instance, you’re not watching something that has happened, it’s currently happening, and is always happening. If the past is not set and is still happening, it can still be influenced. So take a video that was filmed in the past, and as an example, if you hypothetically had the ability of telekinesis, you could lift something up in the video, and that would be what ‘happened’ in the past. If you had that ability, you could influence the past and furthermore, you could influence/ change the past in the future - could do something, in this case watch the video, in the future and change the past. Let’s say there is a video of an object being lifted into the air by telekinesis that was filmed 30 years ago, and let’s say that the person with the telekinesis abilities that watched the video and lifted the object is called person A. Now let’s also say I watch the video of the object being lifted, but person A hasn’t watched the video and lifted the object yet, and is going to do it in the future say 15 minutes from now - something in the past has already happened because of something in the future that hasn’t happened yet. Let’s say we stop person A from ever watching the video, such as delete the video, now person A can’t lift the object in the video of the past, so the object lifting couldn’t have happened. There wouldn’t have been the video of the object being lifted, because it only happened because person A lifted it in the future. So let’s say person A did watch the video and lifts the object 15 minutes from now - I can watch the video now of it being lifted, even though person A hasn’t done it yet? Only if person A actually does/ did do it in the future - if not the object would not have lifted. So the future has already happened? If the object was lifted, then that means person A did lift the object in the future. So the future is set? If the object was lifted, that means that it did already happen, even though person A hasn’t done it yet. But even though the object being lifted has already happened/ appeared, the decision to do it hasn’t appeared yet because the past is only influenced when person A watches the video and lifts the object - only at the ‘time’ (point) when the decision to change the past is made is the past changed, otherwise it wouldn’t of happened (the past changes on a whim so to speak (not fixed)/ it’s not that the object was lifted in the past then the future is already set, and person A lifting the object has already happened (is set). The object isn’t lifted until the point in the future when person A decided to do it, so it’s not that the future is set, it’s because the past isn’t set, the past is still happening. And so the past isn’t changed/ it’s not person A ‘changes the past’ (that the object wasn’t originally lifted then person A lifts it instead and changes something that already happened), the object being lifted is what ‘originally’ happened, or the object lifting is just what is happening - there's no time between the object lifting ‘in the past’, and person A lifting it ‘in the future’/ person A ‘in the future’ lifting the object ‘in the past’, is happening in ‘real-time’. The potential for anything to collapse is always already happening. There are infinite configurations that are always happening, and just one configuration, even though is currently collapsed, is never set - it’s always everything. Just as the potential that collapsed ‘in the past’ exists and is happening, the potential that can appear in ‘the future’ exists and is also ‘already’ happening. It’s not possible to precisely predict the future (clairvoyance), there can just be awareness of/ imagine the ways the particles can be configured, e.g. if there are dark clouds it could be said there is going to be lightning, but it can’t be said when or where the lightning will hit, but the lightning strike has already happened/ is already happening.
Hi Jeffrey, you might be interested in Rupert Sheldrake's book, I think its called The Sense of Being Stared At. He is a brilliant holistic nonduality researcher, whose focus of work is Morphogenic Fields (aka Source Consciousness). There are also podcasts floating around.w some non duality teachers, yet cant recall which ones at the moment. Tana Karen
@@tanakaren1822 Yes I spoke with Rupert Sheldrake and he said that he had never encountered this phenonemon occuring through videos filmed in the past but was too busy to help with it so this is something I would still like to formally explore but have had no luck in finding anyone to help test it. Thanks.
The unfolding is totally scientific, a particle cannot move without using a pre-existing potencial, this system must be under the influence of thermodynamics, so I, as co-creator creat my multiverse. 🥰📚✍️
This is a fascinating topic. I agree that shifting planes of consciousness does allow us to access different universes, but this whole process is mediated by karma. The better our karma is the more able we are to gain access to a universe where we can lead the life we want. It is kind of like driving a car in which the number of gears can differ, depending on the driver's karma. A driver with especially good karma can shift into gears that allow him (or her) to drive at especially high speeds. Same thing with our access to universes where our dreams become reality. It is good karma that gives us access to them.
Hmm, good karma worlds may not necessarily be chosen by Awakend hoid karma folks; we are all one, so those who are truley Awakend have integrated that into themselves & therefore compassion for all. Others may develop Siddhis or outer tecnologyto get to bliss worlds, but that's akin to hoteiring a car.
So amazing the other day I dreamt I was in a different era of time. I was lost at first then awoke in the dream. Even the dog knew I wasn't the same individual then I heard a voice say. Would u like to stay here? I was silent and in shock at what I heard then all of a sudden I woke up. It was trippy. It seemed like I went back the the early eighties.
Imagination/the power of! That we inherently are steeped, spontaneously, in a often richly rewarding habit of practicing it from the earliest days of our youth is profound…and to look back as adults and abstract the implications in the subtext really tends to be, as well…😮❤
... o k, & 2 refills how about... Ch. 3, Science is a Witness of God keeping order- against all odds (a little drama) Ch. 3:1 Both the Earth & Heaven cried-out to God, "Why hast thou forsaken us..?" Ch. 3:2 Dominion equals Responsibility hmm... footnote, (um, I only guess what a footnote is) The order (every) atom bonds in Time began with a thought
Have we went from 11 dimensions to infinite dimensions now? Also Deepak, why do we keep saying the word 'particles' if they are really strings? Too small to know perhaps.
Why would multiple universes be necesarry when its all for the experience of it. Would multiple universes allow us experiences that this universe can not provide us?
![แข่งเพิ่มน้ำหนักใน 24 ชั่วโมง!! [Ver 2025]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/20xn0g6k-ec/mqdefault.jpg)
3:55 "Since consciousness is infinite, it's manifestations inevitably have to be infinite." I believe this statement supports the opinion I believe is most likely to be in the ballpark of what is true. Among those with an informed opinion about philosophy the most significant disagreement, in my view, is whether or not we should or could renounce the world as opposed to having no choice but to learn how to overcome the temptations of the world which lead us into irrational behavior in falling into the deception that our individual self is at all separate from anything witnessed in our experience.
In my opinion there are several irreconcilable contradictions in what is a generally accepted view of what is "Eastern" philosophy. Such as how can an individual person possibly achieve so called liberation separately from everyone else as we all share in the same being and our apparent self is just an appearance projected from and within the one True self which is the one who is aware, the knower of all things known such as our apparent selves. I can't help but notice that every person who anyone has ever claimed to be enlightened remains entangled in the apparent world with not a single plausible reason for anyone to believe that they will free themselves from this entanglement at the time of their apparent death. It seems to me obvious that every so called enlightened person continues to act in the world because they are compelled by the desire to do so and death is just another transition into a different state of mind in which a different world appears. I have yet to hear of any reason to believe a so called enlightened person will somehow after the appearance of the death of a body then their being which is the same being appearing everywhere will then no longer participate in worldly entanglements. This errant, imo, belief is the foundation for the harmful belief of karma being a ranking system of the progress of beings as determined by the state of their appearance. It's the cause of the caste system in India which to me is a practice of idolatry which has it's cousins all over the world often excused in slogans and sayings which pretend to offer reason to allow others to remain in whatever place they find themselves because their environment is a reflection of their karma when in reality all things we witness are an expression of the one self present in all environments. If we view a human cell as a microcosm of the Universe we find ourselves presently then we can infer that environments evolve infinitely within greater environments and divide infinitely, each in their kind, in a process of diversification as daughters of cells which become the mothers of new generations evidenced by the mitosis of cells each nurtured through the mitochondria which seem to relate to Eve as do the Ribosomes, subconscious, etc., as the woman who is silent in the church as to having opinions about what will be done.
I'm wondering if it is correct that who we are is the unchanging being or if it may be more correct to say that we are, I am, the whole of all that we create as a reflection of our being. I am not my reflection in a mirror but it is a reflection of my appearance which is a reflection of my state of being with the equation E equals MC2 being the reflection of the Universal being when put in brackets to the infinite power as potential.
Theory of infinite universes is true from the spirituality point of view, as many of ancient saints from India were able to see infinite numbers of suns. I follow a few spiritual leaders as well, who mentioned that as per various Holy Books from different religions, there are infinite numbers of Universes. This scientific discovery of quantum physics is true. Great discovery 🙏
Multiverses is not a "discovery quantum physics". There's no evidence for it, and probably can't be. Many believe it's not even a physical theory but a physicalist metaphysics. I suggest it might be worth watching the video again.
‘I Am That’ - Nisargadatta Maharaj
Thank You Guruji 🙏
Interesting overview and understanding 😊❤ love your work 🙏
It raises one’s awareness and provide a level of clarity for some of our own “glimpses” or stumble into alternates!
In the quantum physics side of thinking if you pull the string when it’s taut, it will v”vibrate” or shift many times both above and below. Each of those vibrations is the string in multiple positions parallel to each other.
Sharing this understanding saves me from madness. Thank you!!
Thank you 🙏
Crazy and Off the Wall are two ways of characterizing everyone I've known who was worth listening to! Thank you again and Be Cool.
Love and gratitude ❤🙏
Love and gratitude from your great I in Brazi, Shri Deepak Ji
As a physicist, my point of view totally agree with yours Deepak Ji, when you say Shroedinger’s equation, it’s a mathematical expression of spiritual wisdon.
Actually, every night in dreams, we experience this multidimensional aspects of our being
And when we practice what you teach in your “total meditation book”we start becoming aware of this multi dimensionally, in everything we do: observing our small I limited by the body
Practicing meditation in everything we do as our most natural state of being
Going to that which is previous to human constructs like, words, culture, religious dogmas and believes
I truly wish I knew the right answer! 🤔 💭
This understanding helps in seeing our Purpose n Life.
Yoga has the technology to attune n.
Appreciate. Much Luv,Peace n Happiness
Mumbai, India
❤keep them coming. Love it!
Your Crazy makes sense ! 😊 Thank you for your inspiration and dedication to sharing your videos daily. I receive with love. Blessings to you🙏
Thank you, happy you enjoy them 🙏
Thanks for sharing 'crazy'. I am with you. To me, it makes perfect sense. I am grateful that you initiate thought and share your experience.
Nothing is impossible 😉❤
Keep progress
Your'e truly a legend sir ! Always learning when I hear you talk . So much wisdom and so much humility.
Thank you for sharing! That totally makes sense! ❤
Thanks for clarifying the difference, Deepak! I've had the sense for a while that due to the popularization of the multiverse idea in the Marvel movies etc., people have started mixing them up.
In my view Many Worlds (the QM interpretation) is one of the most preposterous ideas in all of human history, and certainly the least parsimonious. It's simply an unfalsifiable get-out-of-jail-free card for desperate physicalists, who can wave it in the air when asked about the measurement problem. If it's true then a sextillion-squared Williams of Occam are spinning in their graves.
That there might be other _created_ , _intended_ universes than this one seems to me pretty much inevitable. It simply follows, imo, from the existence of this one. As you note, many sages have experienced other spacetimes (including, of course, Tom Campbell, who calls them "reality frames"; anyone who's had an NDE; etc.). I myself was once shown a mindblowingly vast vision of countless universes; and perhaps we've all experienced being in a different spacetime, because perhaps that's what dreams are.
@halfacanuck - I appreciate your point of view, especially concerning dreaming. Having gotten much from both Tom and William I'm gonna hope that if any spinning is taking place our William is taking it in stride. Be Cool.
Thanks for sharing 👍The only way to know is looking at all source of experience which tells you different stories. 😉 🙏
since both are thought by a conscious mind they both are possible to experience.which one is probable is the question i guess.
also quality of experince will be different to mind
as u see they are fundamentally different universes .one is experinced with materalist perspective,other is by conciousness.
mind can limit itself and within this limitation experince different types of dimensions. it can also choose to expand itself too.
for example a prison cell is reduced options for a standart mind.but put a sadhu inside.u know what i mean :)
about probability i would like to discuss more.i have different approach to the topic.
Jordan Maxwell says Bluntly: V r not alone.
Who do u think is helping us cope with the present challenges v have at present n our hands due 2 hidden mischiefs.
Did u know: the jabs vr a genode weaoon?
N yet, v r growing. Hows that? V r being helped 2 c better.
Luv: Mu.Mumbai
Deepak do you know anything about gaze response where someone has a reaction from being looked at? Furthermore have you ever encountered these responses occuring through looking at someone in video filmed in the past? thanks
you can ask question on my website under Ask Deepak 🙏
@@TheChopraWell I tried to submit the question on AskDeepak but it displayed the spinning arrows but would not send.
This is just some added information but I wrote a short book about this called change the past in the future - a look into the existence of time and this is the blurb -
Around nine years ago now I noticed that when I look at somebody or another living being they react to it. The responses can include; a blink, raised eyebrows, a flinch, look up, look in my direction, or just a general change in trajectory. This phenomenon is known as a gaze response, and the most prominent researcher that I have come across studying it is Rupert Sheldrake. It is not understood how it happens as there is no physical medium or connection in between people as to how it could happen and so it is a non-local phenomenon (locality means that something can only effect something in direct contact/ immediate proximity with it). However, around seven years ago I noticed that the same responses were also occurring when I watch somebody in a video that was filmed in the past which raised a lot of questions that are discussed in this book.
This is the first chapter of the book discussing this -
The Copenhagen interpretation says the probability waves exist for a particle to appear as a particle, then the particle is observed which then demonstrates what it appears as as being the actual state (called the wave collapses/ wave-function), and the other probability waves were not the actual state, and therefore no longer exist. This therefore assumes what physically collapses as being exclusively ‘real’. In the many-worlds interpretation, it says that regardless of what collapses, the potential for it already and always does exist, which also correlates to Albert Einstein’s block universe theory - that all potential already always exists simultaneously, regardless of an interpretation or perception of linear time.
With this comes the implication that the future has already ‘happened’, in
the sense that the possibilities already exist and what collapses isn’t exclusively real or ‘happening’, and that the potential is as equally ‘happening’ as what collapses (the future is already happening/ whatever can appear is always already happening). Just as the potential that appeared in the 'past', it’s not the past happened and now it’s not happening, those potential waves are not currently collapsed but they still exist, or are still happening. So take a video for instance, you’re not watching something that has happened, it’s currently happening, and is always happening. If the past is not set and is still happening, it can still be influenced. So take a video that was filmed in the past, and as an example, if you hypothetically had the ability of telekinesis, you could lift something up in the video, and that would be what ‘happened’ in the past. If you had that ability, you could influence the past and furthermore, you could influence/ change the past in the future - could do something, in this case watch the video, in the future and change the past. Let’s say there is a video of an object being lifted into the air by telekinesis that was filmed 30 years ago, and let’s say that the person with the telekinesis abilities that watched the video and lifted the object is called person A. Now let’s also say I watch the video of the object being lifted, but person A hasn’t watched the video and lifted the object yet, and is going to do it in the future say 15 minutes from now - something in the past has already happened because of something in the future that hasn’t happened yet.
Let’s say we stop person A from ever watching the video, such as delete the video, now person A can’t lift the object in the video of the past, so the object lifting couldn’t have happened.
There wouldn’t have been the video of the object being lifted, because it only happened because person A lifted it in the future.
So let’s say person A did watch the video and lifts the object 15 minutes from now - I can watch the video now of it being lifted, even though person A hasn’t done it yet?
Only if person A actually does/ did do it in the future - if not the object would not have lifted.
So the future has already happened?
If the object was lifted, then that means person A did lift the object in the future.
So the future is set?
If the object was lifted, that means that it did already happen, even though person A hasn’t done it yet. But even though the object being lifted has already happened/ appeared, the decision to do it hasn’t appeared yet because the past is only influenced when person A watches the video and lifts the object - only at the ‘time’ (point) when the decision to change the past is made is the past changed, otherwise it wouldn’t of happened (the past changes on a whim so to speak (not fixed)/ it’s not that the object was lifted in the past then the future is already set, and person A lifting the object has already happened (is set). The object isn’t lifted until the point in the future when person A decided to do it, so it’s not that the future is set, it’s because the past isn’t set, the past is still happening. And so the past isn’t changed/ it’s not person A ‘changes the past’ (that the object wasn’t originally lifted then person A lifts it instead and changes something that already happened), the object being lifted is what ‘originally’ happened, or the object lifting is just what is happening - there's no time between the object lifting ‘in the past’, and person A lifting it ‘in the future’/ person A ‘in the future’ lifting the object ‘in the past’, is happening in ‘real-time’.
The potential for anything to collapse is always already happening. There are infinite configurations that are always happening, and just one configuration, even though is currently collapsed, is never set - it’s always everything.
Just as the potential that collapsed ‘in the past’ exists and is happening, the potential that can appear in ‘the future’ exists and is also ‘already’ happening.
It’s not possible to precisely predict the future (clairvoyance), there can just be awareness of/ imagine the ways the particles can be configured, e.g. if there are dark clouds it could be said there is going to be lightning, but it can’t be said when or where the lightning will hit, but the lightning strike has already happened/ is already happening.
Hi Jeffrey, you might be interested in Rupert Sheldrake's book, I think its called The Sense of Being Stared At. He is a brilliant holistic nonduality researcher, whose focus of work is Morphogenic Fields (aka Source Consciousness). There are also podcasts floating around.w some non duality teachers, yet cant recall which ones at the moment.
Tana Karen
@@tanakaren1822
Yes I spoke with Rupert Sheldrake and he said that he had never encountered this phenonemon occuring through videos filmed in the past but was too busy to help with it so this is something I would still like to formally explore but have had no luck in finding anyone to help test it. Thanks.
Ah well. Maybe you could do your own research study. Do any reliable pyschics do podcasts?
The unfolding is totally scientific, a particle cannot move without using a pre-existing potencial, this system must be under the influence of thermodynamics, so I, as co-creator creat my multiverse. 🥰📚✍️
😍🌹💖🕊️🤗💞
🕉️ Thank you ☸️
This is a fascinating topic. I agree that shifting planes of consciousness does allow us to access different universes, but this whole process is mediated by karma. The better our karma is the more able we are to gain access to a universe where we can lead the life we want. It is kind of like driving a car in which the number of gears can differ, depending on the driver's karma. A driver with especially good karma can shift into gears that allow him (or her) to drive at especially high speeds. Same thing with our access to universes where our dreams become reality. It is good karma that gives us access to them.
Hmm, good karma worlds may not necessarily be chosen by Awakend hoid karma folks; we are all one, so those who are truley Awakend have integrated that into themselves & therefore compassion for all. Others may develop Siddhis or outer tecnologyto get to bliss worlds, but that's akin to hoteiring a car.
We can
So amazing the other day I dreamt I was in a different era of time. I was lost at first then awoke in the dream. Even the dog knew I wasn't the same individual then I heard a voice say. Would u like to stay here? I was silent and in shock at what I heard then all of a sudden I woke up. It was trippy. It seemed like I went back the the early eighties.
Imagination/the power of! That we inherently are steeped, spontaneously, in a often richly rewarding habit of practicing it from the earliest days of our youth is profound…and to look back as adults and abstract the implications in the subtext really tends to be, as well…😮❤
Probably.
Please also give a brief writing of whatever you speak for the better understanding of the viewers .
... o k, & 2 refills
how about... Ch. 3, Science is a Witness of God keeping order- against all odds
(a little drama) Ch. 3:1 Both the Earth & Heaven cried-out to God, "Why hast thou forsaken us..?"
Ch. 3:2 Dominion equals Responsibility
hmm... footnote, (um, I only guess what a footnote is)
The order (every) atom bonds in Time began with a thought
🙏
Possibly both.
I have had thé expérience of another dimension within our 3 d dimension by changing my frequency
Have we went from 11 dimensions to infinite dimensions now? Also Deepak, why do we keep saying the word 'particles' if they are really strings? Too small to know perhaps.
Do psychedelics allow us to be on a different plane of consciousness, is that the experience we are observing?
you can ask question on my website under Ask Deepak 🙏
What are your views on reincarnation
Why would multiple universes be necesarry when its all for the experience of it. Would multiple universes allow us experiences that this universe can not provide us?
💙🙏