Redox Flow Batteries for Grid Energy Storage: Exploring an Emerging Design Space - Fikile Brushett

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @baderali2826
    @baderali2826 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very helpful and well presented video, i learned a lot.
    Thank you for your efforts.

  • @mikeconnery4652
    @mikeconnery4652 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice presentation

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Engineering can do anything" and may take some time at proportioned cost.., but at least the efforts are made.

  • @bill-zy6dg
    @bill-zy6dg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Anyone see retiring supertankers repurposed to flow batteries amid offshore windfarms instead of third world scrapyards?

    • @hso3facid
      @hso3facid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's a brilliant idea, I've also seen proposals for storing electrolytes in the subsurface in geological formations.

    • @garethbaus5471
      @garethbaus5471 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Definitely want to make an electrolyte that won't corrode the tanks, and won't be an ecological nightmare if it spills before we try something like this.

    • @deankay4434
      @deankay4434 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am guessing they need maintenance to keep from sinking dumping S02H04 into the sea, Harbor or land-locked dry dock. So what does it cost to coat the inside of an old tanker with a plastic that is completely resistant sulphuric acid. $35 - $80 is my guess!
      Whoops, the decimal point is off 8 places, maybe 12? My calculator needs batteries.

  • @keithwilson1554
    @keithwilson1554 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I use to talk with the inventor of Modern Vanadium Redox Batteries Marie from the University of NSW in Australia in the mid to late 80's. Encouraging her to approach our Government but just hit a brick wall. She had talks with the Chinese to have them put into a Bus System. And a few countries such as Canada, USA, Japan and Germany ended up building container size batteries for mostly UPS use.

    • @ccumma1149
      @ccumma1149 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Due to the news of recent weeks in the world, I believe that many innovative solutions that did not have space, will now be considered ...

  • @investingthelike111
    @investingthelike111 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    any one got thoughts on Gelion's zinc bromine , gel battery (not a flow battery) ?

  • @-LightningRod-
    @-LightningRod- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i have 14 000 L spread across 7 containers i need parts to build
    i can not wait to get started!

    • @NwoDispatcher
      @NwoDispatcher ปีที่แล้ว

      How did you do?

    • @-LightningRod-
      @-LightningRod- ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NwoDispatcher
      got clobbered by Winter

    • @NwoDispatcher
      @NwoDispatcher ปีที่แล้ว

      @@-LightningRod- need help? I'd love to work on something like this

  • @trezr3975
    @trezr3975 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I will be emailing you soon.

  • @Juul32
    @Juul32 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is'nt Tesla already producing Li Ion batteries below 100$/kWh and are decreasing the cost dramatically within the next years? At minute 11:09 he mentions that the price will be around 100-200$/kWh..

    • @aeversaelectricthings9034
      @aeversaelectricthings9034 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      As I understand it, they are still well above $200/KWh at the moment

    • @NaumRusomarov
      @NaumRusomarov 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      li-ion battery costs should go down considerably in the next 10-20 years, but since everyone's rushing to get a hold of lithium there might not be enough of it for everyone, so people are also working on other types of energy storage solutions.

    • @Leo-xj8hw
      @Leo-xj8hw 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NaumRusomarov, li-Sulfur batteries are the future Lithium-sulfur battery cells offer four times more density than lithium-ion ones. That translates into a phone battery lasting four times longer, and an electric car traveling that much farther. Their catalytic element sulfur costs less than cobalt or manganese, on which the lithium-ion process depends. Smaller battery size.

  • @Tonywozere99
    @Tonywozere99 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anything organic yet, rather than expensive and toxic vanadium?

    • @markhaus
      @markhaus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Linköping University has proven in the lab that organic materials can be used instead of Vanadium as an electron exchanger. Doesn't last as long, but is so cheap that it's still preferable in price.