Van Der Pauw Method of Measuring Hall Effect to Determine Mobility, Carrier Type & Concentration

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @yryu2
    @yryu2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for your video, it was very helpful. Can you give me recommended science articles and/ or books that you have read to make this youtube video, please. It is for my own private research.

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm very glad it was helpful for you! Lake Shore's marketing department worked with the application scientist Jeff Lindemuth to create this video. As a compliment to this video we have developed the Hall Effect Measurement Handbook which really digs deep into measuring the Hall effect. If you found this video to be interesting and helpful, you definitely should download our Hall Effect Measurement Handbook!
      tinyurl.com/y87gzys2

    • @yryu2
      @yryu2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LakeshoreCryo I have downloaded it now. Thank you very much.

  • @AtlanticSailorLP
    @AtlanticSailorLP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In the equation for Hall Coefficient you need the thickness of the sample as well.

  • @ibtissammohlane7878
    @ibtissammohlane7878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you for this video the animation helps a lot to understand this complicated method of vander paw. make more video....

  • @shepherdlavellen3301
    @shepherdlavellen3301 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    can't imagine such a helpful video received so few views

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you Sheperd! It's slowly receiving more views every day. For only being live less than a year, it's being viewed quite often. The good news is the information will always be helpful and the video will always be here for those that need to refer to it!

  • @10_jillrsaliya10
    @10_jillrsaliya10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thnx for this video u explained this topic within 10min And our professor cant do same in 2hr lecture

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha....great comment! Our goal is to make the complicated more easily understood. We're glad the video was helpful!

  • @methaniwissem9035
    @methaniwissem9035 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative video, I also downloaded the book and I'm using it as a guide for my experiments!

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's excellent! Very happy to hear the documents we've created are being used in the field.

  • @Fisherdec
    @Fisherdec 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    incredible video. Just dont forget to multiply by thickness for hall coefficient

  • @soup6941
    @soup6941 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good video to learn

  • @salilakumarsethy6254
    @salilakumarsethy6254 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir, For very much informative video

  • @arthiitb
    @arthiitb ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for making this video. ❤️✌️

  • @yashpandey8021
    @yashpandey8021 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much sir. I really appreciate your work.

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Yash! Glad you're enjoying the video.

  • @varunsharma-zr1ws
    @varunsharma-zr1ws 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vary clear and concise ....thanks....

  • @flixerstudios1862
    @flixerstudios1862 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are differences in these measurements taken into the resistance calculation? When I do this I get totally different answers compared by plugging in voltages/currents one by one and then averaging.

  • @magalhaes753951
    @magalhaes753951 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You use the absolute values of current and voltage, or do you need to pay attention to the signal of both measures?

  • @MinhTruong1093
    @MinhTruong1093 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for the video. What does "f" in Van Der Pauw's Equation for Resistivity refer to?

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good question Minh, and this information may need added to the video for further clarity. "f" refers to the symmetry of the sample. After speaking with our Hall expert, his explanation is as follows: "f" is determined by using Van der Pauw's equation for calculating "f". If f=1 the sample is symmetric; values less than 1 mean the sample is less symmetric. Please see the linked image: imgur.com/bGdF8Ik
      Hopefully that helps. If not, let us know and we'll provide further detail.

    • @MinhTruong1093
      @MinhTruong1093 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LakeshoreCryo Thank you very much for your answer. So does that mean f = 1 for Van Der Pauw’s geometric configuration (square) ?

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MinhTruong1093 Yes for a perfect square with contacts all the same size, shape and placement, f would = 1.

    • @MinhTruong1093
      @MinhTruong1093 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you very much for your answer!

  • @anyfincanhappen
    @anyfincanhappen 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your video. Can I ask a question about calculate mobility and current density ? I measure hall effect about (Rxx or Rxy) - B curve . Someone will use the slope to calculate them . But ,I don't know how to prove the formula.

  • @ozgurcan4929
    @ozgurcan4929 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What must be the polarity for the voltmeter?

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  ปีที่แล้ว

      If the polarity of the voltmeter is backwards, then a positive current will make a negative voltage, and the resistance will be negative. The polarity of the voltmeter should always be set correctly so that resistance are calculated as positive.

  • @lishint8017
    @lishint8017 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u sir

  • @DhorajiyaMihir
    @DhorajiyaMihir ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the ft meaning in van der pauws resistivity equation

    • @C4illin
      @C4illin ปีที่แล้ว

      f is one and t is thickness?

    • @LakeshoreCryo
      @LakeshoreCryo  ปีที่แล้ว

      In the equation, f is the solution to van der Pauw’s equation (geometry factor related to the sample) and t is the thickness of the sample.

  • @남기태태기남
    @남기태태기남 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kimisanggoong brought me here!

  • @directornishant9100
    @directornishant9100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    u didnt tell how to find nature of career qualitatively...without knowing sign of RH