#Bob Owen's • Not to mention the FACT GeoEngineering IS a very big factor in worldwide weather anomalies, that are increasing. The West Coast of America is drying into a desert, the East Coast is drowning in increasingly intensive weather events. I remember a childhood under BLUE skies. We're lucky to get dull gray, there is so much dispersing going on currently. Get this; IT used to be a trail left behind, thus the name Chem trails. I saw the new technique up close. And it is an INSTANT humdinger. As the plane flew overhead it was ejecting barely perceptible puffs of blackish smoke. I also saw on at least two, possibly three instances, where there was three silver objects. One might even have called it bursts of light. They were always behind the plane as if being spit out, three at a time, stacked snowman fashion. I think it was dissolving canisters or something. Within a matter of two or three minutes the skies had turned completely overcast Grey. Who knows what we are inhaling on a daily basis?
Here's a question: If a massive stratospheric aerosol injection program (SAI) were to be implemented, what would it look like? Answer: it would EXACTLY like what we're are currently seeing in the sky on a very regular basis.
If you havent already you all need to watch the documentary "The Dimming" and share it to everyone you know and tell them to share it. Its mind blowing!! And its not just the USA its happening all over the world. Its time we all wake up, stand together as one and scream No More!! Im not trying to insight hate I'm just hoping ppl finally wake up. I truly feel something huge is going to happen this year not just to rig the election but stop it from happening at all. 😢😳🤬
I like of get it though. 😭 I had to check for people's vaccine cards on their way into a restaurant I worked at. It killed my soul but it was my job. Idk, maybe the guy applied for a good-paying pilot job and didn't realize what he'd be doing. Maybe he's quit by now. I did quit that job eventually due to feeling like a terrible horrible hypocrite.
Geoengineering can lead to weather being colder or hotter more rain,less rain more snow less snow. It can bring about droughts,floods etc... cloud seeding is a form of Geoengineering as well. It's the Stopping of geoengineering that poses this risks and great risk. China has been geoengineering for a while and continues to do so. China plans on geoengineering the entire belt and road. Did you know geoengineering even over in China can have effects throughout the world on climate.most countries have done what they call small geoengineering projects.after much research I believe they have been geoengineering the Artic and Antarctica. Did you know geoengineering can lead to the termination shock? A disaster like setting off a volcano. The termination shock was also a science fiction novel and the man the wrote it came up with metaverse. The powers that be in 2014 have already predicted a disaster. The disaster they say will happen between 2020-2030. The disaster will also be blamed on man made climate change.the termination shock is not just a science fiction novel it is real. They are certifiably insane
@@TheMrCougarful Exactly. All the money goes to windmills , solar pannels , climate cogresses , scientific ......... While basics like poverty eradication and clean water are ot even mentioned to fight deforestation, coral reef protection ....... and whatever biodiversity loss. Best regards to your tribe.
The reference to volcanic eruptions cooling the planet and using sulfur to shade us from solar radiation completely ignores, or at least leaves out in this documentary, the serious risks of acid rain becoming widespread and ruining so much more
My first thought was 'sulfur' ? Are they crazy? I am born 1977 and we grew up in fear of acid rain ruining our environment.. 😬 The problem is that even if we would put Sulfur up the sky, the problematic part is our habits.. There's something called "rebound effect" in psychology. People who live in low energy homes are overconfident because they have a low energy home, hence they allow themselves to fly more often and drive huge cars.. Lol.. Whatever they have saved, the effects are gone through other systematic responses.. 😅 Now transfer this to the "solutions" for lowering the global warming. People will say "hey, we have control over the environment now let's spend more, exploit more and ignore the problem more"..
This year I tilled and planted a garden area which has been fallow for at least 4 years. My from seed Rutgers tomatoes always produced on my property. They died within weeks. Same with Creole tomatoes. The corn looked pitiful and the lima beans barely grew enough to bloom. I didn't get enough okra for a good gumbo. Climate conditions were perfect. The ground should have been perfect. This is why I am researching governmental climate change. These scientists are idealists. Don't they sound similar to others? Do you remember the Manhattan Project? Or was it another scientific breakthrough which became a weapon?
@@lulaporter6080 the Manhattan project was the research for the 1st nuclear bomb so you are correct. I agree most climate documentaries are from an idealist standpoint, but I can agree it has changed. The total effects accumulated so far and where it is possibly headed are hotly debated topics even in the scientific community. My garden also under produced this year so I feel your pain. It would be truly refreshing to be given information on topics in a straight forward, honest, non biased or partisan perspective for a change in comparison to the last decade
@@katja6332 true! But we can’t control the Climate unfortunately. We are playing with God and this will lead to at auto destruction. Some part of this video seems take out from a Fantasy movie we have seen in the past decade. 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
They have been geoengineering for decades. They’re not using sulfur, they’re favorite is aluminum but also barium and strontium. Dane Wigington has heavily documented this over the past 20 years. Through soil samples and snow samples from mount Shasta. He is one of David Keith’s biggest critics it’s a shame you didn’t include him in this conversation, but not surprised as it was clearly biased in favor of geoengineering.
They will never explain Geo Engineering or Weather Modification programs. Cause as much distructive weather to cement and give credibility to the term " Climate Change". They are all liars who have been bought off by the globalists.
Earth belongs to itself. This isn't evil, this is science and you're a dogmatic moron with no arguments. Also apparently you're a radical christian too.
Exactly, same for men doing genetical manipulations... ask indian farmers (or wife after their suicide) - or those suddenly unexpected no longer with us
Cooling the atmosphere in any way will only increase rate of ocean acidification. The cooler the water, the more easily it absorbs gases from the atmosphere. The more acidic the water gets, the harder it is for plankton to bloom. But that's only 1 problem... Another one is what if an explosive volcano goes off while we are spreading sulphur? Look up "The year without a summer"
I love how these super rich millionaire and billionaires pretend like they didn't get rich from exploiting and destroying the environment and people slave labor.
It would have been good to interview some of the "natives" of Patagonia, for example. Or some of the people of the small island nations or the Indian Ocean coastal communities who bear the brunt of this crisis for decades already, and counting.
All I know is throughout history every single time we think we're going to outsmart nature there is always a price to pay. Always. One way or the other she always wins. Seems to me it would be better if we just changed how we live. Changed our entire culture. Started taking care of the earth instead of taking it for granted. I'll also add that living a sustainable more environmentally friendly lifestyle isn't that hard. All it really means is less. Less of everything. Our biggest problem is we're conditioned to believe we should be able to buy and consume as much as we please whenever we want.
True Man, but i haven‘t seen many likes to your comment this is the proof of more more ignorance in People behaviour. More and more people can read but small numbers can really understand. About 1 thing im 100% sure we are playing with God by doing our experiments and there is no way we can win. We are humans being created by our Creator who has control on everything, we don’t have control even on our body 😂😂😂😂😂
Any person that is like myself, selling to the public essential goods, food and water simply said, is also selling to the consumer a variety of absurd gadgets maunufactured from the planet's non renewable resources. These gadgets and fluff, these non essential products have taken long voyages across the planet's oceans before they end up in smart and attractive packaging then are found to be for sale in a convenience store or mega department store, everywhere. Our gluttony as consumers of such garbage, that's what it all becomes all too soon, has been perpetuated by unscrupulous Mega Business Concerns that give generously to the 'Madison Avenue' hucksters that will sell to the consumer through psychological manipulative means. Means to an end that will ensure that their client's assets do continue to escalate in the other well manipulated market, known to be located on, Wall Street. This lifestyle of the rich and famous truly allow for, as Robin Leach quipped, "Champagne wishes and caviar dreams" all on Our One Planet, on our dime, our backs which is shared by the billions that are (S.O.L.) my reader herein. In the final act of this true life drama only a tiny, even let me say, miniscule population of 'Fat Cats' are smiling and living large sailing on the likes of "YS7512" the 246' mega yacht for J. Bezos and a potential crew of 45 that will be 'sweating bullets' at every turn of the propulsion screws which is one 'Prime' example of a notable person with a very large Carbon Footprint. Such wealth that begets wealth is the ugly side of Free Markets and Capitalism. The mindset of the few that always want more, and can never have enough, will continue to rape and pillage the earth of it's resources, including the human resource they need to keep the cycle of their wealth ongoing in perpetuity.
We've already been geoengineering unconsciously for 200 years, what's the difference now? Especially because billions of lives and maybe even civilization is at stake.
@@squamish4244 So we're stuck in a cycle where we are absolutely convinced we have to control everything, while most things we do to control it backfires in one way or the other making it worse, so we just have to do more and that'll fix it. How is that working out for us? It reminds me of farming with my hubby. He has to have complete control of how and when produce grows because somehow it won't grow ,can't grow without him. Lol. Then we get fungus problems, insect loads and no matter how much I show him you can get much better results ,healthier plants if you just work with nature he still has to control every aspect. At this point seeing the proof and agreeing. it's just about the need to control 🙃
Great to see what Iceland is doing, there - what a dynamic country, they were put heavily into debt by scoundrels, and then they got themselves straight back out of debt, pronto, back during the GFC. Really proactive and organised.
I haven't done enough research on Iceland personally. But your comment is one of many I've heard. They obviously have the focus and the moral fortitude to see the obvious and react appropriately. Kudos in hats off to the Icelanders. Thank you for pointing that out. I now have a new search list. 🧐👍
Plants trees and animals also need their ecosystem to not get destroyed by climate change. So let's make it so we can fix that without solar geoengineering
Too late. Melting permafrost. Thermal runaway. Sea acidification kills phyto plankton within 800 years then no oxygen to breathe. Its over. We can rebuild earth but all forests die first and move to new zones on a hotter stormier planet
And it's been good since the 90s. Cancer rates (compared to AGE) have not increased. We gathered valuable data. Every try is a step to ultimate success.
Geo engineering is a complete waste of time and money and will have zero impact on weather and climate . Those scientists behind it as dumb as clowns . A simpleton would even realise that it would not work .Because of one main fact that the atmosphere surrounding the earth is absolutely massive .
The reality of this doc is sobering... a very rich person dominating vast areas of land, proposing more of such. Other than genocide, how is such going to be accomplished?
It's not like she had to murder 72 families to get that land, or fertilized it with the scalps of native infants. She probably just bought it, and acts to put it back into a dynamic habitat before humans deforested/grazed it. There is so much land across this planet that is overgrazed/deforested that leads to desertification/barren land. To imply that finding land to restore always leads to genocide is sardonic.
I am reminded of Eric Sevaried who said "the number one cause of problems is solutions." Albert Bartlett (not the potato guy) warned about exponential growth. We need to take a holistic view of the problems and solutions.
Yes, the haze people pass off as humidity is the years of particulates already sprayed doing their job, creating weather chaos. It will end badly, on purpose.
It's been going on for 70 yrs. Someone needs to knock on the producers door and ask him/her what the hell they hope to accomplish by lying even MORE!! How much are they being paid to make and distribute this film?
That David guy looks like someone who found a way to hack a video game so that he could wipe out all enemies with one blow instead of someone who genuinely cares about humanity, you get what I mean?
It’s the kind of thing where anyone who points out the unintended consequences is ostracised as being antiscience and ignored when the problems come to fruition.
there is more energy in Earths core then humanity will ever need in it's entire existense (we don't need to turn humans into battery cells to get energy when the sun is blocked :D ...I've found that to be actualy the stupidiest part about the film)
All the nano-crap (mainly aluminum) spread in the sky is heated with doppler radar (NEXRAD etc.), causing high pressure, which along with chemical and (primarily) bacteriological ice nucleation used to lower the pressure, is likely how they steer weather systems. Hurricanes are created and weaponized, tornadoes too. This has been ongoing for decades - not something new. This video is a psyop, trying to make people think we need to do what has already been happening for decades, causing the so-called "climate change", a propaganda term, because OF COURSE THE CLIMATE CONSTANTLY CHANGES. This geowarfare, particularly weather warfare, has been causing the catastrophes, not us normal humans. Manmade CO2 is not the issue, as the psyop propaganda Maestros that made this video want you to think. Please watch the videos at "weatherwar101" before that channel is deleted. In December 2017 they disappeared the person who made those videos, who is likely dead now (RIP Mr. WW101).
@@AmbitiousLearnWithGeorge There's a fan theory that in the original script the robots were using humans for distributed computing, but they were told to dumb it down into the energy thing which doesn't really make sense.
We as humans are already intervening by injecting so many man made variables in the first place. Will the potential counter-measures also take into consideration the existing injected variables such as unhindered greed? Unlikely not.
We're already turning outer space into a garbage dump! I don't want anyone messing with natural processes (even though we likely speeded things up with more trash) until they show they clean up our air and drinking water.
Why people think we can tech manipulate everything "but" weather is such ridiculously irrational thought - But this is where media controlled influence is HEAVILY ignored - Humans need to use their own brains and not CNN 's Fox news's BBC's Etc.
"Opportunity knocks. Temptation sneaks in." "When in doubt, don't do what you want to do." And perhaps many more. But considering we have just one plant and very rudimentary computation ability: "You know that sick feeling you get for apparently no reason when you are about to do something.."
how is it possible that this channel keeps putting out quality stuff at this rate?... its pretty crazy. they must have a huge team of ppl working for them lol
its financed by the german tax payer. So they have pretty large budgets and the obly thing they do is this. Good researched, neutral reporting on things.
DW is known for neutral documentation reporting on facts. its one of the best channel for knowledge to understand our world without bias, love them and hope they could continue this the foreseeable future.
The movie Snowpiercer plot was the kind of atmosphere blocking of sunlight causing a massive ice age, playing with the climate is even worst than doing nothing.
Yeah like Tucker the sell out Carlson saying the same thing. Acting like it hasn't been going on, but warning us of something they might do to the sky. Satanists love their lies.
I'm mystified why they publicly talk about a plan to use sulfur which turns into sulfuric acid, when non-public activity using boron has been going on for many years. "Chem trails" aren't a government project or else we'd hear about it; but a secret, PRIVATE project can get away with avoiding investigation.
That man who wants to spray sulphur has good arguments, but a bad plan. The sulphur will come down... Why doesn't he think of better plans, like the project in Iceland?
Why is Greenland called Greenland? It was a “little warmer “ a thousand years ago when some Vikings went there and grazed sheep . Then it got colder again and they had to leave or else eat snow . I live in Melbourne Australia and I observed no sea levels going up . Not one centimetre in the last 50 years. I lived near the beach. Could it be that some island in the pacific are sinking ? We have photos from Sidney harbour from the 1860 that show the same sea level as now. Climate change is crap. “They “ say the hottest year on record , by erasing the old hotter data . Historic records are changed to suit the new agenda.
Most climate change is natural, we should focus on the human effect closer to society. Don't mess with the air, deal with what we are putting in to the air.
Same theories and techniques they have been talking about for the last fifteen years, same thing we've seen them doing to our skies for the last twenty. This "soft-disclosure" pisses me off, even if it validates what we've been saying for decades... And it's not like people don't see it! They just rather keep sleeping.
You dim the sun and solar panels become less efficient. I am sure the particles sprayed in the atmosphere will do wonders for our health as well. Not to mention when it rains and those particle go into the soil. What could possibly go right.
You're absolutely correct. It is madness and destruction. Geo-Engineering has been in progress for years and it has negatively impacted every living thing on earth for 40 years!! When you interfere with the natural balance of nature, you are asking for catastrophic results!! Why don't I here these loony scientists expressing concern about what the potential health ramifications could be for everything living? These people are insane!!
Dangerous and pointless. Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. The IPCC reports in AR6, chapter 11, "The total global frequency of TC [tropical cyclone] formation will decrease or remain unchanged with increasing global warming (medium confidence)." Not that I really care about what the IPCC says. Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. What the data from NOAA SPC shows about tornados: EF1-EF5 (1954-2022) no trend; EF3-EF5 (most destructive) (1954-2022) 50% decline. No EF5s in US since 2013 (a record absence). The Global Land Precipitation Anomaly from AR5 will disappoint with deviations from the average increasing by 0.2% per decade, but if you look at the actual data, it's just very variable over the decades. Drought appears to be decreasing globally (Watts et al, 2018) measured by SPI 1901-2017. For every million people on earth, annual deaths from climate-related causes (extreme temperature, drought, flood, storms, wildfires) declined 98%--from an average of 247 per year during the 1920s to 2.5 in per year during the 2010s. Data on disaster deaths come from (EM-DAT, CRED / UCLouvain, Brussels,Belgium. ) Globally 2000-2019 there was a large decrease in cold-related deaths and a moderate increase in heat-related deaths (Zhao, 2021, Lancet). However, coldwaves are over 9 times more likely to kill than heatwaves, so the overall result is very beneficial. What else? Oh, deserts like the Sahara have shrunk considerably and the Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime (NASA). The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover has reached the greatest extent ever recorded. On extinction the rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years. At that frequency it will take over 930,000 years to reach 80% extinction of species experienced at the K-T boundary that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs. There is no climate crisis.
The super rich sociopaths and their lackeys dug the graves for everyone else, and then convinced us that it's our fault. They only share guilt; never riches, and no-one ever became SUPER rich except through exploitation.
Yes, but as long most of the people cannot realize it they keep brainwashing. Nice documentary about it is Planet of humans. On how people believe psychos that use nice words for them to believe and support anything.
Exact. The Sulphur idea is especially silly. The sulphur would create acid rain that would dissolve more calcium carbonate (Ca CO3) and release... you guessed it more CO2 in the atmosphere.
Oh it is. One billion tree's were planted in Uganda by a woman, minister of forestry. If it can be done in Africa it can be done anywhere like the reforestation of the Gobi desert in Northern China.
It's easy to talk about clima change out of a million mansion house and having another few millions in the bank account Don't forget that your money made on Patagonia outfit have carbon and pollution on them
One thing we need to do is move water from the ocean back inland to places we need it and if we can do that while generating clean energy we have a chance to mitigate climate change and still have a prosperous future. It is really, really hard but it is not impossible. The biggest idea I am trying to express is tunneling aqueducts from the coast, in this case the west coast of the USA inland to feed combination geothermal power and sea water desalination plants. The idea seems to be so big that no one has considered it possible but I believe it is not only possible but it is necessary. For over a century the fossil water contained in aquifers has been pumped out to feed agriculture, industry and municipal water needs. The natural water cycle cant refill fossil water deposits that were filled 10,000 years ago when the glaciers melted after the last ice age. Without refilling these aquifers there is not much of a future for the region of the United states. As a result ground levels in some areas of the San Joaquin Valley have subsided by more than 30 feet. Similar fossil water depletion is happening in other regions all around the world. TBM and tunneling technology has matured and further developments in the industry are poised to speed up the tunneling process and it's these tunnels that are the only way to move large volumes of water from the ocean inland. The water is moved inland to areas where it can be desalinated in geothermal plants producing clean water and power. In many cases the water will recharge surface reservoirs where it will be used first to make more hydro power before being released into rivers and canal systems. It's very important however to not stop tunneling at these first stops but to continue several legs until the water has traveled from the ocean under mountain ranges to interior states. Along the way water will flow down grade through tunnels and rise in geothermal loops to fill mountain top pumped hydro batteries several times before eventually recharging several major aquifers. What I am proposing is essentially reversing the flow of the Colorado River Compact. Bringing water from the coast of California first to mountaintop reservoirs then to the deserts of Nevada and Arizona and on to Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming. This big idea looks past any individual city or states problems and looks at the whole and by using first principles identifies the actual problem and only solution. Thank you for your time, I would like the opportunity to explain in further detail and answer any questions. A better future is possible
The nature and its working is PERFECT If we humans step in on the working and flow of nature which we always do Bcz our knowledge is imperfect , we could trigger immense disbalance and pay the price for our ignorance Our extinction is imminent bcz its the only thing we are good at
Newsflash: Nature is changing in a long lasting dance of entrophy. Earth is changing without our doing (we tipped the co2 scale though too quickly) Nature is not perfect at all. She makes mistakes and she is ever changing. There's nerves, tendons and a part of your guts which are useless and can become dangerous.
@@googleuser9383 Nothing is perfect in the universe But Nature is well Balanced and same goes for Universe We call it the Eco-System of earth , where everything on earth plays its important role to establish and Maintain this unique balance As Humans are Intellectual and Self-conscious species We have WILL , we can either choose to play positive role in this eco-system as other species are Bcz we and everything on this earth is part of Nature Or we can just disrupt this whole ecosystem and destruction awaits for this planet In that way , we are not only harming this Planet we harming ourselves Marking the end of not only many species that went extinct bcz of us But end of us Humans as species too We destroy nature and harm other species , Bcz of our Never Stopping Greed and madness Most Ignorants of us are The ones who are in Power and Authority , they do silly mistakes for sake of money and power For Their Greed , whole planet pays the Price ( those morons never listen or try to listen to warnings ) It will be too Late and our end is indeed Inevitable
@Gautam Agreed But scientists and environmentalists are giving warnings to people for soo long But people remain ignorant and most of the people don't even understand why Global Warming is a threat just bcz they do not even know what it is and they don't wonna know They only are concerned with things that have to do with Profit or Money Specially rich industrialists and sadly Ignorant Rich people who are in power never listen to scientific or intellectual people
No. It didn't. HUMANS did. Science is simply a subject of studying your surroundings from different perspectives. Science has nothing to do with World Population, which is a major reason of all the chaos.
The aircraft will make double the emissions than how much pollution effects are mitigated from the sulfur spraying. Not to mention that some people and some animals are allergic to sulfur.
Not without harming humans and compromising the way we live. Also the Earth doesn't need healing - Mother Nature ALWAYS survives (until the sun blows up at least).
The earth has no cis gendering... Or any chromosomes... In of itself... That's species that have sexual characteristics... Unless you have new information.. There are some self regulating mechanisms to get ones.. James lovelock and his gaia hypothesis... Daisy world model based on black and daisies... Is this what you hint at?, or do you mean something different I don't know about? Share with me if you will?
The earth is doing MOST of the work... Like water being poured into a glass with a small hole. It doesn't need much to overflow... Also a lot of solutions are using the ability of the planet.
I hope any solution that ends up implemented will follow a natural approach (i.e: Planting Trees in mass) or have industries to remove carbon from the atmosphere and use it in other products, all using renewable energy of course. I see some proposals for adding chemicals (or large amounts of minerals) to the atmosphere and oceans, which I find extremely dangerous. In a society where lobbing and personal interests have great power, we have to ensure the medicine will not worsen the patient's condition.
Sorry to say, but some times, when the condition is bad enough, medicine is required. Sometimes it's just temporary, until the climate effects has flat lined for example. But to be against something just because it might have negative effects is just anti progressive. I'm sure happy we go forward developing countermeasures, medicine and procedures to counteract negative effects. Things like chemotherapy, penicillin and solar energy would otherwise not exist. If we just said "nah, implementing new solutions and technology is dangerous and might backfire, let's just not".
@@dexterdextrow7248 I totally disagree with the notion of "to be against something just because it might have negative effects is just anti progressive". The examples you gave also do not apply, sorry. The risks with a medicine can affect millions if unforeseen effects occur but the reaction to stop the process can be quick, limiting the problem and how many are impacted. Changes to the planet impact billions of humans and all life on the planet. We do not yet understand all mechanisms governing Nature. We are children playing with dangerous things affecting life on this planet. There is little to no room for errors. The economic interests pressure from companies trying to sell their model as "the solution" is great already. Considering the great corruption and degradation of moral values we see all over today, we have to be extremely cautions. It is like dealing with nitroglycerine, we do not have second chances.
@@corujariousa all climate countermeasures are not global, thereby you can, much like the case of medicine, stop in expansion of the efforts if the results seem to be harmful or negligible. When it comes to companies? Well, they will try to earn money no matter what. If you don't do these initiatives can companies then not make up pretty much any other scheme that makes money at the cost off the climate? Ofcourse they can, and they have historically. So by not engaging in potentially planet saving scientific methods just because a evil company can take advantage of it is slightly paranoid. Everything and anything can be the cause of evil action, companies, governments, individuals, groups or anything else for that matter. If we are to refrain from everything that can be exploited or misused the we cannot do anything. Additionally the problem is that we have limited time to fix climate change if you indeed believe it's as bad as they say, and then the choice might not be implementing countermeasures or let it normalize naturally, it may well be countermeasures or catastrophic damage and consequences.
Planting trees is much safer than putting dust up above. The trees would grow fast feeding on the heightened CO2 as plants indeed all are since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Plant life before we began burning fossil fuels were in a CO2 drought not far from the line of starvation and death.
From this video, I love the ocean based solution that involves creating more life in the deserts of the ocean and sequestering CO2 while that happens! The rich lady that got rich by selling oil based clothing made in China? I like what she is doing but the way that she became able to do that is questionable to me. Manipulating weather and vacuuming CO2 from the skies are more then counter productive and should be stopped immediately! Those solutions cause more problems then they solve
and here's... the full grown russ. like a 200kg pumpkin onto your roof. He lives in arid and semiarid places gets early to bed and its an order of magnitude more stupid every morning WE NEED to save them !
Chad Norman definitely not but what is presently happening isn’t much to do with viruses .Viruses have always existed but never was it used as a political weapon before. Why ?
There are simpler things we can do. If large, commercial buildings used highly reflective roofing and pavements, for example, it would make a difference.
@@tesso.6193 Whether you like it or not, nature has ways to deal with the ever-expanding human population. The COVID pandemic is one of such ways. In addition, climate change will intensify scarcity of natural resources, which will lead to more conflicts and wars.
@@maxentropy0305 The problem isn't "expanding human population". We produce enough food to comfortably feed 10 billion humans. We don't for one simple reason, Capitalism. It simply isn't profitable to and under Capitalism things are only done because they are profitable, not because they are needed. Just like the British when they casually decided to genocide Indians and Irishmen with starvation because of Malthusian "large population" rhetoric, people who violently reject critiquing the economic system that privileges them will be the death of millions. People fell starved to death in front of trains and ships moving mountains of food from their land. While the British declared it's "nature" rectifying the savage races' population. Capitalists and Imperialists love attributing their destructive actions to "nature".
@@tesso.6193 “We produce enough food to comfortably feed 10 billion humans” - I seriously doubt this statement. It might be true under ideal conditions (no prolonged droughts, no wide-spread infestation, no land grabbing due to over urbanization, etc.) Unfortunately, as the human population keeps growing and climate change intensifies, these conditions are no longer possible to maintain. Even if technologies may alleviate food shortage, there are other types of shortages that may not be alleviated. The most acute one is space shortage. Fighting for living space has been the main drive for wars throughout the history. The non-stop Israel Palestine conflicts and the desire to build a US-Mexico border wall are two typical examples of how much we humans long for or don’t want to share living space. There is no question that capitalism and greed contributes to food shortage and other scarcities and imbalance. I would say over-population is the ultimate form of greed, because it disregards the capacity of nature and the interests of other species. if you criticize capitalism, perhaps you should criticize over-population too.
@@maxentropy0305 It's a widely known fact and if farmers not dumping, tons, literal mountains of food because it wouldn't be profitable to sell them this last crisis didn't make you suspect it, nothing will. You can just google it. Capitalists literally produce food, clothing and tech then dump them in landfills so the prices don't fall. The latest Amazon scandal is just a peek. "I would say over-population is the ultimate form of greed" Riiiiight. Fuck off, I'd need to have 8 children in my country to match the consumption and carbon footprint of 1 European child. But when it comes down to it, White people think *we're* the problem. We exist too much. And it becomes an "overpopulation" problem, not a Capitalism and Imperialism problem. See how the burden is shifted? If the choice is between a person from Luxembourg, who consumes 22 times as much as some random African, people will point to the African as the problem because they have kids. There is no "greed" it's a misdirection. The profit motive is the cause. Left to their own devices, humans are a naturally collaborative pack animal.
I saw deep ocean seaweed being produced near Hawaii. It consisted of buays with ropes as platform for seaweed and a simple wave driven pump with a hose or pipe going into the depths bringing up nutrient rich water.
Robert Grubb I disagree with this lady but she is not clueless. Putting 350 million dollers to preserve nature is one fine gesture. And maybe it will help save some species
Weather modification has been going on for more than 50 years and I would argue is the main cause of extreme flooding and drought.
Exactly
Yup!
75 years already
Agree. Nature is a holistic science. We should not disturb the balance on earth, what to say above?
That's it. A tool to cause chaos, damage, destruction, and fear in order to control people.
I like how David Kieth talks about geoenginering as if it's something that might need done when in reality it's already been in play for years
Exactly.
Touche' Bob
Actually Decades
#Bob Owen's • Not to mention the FACT GeoEngineering IS a very big factor in worldwide weather anomalies, that are increasing. The West Coast of America is drying into a desert, the East Coast is drowning in increasingly intensive weather events. I remember a childhood under BLUE skies. We're lucky to get dull gray, there is so much dispersing going on currently. Get this; IT used to be a trail left behind, thus the name Chem trails. I saw the new technique up close. And it is an INSTANT humdinger. As the plane flew overhead it was ejecting barely perceptible puffs of blackish smoke. I also saw on at least two, possibly three instances, where there was three silver objects. One might even have called it bursts of light. They were always behind the plane as if being spit out, three at a time, stacked snowman fashion. I think it was dissolving canisters or something. Within a matter of two or three minutes the skies had turned completely overcast Grey. Who knows what we are inhaling on a daily basis?
Bingo!
Here's a question: If a massive stratospheric aerosol injection program (SAI) were to be implemented, what would it look like?
Answer: it would EXACTLY like what we're are currently seeing in the sky on a very regular basis.
Nope, but untill recently sulfur rich fuel was used in shipping and when it was stopped temperatures in oceans and seas had increased.
No. Not at all.
You're correct!! For years now!!
If you havent already you all need to watch the documentary "The Dimming" and share it to everyone you know and tell them to share it. Its mind blowing!! And its not just the USA its happening all over the world. Its time we all wake up, stand together as one and scream No More!! Im not trying to insight hate I'm just hoping ppl finally wake up. I truly feel something huge is going to happen this year not just to rig the election but stop it from happening at all. 😢😳🤬
@@anothernumber6679while it acidifies the oceans, killing them. The oceans are the most important carbon sink. Humans are so dumb!
"The arrogance of man is thinking nature is in our control, and not the other way around." - Dr. Ichiro Serizawa
They are "messing up" what nature planned to "mess up". The difference is that men have no good reason but "nature" does.
Amen.
Extreme arrogance. Totalitarian level arrogance.
Exactly, only we would dare to play god. 😩💀
I personally love how the scientists and many people in general act like shit hasn't been getting sprayed in the atmosphere for years now....
Exactly!!
People are noticing, so they start easing them in slowly ...
Best part was the german pilot spraying silver iodide while stating that he doesnt agree with geoengineering.
I like of get it though. 😭 I had to check for people's vaccine cards on their way into a restaurant I worked at. It killed my soul but it was my job. Idk, maybe the guy applied for a good-paying pilot job and didn't realize what he'd be doing. Maybe he's quit by now. I did quit that job eventually due to feeling like a terrible horrible hypocrite.
This is absolutely insane on soooo many levels!!!
Yeah! Let’s do it because it’s insane.
Aerosol geoengineering "proposals" make 500+ atmospheric detonations globally between 1945 and 1962 look like a sane idea.
Geoengineering can lead to weather being colder or hotter more rain,less rain more snow less snow. It can bring about droughts,floods etc... cloud seeding is a form of Geoengineering as well. It's the Stopping of geoengineering that poses this risks and great risk. China has been geoengineering for a while and continues to do so. China plans on geoengineering the entire belt and road. Did you know geoengineering even over in China can have effects throughout the world on climate.most countries have done what they call small geoengineering projects.after much research I believe they have been geoengineering the Artic and Antarctica. Did you know geoengineering can lead to the termination shock? A disaster like setting off a volcano. The termination shock was also a science fiction novel and the man the wrote it came up with metaverse. The powers that be in 2014 have already predicted a disaster. The disaster they say will happen between 2020-2030. The disaster will also be blamed on man made climate change.the termination shock is not just a science fiction novel it is real. They are certifiably insane
I agree
The solutions are similar to taking a pill for pain and never thinking why you have pain in the first place
Because selling a pill is Capitalism, and trying to identify root problems is Socialism.
@@TheMrCougarful no its called common sense
@@TheMrCougarful Exactly. All the money goes to windmills , solar pannels , climate cogresses , scientific ......... While basics like poverty eradication and clean water are ot even mentioned to fight deforestation, coral reef protection ....... and whatever biodiversity loss. Best regards to your tribe.
More like taking it for the pain which is a symptom of a bigger problem but ignoring treating the root cause.
Exactly, bless your brain.
The reference to volcanic eruptions cooling the planet and using sulfur to shade us from solar radiation completely ignores, or at least leaves out in this documentary, the serious risks of acid rain becoming widespread and ruining so much more
My first thought was 'sulfur' ? Are they crazy? I am born 1977 and we grew up in fear of acid rain ruining our environment.. 😬 The problem is that even if we would put Sulfur up the sky, the problematic part is our habits.. There's something called "rebound effect" in psychology.
People who live in low energy homes are overconfident because they have a low energy home, hence they allow themselves to fly more often and drive huge cars.. Lol.. Whatever they have saved, the effects are gone through other systematic responses.. 😅 Now transfer this to the "solutions" for lowering the global warming. People will say "hey, we have control over the environment now let's spend more, exploit more and ignore the problem more"..
This year I tilled and planted a garden area which has been fallow for at least 4 years. My from seed Rutgers tomatoes always produced on my property. They died within weeks. Same with Creole tomatoes. The corn looked pitiful and the lima beans barely grew enough to bloom. I didn't get enough okra for a good gumbo. Climate conditions were perfect. The ground should have been perfect. This is why I am researching governmental climate change. These scientists are idealists. Don't they sound similar to others? Do you remember the Manhattan Project? Or was it another scientific breakthrough which became a weapon?
@@lulaporter6080 the Manhattan project was the research for the 1st nuclear bomb so you are correct. I agree most climate documentaries are from an idealist standpoint, but I can agree it has changed. The total effects accumulated so far and where it is possibly headed are hotly debated topics even in the scientific community. My garden also under produced this year so I feel your pain. It would be truly refreshing to be given information on topics in a straight forward, honest, non biased or partisan perspective for a change in comparison to the last decade
@@katja6332 true! But we can’t control the Climate unfortunately. We are playing with God and this will lead to at auto destruction. Some part of this video seems take out from a Fantasy movie we have seen in the past decade. 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
It's a extreme act, which is why it's only considered as a last option.
“Should we intervene?”
I thought it was our intervention that we are trying to counter.
Nah, it's a sideproduct of our lifestyle that we're trying to counter.
It's like taking meds to combat side effects of other meds.
They spray this crap over my home and make us wear mask to obtain food and think they can escape God's judgement.
If we can do bad shit we should be willing to do good stuff. Only care about reprocrussions whem it can help the world.
Industry caused this industry must fix it.
@@allengordon6929 exactly what I’m saying
They have been geoengineering for decades. They’re not using sulfur, they’re favorite is aluminum but also barium and strontium. Dane Wigington has heavily documented this over the past 20 years. Through soil samples and snow samples from mount Shasta. He is one of David Keith’s biggest critics it’s a shame you didn’t include him in this conversation, but not surprised as it was clearly biased in favor of geoengineering.
They will never explain Geo Engineering or Weather Modification programs. Cause as much distructive weather to cement and give credibility to the term " Climate Change". They are all liars who have been bought off by the globalists.
@@raymondsiewert2720 everything is deception/manipulation/lies plus human stupidity s and god complex to no end.
Cx
Not to mention all anyone has to do to prove these geoenginering programs been in play for years is look up.
For real. I hate "The Powers That Shouldn't Be" and I always will until they are stopped.
Was waiting for an interview with Dane Wigington from Geoengineeringwatch.
Not credible without him haha
The earth belongs to every living thing. This is beyond evil. We need to rise up and tell these diabolical entities we’ve had enough
Earth belongs to itself.
This isn't evil, this is science and you're a dogmatic moron with no arguments.
Also apparently you're a radical christian too.
There is no natural law that says a planet can "belong" to someone or something.
@@nathanvandermeer Come invade my country then, see how your idea plays out.
@@izdatsumcp The US can turn your country into a glass crater. Act accordingly.
Javili se demoni🤣🤣🤣👇
“Fine tuning the environment “ is like giving a ten year old a screwdriver to operate a nuclear facility.
net opportunity is greater than the risk probability of catastrophic failure.
Terrible simile
We already gave the ten year old a blow torch to operate the nuclear plant. How much worse could it get?
Exactly, same for men doing genetical manipulations... ask indian farmers (or wife after their suicide) - or those suddenly unexpected no longer with us
And yet, here we are. There was Oppenheimer...
We’ve geo-engineered the Earth too much already.
#DEGROWTH
Cooling the atmosphere in any way will only increase rate of ocean acidification. The cooler the water, the more easily it absorbs gases from the atmosphere. The more acidic the water gets, the harder it is for plankton to bloom.
But that's only 1 problem...
Another one is what if an explosive volcano goes off while we are spreading sulphur? Look up "The year without a summer"
Jesus Christ... scientifically speaking, this is certainly a disaster waiting to happen interfering....Even as an engineer, this terrifies me.
We have arrived to the disaster. We are here!
God is on the throne
I live in California and have witnessed first hand that they have already been changing the weather for a long time now.
Yep. They spray every day and then zap them with ELF and EMF waves from the GWEN towers and HAARP and NEXRAD.
Washington also!! Chemtrails all day long
Since the 1940’s in Cali…
I love how these super rich millionaire and billionaires pretend like they didn't get rich from exploiting and destroying the environment and people slave labor.
I know! Right?
Selling $800 winter jackets. No wonder they don't like global warming. LOL
@@oregonsbragia lol
Yes. Disingenuous and obtuse to say the least. And geoengineering is a pipe dream, or potential nightmare. Nobody knows.
It would have been good to interview some of the "natives" of Patagonia, for example. Or some of the people of the small island nations or the Indian Ocean coastal communities who bear the brunt of this crisis for decades already, and counting.
All I know is throughout history every single time we think we're going to outsmart nature there is always a price to pay. Always. One way or the other she always wins. Seems to me it would be better if we just changed how we live. Changed our entire culture. Started taking care of the earth instead of taking it for granted. I'll also add that living a sustainable more environmentally friendly lifestyle isn't that hard. All it really means is less. Less of everything. Our biggest problem is we're conditioned to believe we should be able to buy and consume as much as we please whenever we want.
True Man, but i haven‘t seen many likes to your comment this is the proof of more more ignorance in People behaviour. More and more people can read but small numbers can really understand. About 1 thing im 100% sure we are playing with God by doing our experiments and there is no way we can win. We are humans being created by our Creator who has control on everything, we don’t have control even on our body 😂😂😂😂😂
Nature does not need us to save it, just needs that we stop screwing it up
Any person that is like myself, selling to the public essential goods, food and water simply said, is also selling to the consumer a variety of absurd gadgets maunufactured from the planet's non renewable resources. These gadgets and fluff, these non essential products have taken long voyages across the planet's oceans before they end up in smart and attractive packaging then are found to be for sale in a convenience store or mega department store, everywhere. Our
gluttony as consumers of such garbage, that's what it all becomes all too soon, has been perpetuated by unscrupulous Mega Business Concerns that give generously to the 'Madison Avenue' hucksters that will sell to the consumer through psychological manipulative means.
Means to an end that will ensure that their client's assets do continue to escalate in the other well manipulated market, known to be located on, Wall Street.
This lifestyle of the rich and famous truly allow for, as Robin Leach quipped, "Champagne wishes and caviar dreams" all on Our One Planet, on our dime, our backs which is shared by the billions that are (S.O.L.) my reader herein.
In the final act of this true life drama only a tiny, even let me say, miniscule population of 'Fat Cats' are smiling and living large sailing on the likes of "YS7512" the 246' mega yacht for J. Bezos and a potential crew of 45 that will be 'sweating bullets' at every turn of the propulsion screws which is one 'Prime' example of a notable person with a very large Carbon Footprint.
Such wealth that begets wealth is the ugly side of Free Markets and Capitalism. The mindset of the few that always want more, and can never have enough, will continue to rape and pillage the earth of it's resources, including the human resource they need to keep the cycle of their wealth ongoing in perpetuity.
We've already been geoengineering unconsciously for 200 years, what's the difference now? Especially because billions of lives and maybe even civilization is at stake.
@@squamish4244 So we're stuck in a cycle where we are absolutely convinced we have to control everything, while most things we do to control it backfires in one way or the other making it worse, so we just have to do more and that'll fix it. How is that working out for us?
It reminds me of farming with my hubby. He has to have complete control of how and when produce grows because somehow it won't grow ,can't grow without him. Lol. Then we get fungus problems, insect loads and no matter how much I show him you can get much better results ,healthier plants if you just work with nature he still has to control every aspect. At this point seeing the proof and agreeing. it's just about the need to control 🙃
They are geoengineering currently I am 100% against it.
Now I know why some countries have been getting a lot of Sahara dust lately, followed by hail storms....
The dust clouds hide both ufo 🛸 ✨ and troop transport. #afghanexfill #inthedust 👍 catch!
@@qntmxiii we get this dust in Cyprus, I have COPD , I hide away at that time
google it
How many hurricanes did trump face? How many has biden had? Enough to make you go hmmmmmmm.
"We shouldn't play with weather on a large scale." Wondering how climate change is happening 😑
They have already been doing it for decades. They are causing climate change to fool the masses and rob them.
Elites are playing everyone
Tell that to all businessmen they just don’t even care as long there’s profit.
Everyone in this comment chain is stupid beyond saving.
@@googleuser9383 okay Einstein
Great to see what Iceland is doing, there - what a dynamic country, they were put heavily into debt by scoundrels, and then they got themselves straight back out of debt, pronto, back during the GFC. Really proactive and organised.
I haven't done enough research on Iceland personally. But your comment is one of many I've heard. They obviously have the focus and the moral fortitude to see the obvious and react appropriately. Kudos in hats off to the Icelanders. Thank you for pointing that out. I now have a new search list. 🧐👍
All those harsh journeys to Iceland weeded out the stupid Vikings.
Small population, with minimal immigration. They have little diversity, community, and shows what is possible, without big government.
It would be better to keep the forests from burning and plant trees
Say no to Weather Modification/Geoengineering. We need the Sun. So does the plants, trees, animals..
Amen ☀️ Amen☀️ In Jesus Christus Namen Amen 🙏🏼 Danke Danke Danke
Cloud seeding is getting rid of Glaciers.
This video said that seeding causes hail particles to shrink snow particles into RAIN.
We don’t have a choice. This WILL happen
Plants trees and animals also need their ecosystem to not get destroyed by climate change. So let's make it so we can fix that without solar geoengineering
Too late. Melting permafrost. Thermal runaway. Sea acidification kills phyto plankton within 800 years then no oxygen to breathe. Its over. We can rebuild earth but all forests die first and move to new zones on a hotter stormier planet
Wake up, Lookup. It's been going on since the late '90s.
nobody notice the blue skies during lock down or when 911 happened there already doing it.
I don't concent
Much longer than that.
And it's been good since the 90s.
Cancer rates (compared to AGE) have not increased.
We gathered valuable data.
Every try is a step to ultimate success.
Geo engineering is a complete waste of time and money and will have zero impact on weather and climate . Those scientists behind it as dumb as clowns . A simpleton would even realise that it would not work .Because of one main fact that the atmosphere surrounding the earth is absolutely massive .
since vietnam war more like it.
With out CO2 you have a desert. The earth had much higher CO2 then we have now and plants grew much larger and man lived longer.
The reality of this doc is sobering... a very rich person dominating vast areas of land, proposing more of such. Other than genocide, how is such going to be accomplished?
@It ́s not what you think or their vaccines
exactly.
@@Lowkey_ID xD
It's not like she had to murder 72 families to get that land, or fertilized it with the scalps of native infants. She probably just bought it, and acts to put it back into a dynamic habitat before humans deforested/grazed it. There is so much land across this planet that is overgrazed/deforested that leads to desertification/barren land. To imply that finding land to restore always leads to genocide is sardonic.
I am reminded of Eric Sevaried who said "the number one cause of problems is solutions."
Albert Bartlett (not the potato guy) warned about exponential growth. We need to take a holistic view of the problems and solutions.
Yes, the haze people pass off as humidity is the years of particulates already sprayed doing their job, creating weather chaos. It will end badly, on purpose.
It's been going on for 70 yrs.
Someone needs to knock on the producers door and ask him/her what the hell they hope to accomplish by lying even MORE!!
How much are they being paid to make and distribute this film?
That David guy looks like someone who found a way to hack a video game so that he could wipe out all enemies with one blow instead of someone who genuinely cares about humanity, you get what I mean?
perhaps listen, instead of criticise.
What..?
A little bit wacko. A little bit eccentric. Not sure I want greenlight the untested outcome of the entire planet with video hackers.
It’s the kind of thing where anyone who points out the unintended consequences is ostracised as being antiscience and ignored when the problems come to fruition.
@Say When... You mispelled wrong.
Letting trees grow instead of letting blacktop glow might help to
“We know who struck first and scorched the sky, us”--Morpheus III
"We dont know who struck first," Morpheus lifts his gaze up at the dark lighting filled, overcast heavens. "but we know it was us who darkend the sky"
there is more energy in Earths core then humanity will ever need in it's entire existense (we don't need to turn humans into battery cells to get energy when the sun is blocked :D ...I've found that to be actualy the stupidiest part about the film)
All the nano-crap (mainly aluminum) spread in the sky is heated with doppler radar (NEXRAD etc.), causing high pressure, which along with chemical and (primarily) bacteriological ice nucleation used to lower the pressure, is likely how they steer weather systems. Hurricanes are created and weaponized, tornadoes too. This has been ongoing for decades - not something new. This video is a psyop, trying to make people think we need to do what has already been happening for decades, causing the so-called "climate change", a propaganda term, because OF COURSE THE CLIMATE CONSTANTLY CHANGES. This geowarfare, particularly weather warfare, has been causing the catastrophes, not us normal humans. Manmade CO2 is not the issue, as the psyop propaganda Maestros that made this video want you to think. Please watch the videos at "weatherwar101" before that channel is deleted. In December 2017 they disappeared the person who made those videos, who is likely dead now (RIP Mr. WW101).
@@AmbitiousLearnWithGeorge There's a fan theory that in the original script the robots were using humans for distributed computing, but they were told to dumb it down into the energy thing which doesn't really make sense.
Damn, crazy. Mad scientists.
We as humans are already intervening by injecting so many man made variables in the first place. Will the potential counter-measures also take into consideration the existing injected variables such as unhindered greed? Unlikely not.
We're already turning outer space into a garbage dump! I don't want anyone messing with natural processes (even though we likely speeded things up with more trash) until they show they clean up our air and drinking water.
Sulphur seems risky in terms of acid rain.
Its has the silver lining effect of possible depopulating us as well in theroy of coarse.
Using Sulphur is not only dangerous in terms of acid rain, but also risky regarding the health of humans and every living thing!
No, it's good sulfur not bad sulfur. That makes a huge difference.
Yeah see.. An few months back if I'd talked about the weather being made I'd of been called a idiot.
Don't worry, they'll still call you an idiot for impeding science.
People are starting to see it now. Some of them just live in this fantasy world as if everything that is happening is ok. I just don’t get it!!
Why people think we can tech manipulate everything "but" weather is such ridiculously irrational thought - But this is where media controlled influence is HEAVILY ignored - Humans need to use their own brains and not CNN 's Fox news's BBC's Etc.
Complotist*
been going on since post WWII-
"Opportunity knocks. Temptation sneaks in."
"When in doubt, don't do what you want to do."
And perhaps many more. But considering we have just one plant and very rudimentary computation ability:
"You know that sick feeling you get for apparently no reason when you are about to do something.."
So... Chem trails is not a conspiracy theory, it's simply a conspiracy. Fantastic.
It's not procrastination if I'm watching a DW documentary! 🙂
Agree - written from my sofa 😊🙏♥️🌏
I try to ran and watch at the same time😄
@@appliedcommonsense4735 is that...irony? I'm genuinely asking. i don't understand how irony works
Unless your main job is capturing carbon from the atmosphere!
@@radiotory that's alot better than alot of us!
how is it possible that this channel keeps putting out quality stuff at this rate?... its pretty crazy. they must have a huge team of ppl working for them lol
From what I understand, they buy some of the docs to play on this channel.
There's thousands of them around the world
Following the money led me here. More people no morals playing at being our creator. Be blessed
its financed by the german tax payer. So they have pretty large budgets and the obly thing they do is this. Good researched, neutral reporting on things.
DW is known for neutral documentation reporting on facts. its one of the best channel for knowledge to understand our world without bias, love them and hope they could continue this the foreseeable future.
Earth is not a machine...it's a conscious living being,we must show respect,care,and responsility !...
The movie Snowpiercer plot was the kind of atmosphere blocking of sunlight causing a massive ice age, playing with the climate is even worst than doing nothing.
talks about geo engineering in the future whilst showing geo engineered clouds in the present. They think we're all stupid
Yeah like Tucker the sell out Carlson saying the same thing. Acting like it hasn't been going on, but warning us of something they might do to the sky. Satanists love their lies.
Dimming the sun would diminish the intake of vitamin D, which most doctors would agree on its benefits to good health
1%, u get more from diet
Suggests dumping Sulphur into atmosphere(with oxygen and water).
That guy is planning more harm than entire world combined.
Yet ppl on here think thats better than planting trees and stop defoliating trees.the programming is high rn.
It will cause sulfuric acid rain, and we'll be breathing sulfur. Finally killing plantation....animals.....
I'm mystified why they publicly talk about a plan to use sulfur which turns into sulfuric acid, when non-public activity using boron has been going on for many years. "Chem trails" aren't a government project or else we'd hear about it; but a secret, PRIVATE project can get away with avoiding investigation.
That man who wants to spray sulphur has good arguments, but a bad plan. The sulphur will come down... Why doesn't he think of better plans, like the project in Iceland?
thank you! so true!
Why is Greenland called Greenland? It was a “little warmer “ a thousand years ago when some Vikings went there and grazed sheep . Then it got colder again and they had to leave or else eat snow . I live in Melbourne Australia and I observed no sea levels going up . Not one centimetre in the last 50 years. I lived near the beach. Could it be that some island in the pacific are sinking ? We have photos from Sidney harbour from the 1860 that show the same sea level as now. Climate change is crap. “They “ say the hottest year on record , by erasing the old hotter data . Historic records are changed to suit the new agenda.
Let it be. Nature’s being healing for itself. 🙏
Most climate change is natural, we should focus on the human effect closer to society. Don't mess with the air, deal with what we are putting in to the air.
We have meddled enough if we intervene too much the disaster is just waiting in the wings
The disaster they have caused has arrived.
When the guy says "removing the harmfull CO2 out of the atmosphere" I knew I was in Lala land.
Same theories and techniques they have been talking about for the last fifteen years, same thing we've seen them doing to our skies for the last twenty. This "soft-disclosure" pisses me off, even if it validates what we've been saying for decades... And it's not like people don't see it! They just rather keep sleeping.
I say we take David up to the stratosphere and toss him out.
John Bell
Stalker! 😆
You dim the sun and solar panels become less efficient. I am sure the particles sprayed in the atmosphere will do wonders for our health as well. Not to mention when it rains and those particle go into the soil. What could possibly go right.
can't fix a problem without dealing with the cause.
what this planet needs is more cars
Guchu Jeff.... That statement is one that can Definitely be applied to the medical community as well!!
This is madness. This is not salvation but destruction.
No, it is cool.
You're absolutely correct. It is madness and destruction. Geo-Engineering has been in progress for years and it has negatively impacted every living thing on earth for 40 years!! When you interfere with the natural balance of nature, you are asking for catastrophic results!! Why don't I here these loony scientists expressing concern about what the potential health ramifications could be for everything living? These people are insane!!
@@zenokarlsbach4292
You must be young and not have experienced how the earth looked 50 years ago.
@K9010 Fifty, sixty years ago, the exhaust was enormous and nobody cared.
Dangerous and pointless. Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. The IPCC reports in AR6, chapter 11, "The total global frequency of TC [tropical cyclone] formation will decrease or remain unchanged with increasing global warming (medium confidence)." Not that I really care about what the IPCC says. Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. What the data from NOAA SPC shows about tornados: EF1-EF5 (1954-2022) no trend; EF3-EF5 (most destructive) (1954-2022) 50% decline. No EF5s in US since 2013 (a record absence).
The Global Land Precipitation Anomaly from AR5 will disappoint with deviations from the average increasing by 0.2% per decade, but if you look at the actual data, it's just very variable over the decades.
Drought appears to be decreasing globally (Watts et al, 2018) measured by SPI 1901-2017.
For every million people on earth, annual deaths from climate-related causes (extreme temperature, drought, flood, storms, wildfires) declined 98%--from an average of 247 per year during the 1920s to 2.5 in per year during the 2010s.
Data on disaster deaths come from (EM-DAT, CRED / UCLouvain, Brussels,Belgium. )
Globally 2000-2019 there was a large decrease in cold-related deaths and a moderate increase in heat-related deaths (Zhao, 2021, Lancet). However, coldwaves are over 9 times more likely to kill than heatwaves, so the overall result is very beneficial.
What else? Oh, deserts like the Sahara have shrunk considerably and the Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime (NASA).
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover has reached the greatest extent ever recorded.
On extinction the rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years. At that frequency it will take over 930,000 years to reach 80% extinction of species experienced at the K-T boundary that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs.
There is no climate crisis.
Fact is...they've been doing this shit since the 40's. Thus, the situation they created playing god.
They did, but not in large scale. It was always to impact local weather, not change earth climate. It's not the same scale
Man digging his own grave
እውነት ነው ። Amharic
The grave is already 6 feet deep, we simply lack a tape measure.
The super rich sociopaths and their lackeys dug the graves for everyone else, and then convinced us that it's our fault.
They only share guilt; never riches, and no-one ever became SUPER rich except through exploitation.
@@perception5466 Are not the people responsible for allowing that to happen?
No mention of simply ditching meat and dairy. Very good way to reduce carbon getting into the atmosphere in first place.
This sounds like "let's give antibiotics to pigs and chlorinate our chicken" type of solution.
@Angel Freak This is not a solution scientists would typically come up with, but engineers.
Yes, but as long most of the people cannot realize it they keep brainwashing. Nice documentary about it is Planet of humans. On how people believe psychos that use nice words for them to believe and support anything.
Thank you, you have successfully made me burst with laughter.
Exact. The Sulphur idea is especially silly.
The sulphur would create acid rain that would dissolve more calcium carbonate (Ca CO3) and release... you guessed it more CO2 in the atmosphere.
@@elfboi523 in the USA we spend more bursting bombs for oil war
Let’s just create more problems for us because we just love problems🙃😩😩
Thanks for shearing. Really helpfull. God Almighty is in control until the end.
Planting a lot of trees seems like a better idea.
It's NOT as easy as that unfortunately
Well, that needs lots of water.
Oh it is. One billion tree's were planted in Uganda by a woman, minister of forestry. If it can be done in Africa it can be done anywhere like the reforestation of the Gobi desert in Northern China.
@@ThomAnno lol. That's not really what I mean...
It's not like trees will solve the problem.
I'm not saying that trees are bad though
So I guess much of the floods and fires happening everywhere have one thing in common.
Yes we lunatics have been calling it chemtrails ever since
It's easy to talk about clima change out of a million mansion house and having another few millions in the bank account
Don't forget that your money made on Patagonia outfit have carbon and pollution on them
Actually no. Climate change is harder for the people who actually have stuff than the ones who can't dare to worry about the day after tomorrow.
yeah okay... so whats your point, you don't wanna talk about climate change? Do you have a solution? Do you agree with geoengineering schemes?
@@faba6292 we need to consume less! Less flights less personal cars less meat smaller houses basically returning to 1960's standard of living
@@sergeshoemaker5218 1960 of which country?
@@InonoYazy US at least
24:30 This is the part where the Factory could be deployed to bring surface waters downwards so that colder water is pushed upwards.
Have u been drinking 2liters of spirit?
One thing we need to do is move water from the ocean back inland to places we need it and if we can do that while generating clean energy we have a chance to mitigate climate change and still have a prosperous future. It is really, really hard but it is not impossible.
The biggest idea I am trying to express is tunneling aqueducts from the coast, in this case the west coast of the USA inland to feed combination geothermal power and sea water desalination plants. The idea seems to be so big that no one has considered it possible but I believe it is not only possible but it is necessary. For over a century the fossil water contained in aquifers has been pumped out to feed agriculture, industry and municipal water needs. The natural water cycle cant refill fossil water deposits that were filled 10,000 years ago when the glaciers melted after the last ice age. Without refilling these aquifers there is not much of a future for the region of the United states. As a result ground levels in some areas of the San Joaquin Valley have subsided by more than 30 feet. Similar fossil water depletion is happening in other regions all around the world. TBM and tunneling technology has matured and further developments in the industry are poised to speed up the tunneling process and it's these tunnels that are the only way to move large volumes of water from the ocean inland. The water is moved inland to areas where it can be desalinated in geothermal plants producing clean water and power. In many cases the water will recharge surface reservoirs where it will be used first to make more hydro power before being released into rivers and canal systems. It's very important however to not stop tunneling at these first stops but to continue several legs until the water has traveled from the ocean under mountain ranges to interior states. Along the way water will flow down grade through tunnels and rise in geothermal loops to fill mountain top pumped hydro batteries several times before eventually recharging several major aquifers. What I am proposing is essentially reversing the flow of the Colorado River Compact. Bringing water from the coast of California first to mountaintop reservoirs then to the deserts of Nevada and Arizona and on to Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming. This big idea looks past any individual city or states problems and looks at the whole and by using first principles identifies the actual problem and only solution.
Thank you for your time, I would like the opportunity to explain in further detail and answer any questions.
A better future is possible
The nature and its working is PERFECT
If we humans step in on the working and flow of nature which we always do
Bcz our knowledge is imperfect , we could trigger immense disbalance and pay the price for our ignorance
Our extinction is imminent bcz its the only thing we are good at
Newsflash: Nature is changing in a long lasting dance of entrophy.
Earth is changing without our doing (we tipped the co2 scale though too quickly)
Nature is not perfect at all. She makes mistakes and she is ever changing.
There's nerves, tendons and a part of your guts which are useless and can become dangerous.
@@googleuser9383 Nothing is perfect in the universe
But Nature is well Balanced and same goes for Universe
We call it the Eco-System of earth , where everything on earth plays its important role to establish and Maintain this unique balance
As Humans are Intellectual and Self-conscious species
We have WILL , we can either choose to play positive role in this eco-system as other species are
Bcz we and everything on this earth is part of Nature
Or we can just disrupt this whole ecosystem and destruction awaits for this planet
In that way , we are not only harming this Planet we harming ourselves
Marking the end of not only many species that went extinct bcz of us
But end of us Humans as species too
We destroy nature and harm other species , Bcz of our Never Stopping Greed and madness
Most Ignorants of us are
The ones who are in Power and Authority , they do silly mistakes for sake of money and power
For Their Greed , whole planet pays the Price ( those morons never listen or try to listen to warnings )
It will be too Late and our end is indeed Inevitable
@Gautam Agreed
But scientists and environmentalists are giving warnings to people for soo long
But people remain ignorant and most of the people don't even understand why Global Warming is a threat just bcz they do not even know what it is and they don't wonna know
They only are concerned with things that have to do with Profit or Money
Specially rich industrialists and sadly Ignorant Rich people who are in power never listen to scientific or intellectual people
@@yhz2K you speak facts💯💯💯💯💯💯👏👏👏👏👏
@Gautam yh ur right much better to put 1mil tonnes of sulphuric acid n heavy metals into the atmosphere.perfect👌
Funny thing about this vicious circle is that science caused all the problems we're in
No. It didn't. HUMANS did. Science is simply a subject of studying your surroundings from different perspectives. Science has nothing to do with World Population, which is a major reason of all the chaos.
That's akin to blaming knives for murder!
@Angel Freak Are you going to throw your phone away or stop using the internet?
Stop spraying our atmosphere, regardless off the purpose, coz it all hits back !!!
How they know , they are not interfering with earth's evolutionary and complex self healing systems.
Check out dane wigington new doc the dimming he explains this in detail
I don't think they care
Why do you think suddenly there’s so much flood, earthquake etc
The aircraft will make double the emissions than how much pollution effects are mitigated from the sulfur spraying. Not to mention that some people and some animals are allergic to sulfur.
If that were true they wouldn't do it. I'm pretty sure these scientists know more of this science than you.
There is NO climate problem, the problem is what and who you listen to
Geoingeneering showed in this documentary is a devastation, with all do respect.
❤ DOES NOT THE EARTH - HAVE AWAY - OF HEALING HERSELF ?
Not without harming humans and compromising the way we live. Also the Earth doesn't need healing - Mother Nature ALWAYS survives (until the sun blows up at least).
Humans have to disappear , forever......
The earth has no cis gendering... Or any chromosomes... In of itself... That's species that have sexual characteristics... Unless you have new information..
There are some self regulating mechanisms to get ones.. James lovelock and his gaia hypothesis... Daisy world model based on black and daisies... Is this what you hint at?, or do you mean something different I don't know about?
Share with me if you will?
l3rn 2 sp3ll
The earth is doing MOST of the work... Like water being poured into a glass with a small hole. It doesn't need much to overflow... Also a lot of solutions are using the ability of the planet.
This is so nuts. These people have to be thrown in jail for tempering with our planet like this!!
I hope any solution that ends up implemented will follow a natural approach (i.e: Planting Trees in mass) or have industries to remove carbon from the atmosphere and use it in other products, all using renewable energy of course. I see some proposals for adding chemicals (or large amounts of minerals) to the atmosphere and oceans, which I find extremely dangerous. In a society where lobbing and personal interests have great power, we have to ensure the medicine will not worsen the patient's condition.
Sorry to say, but some times, when the condition is bad enough, medicine is required. Sometimes it's just temporary, until the climate effects has flat lined for example. But to be against something just because it might have negative effects is just anti progressive. I'm sure happy we go forward developing countermeasures, medicine and procedures to counteract negative effects. Things like chemotherapy, penicillin and solar energy would otherwise not exist. If we just said "nah, implementing new solutions and technology is dangerous and might backfire, let's just not".
@@dexterdextrow7248 I totally disagree with the notion of "to be against something just because it might have negative effects is just anti progressive". The examples you gave also do not apply, sorry. The risks with a medicine can affect millions if unforeseen effects occur but the reaction to stop the process can be quick, limiting the problem and how many are impacted. Changes to the planet impact billions of humans and all life on the planet. We do not yet understand all mechanisms governing Nature. We are children playing with dangerous things affecting life on this planet. There is little to no room for errors. The economic interests pressure from companies trying to sell their model as "the solution" is great already. Considering the great corruption and degradation of moral values we see all over today, we have to be extremely cautions. It is like dealing with nitroglycerine, we do not have second chances.
@@corujariousa all climate countermeasures are not global, thereby you can, much like the case of medicine, stop in expansion of the efforts if the results seem to be harmful or negligible. When it comes to companies? Well, they will try to earn money no matter what. If you don't do these initiatives can companies then not make up pretty much any other scheme that makes money at the cost off the climate? Ofcourse they can, and they have historically. So by not engaging in potentially planet saving scientific methods just because a evil company can take advantage of it is slightly paranoid. Everything and anything can be the cause of evil action, companies, governments, individuals, groups or anything else for that matter. If we are to refrain from everything that can be exploited or misused the we cannot do anything. Additionally the problem is that we have limited time to fix climate change if you indeed believe it's as bad as they say, and then the choice might not be implementing countermeasures or let it normalize naturally, it may well be countermeasures or catastrophic damage and consequences.
Planting trees is much safer than putting dust up above. The trees would grow fast feeding on the heightened CO2 as plants indeed all are since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Plant life before we began burning fossil fuels were in a CO2 drought not far from the line of starvation and death.
@@dexterdextrow7248 The chemotherapy cure for cancer that causes more cancer?
From this video, I love the ocean based solution that involves creating more life in the deserts of the ocean and sequestering CO2 while that happens! The rich lady that got rich by selling oil based clothing made in China? I like what she is doing but the way that she became able to do that is questionable to me. Manipulating weather and vacuuming CO2 from the skies are more then counter productive and should be stopped immediately! Those solutions cause more problems then they solve
Only just realised that your comment is nine months old.
@@anyonehome8609 It doesn't matter how old the comment is. Tom is right. When ever man, (sorry, or woman) interfere with nature it all goes tits up.
Develop large forests. Many places are still destroying forests.
And just like Dane wigington has been stating for years!!!
thank you- finally someone with a brain! You've got to check out some of these moronic comments!
Dane Wigington with
G e o e n g I n e e r I n g w a t c h.
O r g
When I see these people I want to know who's paying for all the efforts. When you know that you understand what is the real goal.
Ivan Bakhvalov The real goal appears to be to prepare you for the harmful vaccine 😭
and here's... the full grown russ. like a 200kg pumpkin onto your roof. He lives in arid and semiarid places gets early to bed and its an order of magnitude more stupid every morning WE NEED to save them !
Not everything is a conspiracy man.
Chad Norman definitely not but what is presently happening isn’t much to do with viruses .Viruses have always existed but never was it used as a political weapon before. Why ?
Exactly. It’s the same ppl that wants to chip and track you and fill you with vaccinations... also the ppl that funding all the rioting and lockdowns
Yet they call Dane Wiggington crazy.
Why you did not call Dane Wingington, to say you what is Geoengineering do to humanity and all nature on mother earth?
Feel our way and see how it goes? this is unbelievable,
There are simpler things we can do. If large, commercial buildings used highly reflective roofing and pavements, for example, it would make a difference.
the main disinfo is to think that co2 is a problem!
in fact it is essential to growth of plants!
they are already doing it, milky white sky for days and sometimes for weeks, it's really depressing having no blue sky and no sun, forget it
I know 😢
Move to another country
That’s why all the cars are full of Sahara dust and we also have to breathe the dust in 😢😢😢
Make Ecocide the 5th Crime Against Humanity and hold CEO's responsible.
100% agreed we need something like a United Nations but one that is truly global and purely advocates for the environment
How come nobody talks about control of human population, which in my view, is the root cause of all the climate and sustainability challenges?
Well didn't take long for ecofascists to comment huh
@@tesso.6193 Whether you like it or not, nature has ways to deal with the ever-expanding human population. The COVID pandemic is one of such ways. In addition, climate change will intensify scarcity of natural resources, which will lead to more conflicts and wars.
@@maxentropy0305 The problem isn't "expanding human population". We produce enough food to comfortably feed 10 billion humans. We don't for one simple reason, Capitalism.
It simply isn't profitable to and under Capitalism things are only done because they are profitable, not because they are needed.
Just like the British when they casually decided to genocide Indians and Irishmen with starvation because of Malthusian "large population" rhetoric, people who violently reject critiquing the economic system that privileges them will be the death of millions.
People fell starved to death in front of trains and ships moving mountains of food from their land. While the British declared it's "nature" rectifying the savage races' population. Capitalists and Imperialists love attributing their destructive actions to "nature".
@@tesso.6193 “We produce enough food to comfortably feed 10 billion humans” - I seriously doubt this statement. It might be true under ideal conditions (no prolonged droughts, no wide-spread infestation, no land grabbing due to over urbanization, etc.) Unfortunately, as the human population keeps growing and climate change intensifies, these conditions are no longer possible to maintain.
Even if technologies may alleviate food shortage, there are other types of shortages that may not be alleviated. The most acute one is space shortage. Fighting for living space has been the main drive for wars throughout the history. The non-stop Israel Palestine conflicts and the desire to build a US-Mexico border wall are two typical examples of how much we humans long for or don’t want to share living space.
There is no question that capitalism and greed contributes to food shortage and other scarcities and imbalance. I would say over-population is the ultimate form of greed, because it disregards the capacity of nature and the interests of other species. if you criticize capitalism, perhaps you should criticize over-population too.
@@maxentropy0305 It's a widely known fact and if farmers not dumping, tons, literal mountains of food because it wouldn't be profitable to sell them this last crisis didn't make you suspect it, nothing will.
You can just google it. Capitalists literally produce food, clothing and tech then dump them in landfills so the prices don't fall. The latest Amazon scandal is just a peek.
"I would say over-population is the ultimate form of greed"
Riiiiight. Fuck off, I'd need to have 8 children in my country to match the consumption and carbon footprint of 1 European child. But when it comes down to it, White people think *we're* the problem. We exist too much. And it becomes an "overpopulation" problem, not a Capitalism and Imperialism problem.
See how the burden is shifted?
If the choice is between a person from Luxembourg, who consumes 22 times as much as some random African, people will point to the African as the problem because they have kids.
There is no "greed" it's a misdirection. The profit motive is the cause. Left to their own devices, humans are a naturally collaborative pack animal.
When ever with mess with Mother Nature, it always bites us in the ass.
time to make peace with the fact that we're F'd.
Yep pretty much! From the food, water, meds, air, products we use, etc. we are f’d.
@@ladymarmalade9941 but aren’t the people behind it fucked too? Or are they not humans? I don’t get it anymore this world what is It coming to?....
Excellent Docco.
I saw deep ocean seaweed being produced near Hawaii. It consisted of buays with ropes as platform for seaweed and a simple wave driven pump with a hose or pipe going into the depths bringing up nutrient rich water.
aloha from hawai, i didnt work and now were just chemtrailed 24/7. so bad cant even go outside today.
@@happyvalley6990😢
I love the fact that Patagonia woman does an interview from her Mansion. Clueless
Marginally better than a yacht.
Robert Grubb I disagree with this lady but she is not clueless. Putting 350 million dollers to preserve nature is one fine gesture. And maybe it will help save some species
This is a must-watch for the sake of our generations to come.
Must watch ? It's just BS.
@@pinchmesh2856 👍
And whatever chemicals that will/do rain down on us, our food supply, waters etc etc 🙏
Geoingeneering is killing everything. This is crazy.