Thanks for sharing! Getting some great results already! This really is helpful. It made me think about prompting for images "outside of the box". Never would have guessed to do a prompt like this on my own.
Outstanding! I purchased your databases too sometime ago and I love them. Im in the facebook creator monetization programs across all my pages and the boost they have given me Im delighted with.
Hey Eric, Thanks for another great tutorial. Just wondering if a similar prompt can extract from a website which has copyright free/free to use commercially photos? Perhaps have a wildcard in the prompt to source for what you know is there? Many thanks, and keep up the great work!
That's a great question. I've done things similar to this and yes you can, but it's been like a 50/50 chance of success. You can copy/paste a URL from a website and first paste it into ChatGPT to get prompts (works sometimes). I've done this for Game of Throne style photos via the Wikipedia page. You can also use this prompt trick shown in this video: th-cam.com/video/EE3pv3P6qkI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=jF2BrRS3PyC-uAwr You can also take a screenshot of an image you like from a website, paste it into an AI art generator and use it as style reference/describe command.
Thank you! Yes I do. I have thousands of free prompts spread across my blog posts, here: metricsmule.com/blog/ Let me know if you find any. If not, I'll also go through my database and see what else I can post here in the comments for you.
Hi Eric, thank you for the great content. I purchased a Freepik annual subscription since yesterday they were 70% off. I've been a Leonardo user for several months now. I'm trying Freepik and so far my impressions are that it produces images that are much more polished, almost ready to use and with way less errors right from the start compared to Leo. However, to me, Leo seems to be better in some crucial aspects like precise editings (correcting small areas like teeth), also Leo's upscalers are giving me better results since they correct and polish small details very easily (again, teeth), and Phoenix's prompt adherence is way beyond Freepik's models IMO. What I wanted to ask you is this: Is there a way to get precision when fixing areas like teeth in Freepik so I can get images that I can upscale to 8k or 10k like I do with Leo, while retaining almost perfect details? So far I'm producing the images with Freepik then upscaling them there as well, and then taking them into Leo's Canvas editor and universal upscaler as well to polish teeth (yeah, my problem is mainly with teeth lol), since I'm not getting good results with them with Freepik's upscaler or editor, at least not in images that are not extreme close ups, even when raising the level of creativity. I would like to keep being able to produce high quality images in the same resolutions as with Leo, but using only Freepik if possible. However I still have to rely on Leo. What am I missing? I tried the .HEIC prompt trick btw.
Great questions. As as far as the .HEIC, also try other types like .CR2 and .jpg. In Freepik, Flux 1.1 Pro and Mystic are by far the best IMO. Also, when you download the images in Freepik, make sure when you download them, select "upscale and download" if that option is available. It's not available in some high scale models. Also, if you use the 2nd simple prompt I share in this video and then add your specific subject or keyword after it, it looks amazing using Freepik Flux 1.1 Pro. As far as the teeth, let me try a few things first so I can give you the best answer. Have you tried Magnific? I know it's expensive, but Freepik actually owns them now. In the future, I think Magnific AI will be tied into Freepik directly one way or another. That's a great upscaler too. Usually if you message Javi Lopez on X he'll give you a good free trial or credit to use with Magnific. If you're interested, try that too and let me know here if he responds. If not, I'll see if I can get some discount codes for people to use. And one more thing about the teeth, I do remember one thing I used to do that worked surprisingly well. For some reason, when I replaced "teeth" in my prompt with "veneers" it produced better results, lol.
@@metricsmule Thank you for your reply, Eric. I have tried with Flux 1.1 Pro and Mystic. I think they are awesome and I find the images ready to use (in most cases) if you want to use them in 2k, or some of them maybe in 4k max. But if you want to go beyond that resolution then teeth don't look good. I upscale the images in Freepik before downloading them instead of clicking on "Upscale and download", is there a difference? I'm going to try that out. So far I got the best results by creating the image with Flux 1.1 Pro or Mystic then using the Freepik upscaler to add details with Subtle or Vivid Imagintion then taking the resulting image into Leo's Universal or Ultra upscaler. Another thing I tried was upscaling to 4k in Freepik with Imagination set to "none" after adding details with "Subtle" or "Vivid", but doing this doesn't give me good results, the images are soft and have artifacts unless I take them into Leo again, but the former option gives me better results. I will try the prompt in your video, as well as using .CR2 and .jpg in the prompts, and see how it goes! I haven't tried Magnific yet. I don't know the pricing but for what you say it sounds like it's way more expensive than Leo or Freepik. Will check this out though. I hope you're right and it is integrated with Freepik in the near future! In the meantime, if the pricing is high, I think I will probably stick with Leo instead, but I'll see. In any case, I will definitely message Javi and see what he tells me, thank you for the suggestion. And I'll definitely try with "veneers" lol that's curious. You mean in the editor right? I'll try that out. Thank you for taking the time to read and give such a detailed answer, and for the great content! P.S. another "issue" I noticed with Freepik is that when you use the editor on upscaled images (2k or above), you can't set the render density like you do in Leo, and density seems so be set to a low level by default. As a result, the areas you fix end up looking blurred and with low detail when you upscale the images with Topaz, unless you use an AI upscaler that solves the problem, like Leo's.
Just curious about IP copyright using this AI process, creating movie studio IP (Intellectual Property) images? ... in other words can you use those created AI IP images in your own works, without repurcussions from the studios and copyright? ... what's the legal aspect? ... it would be very interesting if they can be used ...
That's a great question that still has a lot of unknowns. The images you create in AI tools are technically considered yours (but you have to look at the FAQs for each app to make sure) But when it comes to the movie studios or the actual people, it all just depends on what you're using them for. Many times, it's labeled for "editorial purposes only", Just like using a stock image from iStock or Adobe Stock, etc.
Love it ,brother , and have Something for you .: when you used my Name , you can gets real good art style : by this prompt : infra in the style of Lee Sylvester Lemon. : And you will love my Art style in MidJourney AI Art! 🎨🎬🎉
Thanks for sharing! Getting some great results already! This really is helpful. It made me think about prompting for images "outside of the box". Never would have guessed to do a prompt like this on my own.
Awesome, I'm glad it's working for you!
Thanks very much bro. Best prompt ever.
I purchased your databases and they are amazing and so are your videos❤❤❤
Thank you so much, I'm glad you like them! 💜
Great video. I will try these out.
Awesome! Let me know how it goes!
Outstanding! I purchased your databases too sometime ago and I love them. Im in the facebook creator monetization programs across all my pages and the boost they have given me Im delighted with.
Thank you, I love hearing things like that! I'm glad you found it helpful for Facebook.
awesome, tysm for the info
Hey Eric,
Thanks for another great tutorial.
Just wondering if a similar prompt can extract from a website which has copyright free/free to use commercially photos? Perhaps have a wildcard in the prompt to source for what you know is there?
Many thanks, and keep up the great work!
That's a great question. I've done things similar to this and yes you can, but it's been like a 50/50 chance of success. You can copy/paste a URL from a website and first paste it into ChatGPT to get prompts (works sometimes). I've done this for Game of Throne style photos via the Wikipedia page. You can also use this prompt trick shown in this video: th-cam.com/video/EE3pv3P6qkI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=jF2BrRS3PyC-uAwr
You can also take a screenshot of an image you like from a website, paste it into an AI art generator and use it as style reference/describe command.
Excellent video. Do you have a prompt for creating tshirt text designs?
Thank you! Yes I do. I have thousands of free prompts spread across my blog posts, here: metricsmule.com/blog/
Let me know if you find any. If not, I'll also go through my database and see what else I can post here in the comments for you.
KISS lol. Thanks bro really awesome! will try some of these for my next AI video
Thanks very much!
Hi Eric, thank you for the great content. I purchased a Freepik annual subscription since yesterday they were 70% off. I've been a Leonardo user for several months now. I'm trying Freepik and so far my impressions are that it produces images that are much more polished, almost ready to use and with way less errors right from the start compared to Leo. However, to me, Leo seems to be better in some crucial aspects like precise editings (correcting small areas like teeth), also Leo's upscalers are giving me better results since they correct and polish small details very easily (again, teeth), and Phoenix's prompt adherence is way beyond Freepik's models IMO.
What I wanted to ask you is this: Is there a way to get precision when fixing areas like teeth in Freepik so I can get images that I can upscale to 8k or 10k like I do with Leo, while retaining almost perfect details? So far I'm producing the images with Freepik then upscaling them there as well, and then taking them into Leo's Canvas editor and universal upscaler as well to polish teeth (yeah, my problem is mainly with teeth lol), since I'm not getting good results with them with Freepik's upscaler or editor, at least not in images that are not extreme close ups, even when raising the level of creativity.
I would like to keep being able to produce high quality images in the same resolutions as with Leo, but using only Freepik if possible. However I still have to rely on Leo. What am I missing? I tried the .HEIC prompt trick btw.
Great questions. As as far as the .HEIC, also try other types like .CR2 and .jpg. In Freepik, Flux 1.1 Pro and Mystic are by far the best IMO. Also, when you download the images in Freepik, make sure when you download them, select "upscale and download" if that option is available. It's not available in some high scale models.
Also, if you use the 2nd simple prompt I share in this video and then add your specific subject or keyword after it, it looks amazing using Freepik Flux 1.1 Pro.
As far as the teeth, let me try a few things first so I can give you the best answer. Have you tried Magnific? I know it's expensive, but Freepik actually owns them now. In the future, I think Magnific AI will be tied into Freepik directly one way or another.
That's a great upscaler too. Usually if you message Javi Lopez on X he'll give you a good free trial or credit to use with Magnific.
If you're interested, try that too and let me know here if he responds. If not, I'll see if I can get some discount codes for people to use.
And one more thing about the teeth, I do remember one thing I used to do that worked surprisingly well. For some reason, when I replaced "teeth" in my prompt with "veneers" it produced better results, lol.
@@metricsmule Thank you for your reply, Eric. I have tried with Flux 1.1 Pro and Mystic. I think they are awesome and I find the images ready to use (in most cases) if you want to use them in 2k, or some of them maybe in 4k max. But if you want to go beyond that resolution then teeth don't look good. I upscale the images in Freepik before downloading them instead of clicking on "Upscale and download", is there a difference? I'm going to try that out. So far I got the best results by creating the image with Flux 1.1 Pro or Mystic then using the Freepik upscaler to add details with Subtle or Vivid Imagintion then taking the resulting image into Leo's Universal or Ultra upscaler. Another thing I tried was upscaling to 4k in Freepik with Imagination set to "none" after adding details with "Subtle" or "Vivid", but doing this doesn't give me good results, the images are soft and have artifacts unless I take them into Leo again, but the former option gives me better results.
I will try the prompt in your video, as well as using .CR2 and .jpg in the prompts, and see how it goes! I haven't tried Magnific yet. I don't know the pricing but for what you say it sounds like it's way more expensive than Leo or Freepik. Will check this out though. I hope you're right and it is integrated with Freepik in the near future! In the meantime, if the pricing is high, I think I will probably stick with Leo instead, but I'll see.
In any case, I will definitely message Javi and see what he tells me, thank you for the suggestion.
And I'll definitely try with "veneers" lol that's curious. You mean in the editor right? I'll try that out. Thank you for taking the time to read and give such a detailed answer, and for the great content!
P.S. another "issue" I noticed with Freepik is that when you use the editor on upscaled images (2k or above), you can't set the render density like you do in Leo, and density seems so be set to a low level by default. As a result, the areas you fix end up looking blurred and with low detail when you upscale the images with Topaz, unless you use an AI upscaler that solves the problem, like Leo's.
I purchased your database but link is not working
Everything is working on my end. Email me by replying to your confirmation/receipt email and I will forward you a new one if still not working.
Just curious about IP copyright using this AI process, creating movie studio IP (Intellectual Property) images? ... in other words can you use those created AI IP images in your own works, without repurcussions from the studios and copyright? ... what's the legal aspect? ... it would be very interesting if they can be used ...
That's a great question that still has a lot of unknowns. The images you create in AI tools are technically considered yours (but you have to look at the FAQs for each app to make sure) But when it comes to the movie studios or the actual people, it all just depends on what you're using them for. Many times, it's labeled for "editorial purposes only", Just like using a stock image from iStock or Adobe Stock, etc.
Makes sense ... thanks ...
"is this the...." no
Love it ,brother , and have Something for you .: when you used my Name , you can gets real good art style : by this prompt : infra in the style of Lee Sylvester Lemon. : And you will love my Art style in MidJourney AI Art! 🎨🎬🎉
Cool, I'll try it!
Please add my art style on your next video. Ok. 🎨🎥 #ArtStyle #NextVideo
I'll definitely try it out!