ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
ต่อไป
เล่นอัตโนมัติ
Celeron 300A: The best CPU you could buy in 1998!Bits und Bolts
มุมมอง 32K
DIY 16MB 30-Pin FPM SIMMs: Supercharge Your Vintage Hardware!Bits und Bolts
มุมมอง 49K
The Clever Way to Count Tanks - NumberphileNumberphile
มุมมอง 918K
Harley Quinn's desire to win!!!#Harley Quinn #jokerHarley Quinn with the Joker
มุมมอง 2.4M
Ice cold between the sticks 🥶Bundesliga
มุมมอง 9M
มาแรง!! บุษบา + สาบานได้เลย + อัปสราหลงฟ้า | เจน เจ้าค่ะ & ออย ราเชน - แซด | ตลาดไท วังน้อยThiLordHae I ไทรถแห่
มุมมอง 82K
天使救了路飞！#天使#小丑#路飞#家庭家庭搞笑日记
มุมมอง 42M
Pentium Pro, was it a lemon ?RetroBytes
มุมมอง 81K
The Insane Engineering of the GameboyReal Engineering
มุมมอง 1.8M
Building a 1996 Dual Pentium Pro NT Workstation PC!LGR
มุมมอง 375K
The Birth, Boom and Bust of the Hard Disk DriveAsianometry
มุมมอง 462K
The NUC7 ...7 years later.Hardware Haven
มุมมอง 4.7K
Giving The OG XBOX Quadruple The RAM | Never Done Before!Macho Nacho Productions
มุมมอง 334K
45 Year Old DOS on a New Intel CPU Without EmulationInkbox
มุมมอง 171K
This SNES Game is Worth Around $400 IF I Can Fix It!TronicsFix
มุมมอง 452K
เด็กปั๊มโดดเกาะรถชิ่งค่าน้ำมัน 2,500 บาท | สำนักข่าววันนิวส์ข่าวช่องวัน
มุมมอง 1.1M
女孩妒忌小丑女？ #小丑#shorts好人小丑
มุมมอง 9M
ขวดน้ำนำโชค #ตู้ซ่อนหมีตู้ซ่อนหมี
มุมมอง 505K
เศรษฐามาเพราะทักษิณ ไปเพราะทักษิณ | ติ่งข่าว | วันที่ 15 ส.ค. 67ข่าวเวิร์คพอยท์ 23
มุมมอง 317K
You installed windows without a mouse... I know a tabber when I see one. 😂
Hehe, yes. I had to look for the PS/2 mouse and procrastinated as long as possible 😂
@@bitsundbolts back in the day I had a 486 without a mouse. We got one eventually, but it took a few months. I learned how to use win3.1 without a mouse. It wasn't fun. Ironically here I am with win11 on my work computer and I still close programs by double clicking the icon on the left left corner. I'm not sure why I'm more prone to use that than the "X" but I am. It doesn't work on everything. VSCode doesn't work with it. Notepad++ does though. Even normal win11 notepad with it's tabbed documents still does it. lol I've seen a few programs that don't have an icon there that still work as well. I think windows explorer used to work before tabbed mode was added.
You use a mouse when installing Windows?
These unters and their mice...
"a friend at the scrapyard"... I need such a friend :)
Haha, absolutely! But it took some time to build up this friendship. The same guy I asked to rescue that Apricot machine... You know how that story ended 😅
@@bitsundbolts You got a Lemon instead!
I remember when I went to Animation School. One of the staff working with accounting was more interested in 3D animation instead of Classical animation. He showed me his new Pentium-Pro that he paid a fortune for. He was an Early 3D studio Max user when it transitioned to "Max" from 3D studio, and I was totally blown away how simple it was to work with polygons in real-time.
Pentium Pro ran Duke Nukem 3D like greased lightning too! :D It was the fast superscalar core and tightly coupled L2 cache that did it. But not really affordable though... Ugh! :)
I bought a 200 MHz PPRO in 1997 running NT4 and later W2K. I used it for many years. I still have it and couple of years ago it was running fine.
I scrapped mine at 2010 when I left the country.
Too bad the same can't be said for new intel cpus lol
@@bakebook Really hope Intel get their act together. Competition is good for all of us
The Pentium Pro was Intel's first CPU with out-of-order execution, and was the grandfather of all of the x86 CPUs that we see today. It's hard to state just how critical of a CPU this was for Intel, it was an absolute game changer in terms of the performance-per-clock that could be achieved, and all of our modern Intel CPUs today can still be traced directly back to the Pentium Pro.
Yeah! First Intel x86 CPU to use a RISC core with microcode for the x86 ISA, IIRC.
Agree! But then they wanted to push the MHz as selling factor with the P4 and screwed it... Until the pentium D and then core architecture scraped it.
@@georgH Yea, they basically went back to the Pentium 3 as the basis for the Pentium M, which became the Core Solo/Core Duo and eventually the Core 2 Duo when 64 bit arrived on the scene. They learned a hard lesson that more mhz, at the expense of IPC, is not always better.
Hard Disk ASMR. I miss the clicking but not the whine.
Fun fact SSDs and NVME's can emit a similar sound to HDDs without the whine when they're under heavy load.
It's much more faint though, but it is there.
You're weird - it's a package sound. The whine is part of the soundtrack - it's like saying "I like Metallica but not the drums"
Western Digital Raptor 10k rpm😍😍
I miss this it's a core memory of the 90's
Newer drives with fluid dynamic bearings didn't have (as much of) the whine. The older drives with ball bearings could be pretty bad - I once had an early 7200RPM Quantum drive (with a whopping 16GB capacity!!! lol) that sounded like a tiny jet engine... Ugh.
The Pentium Pro targeted workstations and servers market. And Windows NT was the preferred OS for this CPU. It performed very well with 32-code, but when it came to 16-bit, the original Pentium was better. We can say that the Pentium Pro was the first intel CPU primarily targeting workstations and servers. Its full speed L2 cache was designed to perform best for this kind of work. The Pentium II Xeon was the true successor of the Pentium Pro.
The Pentium II was optimized for both 32 and 16 bit instructions. The L2 cache was half speed and was moved outside the CPU chip to cut cost. And with the addition of the MMX instruction set, this CPU became the perfect successor for the original Pentium family.
The original Pentium was used in workstations, because intel hadn't had a CPU targeting this market before the Pentium Pro. So The original Pentium was used both for home/business and workstations. So we may look at the Pentium Pro as successor to the original Pentium if we look at it from this angle. Otherwise the real successor to the original Pentium was the Pentium II, while the Pentium Pro was the first of a new class of CPUs.
I have a real "soft spot" for the Pentium Pro. It got a lot of undeserved flack when it came due to poor mixed 16/32-bit performance, but in reality that was not ever it's target platform. Many people did not understand how it was positioned, and maybe Intel didn't help with this confusing diversion between the P1 and P2. However, enthusiasts were keen to get their hands on them, with all that on-die full speed L2 cache proving too much to ignore! The lack of MMX did negate some of the performance gains for gamers though, but again, that was never it's target platform. Also, it's a really nice looking CPU with gold heat spreader! :)
I remember that when I wanted to get away from the weird issues I was having on my Socket7+ Cyrix 6x86 200 I started pricing options, and when I saw the difference between the Pentium 200 and Pentium Pro 200 wasn't really that much (both were around 600$) I went with a socket 8 motherboard not the smart upgrade-able move I thought it was, but even though a little later Pentium MMX were released I was very happy with my purchase. (until I understood that Socket 8 was a dead end, that pissed me off a little) I would had been better off with a high quality Socket 7 and had the K6 path open, but I didn't had that info.
BTW That Pentium Pro was awesome alongside my Rendition Verite and VooDoo 1!
I bet it was a beast if you compiled with optimisations specifically for it. It looks like it had better MIPS/MHz compared to the competition at the time.
Yeah, it found its place amongst those in the know at least. I think Intel should have used a different brand name really, it wasn't a chip that was really of much use to home users so the Pentium name wasn't really required to sell it. Of course every geek wanted one since every geek knew how significant it was.
Still, it made its impact and parts of the architecture live on to this day. Also interestingly the method of construction is kinda back? the whole chiplet design we're seeing now being used to boost yields of very large and complex designs. Not quite the same as the Pentium Pro of course but it's a similar concept.
PPro works very well on DOS gaming. MMX instructions were not widely implemented in games so you can ignore them.
@@AncapDude Perhaps many higher performance DOS games optimized to minimize the number of calls into DOS or BIOS and thus switch into 16-bit code?
That hard drive "crunching" really brings back memories. Lots of virtual memory swapping even when just moving the mouse.
I'm still using my dual Pentium Pro system as my Windows NT 4.0 Server for my legacy home network. I've upgraded it with dual Pentium II OverDrive CPUs with 512MB of RAM and U160 SCSI hard drives. The thing is rock solid and love it.
Wow! Very nice! Especially on those two Pentium II Overdrives!
I wonder if modern linux could work on that system?
@@v12alpine it could!
The sound of old hard disks is the same of the music dance of 90s, you hate them, but you can't stop loving them
I don't miss them at all when using silent SSD's and CF cards. I don't like clicky keyboards or mice either. So hell yes i love rubberdomes. The lower the noise the better. The only sound should come from the sound card.
I don't use SSD in retroPC but I love CF. I bought about 20 CFs of 1-16GB for €30-40 and I hope to have CFs until I die. You forget the weight in the retroPC, in CF is "almost 0". Anyway, this noise is lovely heheh
Back in the days when this came out. I setup one of these with 2 chips and 128MB of ram, 1GB root drive, 9GB archive drive, 4GB dat backup running SCO Unix. with about 50 users and about that many printers. This system was super fast. SCO Unix took full advantage of this chip.
That was a BEAST of a system back then!
I was a NeXTSTEP developer at the time. My first i486 system was such a letdown. But my first Pentium 133 system was a real step up, and my first PPro system was the point where I realized that there was really no hope for the dedicated workstation-class systems. Intel integrating things into the chipset and forcing motherboard makers to stop making random stuff up really tightened things up and made it possible to build decent systems without having to spend days experimenting to figure out what would work.
Да ладно, старичек am5x dx4 133 был совсем не плох, даже достаточно хорошо гнался.
И грелся🤣
Я его до сих пор не выкинул, это был певый комп, по этому мать с процем, памятью и жестким диском на 850мб лежат на полке, все работает до сих пор включал недавно😁
P.S. Ну как недавно, пару лет назад🤷
Did you work at NeXT Computer?
Fun fact: Mechanical pencils actually make pretty good retro CPU pin repair tools.
I owned a Pentium Pro Server about 2004/2005, a local bank sorted out their old servers. It was a Siemens Primergy 561 with 2 Pentium Pro CPU's and 384MB of Memory. I used to run Windows 2000 on this machine. I'm not 100% sure, what I did with that System, but I think I sold it after I finished school.
We all love the Pentium Pro, parts of it live on inside every Intel CPU still being made I think! Nice to see you saved one from the recyclers, it contains entirely too much gold and many have met their end in a beaker of aqua regia.
On-package L2 cache was quite the party trick, a very expensive thing to do in its time and it remained so well into the early 00s when finally we got on-die L2 caches from AMD and Intel. I remember the fastest chips of the late 90s - the first AMD Athlons and Pentium 3's - with their L2 cache chips on cartridge right next to the core but still not integrated yet. Makes you realise just how big the advancements of that time were, what was once very expensive and low-yield became very feasible and mainstram in a matter of a few years.
it kills me when these chips are sold in mass for gold salvage :( they deserve our respect.
For this reason, it is better not to spread this information. The Pentium Pros are worth much more from a cultural and historical point of view, it would be a shame to dismantle them for raw materials.
Yeah indeed ( I've seen lots of them being salvaged for lil piece of gold but to prevent 'em, i looted all of them )
❤ working so many years with Pentium Pro & winnt 4.0... a jump in the past.. good old days ❤
The install sounds was icing on the cake. I was transported 23 years to the past. Thank you!
I watched the whole install process and enjoyed it... I need help! 🤪
Every of your videos is amazing, thank you very much!
Haha, wow. Well, I have never seen the setup screens of this OS. I thought someone else would like to see it and that's why I included the entire thing. Good that it wasn't a total waste 😅
I once watched a Tech Tangents video where he installed Office 97 from floppies. haha It was very zen, at least until the inevitable bad disk, which added just a touch of drama.
My own NT 4 install experience wasn't quite this tidy, though. It was on a system that didn't boot from CD, so I had to use the three install floppies. I guess the boot CD sets up the environment differently, because I ended up experimenting with setup command line switches to work around the abysmal file copy routines it uses. Loading SMARTDRV first was essential... otherwise it took *a g e s* in the blue-screen portion, with the disk thrashing relentlessly the whole time. My guess is that it uses a tiny copy buffer, and only writes one or a couple clusters at a time, updates the FAT, then writes a couple more, etc.. With SMARTDRV doing its delayed-write magic, it moves along like you would expect. Definitely recommend it.
In early 2000s, I worked at a railroad company that used a Pentium Pro system with 16MB RAM and Windows NT 4 to operate a massive printer in the marketing dept.
The Pentium Pro seemed a bit overkill for the task but that 16MB of RAM was brutal. Most print jobs were in the 100s of MBs and that poor HDD just thrashed continuously because of page file swaps.
Nice find! I completely skipped over the Pentium Pro era but I think if I were to visit it today, I'd try a flavor of Linux for comparison with the Pentium and Pentium II counterparts.
Another Pentium Pro that was starved and suffered from too little memory. I also completely skipped Pentium Pros - I didn't even know they existed for a long time and always wondered what their purpose was after I found out. I went from a 486 to a Pentium II - so, technically I skipped two generations of Pentiums.
@@bitsundbolts Me too! Straight from 486DX4 100mhz to Celeron 300A.
@@bitsundbolts 386DX to 486SX to 486DX2 to Cyrix 6x86 to Pentium II, here. I had to go back in time to experience the Pentium and Pentium Pro. haha
I loved my trusty old Pentium Pro 200 with 256mb of cache. That CPU gave me my first glimpse of Windows NT. I kept that system around for many years, even running Windows 2000 on it for a while. I never once had a BSOD on any system running Windows NT or 2000, which I can not say with any of my computers that had 3.11 and up on them.
I loved the video outro. Listening to old WD HDD click away is very relaxing even to this day. Although I will NEVER go back to using HDD's , I would never get any work done waiting on them.
Best part was seeing just 12 processes running after install. Try that with Windows 11!
I was surprised to see the "modern" Task Manager in Windows NT. I wish they ported that to windows 95/98 though an update. That simple task list doesn't work half of the time or ends in a bluescreen.
@@bitsundbolts 👍👍 They did eventually port features like that from NT with WinXP. Which was sort of OK. Much better with XP 64 bit though, just lacked a lot of driver support.
I had an IBM PC Server 704 in my home lab for a few years, which was equipped with four Pentium Pro 200 MHz and 1 MB cache. Among other things, this was the dedicated Battlefield server for our LAN parties :-) Those were the days! But it also had three power supply units together with 1.2 kw of power. The 12 SCSI discs had to be staggered in groups of three so that there were no problems with the power supply. 😀
Many years back my uncle owned a computer building and repair shop. I saved up a bunch of money mowing lawns, working with my dad, and allowance to buy a computer. And he did not disappoint, I didn’t really know much about exactly what hardware was what back then, but all I knew is he said was this is basically as good as you can get right now. Years later I was still able to use the system when i7 processors were out. That’s because it was one of those fastest pentium 4 extreme CPUs. I remember getting a core 2 duo MacBook for school years later and even that was considerably slower. I know this is a different pentium, but I love those extreme pentium. It would be cool to have one from each generation.
Transition from camera angle to onscreen view was pretty sick!
From what little I remember of installing NT4 on newer hardware (Pentium 2 or so) it was imperative that you not try to install video card drivers when it prompts you to do so during setup. Leave it as standard vga or whatever it detects until after setup is complete. Then install the latest service pack. Then chipset drivers. And only after that, video card drivers.
I also vaguely recall that you could use the same trick to copy the \winXX\ directory to the hard drive first, boot from dos with smartdrv loaded, for a faster install and it'd never ask for the CD again. Just had to use the option to convert to NTFS when prompted.
My local cybercafe in the late 90s ran nt4 systems running DirectX 3 and they played StarCraft pretty good.
Ha! I just posted that on another comment. Without SMARTDRV, the install process is awfully painful. Looks like the boot CD does this for you (thankfully!)
I had switched to NT4 after 98SE. It was so reliable and even had some limited DirectX support. I had switched a friend over to it as well. We then moved to Win2k which was equally good. When everyone else started using the NT kernel with WinXP it was like the world caught up with my secret. Then I switched to Linux and never touched Windows again lol
win2k was perfectly functional well into xp's life. problem with nt4 was that it used up way more ram than what was common when it was current, for me anyway. also it was the actual golden era of linux(drivers etc wise and with how much included software you got with the distros and you could irc and play mp3's at the same time on far worse hw than you could in windows of any flavor).
@@lasskinn474 You could run DirectX 9.0C on 2000. It could even run XDDM display drivers. And it was the first NT-style operating system to have plug-and-play, Device Manager, etc.
I used it after trying 95 at home for a while, I quickly learned that iD made sure their games ran on Windows NT and that was pretty much all I needed to make it daily driver. Of course the stability compared to 95/98 made it very worth it as well.
Windows 2000 quickly caught on even amongst gamers since by that time pretty much everything ran on Windows NT and there were a whole lot of benefits.
@@lemagreengreen The games they released at the time used ancient OpenGL and for software rendering low spec DirectDraw.
@@soundspark at the time, opengl was miles ahead of directx, lighter, faster and easily extendible. also, all the design/3d/animation programs used opengl exclusively as it was a much wider standard that worked on many architectures, not just x86. up until winxp, directx was a pile of crap, overbloated and barely worked. when dx9 came around, that was the moment it would start to dominate.
I do have experience with Windows NT and Pentium Pro processors. I actually installed Windows 2000 and a voodoo1 on a Pentium Pro 180 machine back in 2001 and it ran better than expected with 48 MB of RAM.
Amazing! Lovely video! I saw a Pentium Pro only once in my life. It was back there in 1996/7. My friend's mother, used to work in VARIG aerolines, and bought it in LA. The sales guy trapped her and she landed home with a Pentium Pro to replace the old Pentium 75 of the family.
I still remember my first ever job leaving school working for a cheap computer company. I had a 386 to log information into excel spreadsheets and could type faster than the CPU could keep up, it was sooooo slow. After 6 months they upgraded me to a Gateway P120, what a difference that made.
Pentium Pro was awesome. I ran a 150, clocked at 180, for a couple years.
I was using an old workstation pentium pro as my first desktop back in 2004. It was saved from the recycler as I was graduating high school and all it needed was a quick repair to the power supply. The motherboard I have supports USB, and I was able to get a 15GB HDD working with it with some workarounds. The system actually ran pretty great with Windows 2000. It didn't game very well due to missing a graphics card and none of the MMX instructions. I still have it in the basement but it hasn't been powered in a very long time. I believe it is a 166MHz chip.
"My 386 CPU had 64 megabytes of RAM". I personally bought my 486 with 4 megabytes of RAM, and some even had 8 megabytes. 64 megabytes of RAM for a 386 CPU was completely overkill; it was normal to find configurations with 2 or maybe 4 megabytes of RAM. Finally, I'm not saying that this upgrade wasn't possible, but it's worth remembering that the price of 64 megabytes of RAM at that time, in multiple memory banks, could cost $2000 or more in 1993. Good video.
I actually had a 200Mhz Pentium Pro system with 64MB of RAM that had been a workstation at my dads company. When they where getting rid of it I got the motherboard with CPU and RAM. It was my first build really as I had to find/buy the case and everything else to make it a usable computer. I ran Windows 98 SE, Windows 2000, and Linux Mandrake on it through the course of it's life. The last thing it ever did was play a round of Starcraft at a random party where we needed multiple computers to have everyone play, that was in 2009. I have unfortunately recycled it due to needing to clean up space, but I did keep the CPU as a keepsake since it takes up much less space than a whole tower. Seeing this video makes me kind of regret getting rid of it :/
Yes and yes :) Had a dual CPU P-Pro 200mhz that was pretty spicy for the day... I think I had it in a 'full size' tower as well
so it was like a monolith
I played the whole thing through, it reminds me of the good 'ol days. The WD noise I actually miss, made me feel so productive, we really knew when the system was io or cpu contented in those days.
remeber that you could tell when a program was stuck in a loop or drive was on its way out you could tell by the sound the drive was making lol the good old days haha
16MB was still pretty good in 1995, even for a workstation.
I had the same thought. It was just enough to run Windows NT 4.0 efficiently. And of course there were use cases where even more RAM would have helped.
So many Windows NT 4.0 systems I installed. It was the late 90's and early 2000. eCommerce was exploding.
Thanks for all your videos. I really like to see things getting repaired, especially when someone else throws it into the trash.
If you should have a Pentium Pro CPU in a good visual shape I would be very happy if I could get one. It is not required to work.
Btw. Congratulations for making it to the IT news with your video about 16MB SIMMs! 🎉
Thanks! I was surprised to see an article about those SIMMs, but I'll take it 😅
I have the four Pentium Pro CPUs shown in this video. I only tested one of them, but I believe they are all in working condition. They all have some scratches or discoloration on the golden top though. Very rarely I find items at the scrapyard that are in pristine condition.
great content, thank you for hard disk sounds on installation
In the late 90s my company got me a Pentium Pro NT4 workstation built on the cheap, the heatsink clamps were made of plastic to save a few cents, eventually one day I saw the fans flapping around holding on one edge, the Pro just slowed down a bit.
Poor Pentium Pro :( I am sure it was suffering without a fan properly attached!
My Brother purchased a P-Pro 150 which we OC'd to 180Mhz and ran with a Cirrus Logic 5446 2MB PCI Graphics Card and a Diamond Monster3D 4MB. Ran GLQuake like a dream. P-Pro 150 would run games all day and night no issue at 180Mhz, but would lock up with MS Word from time to time. Only program that did not like the OC. Best of times.
Can recall lusting after the Pentium Pro when I got a chance to use a workstation running it. I probably used NT4 up until Windows 98. Also nice soldering skills.
Back in the day when computers were highly radioactive and came with their own Geiger counters.
So that is a 256mSv CPU. "Cache" haha.
Brilliant video as usual =D I love watching all the videos you release!
Thank you! Glad to hear!
Oh it was a beast with Windows NT.
I was in college getting my IT degree when I used win NT 4, though it was in my classes, or in work environments outside of school. I didn't make it my home PC OS until windows 2k came out, with directX built in, so it could play games. I think by then the amd K7 was out, I was a big budget PC fan, and loved how amd and cyrix helped bring Intel prices down, and made PCs more accessable to more people.
NT 4 was awesom, and proof microsoft could make an actual OS that wasn't trash out of the box 🤪
I was fascinated with those cpus as a kid. I read somewhere that they're ahead of their time, and that stuck around in my brain and then in the early 2000s, I bought a desktop pc with a 200mhz ppro on ebay for 56€. Was still a lot of money for me. It had 32mb of edo ram, but as 168pin dimm modules. The seller claimed it would take SD-RAM which it didn't, so I complained to him and he offered to send me 3 more 32mb modules for another 10€. As the system had another cpu socket, I kept scanning ebay for another cpu with matching stepping, plus a VRM, and finally got to experience multiprocessor goodness for the first time in my life. It was pointless since my Athlon XP would run circles around it but still, seeing two cpus in Taskmanager made me happy. Born a nerd I guess. I still have it, actually dug it out two years ago and installed current Debian on it. Was painfully slow, the installer crashed with out of memory the first time and needed some tweaking, but finally got an x session running with i3. Ah yes, nerd stuff.
Around 1998 I was in charge of a pair of Compaq ProLiant towers with two Pentium Pro CPUs in them. One ran SCO UNIX, the other Windows NT 4.0 Server. I had just completed a certification in NT 4.0 Server, so I knew it backwards and forward. At the time, SCO had a hobbyist license, so I was able to run a registered copy of it and NT at home. I don't remember the RAM, probably between 64 and 256 MiB. For comparison's sake, the average business desktop machine in 1995 was 16 MiB for DOS6/Win3.1, and by 2000 had gone up from 128M for Win9x to 256M for Win2k. Not because users needed it, because RAM was cheap. My application server had 256M of costly buffered ECC RAM and never paged.
The first computer I remember using was an original Pentium based system running DOS. We went straight from DOS to Windows 95 on that system, and that was such a major revelation for me as a young computer enthusiast!
Indeed! Any code that accesses the CPU registers by byte or word rather than dword (e.g. AH, AL, or AX instead of EAX) causes a significant performance hit on Pentium Pro.
Also yes, I can't stop using Microsoft's data width jargon. Help me! 😅
I did several DOS benchmarks and compared a PP200-256k to a P200MMX-256k. It was not that bad at all. It could even beat the MMX in some discliplines (eg. Quake).
I've used a few Socket 8 systems, though admittedly they were already obsolete at the time. That said, their usage was closer to when Socket 8 was current than now is to then. I only ever really spent much time with the 200 MHz 1M L2 cache black tops. At the time, they were actually the cheapest Pentium Pro processors you could buy because scrappers wanted the gold caps from the lesser models. I ran a dual socket ALR motherboard as my pfSense router at the time.
Windows NT 4.0. My first love!
I still have the 4 Pentium Pro CPUs with 512K of cache from a DELL PowerEdge 6100. All that’s left of it. Beast of a server!
Best CPU ever made IMO.
This CPU was absolutely amazing at the time.
9:59 Indeed. I had my internship last year at a small mechanical engineering company in my hometown. They had some fairly old machines to work on metal and after watching your video I'm very sure: It was Windows NT running on those machines! Its fascinating how those are still used today. It even supported Data Exchange via Floppy disk!
Haha, nice! The ones I remember were controlling injection mold machinery that made plastic shells for Siemens mobile phones. And on another station, a machine used a laser to create the markings of Volkswagen keys. Pretty fun stuff.
I ran a dual Pentium Pro 200MHz 512K in a Compaq Proliant 2500 with 1GB of ram. It ran as my web and email server for my business for 8 years before upgrading to a dual Xeon 2GHz system.
My friend had such a system working. The Pentium 3 processor is 600 , 768 memory and a SCSI disk of 18 gigabytes . The FAST AV Master Premier 4.2 capture card worked satisfactorily, but the final miscalculation took forever.
I would love a "10 hours Windows NT Installation" video loop :)
A friend had a Pentium Pro 200 / 512kb with SCSI hard drives and it was a monster for its time. I've also worked with Pentium Pros professionally, they were sold as combined raster image processor (RIP) / print servers and graphics workstations. The RIP software was originally on Windows 9x but when they finally ported it and the specialized interface card hardware drivers to NT the devices shows their power. Pentium Pros were also really good under Windows 2000, especially as memory upgrades to 128MB, 256MB, and higher became cheaper.
Such a great chip, and foundational for the successes Intel had throughout the Pentium II and III eras.
In 1996, I picked up a PPro 200MHz with 256K of cache for a then bargin of £200. Loaded with 64MB Ram, I couldn't believe how fast it was, and ran it with Linux 1.2.13 using Slackware if I remember correctly.
I rescued a Pentium Pro single cpu computer in around 2015. It has a 200mhz with 128mb edo installed. Works fine with both Windows 98 and WIndows 2000. I don't remember the motherboards name. I replaced the boot drive with a 2gb ide flash memory and a 8gb ssd as storage. Works perfectly fine. I wonder if there is any lightweight version of Linux for it. Would've been fun to try it atleast. Great video as always. I love vintage electronics.
I never had one of my own but my high school did. We ran Linux on it, Red Hat 4.something, IIRC, and used it as a telnet and web server for the C and HTML classes. It usually had up to 16 users logged in from 68K Macs. I don't remember the clock speed or RAM but it was plenty of machine for that, even if everyone wanted to compile our simple programs with GCC all at the same time.
Where can I find a scrapyard with computer hardware?
If you find one AND they let you enter, it is a pretty cool thing! But I heard that it gets more and more difficult to get full access. I should count myself lucky to have access to one with almost no restrictions.
@@bitsundboltshonestly, since I have a bit of a hoarding problem and always try to save/repair broken things, maybe it is better that I don't have access 😊
Sutton, South London UK they have a shop where anything worth reselling is sold
I love the Pentium Pro. Ahead of its time but clunky. I am sporting the overdrive version of this chip in my retro build. Love it
Very nice. I happen to have built a Pentium Pro system just last month, using the exact same motherboard, and a 200MHz 512kb CPU. In fact I have another identical motherboard, but that one is not working - it powered up a couple of times, and then it stopped working (I have to repair it at some point). For my build, I chose to go for an all-SCSI system, appropriate for a server-grade build of the time: AHA-2940 controller, IBM 18.2GB SCA-80 drive and NEC SCSI CDROM. I installed Windows 2000 on it. :)
As for the CPUs themselves... I have a little collection of Pentium Pros. Including several of the black 1MB ones. I am in fact willing to send you one of them for free, but there is a catch: it has badly bent pins. Not worse than I've seen you repair, but beyond my abilities to fix. It was unfortunately how I got it. If you're interested please reply to this comment, and we'll work out a way to get in contact. :)
Thanks for your offer! I would indeed be interested and bent pins shouldn't be an issue. Although, the plastic-like package requires more caution. From my experience, ceramic packaged CPUs are quite solid, Pentium III (Socket 370) CPUs tend to break if too much pressure is applied to the pins. But good that I got some experience already. It would be very generous of you to send me that CPU - even if it has the bent pins. You can contact me at bitsundbolts at gmail dot com.
My first build was a 486DX system which I took to college. My major was graphics design which also included 3D modeling...so the 486 didn't cut it. In 1996...I collected all of the parts for my workstation build which included a Pentium Pro. If I'm not mistaken...the first OS I installed was Windows 95 but in 1997, I did install Windows NT 4.0 which was a very solid OS. I may have later installed Windows 2000 but I don't remember. I still have my Pentium Pro chip but I threw away the rest of the workstation.
Can't wait for some of that sweet "Socket Drop" action. I could listen to old-school WD drives all day long. My first PC had a 512MB Caviar in it, brings back so many fond and frustrating times.
I picked up around 5 drives the other day - I'll have have a look soon to see if they work and maybe what data we will find on them :)
I never had a Socket 8 system, but a dual Socket 8 board would be nice to try. I had some experience with Windows NT 4.0 in 2000 or 2001, when I got a virus and my computer had to be re-installed. I didn't have any OS install CDs, so I asked the guy from who we bought the computer in 1999 to do it, but I asked him to split my 1.6GB WD Caviar 21600 in half and install Windows 98 along with NT 4.0. I recently re-built my first computer with the same parts as I got it with 25 years ago. (and that's why the WD drive noises were oddly familiar) Well, it's quite a trip down memory lane :)
I have this board with onboard sound and it works instantly under DOS with unisound. I Benchmarked some DOS things with 200-256, 200-512 and a P200MMX with 256k onboard cache. They are almost equal with some disciplines ruled by one or the other platform. Not that bad on 16bit at all and a good Quake CPU. Higher cache only adds some fractions of additional FPS. So don't worry the 200-256k is good enough. Don't tested NT/2K on it due to low RAM. Good platform either i love it escpecially these fat & heavy CPUs in my hands and this monstrous socket lever.
Wow that takes me back. It seems all NT4 machines sound identical when booting up.
sounds just like 150gb WD raptors (10K RPM). They are in my 2008 build. It's a core 2 quad. It still works. lol Or at least it did in 2021. That's the last time I powered it up.
14:18 - Inside Chernobyl
Man: "Oh shit! You hear that? Radiation levels are skyrocketing! We are so dead!!"
Man #2: "Geez... It's not a dosimeter, just my PC! Chill... No reason to be alarmed! Just installing Windows NT. Not great, not terrible!"
I used to build a lot of Dual Pentium Pro's for larger companies, during that time.
I had several P-Pro machines. Built and sold many more, as well. I believe that board you have had the Vesuvius project name, hence VS. PR440FX was another, but the project name escapes my synaptic junctions at this moment. I also have a Dell Road Runner server, PowerEdge 2100, with a single socket 8. I last ran it maybe 10-12 years ago, and still had functional EISA configuration disks available for the NICs and SCSI controllers. I never did install the black 200MHz 1MB P-Pro chip I pulled from a functional IBM server, to save for the PE 2100. I am fairly certain that the 333MHz OverDrive chip does function in the PE 2100. Perhaps one day soon, it will see the light of day again, and perhaps even some more internet access. I believe there are some supported, secure, 32-bit versions of linux around that I could load on it. Not likely to be very good decoding videos, except maybe at 160x120. ;-P
Thank you!
NT 4.0 was great once you had everything up and running but setup could be a pain. I was relatively new to PCs at the time (coming from Applie IIs and Macs) and it didn’t support plug & play. Luckily I had no interest in games because it had some issues there, too.
I was a programmer and it was excellent for that. It was the first time I’d encountered an OS you couldn’t crash no matter how badly you screwed up your own app.
Windows 2000 was where everything started clicking. It was a masterpiece in its day.
I got myself two golden P-Pro 200 CPUs and a dual socket motherboard, neither of which I ever managed to get running. Bought used for cheap, I am not exactly surprised though, especially after I had to bend-correct nearly every PIN possible.
The oldest OS I used was DOS 1 on Zenith computer. The oldest I used on a regular basis was my 8088 with DOS 2.1. I Toyed a little with Windows 2 on a 286, and daily drove Windows 3.10 until 95 came out. I had to upgrade my 486 trom 4-8MB of RAM to run it. I used NT for years at home and at work.
Back in the day I upgraded my Pentium MMX 166MHz to a Pentium Pro 180MHz, which I promptly overclocked to 200MHz by switch the FSB from 60MHz to 66MHz. That machine was one of my favourites, because it's the one I had when I also upgraded to a Voodoo2, which really made a huge difference for gaming. I did quite a number of other upgrades, including a SCSI controller and my first CD burner (a SCSI model), memory, hard drives, etc. Mostly I used it for DOS and Win 95/98 gaming. I think around that time I first got on the Internet as well, so that must've been the machine I first got online with.
Interesting you mention a performance hit in 16-bit software. I never really noticed this, but I guess by that point most games were 32-bit. I'd be interested to see gaming performance of a Pentium Pro vs MMX vs PII. Especially if you happen to have 233MHz example of each. I'm curious if this 16-bit performance issue was a real thing, or just something that showed up in synthetic benchmarks, but wasn't so noticeable in actual games.
Of course, you probably won't find that many games that run well on NT 4.0 (if any?), so you'll probably have to switch to 95/98.
I literally found a PII 233 today at the scrapyard! I'll benchmark those CPUs one day. I have all the CPUs you mentioned. I'm curious as well how much of a performance loss there is. And yes, I'll probably have to go with Windows 98
I had several Pentium Pro systems I picked up in the late 90s/early 2000s to play with. I actually had 8 new inbox pentium pros, including some 1MB cache units, but I never opened them. I still have 4 of the 256kb units new in box unopened. I had a Tyan motherboard that was dual socket 8, but I was never able to get it to work right. I did use a 200MHz Pentium Pro system with Windows NT for a while, and then later moved it to Windows 2000, it mostly was just a curious thing, I didn't use it for anything serious. However my first job in the late 90s, Windows NT was the primary operating system for everyone, me included, so I used it quite a bit.
I love the sound of old hard drives. Probably just nostalgia, lol
I used a Dual-Pentium Pro 200 Setup in ~1998/1999 to Encode all my CDs to MP3s.
Adaptec AHA-2940 with 4 SCSI Quantum Fireball Drives 640 MB (!), all mounted to slot-Brackets with holes in a RAID0 Setup later some bigger disks, a SCSI-Teac-CD-Drive for the Digital Read-Out of the CDs.
In the Mornning and in the Evening I Ripped some CDs to WAVs, created a Batch file with the Songtitles for converting the WAVs with the l3enc from Fraunhofer IIS to MP3s
The Encoding speed was less than half of the CD-Singlespeed... a 5 Minute Track took maybe 12 Mins to encode! 😞 I ran 2 parallel tasks with encoding batches to make use of the dual PPros.
I had to fight hard with diskspace limits all the time...
I'm not 100% shure if the listed setup is correct, but very similar for sure...
operated all of this with flying cables without case in the living room 😅
I guess the real successor to the Pentium Pro was the Celeron 300A: a P6 core with full-speed L2 cache on a single die, that could be successfully manufactured in very large amounts. I also remember reading about a special 333 MHz version of it, that was marketed as an "accelerator" for older Pentium Pro systems.
yeap...the sound of the hard drive and the way memory slots were designed really touched me too lol
I had a Pentium Pro 180 when I was 13-18. Mom got talked into the system by Gateway 2k, I never realized how overkill the system was. I do remember it being incredibly expensive, and with it's I'm sad to say 2mb gpu that I cannot for the life of me remember what it was, there wasn't much it wouldn't do at the time, mostly gaming. When I was 16 friend came over and we took the side off, and looked at the schematic, and realized that just pulling a jumper would overclock it to 200 mhz, and it ran like that for the rest of the time I had it. I didn't realize until later just how ridiculous that was for a home system.
I swear these old WD drives sounded like they had bad bearings when new.
I remember when the Pentium Pro came out and it was deemed slow when it came to 16-bit code. Then the Cyrix 6x86 came out which claimed to be fast in both 16-bit and 32-bit, which made it interesting, but of course it was not a CPU made for servers and workstations like the Pentium Pro was.
I had a Dual Pentium pro workstation with windows 2000 PRO. That thing smashed the Pentium 2 300 in single thread and obviously killed it in multi thread. It even eventually got the windows XP treatment. But i retired it shortly after for my AMD Athlon XP 3000+.. Those were the days.
Thanks for your sharing
I have completely skipped the Pentium Pro/2 so I ran NT4 on my Am5x86-133 equipped with 32 Mb of RAM. It was kind of bearable, very slow but bearable. Of course I had a Windows 98 in dual boot so that I could play some DOS games. But for the software development, I used the NT almost exclusively. Computer not locking up once you did something wrong with the code was a pleasant change. Until the NTFS partition decided to nuke itself out of the blue around 2001.
That was a sign for me to go upgrade. Duron 850 with Windows 2000 ran circles around my potato.
Riiight, there was a Pentium Pro too. 😅 I almost forgot about that CPU, as I didn't come into contact with it much. I still remember when we got new Pentium based Desktops (replacing ancient 8086es with monochrome monitors) in our school and the teacher PC was equipped with a Pentium Pro, basically to differentiate it from the other machines, just because. It was of course just a waste of money, since our teachers (except for one) didn't know jack about PCs and thus never really utilized it. Looking at my gaming rig just collecting dust, I suppose I shouldn't throw stones though...
With NT on the other hand, I had tons of hands-on experience, working for one of the first companies that made websites in our country and maintaining all their machines. I even worked a little bit on the server version. It was immediately obvious to me that NT was the way forward, it was just that much better. Shame that it was completely useless for gaming, I was really sad about that at the time.
PPro 200MHz was my second computer, the first I assembled all by myself.
Since you asked (and for some engagement) I happily ran NT 4.0 and NT 4.0 Terminal Server. Had HW compatibility issues often, especially with my 56k Winmodem (no drivers). In the early 2000's I saved a 4 x Pentium Pro Compaq 4U server from ewaste, but sadly, it's long gone. 😢
I currently have a couple socket 8 to slot 1 adaptors that I'm itching to use and a pair of socket 8 pentium ii overdrives.
Those adapters are very nice! It must be very interesting to get those Pentium Pros on to a slot 1 board.
I never had much to do with Windows NT, but it seems to be the common consensus that plug and play wasn't available and driver issues were very common!
@@bitsundbolts I'm waiting for some time to get to those adapters/ project, I have multiple dual slot motherboards (different chipsets). I expect it may require porting coreboot to one of the boards to get things working. I work for a well known chip company so you can imagine I don't have much time for personal projects. 🫠
@@bitsundbolts let me say also that I really enjoyed your video. Lots nostalgia and enjoyed the board repair part too.
I love the clicking so much.
I used NT4 extensively and supported it at several companies. It's a pretty decent OS, but Windows 2000 was a huge step forward, mainly because it protects the system files with WFP. On NT4 you had to reapply the service pack and sometimes the roll up packages after many things to make sure you had the latest system files. Also, 16 MB is too little for NT 4. It'll run, but it really needs 32 MB in the original version and a lot more with SP6 (64 or maybe 128 MB, not sure, it's long ago). Someone else further down also mentioned you need to install the SP before installing any drivers, especially video drivers, this is indeed vital. Many video drivers require at least SP3 and will misbehave if you don't have it installed.
I also recall installing the Intel Busmaster IDE driver made a huge difference, both for disk and multi-tasking performance (otherwise your CPU time will get eaten by PIO disk access).
I wanted one of those so badly when I was a teenager.
Back in 97 I was responsible for a Proliant 5000 server with dual Pentium Pro running NT 4.0 Server and the corresponding MS-SQL server software. It was a beast! Tooting took ages while you had to wait for all the system tests, both CPUs coming up, RAM test and finally the HDDs spinning up. Beside of that, it was making a noise that made working in front of the server a pain in the ***
I remember installing patches from Compaq and Microsoft was a frequent activity 🙂
To be fair, tooting a server or workstation-orientated system still takes a while today. ;)
I'm guessing these are among the earliest purchased Pentium Pros due to the usage of FPM. 16 MB would have been pretty marginal for the time. Mainline Pentium PCs had 8 MB, so performance-oriented consumer PCs were already up to 16 MB. NT 4 wasn't out yet but would be in a few months and 16 MB was the stated minimum. In practice you wouldn't go with less than 24 MB and really needed 32 MB to make it worth using over something older. None of this would have been a surprise to anyone following tech press. On the other hand, it's likely a lot of these units would have never seen NT 4 and would have stuck with NT 3, Netware, OS/2, SCO, etc. for the lifetime of the machine.
I had Pentium Pro few years ago for some fun. I liked it. Also I had Windows NT 4.0 SP6 installed on old pentium mmx computer. Nice OS. But I liked Windows NT5 beta and later Windows Neptune more :D