Dhruva's Reward (Dr4, SB 4.9)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @VicDiCaraAstrology
    @VicDiCaraAstrology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I have made a significant clarification by studying this carefully. This clarification makes clear the difference between Abhijit Nakshatra and the actual Dhruva Point. Viṣṇu points up into the sky at something called bhṛjiṣṇu dhruvakṣiti - which might mean a very bright (bhrājiṣṇu) immovible star (dhruva-kṣiti). That would be the polestar (anyone, probably Vega, the yogatāra of Abhijit). However this is the final destinationn of Dhruva and Abhijit nakshatra doesn't match, for two reasons. Viṣṇu says the star or point he is pointing at is "nānyair adhiṣṭhitam" (has no ruler "other than me"). This is not true of Abhijit, whose ruler is Brahma. Vishnu is the ruler of Shravana, but he cannot be pointing at Shravana Nakshatra, becaause he describes the place he is pointing at as the central pivot of all the stars, with an even higher latitude than the big-dipper. Also, he can't be pointing at abhijit, because Dhruva is going somewhere SUPERIOR to where brahma resides (Brahma resides in Abhijit), and this is another reason he can't be pointing at Śravana, because Śravana has inferior latitude to even abhijit. (PS the Viṣṇu in Śravana is the Trivikrama avata, Indra's youngest brother, and deity for locomotion)
    Bhrājiṣṇu does not only mean "bright" it also means "Viṣṇu's" (Mahābhārata uses the word this way). So, Bhrājiṣṇu Dhruva-kṣiti also literally means "Viṣṇu's permanent abode", and nānyair adiṣṭhtitam confirms, "no one else predominates there."
    The word Dhruva is also the name of the child Dhruva, and Viṣṇu is therefore poetically saying, "See that spot around which all the stars revolve? That is my permanent abode, and it will be yours too!"
    The implication for astronomy is that the Vedic people probably knew of Axial Precession and differentiated the north celestial pole from whatever star happened to currently be at that location (usually treated as Vega, the abhijit yogatāra). They differentiated Viṣṇu's Śvetadvīpa (lit. "pinnacle") from Brahma's Vega/Abhijit.
    A final fascinating point is that just as Shiva has two nakshatras (ārdrā and mūla), Brahmā has two. Brahmā's are different though, in that one (Rohini) is ecliptic (and ruled by the simpler, more practical aspect of Brahmā as a creator and generator of beings), while the other is far superior to all 27 nakshatras, associated with the dhruva point and ruled by Brahmā in his higest aspect, as the supreme being / supreme creator. Similarly we can now know that Viṣṇu has two locations in the night sky (besides the many derivations that are possible to interpret among the conventional nakshatras, as is also the case with Śiva). The first is a conventional ecliptic nakshatra, Śravana - ruled by Viṣṇu in the more conventional aspect of a path-walker, and praise-hearer. The other is the true abhijit, the point that lends abhijit its power, the celestial north pole, which is ruled by Viṣṇu as the ultimate center and foundation of all of existence.

  • @Sarah-nw7xl
    @Sarah-nw7xl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you 👂💕!

  • @samanthabirdx
    @samanthabirdx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I loved this one so much Vic. Thank you 🙏🏻

  • @adarshsoni5323
    @adarshsoni5323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One question ❓ I want to know if kshatriya is king as well as pure devotee, how does king kill the people who are doing wrong like if people kill cows etc and the king kill those people but at the same time be a devotee of lord hari because pure devotees always care for welfare of all, How to reconcile this @vic.

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it is not welfare to allow people to commit evil deeds. it is welfare to prevent them from doing so. if killing them is the only opinion for that (i.e. they refuse reform), then killing them is welfare.

  • @bulb1810
    @bulb1810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Vic, Does it mean that Dhruva was the Pole star for 36000 years, before the next pole star emerged?

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      no, it cannot mean that.
      36k is a very interesting number though, and I wonder if there is an astrological reason for that particular number. A complete axial precession takes about 26k years. Maybe they were about halfway through one precession? I don't know. But I know that no polestar remains constant.

    • @alf4006
      @alf4006 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VicDiCaraAstrology so every 26k we switch pole stars? And enter new astrological ages or signs?

    • @bulb1810
      @bulb1810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you Vic.

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no, every 26k years an axial orbit completes. In the course of that, a few stars may come close to the dhruva point.

  • @alf4006
    @alf4006 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does Vraja mean Flawless and Powerful like Viraja?

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, it means "Road, Path, Herd, Pasture-Farmland"

  • @RippleDrop.
    @RippleDrop. 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Any suggestion, if success, takes a blessing from relatives, as you say here, and it is impossible to come by, what is the remedy or alternative route? Due to mentally delusional birth family, with fragile self-esteem, so everything turns into a fight instead of a blessing? Thank you, if you considered us with debilitated 2nd, 11th and 4th lords. :)

  • @VicDiCaraAstrology
    @VicDiCaraAstrology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    maybe this animation is helpful... upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7c/Precession_animation_small_new.gif/290px-Precession_animation_small_new.gif

  • @alf4006
    @alf4006 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Historical regression? Can we find birth charts from hundreds of years ago?

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      its not about birth charts. you regress the precession of the axis to see the various points in time at which it was pointing at a prominent star. eg: www.global-climate-change.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Screenshot_25-1.jpg

    • @bulb1810
      @bulb1810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vic, is it Thuban or Dhruvan?

    • @VicDiCaraAstrology
      @VicDiCaraAstrology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dhruva