Logical Equivalences Involving Predicates & Quantifiers (Part 1)

[@ionuorah]

Excellent explanation. One has to grasp the concept of Conditional Statements in Logic to understand this topic

[@kalindikumar4018]

Respected Neso academy, kindly upload further videos. It will be a great help for us. Thank you

[@chandanpaul7020]

Thank you so much NESO academy for the perfect explanation

[@IRFAN-jx6dk]

Thank u very much sir.
Sir,please upload more videos on Discrete mathematics as soon as possible.
Your lectures are Awesome.

[@vijay4703]

Please make videos quick bcz of ur channel i am neglecting my online classes...😁thank you so much

[@abdouliebah3704]

I was confused 😕 until when I watched this video. Thank you

[@cyber_dbs]

Need more videos asap. Thank you

[@rakeshofficial4564]

Respected neso acadmy thanks for uploading such kind of vidoe 👍

[@amritanand9830]

Plz upload more videos...as syllabus passing very fast.....

[@DeepCoderMK]

Thank you

[@vishnu.s_]

Forolecs 👍really understandable.

[@akulaanudeep458]

Upload more videos as soon as possible sir!... Please sir!

[@ashindc5859]

yes please do upload the later videos fastly

[@intekhabahmad4394]

Have anyone counted ...how many times sir have said for all x p(x) implies for all x q(x) 😂😂

[@farzeenarshad384]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@Rupali_45]

😵‍💫

[@BhabaniShankarsahuIlovemymaaan]

For all time that is exit for universal quantifier 😅😅

[@twilight7457]

Is an example considered a proof? That's not the norm in mathematics. Could you please prove it using math?

[@raghavachekuri7270]

Upload videos as soon as possible sir

[@ParthKawatra]

Kindly please turn closed caption on.

[@primeprodigy7184]

What if you change and to the implies -> symbol

[@rajendranwarshini6393]

Thank u sir

[@brahmanandakabi8796]

Thanks

[@moalobaidi7773]

khan academy needs to hire you!

[@moalobaidi7773]

they're missing out

[@hetaeramancer]

@@moalobaidi7773 i agree that the teacher is really good, but khan actually has too much too offer than neso's courses. khan has world history, calculus, chemistry, biology, etc.

[@Mr._Programmer]

Sir when are the more videos available of discrete mathematics??

[@miguelnuno928]

Thank you so much

[@BelegaerTheGreat]

No you cannot replaceme triple= with

[@geetahuunimmiruusirnaa9990]

Thank you my sir

[@jitendrakohar7281]

at 7:47, how the condition is satisfied.please help us by removing confusion

[@learnwithme9677]

It's nothing. "Or" means any "one" can be true. So one is true and other is false, still the Or statement is true.

[@9996455921]

please make videos on dbms

[@sabrinaaqilla910]

Very good and funny videos bring a great sense of entertainment!

[@RahulRazj]

I wish I could enroll in your hypothetical XYZ University

[@S2KEVIN]

LOL

[@observantmagic4156]

It will be better than the money grabbing institute I am currently enrolled in.

[@helloworld2054]

As an introvert I would love it

[@shaikfahim1232]

you have not clarified the doubt of if then for (for all) and and for (there exists)

[@charanteja2831]

Prove without using example

[@fragger717]

Can we also use some students instead of every student?

[@sowdub9445]

no, because the symbol given in the question is of universal quantifier(for all symbol)

[@radhikach1115]

complete the full syllubus fast

[@techhackz2897]

this is my hypothetical university😂😂😂

[@mariamercedeslozanavas4521]

explicas bien papi

[@vatsalyaa.m]

Too much Px and Qx

[@VamsiKrishna-ym3cr]

😍

[@_HarshVerma]

joe who ?

[@diwakarisonyoutube]

joe mama

[@hamdimohammed2541]

forolex pee x forolex pee x

[@melune-8759]

This is not proof!