How To Go Faster Than Light Speed (Seriously…)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Thank you to Foreo for supporting PBS. For more information, go to foreo.se/fmg3 and use code PBSFOREO
    ↓↓↓ More info and sources below ↓↓↓
    Nothing can travel faster than light - in a vacuum. But when light slows down, sometimes matter can blaze past that speed limit, creating a stunning glow called Cherenkov radiation. We can see this glow in a nuclear reactor as high-energy particles speed by. It offers us a window into a realm of the universe that is usually invisible to us.
    Filmed at the J. J. Pickle Research Campus at the University of Texas at Austin
    References ►► sites.google.com/view/cherenk...
    SUBSCRIBE so you don’t miss a video! ►► bit.ly/iotbs_sub
    We’re on PATREON! Join the community ►► / itsokaytobesmart
    0:00 A strange blue glow
    1:24 How to slow light down
    3:19 The right way to think about light
    5:41 How to make a photonic boom
    7:51 Who discovered this?
    8:25 Why this matters
    9:45 Extras!
    -----------
    High fives to all our Brain Trust Patrons:
    Jaap Westera
    Millennial Glacier
    Mark Littlehale
    Mehdi Damou
    Barbora Bei
    Burt Humburg
    dani bowman
    David Johnston
    Salih Arslan
    Baerbel Winkler
    Robert Young
    Eric Meer
    Dustin
    Karen Haskell
    Join us on Patreon!
    / itsokaytobesmart
    Twitter
    / drjoehanson
    / okaytobesmart
    Instagram
    / drjoehanson
    / okaytobesmart
    Merch
    store.dftba.com/collections/i...
    Facebook
    / itsokaytobesmartpbs
    This episode of Be Smart is licensed exclusively to TH-cam.

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @besmart
    @besmart  ปีที่แล้ว +607

    Nuclear reactors are cool. This might be the coolest thing about them. Thanks for watching! I hope I've earned your like and subscription. If you'd like to help me make videos like this one, check out the link to the Patreon in the description!

    • @pyeitme508
      @pyeitme508 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha ha

    • @gastonpossel
      @gastonpossel ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I mean, nuclear reactors are the exact opposite of cool... they're hot! that's the whole idea XD

    • @meinkamph5327
      @meinkamph5327 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tacobell has the ability to travel faster then light speed.......

    • @christianheichel
      @christianheichel ปีที่แล้ว

      If neutrinos are producing Cherenkov radiation, they should be losing speed. Where are all the slow neutrinos? Why haven't we found them?

    • @linkonmazumdar8155
      @linkonmazumdar8155 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sometimes I wonder why I watch these videos
      Most of the informations goes above my head 😂 but still these attract me and yeah I love biological videos rather than physics 🙃

  • @chillmaalda7333
    @chillmaalda7333 ปีที่แล้ว +2540

    Gotta love how Joe just casually sits atop a nuclear reactor

    • @maxwyght1840
      @maxwyght1840 ปีที่แล้ว +355

      Why would that be an issue?
      Nuclear power is perfectly safe, and with that volume of water, the background radiation is much higher than what's coming from the reactor.

    • @maksphoto78
      @maksphoto78 ปีที่แล้ว +184

      @@maxwyght1840 It's not perfectly safe, but yeah, water is blocking the radiation here.

    • @maxwyght1840
      @maxwyght1840 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@maksphoto78 people swim those pools all the time to perform maintenance.
      So yeah, it's perfectly safe.
      As long as it wasn't built by communists.

    • @mandelbraught2728
      @mandelbraught2728 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      Lol exactly. I was worried through the whole video that he was gonna fall in. Lol. I can't tell if it was just the way it was filmed, but could someone fall in there?!

    • @nguyennam1945
      @nguyennam1945 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      This is small nuclear reactor, for test so it not much radiation, also water is the best shield

  • @see8chsee
    @see8chsee ปีที่แล้ว +756

    As a particle physicist, I appreciate this video. Cherenkov radiation can be used to measure the speed of a high energy particle traveling through a medium as well as to distinguish types of particles such as electron vs muon.

    • @prateekkarn9277
      @prateekkarn9277 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The muons just existing cuz of time dilation?

    • @thomasciarlariello3228
      @thomasciarlariello3228 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cosmic ray muons are from economic necessity given how expensive particle accelerators are even if Inai has a Japanese patent on ground based muon particle beams to supply rocket engines in flight so for relativistic spaceflights a ship and crew would turn into meson particles to sink into gravity wells and burst with force of a supernova.

    • @ThiagoFer93
      @ThiagoFer93 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just a random question of someone that isn't physicist: If Cherenkov radiation is the "echo" of the light of a high energy particle and can be used to measure the speed of that particle, why can't we break the uncertainty principle with it? Measuring it's position and then using the "echo" to determine its speed?

    • @see8chsee
      @see8chsee ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ThiagoFer93 No physical quantity can be measured with 100% precision. You can measure the position and the momentum, just cannot do it precise enough simultaneously to break the uncertainty principle.

    • @rosyidharyadi7871
      @rosyidharyadi7871 ปีที่แล้ว

      does it work for neutral particles? because from the explanation from the video, it seems like it has something to do with its electric charge as well.

  • @bluehairedemon
    @bluehairedemon ปีที่แล้ว +528

    to anyone wondering how joe is still safe;
    the water between him the the rods is protecting him, even if he was in the water he would be alright, there's more than actually needed, to be extra safe

    • @threemooseqateers9689
      @threemooseqateers9689 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Hot tub :D

    • @vaingloriant
      @vaingloriant ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@threemooseqateers9689 Forbidden hot tub

    • @jackwastakenx2
      @jackwastakenx2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@vaingloriantbut not cuz radioactivity, you just ain’t allowed cuz it’ll make the water dirty (also it’s more a cool tub)

  • @xtieburn
    @xtieburn ปีที่แล้ว +448

    This is why I quite like 'Speed of Causality' for light speed in a vacuum. I think its clearer, or at least gets people asking the right questions.

    • @ultraawakening4328
      @ultraawakening4328 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I agree 👍

    • @CheatOnlyDeath
      @CheatOnlyDeath ปีที่แล้ว +59

      True. My car can go faster than a Lamborghini... through a car wash.

    • @DarthVaderfr
      @DarthVaderfr ปีที่แล้ว +42

      ​@@CheatOnlyDeath i can go faster than any airplane, if we are both in water

    • @scottmacs
      @scottmacs ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes!

    • @dowesschule
      @dowesschule ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That‘s why it‘s called c, right?

  • @mycosys
    @mycosys ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Cherenkov radiation in a spent fuel pool is genuinely one of the most beautiful things ive seen, truly unforgettable

    • @mycosys
      @mycosys ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @Diesel Techie Wow, that is utterly untrue. Spent fuel from traditional reactors is actually about 5% consumed. There is enough energy in 'spent' fuel reserves to power humanity for about 500+ years with more efficient reactors. The best and ONLY practical way we have to get rid of nuclear fuel waste is fast neutron reactors.
      Why didnt we use them in the first place? they dont produce enough of the nuclear waste they wanted to make weapons.

    • @draghettis6524
      @draghettis6524 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@mycosys And when the technology was finally explored, anti-nuclear activists were not happy, for some reason.
      Like, here in France we had two, Phénix and Superphénix, two prototypes of fast neutron reactors, and inarguably two successes.
      During its construction, Superphénix was the target of an unclaimed terrorist attack. With a rocket launcher.
      It was shut down in 1997, despite a stellar 1996, because of the "ecologists"

    • @CraftyF0X
      @CraftyF0X ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@mycosys That's not entirely correct reasoning, fast spectrum reactors are perfectly capable to produce weapon material via breeding. Matter in fact they are much better at it than the commercially used moderated reactors, because those don't necessary need fuel reprocessing or at least not as extensive to acces the materials.

  • @gastonpossel
    @gastonpossel ปีที่แล้ว +359

    I've seen the Cherenkov effect myself, on top of a pool of water with a small reactor core below too. It's beautiful. But I thought it had to do with neutrons shooting into the water, so you've corrected this mistake in my mind. Thank you. A shockwave of light, that's awesome!

    • @Leboybandent
      @Leboybandent ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think that happens too. Like at the IceCube Neutrino Observatory in Antarctica...

    • @gastonpossel
      @gastonpossel ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Leboybandent I was thinking about neutrons, not neutrinos. Anyway, that is interesting, since I understood from the video that the effect is caused by charged particles.

    • @Leboybandent
      @Leboybandent ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gastonpossel Oh I misread.. but yeah that is interesting.. need to look up how the emission from the neutrons passing through water happens!

    • @MrMan20
      @MrMan20 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Photonic wave

    • @bsadewitz
      @bsadewitz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Leboybandent "Neutrinos are detected in water Cherenkovs when they interact by W exchange, converting into the equivalent charged lepton (muon or electron for νμ or νe respectively), or when they elastically scatter off electrons (when the recoil electron can be detected)."

  • @Acid_Viking
    @Acid_Viking ปีที่แล้ว +85

    When I was a kid, my friend Todd used to steal Red Bull from his dad and we would ride our bikes faster than the speed of light. We had fun observing the relativistic effects as our velocity increased. Time always seemed to fly by. We'd get started in the afternoon, and by the time we got home, dinner had been over 40 years ago. Those were good times.

    • @SuperMarioOddity
      @SuperMarioOddity ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I thought red bull gave you wings, not bike powers?

    • @melissaleigh8019
      @melissaleigh8019 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      fr fr i can relate

    • @masterroyale6923
      @masterroyale6923 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @funkytrickster618 It’s the new line of Redbull they released, didn’t you hear?

    • @GregJumpscare
      @GregJumpscare 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SuperMarioOddity red bull breaks realityyyyy~

    • @tetzy3882
      @tetzy3882 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This read like a quote from a novelist

  • @Beryllahawk
    @Beryllahawk ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I absolutely love that you also showcase how chill you can be around a nuclear reactor. Yes, it's small, but ALSO it's built such that you can absolutely sit right there and be perfectly fine, even if you did fall in.
    I'm also giggling a lot, because the first time I learned about Cherenkov radiation was after it was mentioned a little (possibly infamous) article called "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" by Larry Niven...

    • @singularityscan
      @singularityscan ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can showcase getting a lethal dose of radiation while remaining absolutely chill 😂 Filming it without camera distortion is harder though.

    • @jackwastakenx2
      @jackwastakenx2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@singularityscanwell it’s still not lethal in most cases; I’ve been to a reactor; I’m not even in university/college

  • @NishantKumar-nq6nl
    @NishantKumar-nq6nl ปีที่แล้ว +25

    this is sure the best time to be living in, just think how much information we normal people have access to, which would be a dream for a scientists back then, thank you for explaining such a complex thing in a very easy way

  • @luismijangos7844
    @luismijangos7844 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Great video, Dr. Joe!!! Just one thing: at 8:27 it's implied that you can use Cherenkov radiation to detect neutrinos, but technically neutrinos can't produce Cherenkov radiation because they have no charge. The neutrino has to decay in other particles in order to be able to produce Cherenkov radiation.

    • @tomlxyz
      @tomlxyz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You can use it for neutrinos, in that case muons or electrons are first created which in turn do have a charge and thus it can be detected the same way

  • @jeroenrl1438
    @jeroenrl1438 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    One of the most beautiful things I have ever seen. Going to a nuclear power plant while studying Physics at university. Cherenkov radiation makes all the water light up. Really magical.

  • @hamsterclamper
    @hamsterclamper ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Superbly well explained. Well done😊

  • @NewMessage
    @NewMessage ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Pretty enlightening.

  • @Mike-mu7tk
    @Mike-mu7tk ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thanks for giving me that '"click" Oh, I get it now!' moment. Such a great feeling

    • @besmart
      @besmart  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The best!

  • @derekofbaltimore
    @derekofbaltimore ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The reason my brain isnt hurting is because youve done an excellent job at explaining it

  • @ggtt2547
    @ggtt2547 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great, just great visuals. Thank you for the constant quality!!

  • @kamabokogonpachiro6797
    @kamabokogonpachiro6797 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    9:41 as a fellow dude i can confirm we all wanted to jump into it

  • @Petriefied0246
    @Petriefied0246 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I love these quirks of physics!

    • @tri-ify8852
      @tri-ify8852 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait how was this 2 days ago

    • @rykehuss3435
      @rykehuss3435 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its not a quirk of physics. Light is not decelerating

    • @mycosys
      @mycosys ปีที่แล้ว +1

      quark quirks!

    • @Petriefied0246
      @Petriefied0246 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tri-ify8852 Patreon innit.

    • @Petriefied0246
      @Petriefied0246 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rykehuss3435 light changing speed when it changes medium is a quirk of physics.

  • @IWouldLikeToRemainAnonymous
    @IWouldLikeToRemainAnonymous ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you so much! I have said this before but everything having to do with light/EM-radiation and colours and wave-physics is my all favourite! I had heard all the false explanations before and realized that they couldn't be true but never knew the true explanation, thanks again for that! And what a great addition it was to talk about the Cherenkov detector used to study the cosmic high-energy particles. Keep up the good work Joe and team

  • @orange-micro-fiber9740
    @orange-micro-fiber9740 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    9:35 what did he say? Shedding light. Oh. Shedding. That's not what I heard at first.

  • @cmuller1441
    @cmuller1441 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    The trick is not going faster than c. The trick is slowing down light in water...

    • @MNSalty
      @MNSalty ปีที่แล้ว +1

      …………..god forbid they make a video to educate people that don’t know…………

    • @phoenixsmaug1568
      @phoenixsmaug1568 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      ​@@MNSalty Then maybe without such pathetic clickbait

    • @No_one_cares_about_Ukraine
      @No_one_cares_about_Ukraine ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@phoenixsmaug1568 agree

    • @spiguy
      @spiguy ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ​​@@phoenixsmaug1568 just 1:30 into the video he clarifies the meaning of the statement

    • @emreyurtseven23
      @emreyurtseven23 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@phoenixsmaug1568 Meeh it's ok if more people are going to learn because of it, I think

  • @Sunflowersarepretty
    @Sunflowersarepretty ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I'd need to watch it twice or even thrice to understand it better. Also the analogies were great especially the duck going at turbo speed and the ripples behind it bunching together. Something just clicked in my head then. (English is not my native language so my bad if something feels off in my wording) I love these videos.

    • @gavinhicks7621
      @gavinhicks7621 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your English is amazing! I wish I could speak more languages. As an American, foreign languages aren’t taught well here. I know most other places teach a few languages throughout all of their schooling. In America, we touch on Spanish a couple times and move on.

  • @ballgoodman
    @ballgoodman ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think we should call it a superluminal shock wave, it sound cooler than photonic boom, and its also a better description of what is actually happening

  • @KurtQuad
    @KurtQuad ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’d love to see a collaboration with Be Smart and PBS space time.

  • @zolacnomiko
    @zolacnomiko ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is really cool! I knew about Cherenkov detectors (although not necessarily by that name) and how they give off light when particles pass through the water, but I'd never had a detailed explanation of *how* and *why*!

  • @elianadrew1964
    @elianadrew1964 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So clearly explained! Thanks 🙂

  • @frenche4life
    @frenche4life ปีที่แล้ว

    Such an amazing episode!

  • @balex7677
    @balex7677 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    At 6:02 the positive partial charges of water are at the hydrogen atoms. Wouldn't the molecules turn their positive parts (hydrogen) to the passing electron (which is negative).

  • @NeonVisual
    @NeonVisual ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That's the warp core

  • @stuartgibbel
    @stuartgibbel ปีที่แล้ว

    Learned so much from this video. Thanks.

  • @serenity8839
    @serenity8839 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally needed a tutorial on this.

  • @orlevzach
    @orlevzach ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent video. It's astonishing how you (all of you, include the animators!) succeed to explain such complicated issues.

  • @shishirdhar5091
    @shishirdhar5091 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    A video on neutrino detection would be awesome! Great video btw.

  • @allezvenga7617
    @allezvenga7617 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your sharing

  • @13thravenpurple94
    @13thravenpurple94 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Thank you

  • @Nell_Hell
    @Nell_Hell ปีที่แล้ว +4

    sience like this always gets me hyped up like a jet turbine

  • @racecarrik
    @racecarrik ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Like the video, one quick correction would be the graphic at 6:00 is slightly off, the positive end of water is the hydrogens, so that's the thing that would be attracted to the negative electron, not the oxygen as is shown.

  • @Huggybear_
    @Huggybear_ ปีที่แล้ว

    I just learned so much!

  • @kamigoroshi9459
    @kamigoroshi9459 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    One interesting thing to think about is that the Cherenkov effect in case of the nuclear reactor is due to the interaction of the charged particle and the water molecules and the subsequent "piling up of the ripples of light", then how do the Cherenkov detectors work in case of neutrinos which do not interact with matter? Actually, they DO interact with matter, albeit rarely. The neutrinos interact through weak force which is very short range. And since these neutrinos are high energy as well, one can imagine the rarity of these interactions.

  • @Vordb666
    @Vordb666 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I like that since it's 2023 it's completely acceptable to casually use stock death metal music in your science education video

    • @besmart
      @besmart  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Oh I've been droppin' death metal stings since at least 2019

    • @_mmuffe_3079
      @_mmuffe_3079 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We only need more stock death metal in science education :))

    • @Vordb666
      @Vordb666 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@besmart oh you know what you're right LOL

  • @najati
    @najati ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video.

  • @waynecribbs8853
    @waynecribbs8853 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was an excellent explanation of light and Cherenkov radiation!

  • @markusnl
    @markusnl ปีที่แล้ว +15

    But Joe, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light!

    • @Crausy
      @Crausy ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I see what you did there...

  • @calcaware
    @calcaware ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Would the temperature of the water affect the color?
    I love how out of the entire spectrum it just happens to have the right energy to be bluish white instead of most of the spectrum being not visible.

    • @madonius
      @madonius ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No, at least not in the perceived wavelength. There is a correlation of refractive index and temperature and a correlation between the refractive index and the maximum frequency that is emitted. But this would have no effect in the perceived colour of the glow.

    • @davidroddini1512
      @davidroddini1512 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The charged particles are moving toward the top of the tank so the light is blue shifted. If you could see the particles moving downward through the water they would be red shifted since they are moving away from the observer. 😉

  • @swoondrones
    @swoondrones ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @nadiposzata17
    @nadiposzata17 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW, EPIC video!!! Thank You!

  • @HeisenbergFam
    @HeisenbergFam ปีที่แล้ว +10

    To go faster than the speed of light you just need to be r34 artist

    • @joshuaosei5628
      @joshuaosei5628 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I want to understand this, but something tells me it’s better I don’t

    • @Guru_1092
      @Guru_1092 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@joshuaosei5628 good intuition.

    • @lorenzoblum868
      @lorenzoblum868 ปีที่แล้ว

      The speed of darkness on steroids.

    • @ryangainey94
      @ryangainey94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@joshuaosei5628 Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it. You can commission a "r34 artist" to create pornographic images of whatever you want. That being said, drawing pornographic matter going faster than the speed of light isn't the same thing as actually being faster than the speed of light, so I must admit I don't really understand what the joke is either, even though I know what a r34 artist is.

    • @joshuaosei5628
      @joshuaosei5628 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ryangainey94 Thanks for the explanation. I guess the joke was that people must be very quick to make the porn of that fandom or idea, and so they’re so fast they “go faster than the speed of light”

  • @kanshank
    @kanshank ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Imaging going faster than light speed and not even be able to flex about breaking the laws of physics

    • @rykehuss3435
      @rykehuss3435 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Light does not decelerate. Its still traveling at c, even in water. It just takes more time since the photons are constantly being absorbed and re-emitted by the atoms of said medium.

  • @boazbrisker81
    @boazbrisker81 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video thank you 🙏🏻

  • @AironExTv
    @AironExTv ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. I had no idea this is how Neutrino detectors work.

  • @henriroggeman7267
    @henriroggeman7267 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This Danish lady professor slowed down light so much you could walk past it, Joe. I don't think this is what people have in mind when they talk about "traveling" faster than the speed of light 😀

  • @andi5262
    @andi5262 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    A light-boom?🤔🧐 Makes sense. Also, I never new there was anything that could move faster than the speed of light. That’s pretty cool.

    • @crewgunnight8987
      @crewgunnight8987 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Flash: am i a joke to u?

    • @badoem5353
      @badoem5353 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actively, not cause the e= mc²
      But space could technically could be faster. Like light has no mass, space doesn't really need (added) energy to exist or accelerate. It's in homeostasis technically.

    • @pix23
      @pix23 ปีที่แล้ว

      This idea intrigued me and I searched a bit, it seems the term used is "photonic boom". Although maybe "photonic flash" would better capture the redundancy present in the original term

  • @andrewwalledge6101
    @andrewwalledge6101 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have the most amazingly good job - and you're incredibly good at it too. Staying curious.

  • @navneetkaushik2482
    @navneetkaushik2482 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this bro.

  • @DigSamurai
    @DigSamurai ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This video has the best clickable but not clickbait title in the history of TH-cam!
    It's immensely provocative and on its face, seems easily disprovable and yet it's 100% accurate and scientifically provable. Prodigious!
    You are clearly a man of sagacity and wit. 😎

  • @Ali_Fly
    @Ali_Fly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I feel clickbaited

  • @tokugeeky2931
    @tokugeeky2931 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is fascinating 👍

  • @HelenaSavicMurphy-od5un
    @HelenaSavicMurphy-od5un ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd love it for Joe to explain more about microcurrent in a longer form video! The foreo bear explaination was wonderful

  • @DuckSlinger11
    @DuckSlinger11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey! Great video! I have 2 questions:
    1. In the portion where you explain Cherenkov radiation with electrons (5:58 to 6:25) the water molecules are re-orienting themselves due to the electric field the electron is giving off. I was just wondering whether the re-orientation of the water molecules was correct, since the e- is negative, and the water molecule being polar, the positive side (Hydrogen side) would be facing the e- as it went by. In the video the negative side of the water (2 pairs of e- on the O) face the e- as it goes by. Let me know if I am wrong or if it is due to other facotrs, such as the magnetic field the moving charge produces, or perhaps the field the e- produces is very small compared to the field the other water molecules produce and so it is a relativley small change etc.
    2. Lastly, I don't fully understand why the neutrinos produce Cherenkov radiation. I understand the e- doing it, since it interacts with the Electromagnetic force with it's neighbours (water), producing EM waves. However, as you stated in the video, neutrinos don't interact electromagnetically (since they are neutral charge), therefore I don't see how they can produce light. Perhaps it is a different sort of Cherenkov radiation, produced by other mechanisms such as the weak force, which eventually produces EM waves (Cherenkov radiation)
    Many thanks, again great video I enjoyed it alot!

    • @NightBlazr_
      @NightBlazr_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1. I think you're right.
      2. "Neutrinos are detected in water Cherenkovs when they interact by W exchange, converting into the equivalent charged lepton (muon or electron for νμ or νe respectively), or when they elastically scatter off electrons (when the recoil electron can be detected)."
      I got this from another comment.

  • @N3ur0m4nc3r
    @N3ur0m4nc3r ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can't help but imagine you oops-ing right into that reactor.

  • @koiyujo1543
    @koiyujo1543 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing I never knew about this awesome!

  • @illuminum8576
    @illuminum8576 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wanted to know that thanks, actually much more straight forward than I expected

  • @user-ei1ym1lq6h
    @user-ei1ym1lq6h ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The speed of light is already variable.

    • @wolvenar
      @wolvenar ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The speed of light != C C is not always equal in all space, as gravity affects the local constant, because all dimensions change and distort.

    • @user-ei1ym1lq6h
      @user-ei1ym1lq6h ปีที่แล้ว

      My theory dwarfs all of the vaccum, constant & dimensional limitations. I can actually prove it with a small diagram, but ideally, I'd like to further test on a simulator.

    • @rykehuss3435
      @rykehuss3435 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wolvenar Wrong. The speed of light is always the same, even in mediums. It is not variable. Photons in water still travel at c, they just bump into atoms and get absorbed, re-emitted and then sent on their way.
      Photons cannot decelerate, anything with rest mass will ALWAYS travel at c. If you disagree then go ahead and disprove theory of special relativity.

    • @wolvenar
      @wolvenar ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rykehuss3435 You might want to find out what happens mathematically to C and all the dimensions as you approach a gravity well, now work that relative to a second observer from a position well away from the gravity well.

    • @rykehuss3435
      @rykehuss3435 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wolvenar Nothing happens to it. You might want to find out about general and special relativity.

  • @Alec_Reaper
    @Alec_Reaper ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I simply just run really fast.

  • @phillipbedwell8424
    @phillipbedwell8424 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video 👍😃.

  • @ehrenloudermilk1053
    @ehrenloudermilk1053 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whoa dude. Youre blowing my mind right now

  • @JoeBuk724
    @JoeBuk724 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, that glow is so cool and now I have a better idea of how those giant detectors work.

  • @barnabycollis6963
    @barnabycollis6963 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now that is fascinating!

  • @UrsulaPainter
    @UrsulaPainter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for teaching us about Cherenkov "thingies".

  • @iwansays
    @iwansays ปีที่แล้ว

    Today I learned more about light. Thank you.

  • @Dionyzos
    @Dionyzos ปีที่แล้ว

    That a channel like this has almost 5 million subscribers makes me happy

  • @subratamridha1339
    @subratamridha1339 ปีที่แล้ว

    The opening scene is soo satisfying...

  • @Pretni
    @Pretni ปีที่แล้ว

    Really like to watch your videos

  • @EldritchCypher
    @EldritchCypher ปีที่แล้ว

    Like how you went full glowing Mr Burns at the end there! Lol

  • @bambalaramba
    @bambalaramba ปีที่แล้ว

    thank's hank ❤

  • @theirsecretkey
    @theirsecretkey ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like this 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @Neceros
    @Neceros ปีที่แล้ว

    the swan segment was good. this pleases me

  • @gidi6066
    @gidi6066 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:45 that's kinda like the sledge going into mud analogy. Why did u dismiss that away?😂

    • @TheBeanMan-ks3gi
      @TheBeanMan-ks3gi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The mud analogy is assuming that we are still using friction, and since there would be no friction once as you exit said thing that is slowing you down ( that is if you were light) then you would immediately start going your original speed.

  • @anandha12
    @anandha12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really happy that I randomly landed on this video.😊

  • @RJ_Ehlert
    @RJ_Ehlert ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice.

  • @TomCTown
    @TomCTown ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating!

  • @yortgq
    @yortgq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for shedding light on weird physics, Joe

  • @edgeeffect
    @edgeeffect ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent work... I started this video thinking "'faster than light'? I don't (expletive deleted) think so!" and finished it thinking "Oh... so that's why neutrino detectors are in gigantic buckets of water".

  • @akshay831
    @akshay831 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just found your channel from the rainbow video and have commenced my weeklong binge of the backlog. Great stuff keep up the great work Joe!

  • @jamielandis4606
    @jamielandis4606 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish I had you as a science teacher! ❤

  • @dirkroosendaal2254
    @dirkroosendaal2254 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol, you completely blew my mind. I thougt i was not possible

  • @MattanjaGerritsen
    @MattanjaGerritsen ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does light instantly get back up to speed after leaving the medium? Or is the speed "slowly" building up to lightspeed in the vacuum?

  • @Blueskies2513
    @Blueskies2513 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks bro

  • @takenname8053
    @takenname8053 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super Nice

  • @PTRMAN
    @PTRMAN ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. That "celebrity walking through a crowd" analogy was fantastic!

  • @mtranchi
    @mtranchi ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:24 Aw man.... Yeah, you got me, I implicitly added "in a vacuum" to the title. Lame.

  • @Mr.Redacto
    @Mr.Redacto 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I saw the Short on this and had to look into it.

  • @hrtbrk1
    @hrtbrk1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Like a Shockwave with the speed of sound, but with the speed of light. Love it.
    Also love when you explain something and i get excited because it makes sense, then say "if your brain hurts right now its okay." When my brain isnt hurting!

  • @3zdayz
    @3zdayz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your electric wave and magnetic wave animation isn't the line right. The magnetic and the electric are not at a maximum at the same time but rather are 90° skewed

  • @zenbum2654
    @zenbum2654 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another great video. Thanks.
    However, I think your animation of an electron passing through a bunch of water molecules was slightly wrong. As the electron passed, you showed each molecule rotating so that its oxygen side was closer to the electron. I think the torque on the dipole would actually turn the hydrogen side towards the electron.

  • @Ameenmuith
    @Ameenmuith ปีที่แล้ว

    cool vidieo

  • @AaronOrtiz
    @AaronOrtiz ปีที่แล้ว

    I had not understood the magnetic and electrical fields that make us light until seeing this video!

  • @timsullivan4566
    @timsullivan4566 ปีที่แล้ว

    Of course matter travelling faster than the speed of light IS a tremendous teaser, but tbh...
    ...you already had me just with the cool, blue glow. 🤗

  • @joeblack4436
    @joeblack4436 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also worth mentioning the Askaryan effect. Very much related. Just as interesting.