Supreme Court overturns 40-year-old Chevron decision
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ส.ค. 2024
- CNBC's Eamon Javers reports the latest news in politics. For access to live and exclusive video from CNBC subscribe to CNBC PRO: cnb.cx/42d859g
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
Turn to CNBC TV for the latest stock market news and analysis. From market futures to live price updates CNBC is the leader in business news worldwide.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC on Threads: cnb.cx/threads
Follow CNBC News on X: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC on WhatsApp: cnb.cx/WhatsAppCNBC
www.cnbc.com/select/best-cred...
#CNBC
#CNBCTV
Next, we need to repeal the Patriot Act.
I could not agree more. The patriot act has become a tool for the intelligence agencies to target civilians based on political ideology and affiliation.
That would hurt the corporations not help them
@@brandonborgerding182 yep.
Republicans designed it to stop people like you..be careful what you publicly post.. yes Republicans are out to get people like you
funny for as many reasons as you could think of
It doesn't weaken their ability, it takes it away from them.
good
@@ethgod 🍻
Correct, and whats hilarious is the morons here cheering on the destruction of government. They actually want the America of the Walking Dead. Funny thing is, as a progressive European, the America of the walking dead suits me fine too 😂
The Fed should be stripped of any and all power. The Fed should also be audited so we can see how they've wasted our money over the decades.
One or the other. Lets not waste even more.
The fed is illegal !!!
You can already see what they’re wasting money on in real time…war.
No. Six crooked Supreme Court justices are NOT my government.
We know where the money went!! Straight into their pockets!! Thank God the corruption is ending.
Next the NFA, the Patriot act and complete overhaul of our government.
How did it take me 2 days to hear about something this big?
the media doesn't like this
Because the media just wants to make a fuss over Ukraine, Israel, and the Battle of the Granddads(Trump/Biden).
The media is having a Wag the Dog moment. They're using other stories that don't mean as much to Americans, as a way to divert attention from the bigger, more important events that Americans actually want to know about.
Government does this wag the dog stuff all the time.
They don’t want you to hear about it
Allowing the non elected parts of our government to interpret rules by the selves is scary.
Ignoring the fact the elected people elect the heads of the agencies. Also ignoring the fact a major party is trying to make them into a puppet in the next election. Also would you rather have uneducated yes men on emissions problem create rules? Or rule on regulations on how much wild fish you are allowed to catch? Or how to protect endangered species?
It's already been happening for years. This just makes it official.
@@user-zu5do6ri6r and repealed
This does the opposite? It prevents government agencies from interpreting vague legislation?
@@yusteryumeister4601 Wich just means that none experts will be interpreting laws. Wich is incredibly dumb
Federal agencies should not have the power to interpret laws. The Supreme Court made the right call.
I want experts implementing things, not politicians. This is a prelude to a soviet-style govenment where someone's friend is given the job because they're powerful, not because they know what they're doing. We're about to have a world ruled over by crooks and clowns.
So to be clear, you want politicians setting guidelines for things like how much radiation you can be safely exposed to, or how to sanitize your operating room, rather than scientists who know what they're talking about? Instead of saying 'safe for humans' in the law, and having an expert who knows what they're doing determin what's safe, you're going to let Lauren Boebert decide, or Matt Gaetz, or George Santos, they'll be in some committee coming up with how many rads you can safely absorb. Maybe they'll look it up with chatGPT and get a fabricated answer.
Now the ATF is finally gonna stop harassing the public.
Unlikely.
Don't get comfortable friend. That's what got us here in the first place. We need to keep fighting until the ATF is completely gone
@@itsmrbigsmoke862 that will never happen
@@angelainamarie9656 with that attitude, of course it won't
This will be the most influential ruling in our lifetime
This ruling is a big deal, and I am afraid of it.
@Martha-jl6eu Why? It simply prevents faceless bureaucrats from inventing laws not voted on and passed by people we elect to vote and pass laws. Chevron allowed career federal employees to circumvent the Legislative, tExecutive and Judicial branches of government. It was BAD law.
@@aaronjohnston1584 That "bad law" was held up for decades. Instead of experts determining rules, it's the courts. The courts are made up of appointed judges who have no expertise in thousands of areas. It was a power grab by the supreme court, a power grab for the federal courts, and gives the president wayyyy too much power. Not to mention the new and innovative ways to bribe judges. This is a bad decision.
@@Martha-jl6euyou like fascism?
100%. Trump's legacy on the SC is amazing for freedom
Best option, get rid of all regulations that came out since 84.
Congress has to do their job, not to let bureaucrats make up their own laws.
We investigated ourselves and found we did no wrong. That is the Chevron Doctrine in a nutshell.
Not to "interpret" but to pervert the law to suit their agenda. The government should never be allowed to pervert the law without checks and balances.
Big win! Unelected Adminitrative state loosing it's power over citizens and businesses.
No, it stops agencies from using "their interpretations" of THE LAW!!!
We both know it is a direct assault on free market capitalism.
Obey the party and you are free to do what you want.Oppose the party and you're suddenly find the courts making you subject to regulations.
This is the first step in making business subservient to the state.
@jamesricker3997 The Chevron Doctrine allowed lower level government organisation's the ability to interpret vague laws as they saw fit. To my understanding, it won't attack businesses.
This won’t make businesses anywhere close to “subservient” it just means less people they have to bribe. Instead of professionals who literally spend their lives studying a topic like what counts as “clean” drinking water, you can have a judge with no experience on the topic deciding that instead. Now Aquafina can simply pay off the same judges who just overturned this ruling. Oh and they also just ruled that judicial bribery is legal.
@@TimoriasI wish this comment and narrative was seen more by the uneducated self righteous people who are talking about how this is a great thing and congress now has to “do its job.” I’m open to any take other than “we’re doomed.”
@@jamesricker3997that's not true at all, whoever told you that is absolutely clueless and has their head up their ass
It’s gonna be great time for lawyers
I can see the commercials now. LOL
They will be the only winners in the end
They are all grey areas. That's why the scotus is saving us
YAY, about time this happened. Regulatory agencies should have never been allowed to make regulations to have the same effect as law.
I’m happy that the ATF is now unhappy!
Not just the ATF - the whole administrative branch is affected.
Will you be happy when we are in a new gilded age? Are you rich enough you don't need to work for a living?
@@Jake-mv7yo I’m comfortable. No debt, I make products that the marketplace wants. Took years of hard work to get here. How are you doing?
@@Jake-mv7yo Yes and yes.
Regardless, if they want to restrict my rights they can at least do it with people I can vote out.
@Cloudguy5673 I meant Executive - but yeah, basically. 😂
This is a good thing,
The agencies that laws give power to, can not fairly regulate their own power.
They should not be the ones who determine what the laws says.
Maybe 40 years ago when the best and brightest were appointed and it made sense to divert to them. But that isn’t what we have today. Instead we mostly have people who are appointed that have never worked in the real world. Lately it’s been a DEI leadership component that eliminates people that are better because they don’t check a box. The left criticizes multiple laws/rules written many years ago, but now when one they like is challenged because it is outdated, can’t have that. Until there is some bipartisan consensus this is the best thing to happen. And it works both ways. It’s not like it doesn’t apply to conservatives. The left doesn’t like it because they made it partisan years ago sneaking in activists funded by special interest and now that will effectively end since they just had their teeth pulled.
Right! Well said!
I'm in total agreement with you.
Way past time! BIG government power needs trimming. A constitutional win!
Thanos snap the taxes.
Thanos snap the ATF.
Good! The regulatory agencies are an arm of the Executive branch who should not ever be allowed to legislate. The process is intended to be slow and now these agencies must stay within the law as it has been passed in Congress. This stops the executive from turning law abiding citizens into felons overnight with no oversight!
Big win for ALL Americans!
Interpretation: Our tyrannical dictatorship just got pushed back a little.
This is the 1st time I have ever given CNBC a 👍
One other time for me, when Jim had to eat his words…😂
Why? They didn't overturn it.
@@thatlittlevoice6354 go away troll
I like the ruling but I don't like them or their politics. So I don't give them a thumbs up, I just listened and then move on.
@@tat2zz68how are they a troll?
Good! Now if you can't pass the law in congress you can't pass the law.
The capitol is public property there was not tress passing
During the Vietnam war people used to handcuff themself to the pillars and all kinds if protests
Is not insurrection if you don’t have guns
Yes!
but people didn't break windows and these people had guns and bombs that not sight seeing trip s plane riot is not sight seeing trip
They finally removed the democrats from their sphinxter.
So, the people we can fire have to make the laws and not some government employee that can change the law based on their personal politics or whoever is currently in power. Seems like a really good thing. You have literally hundreds of lawyers in congress if they cannot pass a coherent law maybe it's not needed.
Totally agree.
And how did we prevent those people from being bought by lobbyists? This only gives corporations even more power to maximize profit with no regulations.
@@a.jdeets5527 The difference is we can vote out the people being bought by lobbyists. The people in the agencies with free reign to do as they pleased under chevron are appointed not voted in, and rarely ever removed from their positions. Maybe if you used some critical thinking you'd be as smart as you think you are.
Lawyers are not even supposed to be allowed to be in congress, iirc
Lawyers do not have the technical expertise to even have a clue about some of the things these agencies protect us from.
I got curious and decided to do some reading. Its kinda confusing.
So! Chevron gave federal agencies the power to interpret laws when there's a gray area or something is vague. Now, if there's a question, it has to go to court.
What was good about Chevron and the agencies making their own decisions when it came to vagueness was that, for the most part, they kinda know the details of what they're doing. The people at the EPA know their beans when it comes to the environment, and so when there's a question about how a law is supposed to be implemented, they can use that knowledge to make an educated decision.
The argument against Chevron is that it took power away from the courts, and what I'm seeing in comment sections where people are celebrating its death is that people are glad that things will be decided by 'elected officials'.
Im a little worried, our elected officials can be really stupid. I think that everyone can agree on that.
I'm fuzzy on if it means judges now are gonna be making rules or if we have to send this all to Congress.
From what I'm getting, people less educated on the issues will be making decisions from now on and stuff is gonna slow down. A lot of these agencies deal with regulations, so you'll probably see less of those. Which is good if you're a company, bad if you're the consumer or worker.
Why a regular person might care:
Your water quality, air quality, and food quality will probably drop in the next few years. It will take longer to regulate new technology or medicines.
This is what I've got. Someone else can correct me if I'm wrong.
Basically, it puts big checks and balances on both congress and the administrative agencies. No more ambiguous laws! And no more ambiguous interpretations, or your going to end up in court.
Congress works on average two and a half days per week. Only 20 percent of administrative agencies are working in office. Its time to get to work!
To prevent any branch of government becoming too powerful, powers were separated: Congress writes laws, the Executive branch approves them, and the Supreme Court interprets laws. In 1984 the Supreme Court (with three Justices absent) wrote a decision known as the "Chevron decision", which combined all powers under the Executive branch. The President and his staff now had authority to write laws and interpret them, without the other branches of government. Today's Supreme Court decision weakens the Chevron decision, which helps to restore the separation of powers.
Hahahahahahahha
Bring back Civics in school.
Bad brains you have there
God bless this supreme court
Funny thing. I graduated high school in 1996, I have never heard of this SCOTUS ruling? It could have something to do with going to school in California 🤔
Age limit 60 years old, Two term limits for the Supreme Court too
Requires two-thirds of both house or two thirds of the states to propose, then three quarters of the states to ratify.
Good luck with that.
no lol
😂😂😂😂 poor atf
ATF should be a convenience store, not a federal agency.
Applaud 👏 the decision!
❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
You're evil
There are 438 federal agencies and sub agencies that have had the power (until now) to layer on "regulations" that are essentially laws not passed by Congress. Executive Branch overreach has been out of control for many years. This will open up many challenges and will hopefully eliminate many of these regulations. Example: The ATF's "rules" that try to restrict our 2nd Amendment rights.
The Chevron Doctrine was created by a Republican majority Supreme Court in 1984. You are literally cheering the remaking of the USA into a 3rd world plutocracy.
The Republican judges of 1984 understood that expert government professionals had a likely safer interpretation of regulation than the corporations who gave us Love Canal, choking air pollution, contaminated food and water, unsafe medicine etc. 7 Republicans on the 1984 court. The Roberts court is fascist.
Just abolish all ABC agencies
The FDA? Do you care about food safety? Let's stop inspecting meat, great idea!
@@silverstem2964 Yes, that's why I want to abolish the criminal FDA
@@silverstem2964The same FDA that allows our food to be pumped full of questionable ingredients that are banned in most countries?
start with the RNC
Why not abolish the government all together then?
Weakens? No. Chevron allowed government to ‘always’ get what they wanted if any grey area. Basically they could make up things as they go. We given power to enforce statutes not create new or different meanings.
I'm sure Justice Gorsuch's mom is/would be extremely disappointed in her son's vote. The American people got the short end of the stick ..... Again.
@lindabingham6403 You either don't understand it, or you're one of them
@@aaronjohnston1584 I understand that the courts are taking away the decision making from the people qualified to make the decisions. One of THEM???
Big blow to the administrative state…. And a huge win for freedom!
Spoken like a white guy
@@behindthacrookedcross forgot the 'rich' adjective.
@@behindthacrookedcross quiet down racist.
All it does is give lobbyists and corporations even more power to buy our government.
@@behindthacrookedcrossyou butt hurt??
This is a massive win for Americans.
Don’t “micro-legislate” -just get rid of the rules.
Can you imagine anyone from the public being upset and siding with the agencies on this ? The fact Sotomayor was so upset about it tells you where her allegiance is.
This is HUGE !! A win for the people for once !
Because Chevron has been overturned shouldn't the corporate veil be removed as well?
Good! I agree with Gorsuch that if a law is ambiguous, toss the law and tell Congress to write a succinct and clear law.
YES SIR! it is. No more mud puddles being wet lands and destroying peoples lives, just one example. or a ditch being navigable water ways due to heavy rain. Or a arm brace making a pistol a long rifle, jeebus those bureaucrats went nuts with chevron now hopefully it's over.
Laws will NEVER be able to keep up with changing times.
Experts are far better at pointing things in the best direction.
@@mnguardianfan7128experts should be consulted during the drafting of legislation. Not allowed to do whatever they want with it afterwards
@@LawAdNauseam Laws are WAY too slow. Congress just isn't able to update laws effectively or in a timely manner.
Brute politics will overwhelm needed changes.
This is a HORRIBLE decision.
@@mnguardianfan7128 horrible for the administrative state and faceless bureaucracy😂
Yes! No more rogue agencies and unelected bureaucrats making law on their own!! No more "agency rule = law!"
Yeah instead lets let 9 decrepit unelected officials decide everything!
No more rogue agencies like the FDA making drugs safe! No more rogue agencies like the EPA keeping lead out of drinking water! Pure free market capitalism is back. Bribing judges is also legal thanks to the supreme court.
🎉
ABOUT TIME!!
Agencies are supposed to answer to the executive branch any way.
Good. Federal Agencies have too much power. Too much wiggle room.
You're exactly right. We should be making sure that companies are allowed to cut corners, let's say if it's more cost-effective to let chemicals run in our drinking water instead of investing in better filtration and inspections. We could also make sure that auto companies are allowed the freedom to completely deregulate their emissions, so we can keep leaking dangerous gasses into the air.
We should also let food manufacturers decide how much cancer causing microplastics is good enough to be in their products.
You're totally right, we should absolutely let the moral corporations decide what's good enough for the rest of us. because after all, it's not like corporations don't have the peoples best interest in heart, historically!
You're exactly right!
@@itdies2dayyo profits over people, as long as the justices get a piece of that pie.
Yeah, what business does the federal government have regulating food safety, vehicle safety, or banking standards?
@@itdies2dayyoyou probably believe they don’t pay their “fair share”
@@vincentgiasulloWhat is your plan to prevent our food from being poisoned, now that the FDA can’t do its job nearly as well?
Oh yeah everyone told me a supreme court pick was not a valid reason to vote Trump.
He's putting two younger ones in next year..
@@neilwatson9709 From jail you mean….
@@OmarDuval Over an accounting error. Dream on commie, ever heard of an appeals process?
@@OmarDuval nah, from the white house.
I have been voting for the potential supreme court justices as well as federal judges my entire life. It is not a bad way to vote.
Now the Presidency needs a Duty Statement so that it can be determined what actions are protected "official business" and which are not. Criminal actions cannot be considered immune "official business." All claims of immunity for questionable and criminal actions will have to be resolved in court, with the courts determining if the President's actions were "official business" or not. The SCOTUS decision is not a free pass for all Presidential actions. And now, the DOJ will have to charge a sitting President for criminal actions so that the courts can respond. Waiting for the end of a term can no longer be tolerated.
Good. Chevron was one of the biggest drain plugs in the swamp.
Yeah, who needs experts when you can have lawyers making laws.
@@mnguardianfan7128 and totally ignorant people determining policy that affects your safety. Yay!
@@mnguardianfan7128 You are correct. New policy makers are needed.
@@mark_morse Congress members will never be experts
@@mnguardianfan7128 regulators are NOT experts.
In a democratic republic any ambiguity should side with the people not the executive branch. Freedom over tyranny
True but everyone needs to remember that this administration has not felt the need to follow SCOTUS's decisions.
The constitution is filled with ambiguity 😂 if it wasn’t we wouldn’t need constitutional scholars and Judges to interpret it
@@PyroEnderSlayer Wrong it's cut and dry, Only tyrants and (sleasy lawyers) try to interpret it to there way of thinking, Kinda like a "militia being the national guard" is one example.
@@PyroEnderSlayerPlus it wad written 237 years ago 😅
But the executive branch can freely do bribery though, thanks to SCOTUS
Hahaha screw the ATF
@Cloudguy5673Project 2025 would defund multiple law enforcement agencies , but not the ATF. Republicans are going to need someone to take away your guns.
BLM has been running amok, too.
What is the Administrative Procedures Act?
Heck yeah! Give the power back to the people
This is a good ruling.
The first step should be questioning if the agency even has the authority to enforce the law.
Or if that agency should even exist. Looking at you BATFE, DEA, FCC.
@@DarkMatterX1 THAT! is what i was thinking as well!!! 👍🤟😃
@@mikefowler301
You know what I find amazingly disheartening? Just how much modern Americans are in love with government control of other people's lives. Irrespective of which "side" they claim to be on.
Congress created the agencies....
They obviously have the right to enforce as they are part of the Executive branch that is responsible for enforcing laws. The good news is now they cannot create their own legislation turning law abiding citizens into felons overnight for purely politically motivated reasons.
Congress should manage regulations.
Own it.
@@gregorypowell9132 congress can’t manage a Taco Bell drive through, what makes you think they can successfully take care of micro managing a country?
@sirconrad8328 well... I guess " that" will show pretty fast. It's why we have two year terms. Isn't it?
@@sirconrad8328they shouldn't. No one should in the Federal government.
Agencies would probably submit bills and guidelines to Congressional committees
Some process to that affect is the point of the decision. In other words, voters can remove the elected officials who passed the egregious law and elect instead officials who will get the policy right.
THAT is what they desperately wanted to avoid. Do you know how many politicians used the agencies to pass rules they themselves would never sign off on because of the backlash from voters?
What about the IRS??? FACT: The only liability every placed on anyone for the income tax is the original Tariff act that placed the tax liability is place on the named source AND the government worker tax collector.
Very Good Decision by the Supreme Court!!
So, for one example, agencies like the EPA would no longer be able to set pollution standards for factories? As if we don't already have enough problems with the climate.
Maybe they can go to China where they are really needed 🤔
One of the most perfect constitutional decisions of the court, Americans have a right to live under laws passed by elected officials not by rules dreamed up by agencies who are not responsible to the people
State agencies are given their power by these federal agencies and should be shut down as well. ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!! END ADMINISTRATIVE LAW!!
I can feel the deep state crying and i love it.
And what/who is this so called “deep state”?
This battle between the republicans (not the GOP) and the federalists has been raging since before our country was founded. The size, scope and power of the federal government was hotly debated and is a reason why so much of our governmental form was created and why so much of the constitution is dedicated to defining what powers the federal government has and does NOT have. For so long the federalists have been winning these battles so it’s great to see the tide turning in favor of the republicans.
❤
Suoreme Court forwarding progress on Project 2025.
Question, is the IRS involved in this decision?
So glad they overturned chevron. These agencies have been abusing these ruling. Making wishy washy rules they call laws and abusing citizens rights.
Like the one where the, ATF overnight decided gun stabilizer was illegal, who the he'll are they to make laws?? Like the ATF using a wishy washy rule about how many guns a hobbyist can sell or trade. To ki!! a man, looked like a hit job to me. Instead of serving a house search warrant, then searching his house. They wait till he is home, when they decided not to raid when he wasn't home cause could have got him that way. they bust down the door like criminals. Knowing he will defend his home,
as he had the right to do. So set it up so they get the reaction they needed to complete the hit. Now I in no way believe the officers were involved in this hit. It was whomever set it up.
I am glad they ended chevron!!!!!!
Very , very glad they ended it. Three letter agencies should not be able to make laws, they call rules, in no way shape or form. They need to be made in Congress!!
The Supreme Court got it right!!!
“Chevron” was unconstitutional from square one. Just like Roe v Wade was. We have _three_ branches of government, not four. The purview of interpreting the law lies with the judiciary, not the bureaucracy.
This one is more good than bad. However, it may turn all bad over the long haul, especially if voters are underrepresented vs. businesses (i.e. money). As always, time will tell. The voting track record, being that it is, doesn't bode well for the lot of us.
This is huge for the American citizens 👍
Good. This means that the government can't go to court on some weak case. The administrative state has been too strong for a long time
It’s paving the way for a right wing fascist take over and if anyone thinks that better, they really need to educate themselves
A lot of talk about how this could roll back regulations, but couldn't this be used to create stricter regulations also?
Claim the current regulation is unreasonable and should be stricter, then shop for a judge that agrees.
Question: Does this have anything to do with permitting offices for building on our own lands?????
FINALLY!
Tyrants mad
Oh no! You mean federal agencies are going to have to pause for a moment and ask themselves if what they're about to do is lawful? Before they do it
How does this affect me on a daily basis?
This was long overdue. These unelected Czars we have now days have way to much power hopefully this will reel them in abit much more is needed though
This is a good decision by the court
Wonderful! Now let's get rid of low-flow toilets and shower heads. Also, onerous EPA requirements that force restrictions on major appliances, like air conditioners and water heaters. These things drive up costs for consumers and have a negative impact on standard of living.
We are being set free from the administrative departments that have ruled us despite it being unconstitutional.
More like being set free from clean drinking water.
@@Maelstromme foolishness!
Wow! Glad the media is reporting on this. It's one of the lesser known cases among the public but an extremely important one. I remember learning about this case in law school and for the bar and proceeding for years using the rule that "federal agencies are allowed to interpret their own unclear rules" (my hyper-simplified understanding of the case from what I remember). No more.
I was twenty three when that was ruled on, Didn't like it then (neither did anyone else I knew) don't like it now. Jeebus I am thrilled to death over this decision.
So what does this mean for my child suppprt ? Lol
Winning!
Give free rein to corporations to dump their garbage into our environment. Say hello to more PFAS in your drinking water, more pollutants in our lakes, and more toxic particulates in your air.
Dang, if only there was a solution to this like passing clear laws that arent vague.
@@dafeekielelliott2442 ikr lol
@@dafeekielelliott2442congress won’t
FOOLISHNESS! It just means congress will actually have to start doing their job! Maybe no more two and a half day work weeks 🤔
@@tristenatorplaysgames6833
States can
It was congress that created these agencies to begin with because they realized the need for experts and how impossible it would be to micro legislate a modern society.
Wrong on every account.
@UniqueBreakfastTaco How so? How is microlegislation a reasonable system of governance, especially when the current Congress ranks as the least productive in history?
It violated the separation of powers so too bad
@@burntorangehorn micro legislation is preferable to giving agencies a blank check
@@Grunttamer and what powers is it you believe executive agencies should have? The violation here is the power grab by the judiciary
Oh great, incompetence now gets to decide the meaning of the laws ?!?!?! Oh no, we are doomed for sure!!!!!!
This supreme court has to be the wirst ever!!!!!!
Best decision EVER!!!!
HUGE win for the 2nd Amendment
Huge win for EVERY amendment.
Huge win for increased lead in baby food
@@PURENT Now you're being over dramatic.
@@jamietwigg5152 Now you need a congressman to decide how much lead is acceptable in your baby food, and if some lobbyist decides to sprinkle in a couple of thousand dollars for that congressman, you got a vague law which lawyers can abuse in court against you.
Huge win for flammable water. Gotta love that freedom
finally, make them do their jobs! if they aren't smart enough on the topic bring in experts to help or better yet reduce the amount of laws it is getting crazy.
Yes! Consult the experts BEFORE you write the law instead of letting bureaucrats who may or may NOT be experts interpret it as they wish.
Yup, now the Dems will have to depend buffoons like AOC to make law.
They have no reason to do that now, they’ll just agree with whatever lobbyist pays them the most money.
The "experts" are a big part of the problem.
Good stuff, all you need to know about this ruling is that CNBC doesn’t like it! So it’s a good thing for sure
"Chevron's Law!"
I always wonder where the names of these old cases come from, but then I investigate a little and it typically comes back to some company that never has anything to do with the actual subject. Idk if that is this case, but most that I have seen do.
Excellent! Congress will have to take responsibility for the laws they pass instead of passing the buck to the bureaucracy. They've been purposefully passing ambiguous laws and letting the bureaucrats run the country.
EXACTLY !
Hooray!
Now maybe we can get 'right to repair' our own vehicles and everything else that can't be repaired instead of buying new crap constantly
Uh, that’s now how that works. Corporations don’t allow you to repair, not the agencies.
Hahaha are you stupid? This will allow the companies total authority thru their control of legislators.
You think unelected officials are bought, imagine the guys who companies pay good money so they get elected! Use your small brain. Who do you think is going to be writing the rules for Congress? It’s going to be APPLE in the room when repair rights are decided by a select committee. Not your ass.
This will be a rewriting of all the rules , to favor the people who put Congress in power.
What kind of laws are those in this country that you need to interpret them? The law should be exact in words to execute. What is it? A Bible?
What day did this happen
have to use the Constitution like it's written
Prioritize large corporations’ business interests. Not sure that was in the constitution, but here we are.
@@benreiter7218 I would much prefer vague laws being better for businesses over it allowing non elected government organizations to make up new rules.
please tell me in the constitution where it says I cannot cause large scale brain damage of children by using leaded gasoline.
@@coolbugfacts1234 Nowhere of course, that comes down to laws on the state and/or federal level.
@@dafeekielelliott2442 So you think when a corporation invents a new type of brain eating microplastic that is killing children, instead of the EPA banning it, we should wait 2-3 years for Congress to pass a law. I think you may be suffering from lead poisoning yourself! 🤡🤡🤡
What a great day for Americans!