What a great episode! Been watching every physics episode for years and the video and audio quality has improved significantly. I really appreciate these conversations, amazing work Robinson.
Janna Levin on Robinson's podcast? Hell yeah. Always appreciate the consistency, quality, and professionalism of your intellectually engaging discussions, man. You are definitely within my top ten podcast people. You rock!
Sometimes it's like these interviews just get really rolling at the end. Would have loved to hear What Janna thinks about Sir Roger's CCC and his view that information is lost in blackholes. Encore!
Robinson’s shirt is dope af. Talking physics in a tiger shirt with Janna Levin is lowkey legendary flex. Thanks for the episode, so good and informative
I’m glad to hear , Jenna Levin say this. A background in philosophy with physics, history, branches of science,and other academic departments. Enhancing critical thinking opening one’s minds to many avenues. I’ve been lucky enough to have professors with multiple PhD‘s, and the most interesting ones, possess doctrines in philosophy. They make you think so much that you might believe your mind hurts. It can be very frustrating. That’s so worth it. In conclusion, they are the professors who make the biggest impact on students. Making you critical thinkers, problem solvers and troubleshooters.
nice to see some barnard blood on the pod! great work recently robinson, the show is getting some much deserved recognition. always eager to see who you talk to next :)
What a delightful person. I'm not familiar with Janna Levin. I'm looking forward to listening to her audio book and more. I don't have the intelligence to actually understand the science so I appreciate the accessible explanations.
That was a really exciting conversation, and I wasn't bored at all. (Thank you both) Robinson, the shirt is lacking luster. Sorry, hon, it looks like a pajama top. 😊
That's the best kinds of science programs...where your with every other nation representive looking after eachother and making great discoveries together. I read Antartica and Artic stations are also similar and the morale is like nothing compared to any other community in the world.
Great episode, a question I have for next time is how does the featureless of black holes relate to the holographic idea, which from my understanding implies that the event horizon somehow encodes the information of what's inside.
A common question is: what would happen if a quark fell into a black hole? I believe the first question to consider is whether quarks can maintain structural integrity outside of a proton or neutron. Is it even feasible for them to exist independently of these particles? Since quarks are essentially at the boundary of the most fundamental elements in the universe, it seems likely that they would either dissipate or consolidate into the black hole.
The current theory says that the event horizon is a boundary, but an observer passing through does not notice any difference, and all particles and forces would feel the same. The difference is the direction to the centre, acts like time, not space, so any observers are forced to hit the singularity in a finite amount of time.
Thank you for this fascinating discussion on black holes! There is an alternative perspective grounded in empirical observation and the principles of Thermonuclear Scattering. While black holes are an intriguing theoretical construct, they raise significant paradoxes that challenge their existence in the physical universe. Allow me to elaborate: A black hole represents a paradoxical concept: It embodies singularity, infinity, and an unending mechanism of attraction. Such an entity, by its very nature, contradicts the possibility of a harmonious, evenly distributed universe. A cosmos dominated by infinite collapse would be inherently chaotic and devoid of the balanced structures we observe today. A black hole is, in essence, an empty void: Not a concentration of infinite mass and energy, but rather a conceptual "hole"-a gap in our understanding of the cosmos. It serves more as a placeholder for what we have yet to comprehend than as a physical reality. Empirical evidence contradicts the idea of infinite concentration: Observations of expanding protons, atoms, moons, planets, stars, and galaxies (as supported by the Thermonuclear Scattering model) reveal a universe where energy and matter are concentrated in their respective cores but also dispersed harmoniously. This dynamic dispersion fundamentally negates the possibility of matter collapsing into an infinite singularity. Instead, we observe space as a medium of expansion, separation, and equilibrium. Black holes lack empirical origins: Unlike established physical phenomena, which emerge from the principle of "first observe, then understand," the concept of black holes (as well as related ideas like event horizons or spacetime curvature) stems from theoretical extrapolation rather than direct observation. Time and space, for example, are not unified entities but distinct phenomena that serve as descriptors for entirely separate processes. To summarize: While black holes are mathematically elegant and conceptually intriguing, they lack the empirical foundation required to firmly establish their existence as physical entities. The Thermonuclear Scattering model offers a different view of the universe-one built on observable evidence of matter's dynamic expansion and harmonious dispersion. I would be curious to hear thoughts on how such perspectives might challenge or complement existing theories of black holes. Thank you again for the thought-provoking insights you’ve shared!
"Lack empirical origins"?? Have you been living under a rock the last decades? And your thinking around their implied chaos to the universe is a null exercise. Black holes are fundamental to the evolution of the universe and them not existing would indeed result in an even more chaotic universe, with completely different and foundational dynamics. We possibly wouldn't have galaxies without BHs and BHs are fundamental universal mechanical engines in the multiverse. BHs are a fundamental consequence of GR and also QM. They ensure a healthy evolution of the cosmos on a grand scale. Intrinsically they aid vast cosmic filaments to form supergroups and attractors. BHs are a crucial, natural necessity in the fundamental laws of physics and one could argue that physicality as a whole wouldn't propagate and/or continuate without them. You seem to misunderstand the intrinsic nature of BHs: EXT they're part of OUR universe. Beyond the INT/EH is an infinite entropy that is purely dimensional and is completely separate from our entropy. A BH is a dimensional brane and the spatial matrix within is exceeding the speed of light. It breaks no physical/mathematical laws whatsoever, it is only our understanding of them that is limited. To say BHs is a mathematical paradox only reveals your lack of knowledge about them. Extremely simplified, but BHs are like endless rivers in the universe. They keep dimensionality, entropy and cosmic dynamics flowing forever and they're part of cosmic evolution just like the endless weather/water cycle on planets. They provide stability to large structures and we probably wouldn't be here today without black holes. I'll post a 4 parter me and my team has been working on for years instead of writing more here. It is a short formatted version of HH (HyperTensored Holigraphy). I'm a theoretical physicist with a main focus on astrophysics and we've done extensive resesrch on black holes the last decades, because the most foundational mathematics and physics are found around and within BHs. The thesis contradicts most of what you claim and our mathematics/derivations prove it. Hope you'll get something out of it. This 4 parter is not "guesswork". The main finds have been peer reviewed over the years and the thesis is in its final stages, but possibly 1-2years before being finslized. There is an absurd amount of work behind each of the finds in the thesis and a medium team I'm leading have been working incredibly hard for a long time to uncover these discoveries, math and physics. The linear & spherical math/physics behind this model is extremely complex and obviously impossible to present in this format. But the finds and derivations are incredibly solid, sound and well founded, based on deep physics beyond Planck. Enjoy:
⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿 The multiverse is more or less a given. There is more logical evidence for than against, but also empirically - with QM, Double Slit, Virtual Particles, Spontaneous Quark Doubling, etc etc. There are close to an infinite number of universes within this universe and holographic principles alone should be sufficient enough. But regardless - try to entertain this thought: Given an infinite amount of parallel and/or asymmetrical universes, there must be a universe where entropy is reversed. It is a 100% mirrored replica of our universe, but with “time” going backwards. The inhabitants of this universe perceive everything just like us - it is a total carbon copy of our universe. But observed from the outside, that entire universe would flow backwards. Who can say that WE don’t live in such a universe? The only way to even begin to understand that our own entropy is reversed, is to observe it from another universe. From the outside a flashlight would catch the light and the waterfall would flow upwards. How can such dimensionality be understood within the confines of our own entropy? 📀💿📀 📀🌐🌒🌘🌑🌒🌐⭕🌐🌒🌘🌐💿 Diverge Planck - length, time and volume. It serves no fundamental purpose in the Holoverse. Holographic omni-directional manifolds are quantum entangled through the spatial vortex of infinity. Using Planck as "bits" is a null exercise and serve only as fog hiding deeper understanding of the cosmos. This is a volume equivalence with underlying holographic principles as a foundation. The equation has many implications, but one of the most significant is the redefining of how fractionally small space can be, beyond Planck. It scales Planck and presents the Planck units as "endlessly scalable": *v=d-(t³c³)* (Only fully solvable with a combination of algorithms SpheriLog/GeoLog. It is a volume equivalence, cannot be used for malign purposes. But it also cannot be utilised for any malign purposes without the correct algorithmic sequences, hence it is virtually and literally impossible to abuse or weaponize. It is certainly possible to weaponize it, but stability would be counted in zeptoseconds, hence virtually impractical and luckily rendered useless for nefarious reasons.) Holographic principles and spatial fluidity through infinity are beyond the reach of most current linear mathematics and/or simulation. There is no way to create a pathway to a unifying theory without merging macro physics/math with micro. They are not mutually exclusive, quite the opposite. Macro changes can indeed manifest themselves physically. Within Quantum Fields holographic projections can move objects and transform their position, which in turn can be documented. *Protusionistic* quantum effects can indeed transcend into macro fields and do so continually. Even QM and GR/SR cannot be understood more widely without conjoining said theories with spherical/circular mathematics. Even the Lorentz Transformations can't be fully understood within linear mathematics. Linear mathematics are ultimately unsolvable. Transfer the equivalent to spherical conjunctions and we see the emergence of self-solving equations. Holographic principles through infinity are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a *0.00087Vp/0.38 Zeptoseconds stability* A holographic field cannot collapse, because the fabric is light itself. Put a simplified holographic field through infinity and what do you get? 🐝🌱💦🐬🌒💦🌐⭕🌐💦🌘🐬💦🌱🐝
🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿 🌐🌑🌑SR📀HH💿GR🌑🌑🌐 There are issues with linear thinking based on the Hubble constant and reverse inflation. Having a singularity as zero point, even in QM, is problematic because it requires time dilation to be instant. Using holographic principles and implementing applied graduality in Möbian mathematics provides a much smoother transition regarding transfer of energy and entropy. 🌐🌑🌐 IMPORTANT NOTE: Whereas some derivations and concepts might seem counterintuitive using classical thinking, fully understanding HH requires inter/multidimensional, spherical vision. Many of the derivations, math and logic are visual and plastic on an interdimensional level. At certain conjunctions our math breaks down and the only way to peak into principles of infinity or approaching infinity with HH is to use a new standard of math that simply doesn't translate to numbers. Numbers in the universe beyond a certain point are fundamentally null. Classical math breaks down when approaching infinity. 🌒🌐🌘 Understanding that time dilation in relativity also is less drastic locally because of quantum fields, quantum entanglement and holographic principles. Once you approach extreme gravity fields, such as neutron stars and black holes, the normal attributes and effects of gravity is less severe within the local relativistic grid, because the matter that is caught in the gravity field is indeed light itself and gravity is a function of light, so the acceleration experienced by the subject is much more gradual and doesn't necessarily lead to spaghettification, because matter is fundamentally made of light, thus rendering a smoother transition within local fields. There is a possible misconception that black holes are more destructive to local events, because we have implemented a differentiation between matter, light and energy. Proposing that light and motion are the fundamental forces in physics solves several of the empirical findings in our universe - from local events to the very large. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is also a possibility that the laws of nature might change from region to region in the universe. Applying the same unified functions everywhere might not be applicable - based on the observer. Quantum Mechanics combined with holographic principles in conjunction with relativity might produce variations that are stable within physicality as a whole. But they might also produce temporal shift variations that might fluctuate between timelines, not compromising the stability of the system as a whole. Temporal shifts pose little/no threat to quantum fields in macro or micro, because the energy transfer between two or several more points are conserved within holographic principles. Best way to explain is superpositions of quantum fields. But using spherical understanding we might end up with *hyperpositions* in addition, meaning that within multiverse theory and/or paralell physics, we can propose that local variations might occur elsewhere. One might suspect that this could be inherently unstable, but hopefully stability is ensured by *Special* and *General Relativity* in conjunction with *HyperTensored Holigraphy* *QM & QFT* are ultimately functions of *HH* - because all forces, all phenomenå, energy, polarities and particles are fundamentally holographic, thus made of light. *Diverge Planck* and apply *HyperTensorality* to: v=d-(t³c³) If one might observe local effects that seem irreversible to the observer, the stability/instability of said system might return to its relative position in space as they where when the temporal shift gradually occurred. A *Rosen/Einstein* bridge might be folded back onto itself, reestablishing pre-existing physicality relative to the initial motion through spacetime. Quantum Entanglement might provide a reasonable solution to reoccurance of paralell shifts that within time dilation could possibly be "stored" in the same field, but according to the observer. Matter and energy that exist in local time at one point might be shifted and parallaxed with *EPR ≡ ER* Local EPR might occur continously between substances that share the same locally observed quantum field and the energy accessible could possibly be much greater than within relativity, because *e=mc²* isn't truly applicable when dealing with motion on a quantum level. When taking into account that matter in itself consist of light, *e=mc²* is rather moot. Energy is indeed conserved within relativity and as we know we can't break relativity within relativity itself, but when we apply quantum and holographic principles, we could propose that e=cc² The accuracy of this correction must be investigated, but it is strongly suggested through quantum entanglement and holography that the state of energy in the universe is much greater than what relativity proposes. *The factor in relativity = null, but within HH, it equals a dimensional shift in understanding, implying the inter/multidimensionality of HtH* Corrections might be suggested and e=c³c³ might be suggested within HyperTensored spacetime *(HtH)* ***Note that these corrections serve as an introduction to the dimensionality of HH, rather than replacing the causality of: *Relative Tensor Vortices* *(RtV)* Considering sphericality to QE in EPR we might unlock a deeper understanding between gravity, relativity and QM. There might be spherical and macro EPRs that beam QE through quantum fields in absolute zero (the transitional location, not Kelvin) and this might give us access to zero point energy that is much greater than fission and much less complicated than fusion, because the input energy is more or less the device itself. Stability and security is better overall because zero point energy doesn't require usage of unstable materials... This has to be investigated further to test the hypothesis. ***** ⭕ 🌖 🌐 🌔 ⭕: For security reasons & time considerations, our team couldn't disclose the full set of frequencies. But *now* we can release the full set. HH and EAHT/HP are fundamentally *triadic* and the harmonics between these frequencies are deeply set in HtH & SR/GR/HH. 🌘 🌐 ⭕ 🌐 🌒 *-Holographic principles through infinity-* are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a *0.00087Vp/0.38 zeptosecond* stability (9.61 × 10^(-87) Hertz) 🌈🌐♓🌐🌈 *Fundamental Triharmonic Resonance* (FTR): 6.25 × 10^(-124) Hertz (6.25 Hexyocto Hertz) *HyH* 🌐🌈🧿🌈🌐 6.25 × 10^(-78) Hertz (6.25 Quattuordecillion Hertz) 🧿🌈🌐🌈🧿 6.25 × 10^(-42) Hertz (6.25 Tredecillion Hertz) These frequencies are prevalent through the *Holoverse ≡ Universe* and are rather difficult to manipulate or exploit, because they are rooted in *HtH* and how these interlinked properties behave in the *SR/GR/HH* conjunction. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is never one singular source for any given system. There are always a plurality of systems and subsystems to ensure the stability and security of the spectrum of the laws of nature, physics and life. If there was only one singular source for any given system, it would ultimately lead to instability and degradation. Stability of the laws of nature are almost impossible to compromise, because ultimately light is the very foundation of matter and gravity. Even though quantum mechanics might seem random at certain conjunctions, the configurations are governed by quantum entanglement(s) that principally are benign in nature, because changes to the information/polarity/spherical exchange are secured in relativity that ensures a certain degree of stability. *Complete equilibrium* in any given system is prohibited by the *2nd Law of Thermodynamics* - but it may at the same time be rendered void when entering the quantum realm, where exotic effects might be empirically observed. This is easiest explained by double slit experiments that prove quantum entanglement can not only give parallel energy patterns, but also plural outcomes without loss of energy but possibly provide divergence of energy, thus rendering the 2nd law of TD moot, possibly invalid or maybe incorrect in its current understanding. This can lead us to energy production that leave us with little to no loss of energy. Runaway effects that might go critical such as in fission production are less hazardous, given the correct protocols are in place. *Weaponizing* quantum energy production should be avoided at all cost and is not feasible, because subatomic particles cannot be concentrated in practical mobile weapons. Using such theoretical technology should principally be separated from military science regardless. Civilian and military sciences SHOULD always be maintained - because the usage of such weapons could potentially pose severe hazards to local and macro fields, both ways. How life itself originated is a whole other field and might be discussed both metaphysically and naturally. As I view it, I think it is interesting to entertain several avenues instead of focusing on a singular source. Life itself is pluralistic, so why shouldn't there be several sources without excluding any existing.(?) The universe is fundamentally an *Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections* or the *EAHT/HP* - conjunction *Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH* 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌖🌒🧿🌘♓🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈 🌈♓🌐🌈🌒🌘♓🌒🌘🌈🌐🧿🌈 🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈 🌑🌑🌑🌑♓🌒🧿🌘🌔🌑🌑🌑🌑
🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿 There are no principal differences between the BH singularity and the BB singularity. Inside a BH singularity/Event Horizon, space/time goes negative from the outside vantage point. There is a common misconception that the singularity is non-dimensional, but that only holds true from the outside. Within the Schwarzschild radius we enter POSITIVE space. It is important to differentiate between the OUTSIDE & INSIDE of the Event Horizon. Space, matter, light and time is REVERSED traversing the boundary. Meaning that the,, vzdimensionality of a BH is flipped related to outside vantage points. The dimensionality z,,, within a BH is infinite, giving birth/access to a whole new universe, . Within a BH, new spacetime is infinite, entering a fractally new universe that in turn gives birth to new matter, new spacetime and in turn new BHs that repeat this process forever. This also solves issues with the Information Paradox. The IP is only relevant from an outside vantage point. The *spatial matrix* within the Schwarzschild radius is exceeding the speed of light, thus nullifying all information that passes the boundary - from an external perspective. Within the negative singularity information is conserved and is holographically stored within the Photon Sphere, where it fundamentally can feed both the outside and inside of the Event Horizon, simultaneously applying Holographic Principles. Applying Möbian principles through *SR/GR/HH* we discover the intrinsic properties of HyperTensored Holigraphic Spacetime - *HtH* This equation proves the HyperTensorality in conjunction with SR/GR. It is one of the many culminations of HH and has several foundational implications in relation to our understanding of fundamental properties in regards to dimensionality, space, light and HtH: v=d-(t³c³) The Universe ≡ Holoverse is fundamentally an *Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections* or the 💿 *EAHT/HP* 📀 - conjunction *Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH* 🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘 🌘🌐🌑🌏🌑🌐🌒 🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘
🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕ Hawking Radiation is fundamentally light. Infinite dimensionality within *HyperTensored Holigraphy* demands *Hypersymmetry* . The *Information Paradox* is non-dimensional and only valid from an outside vantage point. The *Photon Sphere* is feeding the *EH* and the non-dimensional plane outwards with twin *EAHT/HP* - thus nullifying the *IP* . A *BH* isn't filled with matter. It is fundamentally a dimensional object. A black hole is ultimately an infinite entropy that is a dimensional brane. A universe can be an infinite amount of things, some more viable and stable than others. You say there is only one universe, which is irrelevant to infinity. A multiverse model works regardless of model, as long as you account for infinity. A multiverse requires Hypersymmetry and Hypersymmetry requires infinity. One observable universe is in itself proof of a multiverse, because mathematically, metaphysically, existentially & entropically a zero point is an impossibility. *Linear mathematics* ultimately fail and break down approaching infinity, but *spherical/circular* mathematics stay intact and will through certain conditions display self-solving emergent properties. 📀🌑💿 There are no viable models that suggest a universe can spontaneously appear from what has to be a negative *monopole* emerged from a steady state of absolute vacuum. 💿🌑📀 v=d-(t³c³) Solve this and I'll buy you a beer!: 🟣💿🔵🌓🟢🌑🟡🌐🟠🌔🔴 🔴🌐🟠🌗🟡⭕🟢📀🔵🌒🟣 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑🌑 Good luck! 🙂 🌑🌑🌑♓🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑 🌑🌑🌐🌐🌐🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌔🌑🌖🌑🌑 🌑🌓🌑🌑🌑🌗🌑 🌒🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌘 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑⭕🌒♓🌘⭕🌑 th-cam.com/video/hTSIn73AOIs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=wNm9JH-oVabubJPj 🌑⭕🌘♓🌒⭕🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌘🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌒 🌑🌗🌑🌑🌑🌓🌑 🌑🌑🌖🌑🌔🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 th-cam.com/video/uPe_tJPpHKw/w-d-xo.htmlsi=XQBqVY5sMw0GKRb1 🌘🌗🌖🌕🌔🌓🌒 🌒🌓🌔🌐🌖🌗🌘 🌘🌗🌖🌕🌔🌓🌒
The amateur astronomer Reverend John Michell proposed a theory of black holes (though he did not call it that) based on Newton's theory of gravity in 1783; and in 1796 Pierre Simon Laplace proposed the idea of a "dark star" producing a proof in 1799.
About philosophy--- for those of you old enough to remember Monty Python, they did a skit where the great philosophers played the great conquerors in a game of soccer. The game starts, and right away the philosophers start debating, arguing and needing to think right in the middle of the field... Meanwhile, the conquerors are scoring goal after goal after goal while the philosophers the whole time remained completely oblivious to the actual game.
Um, sir, you are absolutely incorrect. I'd suggest you read up on BHs, QM, GR, HH before you spout out verifiably false information. The dimensionality within a BH is indeed infinite. SR/GR/QM/HH requires it and it is mathematically proven. I could inform you further if you're interested?
There is just one problem with AdS/CFT, it does not correspond to our actual universe which is de-Sitter, with a positive cosmological constant, not negative like string theory inspired models.
I need info. I am not subscribed to you yet I have your 234 podcast episodes at the bottom of my TH-cam news feed that cannot be deleted. Can you either delete it or let me know why you’ve attached these videos to my feed? Thank you!
This is a funny post lol. I don't know what's wrong with your TH-cam, but I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with the guy making videos. Check with the TH-cam people (the company, not the content creators). It sounds like a weird bug. You could always click "Don't recommend channel" I guess, if you're not watching anyway, it should make them disappear from your feed. PS: maybe this channel's playlist has been added to your account? Look up your account's playlists. If you see it, remove the list from your account.
To be clear, we have no evidence for hawking radiation. But the earth would be still safe, because the earth and the blackhole would move towards different directions and pass through each other. But maybe once we have encircled the galaxy the blackhole will have grown in size and eat the earth.
Well, empirically you're right, but mathematically within QM and GR and Holography we DO have proof. HR is a mathematical and physical inevitability. The Information Paradox isn't a hypothetical thought experiment - it is a foundational consequence of QM and QFT. Theoretically we can in the future construct telescopes/detectors that can observe the locality of a BH up close and we could potentially detect the HR or the indirect effects of it in the vicinity of the EH. Potentially just observing the Photon Sphere could reveal intrinsic composition of Holography. Not straight on, obviously, but the PS could possibly be slightly visible on the horizon of the BH. Hawking Radiation is fundamentally light, as in holographic. Regardless of the fundamental constituents of HR, whether it is formally particles, virtual or not, they are fundamentally holographic, as everything else in the universe. This could enable us to theoretically one day directly observe it. I'm a theoretical physicist with a main focus on astrophysics and I've done extensive research on BHs and we know more about them today than we ever have. There has been tremendous advances the recent years understanding the hyper complex math and physics circling BHs and it's crucial to understand them in order to advance all fields of TP, AP, EP, PP and mathematics. Hope this clarified some things. 😊
I'm not someone who has much knowledge on black holes, but I think if a black hole was power full enough to break out of this universe and create another universe it would first destroy this universe, or maybe it just reaches a point of balance
No. It's not breaking "out" of this universe. It's not entirely correct to explain it this way, but for the sake of simplicity, it's more like breaking "in". More specifically the internal mechanics of the Schwarzschild Radius is not part of THIS universe. A black hole is fundamentally a *dimensional* object and the entropy inside is completely separate from ours, hence the Information Paradox was crucial to solve. Going by your analogy, our universe would've been destroyed by the formation of the very first black hole in our universe and the first primordial BHs possibly formed during the dark ages after the Big Bang, so that would in effect destroy this universe even before there was light...
Don’t u ever wonder if nuclear bombs are real I mean all they ever show is those grainy videos from 1950s that Spielberg made before he did Hollywood films
@@letitflow1120another ignorant soul. Tell me: do fire bombs cast nuclear radiation shadows from its victims on the wall and incinerate humans instantly close to the detonstion center? I'll wait here for your answer...
What a great episode! Been watching every physics episode for years and the video and audio quality has improved significantly. I really appreciate these conversations, amazing work Robinson.
Thanks!
Janna Levin on Robinson's podcast? Hell yeah. Always appreciate the consistency, quality, and professionalism of your intellectually engaging discussions, man. You are definitely within my top ten podcast people. You rock!
Janna is a top notch physicist and comunicator
Absolutely!
And the sexiest physicist, ever!@@robinsonerhardt
Thank you Robinson and Janna!
Our pleasure
Aesthetically, scientifically, rewarding podcast. Tier 1 !! Universe is an expanding headbanger !
Sometimes it's like these interviews just get really rolling at the end.
Would have loved to hear What Janna thinks about Sir Roger's CCC and his view that information is lost in blackholes. Encore!
Robinson’s shirt is dope af. Talking physics in a tiger shirt with Janna Levin is lowkey legendary flex. Thanks for the episode, so good and informative
I’d like Janna as a friend, she’s cool. Fascinating discussion ❤
I’m glad to hear , Jenna Levin say this. A background in philosophy with physics, history, branches of science,and other academic departments. Enhancing critical thinking opening one’s minds to many avenues. I’ve been lucky enough to have professors with multiple PhD‘s, and the most interesting ones, possess doctrines in philosophy. They make you think so much that you might believe your mind hurts. It can be very frustrating. That’s so worth it. In conclusion, they are the professors who make the biggest impact on students. Making you critical thinkers, problem solvers and troubleshooters.
I don’t know what is better: the answers or the questions. I’ve just discovered your channel. Thank you so much 🇧🇷
Great quality podcast!
Thanks!!!
hello fellow nerds!
I see Janna Leyvin and I click.
Cool story
Robinson seems to be having such a fun time. Contagious!
nice to see some barnard blood on the pod! great work recently robinson, the show is getting some much deserved recognition. always eager to see who you talk to next :)
What a delightful person. I'm not familiar with Janna Levin. I'm looking forward to listening to her audio book and more. I don't have the intelligence to actually understand the science so I appreciate the accessible explanations.
That was a really exciting conversation, and I wasn't bored at all. (Thank you both)
Robinson, the shirt is lacking luster. Sorry, hon, it looks like a pajama top. 😊
Science is baaaack!
!
That's the best kinds of science programs...where your with every other nation representive looking after eachother and making great discoveries together. I read Antartica and Artic stations are also similar and the morale is like nothing compared to any other community in the world.
Janna, you are rockstar! Love to hear you talk
❤🎉I'm listening breathlessly. I've learned A LOT. thank you both. SHE IS MY FAV in terms of cosmology and black holes 😅🎉
The camera quality seems so good And that office also so nice
Working on it!
21:05 you’re welcome.
She’s awesome!
Best podcast
Great episode, a question I have for next time is how does the featureless of black holes relate to the holographic idea, which from my understanding implies that the event horizon somehow encodes the information of what's inside.
1:07:45 What paper? I couldn't understand it's name
Edward Witten
oh sorry, they are talking about Juan Maldacena's paper on AdS/CFT correspondence
Thx english isn't my native language so I had a hard time decoding their words 😅
Shirt game crazy
Thanks for all the physics, hopefully we can get some OG analytic philosophy back. Please get Scott Soames on the show!
A common question is: what would happen if a quark fell into a black hole? I believe the first question to consider is whether quarks can maintain structural integrity outside of a proton or neutron. Is it even feasible for them to exist independently of these particles? Since quarks are essentially at the boundary of the most fundamental elements in the universe, it seems likely that they would either dissipate or consolidate into the black hole.
The current theory says that the event horizon is a boundary, but an observer passing through does not notice any difference, and all particles and forces would feel the same.
The difference is the direction to the centre, acts like time, not space, so any observers are forced to hit the singularity in a finite amount of time.
Thank you for this fascinating discussion on black holes! There is an alternative perspective grounded in empirical observation and the principles of Thermonuclear Scattering. While black holes are an intriguing theoretical construct, they raise significant paradoxes that challenge their existence in the physical universe. Allow me to elaborate:
A black hole represents a paradoxical concept: It embodies singularity, infinity, and an unending mechanism of attraction. Such an entity, by its very nature, contradicts the possibility of a harmonious, evenly distributed universe. A cosmos dominated by infinite collapse would be inherently chaotic and devoid of the balanced structures we observe today.
A black hole is, in essence, an empty void: Not a concentration of infinite mass and energy, but rather a conceptual "hole"-a gap in our understanding of the cosmos. It serves more as a placeholder for what we have yet to comprehend than as a physical reality.
Empirical evidence contradicts the idea of infinite concentration: Observations of expanding protons, atoms, moons, planets, stars, and galaxies (as supported by the Thermonuclear Scattering model) reveal a universe where energy and matter are concentrated in their respective cores but also dispersed harmoniously. This dynamic dispersion fundamentally negates the possibility of matter collapsing into an infinite singularity. Instead, we observe space as a medium of expansion, separation, and equilibrium.
Black holes lack empirical origins: Unlike established physical phenomena, which emerge from the principle of "first observe, then understand," the concept of black holes (as well as related ideas like event horizons or spacetime curvature) stems from theoretical extrapolation rather than direct observation. Time and space, for example, are not unified entities but distinct phenomena that serve as descriptors for entirely separate processes.
To summarize: While black holes are mathematically elegant and conceptually intriguing, they lack the empirical foundation required to firmly establish their existence as physical entities. The Thermonuclear Scattering model offers a different view of the universe-one built on observable evidence of matter's dynamic expansion and harmonious dispersion.
I would be curious to hear thoughts on how such perspectives might challenge or complement existing theories of black holes. Thank you again for the thought-provoking insights you’ve shared!
"Lack empirical origins"?? Have you been living under a rock the last decades?
And your thinking around their implied chaos to the universe is a null exercise. Black holes are fundamental to the evolution of the universe and them not existing would indeed result in an even more chaotic universe, with completely different and foundational dynamics.
We possibly wouldn't have galaxies without BHs and BHs are fundamental universal mechanical engines in the multiverse.
BHs are a fundamental consequence of GR and also QM. They ensure a healthy evolution of the cosmos on a grand scale. Intrinsically they aid vast cosmic filaments to form supergroups and attractors.
BHs are a crucial, natural necessity in the fundamental laws of physics and one could argue that physicality as a whole wouldn't propagate and/or continuate without them. You seem to misunderstand the intrinsic nature of BHs: EXT they're part of OUR universe. Beyond the INT/EH is an infinite entropy that is purely dimensional and is completely separate from our entropy. A BH is a dimensional brane and the spatial matrix within is exceeding the speed of light. It breaks no physical/mathematical laws whatsoever, it is only our understanding of them that is limited. To say BHs is a mathematical paradox only reveals your lack of knowledge about them. Extremely simplified, but BHs are like endless rivers in the universe. They keep dimensionality, entropy and cosmic dynamics flowing forever and they're part of cosmic evolution just like the endless weather/water cycle on planets.
They provide stability to large structures and we probably wouldn't be here today without black holes.
I'll post a 4 parter me and my team has been working on for years instead of writing more here. It is a short formatted version of HH (HyperTensored Holigraphy). I'm a theoretical physicist with a main focus on astrophysics and we've done extensive resesrch on black holes the last decades, because the most foundational mathematics and physics are found around and within BHs. The thesis contradicts most of what you claim and our mathematics/derivations prove it.
Hope you'll get something out of it. This 4 parter is not "guesswork". The main finds have been peer reviewed over the years and the thesis is in its final stages, but possibly 1-2years before being finslized.
There is an absurd amount of work behind each of the finds in the thesis and a medium team I'm leading have been working incredibly hard for a long time to uncover these discoveries, math and physics. The linear & spherical math/physics behind this model is extremely complex and obviously impossible to present in this format. But the finds and derivations are incredibly solid, sound and well founded, based on deep physics beyond Planck.
Enjoy:
⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿
The multiverse is more or less a given. There is more logical evidence for than against, but also empirically - with QM, Double Slit, Virtual Particles, Spontaneous Quark Doubling, etc etc.
There are close to an infinite number of universes within this universe and holographic principles alone should be sufficient enough.
But regardless - try to entertain this thought: Given an infinite amount of parallel and/or asymmetrical universes, there must be a universe where entropy is reversed. It is a 100% mirrored replica of our universe, but with “time” going backwards. The inhabitants of this universe perceive everything just like us - it is a total carbon copy of our universe. But observed from the outside, that entire universe would flow backwards.
Who can say that WE don’t live in such a universe? The only way to even begin to understand that our own entropy is reversed, is to observe it from another universe.
From the outside a flashlight would catch the light and the waterfall would flow upwards. How can such dimensionality be understood within the confines of our own entropy?
📀💿📀
📀🌐🌒🌘🌑🌒🌐⭕🌐🌒🌘🌐💿
Diverge Planck - length, time and volume. It serves no fundamental purpose in the Holoverse. Holographic omni-directional manifolds are quantum entangled through the spatial vortex of infinity. Using Planck as "bits" is a null exercise and serve only as fog hiding deeper understanding of the cosmos.
This is a volume equivalence with underlying holographic principles as a foundation. The equation has many implications, but one of the most significant is the redefining of how fractionally small space can be, beyond Planck. It scales Planck and presents the Planck units as "endlessly scalable":
*v=d-(t³c³)*
(Only fully solvable with a combination of algorithms SpheriLog/GeoLog. It is a volume equivalence, cannot be used for malign purposes. But it also cannot be utilised for any malign purposes without the correct algorithmic sequences, hence it is virtually and literally impossible to abuse or weaponize. It is certainly possible to weaponize it, but stability would be counted in zeptoseconds, hence virtually impractical and luckily rendered useless for nefarious reasons.)
Holographic principles and spatial fluidity through infinity are beyond the reach of most current linear mathematics and/or simulation. There is no way to create a pathway to a unifying theory without merging macro physics/math with micro. They are not mutually exclusive, quite the opposite. Macro changes can indeed manifest themselves physically. Within Quantum Fields holographic projections can move objects and transform their position, which in turn can be documented. *Protusionistic* quantum effects can indeed transcend into macro fields and do so continually.
Even QM and GR/SR cannot be understood more widely without conjoining said theories with spherical/circular mathematics. Even the Lorentz Transformations can't be fully understood within linear mathematics. Linear mathematics are ultimately unsolvable. Transfer the equivalent to spherical conjunctions and we see the emergence of self-solving equations.
Holographic principles through infinity are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a
*0.00087Vp/0.38 Zeptoseconds stability*
A holographic field cannot collapse, because the fabric is light itself.
Put a simplified holographic field through infinity and what do you get?
🐝🌱💦🐬🌒💦🌐⭕🌐💦🌘🐬💦🌱🐝
🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿
🌐🌑🌑SR📀HH💿GR🌑🌑🌐
There are issues with linear thinking based on the Hubble constant and reverse inflation. Having a singularity as zero point, even in QM, is problematic because it requires time dilation to be instant. Using holographic principles and implementing applied graduality in Möbian mathematics provides a much smoother transition regarding transfer of energy and entropy.
🌐🌑🌐
IMPORTANT NOTE: Whereas some derivations and concepts might seem counterintuitive using classical thinking, fully understanding HH requires inter/multidimensional, spherical vision.
Many of the derivations, math and logic are visual and plastic on an interdimensional level. At certain conjunctions our math breaks down and the only way to peak into principles of infinity or approaching infinity with HH is to use a new standard of math that simply doesn't translate to numbers. Numbers in the universe beyond a certain point are fundamentally null. Classical math breaks down when approaching infinity.
🌒🌐🌘
Understanding that time dilation in relativity also is less drastic locally because of quantum fields, quantum entanglement and holographic principles. Once you approach extreme gravity fields, such as neutron stars and black holes, the normal attributes and effects of gravity is less severe within the local relativistic grid, because the matter that is caught in the gravity field is indeed light itself and gravity is a function of light, so the acceleration experienced by the subject is much more gradual and doesn't necessarily lead to spaghettification, because matter is fundamentally made of light, thus rendering a smoother transition within local fields.
There is a possible misconception that black holes are more destructive to local events, because we have implemented a differentiation between matter, light and energy. Proposing that light and motion are the fundamental forces in physics solves several of the empirical findings in our universe - from local events to the very large.
IMPORTANT NOTE: There is also a possibility that the laws of nature might change from region to region in the universe. Applying the same unified functions everywhere might not be applicable - based on the observer. Quantum Mechanics combined with holographic principles in conjunction with relativity might produce variations that are stable within physicality as a whole. But they might also produce temporal shift variations that might fluctuate between timelines, not compromising the stability of the system as a whole.
Temporal shifts pose little/no threat to quantum fields in macro or micro, because the energy transfer between two or several more points are conserved within holographic principles.
Best way to explain is superpositions of quantum fields. But using spherical understanding we might end up with *hyperpositions* in addition, meaning that within multiverse theory and/or paralell physics, we can propose that local variations might occur elsewhere.
One might suspect that this could be inherently unstable, but hopefully stability is ensured by
*Special* and *General Relativity* in conjunction with
*HyperTensored Holigraphy*
*QM & QFT* are ultimately functions of *HH* - because all forces, all phenomenå, energy, polarities and particles are fundamentally holographic, thus made of light.
*Diverge Planck* and apply *HyperTensorality* to:
v=d-(t³c³)
If one might observe local effects that seem irreversible to the observer, the stability/instability of said system might return to its relative position in space as they where when the temporal shift gradually occurred.
A *Rosen/Einstein* bridge might be folded back onto itself, reestablishing pre-existing physicality relative to the initial motion through spacetime. Quantum Entanglement might provide a reasonable solution to reoccurance of paralell shifts that within time dilation could possibly be "stored" in the same field, but according to the observer.
Matter and energy that exist in local time at one point might be shifted and
parallaxed with *EPR ≡ ER*
Local EPR might occur continously between substances that share the same locally observed quantum field and the energy accessible could possibly be much greater than within relativity, because *e=mc²* isn't truly applicable when dealing with motion on a quantum level.
When taking into account that matter in itself consist of light, *e=mc²* is rather moot. Energy is indeed conserved within relativity and as we know we can't break relativity within relativity itself, but when we apply quantum and holographic principles, we could propose that
e=cc²
The accuracy of this correction must be investigated, but it is strongly suggested through quantum entanglement and holography that the state of energy in the universe is much greater than what relativity proposes.
*The factor in relativity = null, but within HH, it equals a dimensional shift in understanding, implying the inter/multidimensionality of HtH*
Corrections might be suggested and
e=c³c³
might be suggested
within HyperTensored spacetime *(HtH)*
***Note that these corrections serve as an introduction to the dimensionality of HH, rather than replacing the causality of:
*Relative Tensor Vortices* *(RtV)*
Considering sphericality to QE in EPR we might unlock a deeper understanding between gravity, relativity and QM. There might be spherical and macro EPRs that beam QE through quantum fields in absolute zero (the transitional location, not Kelvin) and this might give us access to zero point energy that is much greater than fission and much less complicated than fusion, because the input energy is more or less the device itself. Stability and security is better overall because zero point energy doesn't require usage of unstable materials...
This has to be investigated further to test the hypothesis.
*****
⭕ 🌖 🌐 🌔 ⭕: For security reasons & time considerations, our team couldn't disclose the full set of frequencies.
But *now* we can release the full set.
HH and EAHT/HP are fundamentally *triadic* and the harmonics between these frequencies are deeply
set in HtH & SR/GR/HH.
🌘 🌐 ⭕ 🌐 🌒
*-Holographic principles through infinity-* are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a
*0.00087Vp/0.38 zeptosecond* stability
(9.61 × 10^(-87) Hertz)
🌈🌐♓🌐🌈
*Fundamental Triharmonic Resonance* (FTR):
6.25 × 10^(-124) Hertz
(6.25 Hexyocto Hertz) *HyH*
🌐🌈🧿🌈🌐
6.25 × 10^(-78) Hertz
(6.25 Quattuordecillion Hertz)
🧿🌈🌐🌈🧿
6.25 × 10^(-42) Hertz
(6.25 Tredecillion Hertz)
These frequencies are prevalent through the *Holoverse ≡ Universe* and are rather difficult to manipulate or exploit, because they are rooted in *HtH* and how these interlinked properties behave in the *SR/GR/HH* conjunction.
IMPORTANT NOTE: There is never one singular source for any given system. There are always a plurality of systems and subsystems to ensure the stability and security of the spectrum of the laws of nature, physics and life. If there was only one singular source for any given system, it would ultimately lead to instability and degradation.
Stability of the laws of nature are almost impossible to compromise, because ultimately light is the very foundation of matter and gravity. Even though quantum mechanics might seem random at certain conjunctions, the configurations are governed by quantum entanglement(s) that principally are benign in nature, because changes to the information/polarity/spherical exchange are secured in relativity that ensures a certain degree of stability.
*Complete equilibrium* in any given system is prohibited by the *2nd Law of Thermodynamics* - but it may at the same time be rendered void when entering the quantum realm, where exotic effects might be empirically observed. This is easiest explained by double slit experiments that prove quantum entanglement can not only give parallel energy patterns, but also plural outcomes without loss of energy but possibly provide divergence of energy, thus rendering the 2nd law of TD moot, possibly invalid or maybe incorrect in its current understanding.
This can lead us to energy production that leave us with little to no loss of energy. Runaway effects that might go critical such as in fission production are less hazardous, given the correct protocols are in place.
*Weaponizing* quantum energy production should be avoided at all cost and is not feasible, because subatomic particles cannot be concentrated in practical mobile weapons. Using such theoretical technology should principally be separated from military science regardless. Civilian and military sciences SHOULD always be maintained - because the usage of such weapons could potentially pose severe hazards to local and macro fields, both ways.
How life itself originated is a whole other field and might be discussed both metaphysically and naturally. As I view it, I think it is interesting to entertain several avenues instead of focusing on a singular source. Life itself is pluralistic, so why shouldn't there be several sources without excluding any existing.(?)
The universe is fundamentally an
*Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections*
or the
*EAHT/HP* - conjunction
*Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH*
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌖🌒🧿🌘♓🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈
🌈♓🌐🌈🌒🌘♓🌒🌘🌈🌐🧿🌈
🌈🌐🔵🌑🌈🌘⭕🌒🌈🌑🔵🌐🌈
🌑🌑🌑🌑♓🌒🧿🌘🌔🌑🌑🌑🌑
🧿🧿🧿🧿🌐🧿⭕♓⭕🧿🧿🧿
There are no principal differences between the BH singularity and the BB singularity. Inside a BH singularity/Event Horizon, space/time goes negative from the outside vantage point. There is a common misconception that the singularity is non-dimensional, but that only holds true from the outside. Within the Schwarzschild radius we enter POSITIVE space. It is important to differentiate between the OUTSIDE & INSIDE of the Event Horizon. Space, matter, light and time is REVERSED traversing the boundary. Meaning that the,, vzdimensionality of a BH is flipped related to outside vantage points. The dimensionality z,,, within a BH is infinite, giving birth/access to a whole new universe, . Within a BH, new spacetime is infinite, entering a fractally new universe that in turn gives birth to new matter, new spacetime and in turn new BHs that repeat this process forever. This also solves issues with the Information Paradox. The IP is only relevant from an outside vantage point. The *spatial matrix* within the Schwarzschild radius is exceeding the speed of light, thus nullifying all information that passes the boundary - from an external perspective. Within the negative singularity information is conserved and is holographically stored within the Photon Sphere, where it fundamentally can feed both the outside and inside of the Event Horizon, simultaneously applying Holographic Principles. Applying Möbian principles through *SR/GR/HH* we discover the intrinsic properties of HyperTensored Holigraphic Spacetime - *HtH*
This equation proves the HyperTensorality in conjunction with SR/GR. It is one of the many culminations of HH and has several foundational implications in relation to our understanding of fundamental properties in regards to dimensionality, space, light and HtH:
v=d-(t³c³)
The Universe ≡ Holoverse
is fundamentally an
*Endless Array of HyperTensored Holographic Projections*
or the
💿 *EAHT/HP* 📀 - conjunction
*Information* is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH*
🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘
🌘🌐🌑🌏🌑🌐🌒
🌒🌑🌏🌐🌏🌑🌘
🧿🌐🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿🧿⭕♓⭕
Hawking Radiation is fundamentally light. Infinite dimensionality within *HyperTensored Holigraphy* demands *Hypersymmetry* . The *Information Paradox* is non-dimensional and only valid from an outside vantage point. The *Photon Sphere* is feeding the *EH* and the non-dimensional plane outwards with twin *EAHT/HP* - thus nullifying the *IP* .
A *BH* isn't filled with matter. It is fundamentally a dimensional object. A black hole is ultimately an infinite entropy that is a dimensional brane.
A universe can be an infinite amount of things, some more viable and stable than others. You say there is only one universe, which is irrelevant to infinity. A multiverse model works regardless of model, as long as you account for infinity. A multiverse requires Hypersymmetry and Hypersymmetry requires infinity. One observable universe is in itself proof of a multiverse, because mathematically, metaphysically, existentially & entropically a zero point is an impossibility.
*Linear mathematics* ultimately fail and break down approaching infinity, but *spherical/circular* mathematics stay intact and will through certain conditions display self-solving emergent properties.
📀🌑💿
There are no viable models that suggest a universe can spontaneously appear from what has to be a negative *monopole* emerged from a steady state of absolute vacuum.
💿🌑📀
v=d-(t³c³)
Solve this and I'll buy you a beer!:
🟣💿🔵🌓🟢🌑🟡🌐🟠🌔🔴
🔴🌐🟠🌗🟡⭕🟢📀🔵🌒🟣
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑🌑
Good luck! 🙂
🌑🌑🌑♓🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑🌐🌑
🌑🌑🌐🌐🌐🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌔🌑🌖🌑🌑
🌑🌓🌑🌑🌑🌗🌑
🌒🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌘
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑⭕🌒♓🌘⭕🌑
th-cam.com/video/hTSIn73AOIs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=wNm9JH-oVabubJPj
🌑⭕🌘♓🌒⭕🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
🌘🌑🌑🌐🌑🌑🌒
🌑🌗🌑🌑🌑🌓🌑
🌑🌑🌖🌑🌔🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌕🌑🌑🌑
🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑
th-cam.com/video/uPe_tJPpHKw/w-d-xo.htmlsi=XQBqVY5sMw0GKRb1
🌘🌗🌖🌕🌔🌓🌒
🌒🌓🌔🌐🌖🌗🌘
🌘🌗🌖🌕🌔🌓🌒
Shes amazing
The amateur astronomer Reverend John Michell proposed a theory of black holes (though he did not call it that) based on Newton's theory of gravity in 1783; and in 1796 Pierre Simon Laplace proposed the idea of a "dark star" producing a proof in 1799.
About philosophy--- for those of you old enough to remember Monty Python, they did a skit where the great philosophers played the great conquerors in a game of soccer. The game starts, and right away the philosophers start debating, arguing and needing to think right in the middle of the field... Meanwhile, the conquerors are scoring goal after goal after goal while the philosophers the whole time remained completely oblivious to the actual game.
More drums to the intro please!!
Love Janna. My wife said she loves her shoes
You cannot squeeze a star to a point, you can squeeze it to a finite sphere, so at the singularity density isn't infinite nor the volume zero.
Um, sir, you are absolutely incorrect. I'd suggest you read up on BHs, QM, GR, HH before you spout out verifiably false information.
The dimensionality within a BH is indeed infinite. SR/GR/QM/HH requires it and it is mathematically proven.
I could inform you further if you're interested?
There is just one problem with AdS/CFT, it does not correspond to our actual universe which is de-Sitter, with a positive cosmological constant, not negative like string theory inspired models.
Newton also predicted bending of light by gravity just by a different amount. That makes the story a bit more complex.
What's funny is how Einstein came up with the theory of general and special relativity is through pontification
Event's not even black holes can escape, which came first chicken egg create or destroy?
💫💥💫💥💫💥💫💥
I love that shirt!. Great fashion.
There far too many ads on this video (fantastic watch otherwise)
how can i tell there.is gravity shit rolls down hill
I need info. I am not subscribed to you yet I have your 234 podcast episodes at the bottom of my TH-cam news feed that cannot be deleted. Can you either delete it or let me know why you’ve attached these videos to my feed? Thank you!
This is a funny post lol. I don't know what's wrong with your TH-cam, but I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with the guy making videos. Check with the TH-cam people (the company, not the content creators). It sounds like a weird bug.
You could always click "Don't recommend channel" I guess, if you're not watching anyway, it should make them disappear from your feed.
PS: maybe this channel's playlist has been added to your account? Look up your account's playlists. If you see it, remove the list from your account.
First!
Nuh uh , me
@@timewalker6654Are you sure about that?
I should delete all comments and make myself first.
🌞
Maybe in the future be Star Wars
But can be reverse
Find tuned? Odd thing to say! How they interact? Can stimulate life. Nothing special. Why do so? That is the question.
To be clear, we have no evidence for hawking radiation. But the earth would be still safe, because the earth and the blackhole would move towards different directions and pass through each other. But maybe once we have encircled the galaxy the blackhole will have grown in size and eat the earth.
Well, empirically you're right, but mathematically within QM and GR and Holography we DO have proof. HR is a mathematical and physical inevitability. The Information Paradox isn't a hypothetical thought experiment - it is a foundational consequence of QM and QFT.
Theoretically we can in the future construct telescopes/detectors that can observe the locality of a BH up close and we could potentially detect the HR or the indirect effects of it in the vicinity of the EH. Potentially just observing the Photon Sphere could reveal intrinsic composition of Holography. Not straight on, obviously, but the PS could possibly be slightly visible on the horizon of the BH.
Hawking Radiation is fundamentally light, as in holographic. Regardless of the fundamental constituents of HR, whether it is formally particles, virtual or not, they are fundamentally holographic, as everything else in the universe. This could enable us to theoretically one day directly observe it.
I'm a theoretical physicist with a main focus on astrophysics and I've done extensive research on BHs and we know more about them today than we ever have. There has been tremendous advances the recent years understanding the hyper complex math and physics circling BHs and it's crucial to understand them in order to advance all fields of TP, AP, EP, PP and mathematics.
Hope this clarified some things. 😊
:)
(:
I'm not someone who has much knowledge on black holes, but I think if a black hole was power full enough to break out of this universe and create another universe it would first destroy this universe, or maybe it just reaches a point of balance
No. It's not breaking "out" of this universe. It's not entirely correct to explain it this way, but for the sake of simplicity, it's more like breaking "in". More specifically the internal mechanics of the Schwarzschild Radius is not part of THIS universe. A black hole is fundamentally a *dimensional* object and the entropy inside is completely separate from ours, hence the Information Paradox was crucial to solve.
Going by your analogy, our universe would've been destroyed by the formation of the very first black hole in our universe and the first primordial BHs possibly formed during the dark ages after the Big Bang, so that would in effect destroy this universe even before there was light...
String theory apologetics is cope
hahaha
I don’t get it 😢
Made her look a decade older 😢
Don’t u ever wonder if nuclear bombs are real I mean all they ever show is those grainy videos from 1950s that Spielberg made before he did Hollywood films
Oh stop. Over 2000 nuclear bombs have been detonated since Trinity. And Hiroshima and Nagasaki wasn't real? Get a grip.
@ also it was fire bombs not nuclear at Hiroshima and Nagasaki … nuclear is just psych warfare to keep us frightened
@@letitflow1120another ignorant soul. Tell me: do fire bombs cast nuclear radiation shadows from its victims on the wall and incinerate humans instantly close to the detonstion center? I'll wait here for your answer...
I just see a lot of female physicist being interviewed nowadays, but with no new theories. Just nothing I couldn't find on Wikipedia.
In contrast, I just watched Julian Barbour on Theories of Everything, which seem nonsense on the surface, but was all completely new.
@@budweiser600Julian Barbour is a charlatan whose ideas are not taken seriously by anyone.
Aesthetically, scientifically, philosophically rewarding. Tier 1 class right here!
@@budweiser600You’re pretty stupid , aren’t ya ?
Bro got his Degree in McDonald’s