Newton's Principia Explained Part I

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 49

  • @TheGlass50
    @TheGlass50 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you so much Mr. Rubinstein. This was extremely helpful.

  • @mickwilson99
    @mickwilson99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can offer no higher recommendation that my refernce to this series in my response to a question on Quora: "It's a bit of a slog but does not involve any arguments beyond about a year 11 grasp of Greek geometry - espcially conics a la Apollonius - and, IMHO as a physics major and long-term and possibly physics nerd, it stands out as the best and least hand-waving explanation of Newton's derivation that I've found. It also wonderfully highlights how Greek mathematical thinking worked so beautifully using only ratios and concordances, with no relience on irrational quantities or algebraic analysis. Highly recommended!"

  • @wfla2285
    @wfla2285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm thinking of putting together a hypothesis (web notation) tour through this and Galileo's dialogue.

  • @maraizato7
    @maraizato7 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for your work. Very well made. 👌🏽

  • @Gustavus_Cartanus
    @Gustavus_Cartanus 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What is the name of the website/app you used in the video?

  • @PSKL1974
    @PSKL1974 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is amazing work of enlightenment for next generations! I'm interested in taking this massage to Brazilian kids. Would you mind sharing the tool you used for the animation of your video series?

    • @ThaiyaWaronja
      @ThaiyaWaronja 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Geometer's Sketchpad version 5

  • @johnbob9551
    @johnbob9551 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, Mr. Rubinstein. So sophisticated.

  • @royercrafter
    @royercrafter 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    that was so cool bro tbh its easier to make sense of things when you see it as a graph

  • @natalia.paixao
    @natalia.paixao 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you, was very enlightening.

  • @mofritz6834
    @mofritz6834 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best lesson ever! Thanks Mr. Rubinstein! -sea burger

  • @dexpip1
    @dexpip1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    good explanation

  • @German1184
    @German1184 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you! Good job.

  • @PasajeroDelToro
    @PasajeroDelToro 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One thing missing...SOURCE: andyborne.com/math/library-storage/philosophiae-naturalis-principia-mathematica.pdf

    • @PasajeroDelToro
      @PasajeroDelToro 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You won't be able to go straight to the file btw. Navigate through the site.

  • @vtembekar
    @vtembekar 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    sir can u please tell me which software did you use for geometry drawings and their analysis

    • @nymathteacher
      @nymathteacher  10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sure. I used The Geometer's Sketchpad version 5

  • @nmc2052
    @nmc2052 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir there are only 8 tutorials on principia? Plz plz upload more vedios you are great

    • @nymathteacher
      @nymathteacher  4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That's pretty much all I know about the Principia. You should get that book I mention in the videos if you want to learn more about it. I'm glad you like the videos, it took months to make this series so I'm happy that some people are learning from it.

    • @nmc2052
      @nmc2052 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nymathteacher sir thank you very much you are genius

  • @JustinL614
    @JustinL614 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for breaking it down. Not an easy read.

  • @JackMoranRain
    @JackMoranRain 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome, thank you so much

  • @leica_sl2
    @leica_sl2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @4.39 & @4.45 a small but big point , A planet can't be in 2 places at once.One other thing
    form a triangle. in the period of time around the sun and the opposiite side at 180 deg should be the same , taking into account the speed of the planet.Which is the case above.

  • @Demagogue777
    @Demagogue777 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks! I really appreciated this.

  • @josephpeter6796
    @josephpeter6796 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Sir, the videos are grt. Thks
    I had a query ....... how did u create the animations ..... power point or something else ?

    • @nymathteacher
      @nymathteacher  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I used Geometer's Sketchpad

    • @josephpeter6796
      @josephpeter6796 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nymathteacher Dear Gary, thks 4 sharing the resource. Once again, I referred to the book you mentioned and I understand and appreciate the effort you have put in to bring this to us.

  • @peterxyz3541
    @peterxyz3541 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you’re explaining calculus, I’m subscribing!!! 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

    • @nymathteacher
      @nymathteacher  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! I have enough math to keep me busy before Calc so I don' t think I'll be opening that box up anytime soon.

  • @st105900
    @st105900 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks for the explanation :D

  • @feynstein1004
    @feynstein1004 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Don't we have literal English translations of the book?

    • @monsieurali8484
      @monsieurali8484 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mathematical_Principles_of_Natural_Philosophy

  • @guraski
    @guraski 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    yea, latin only has a hard "c" sound

  • @Tobi-bi3lx
    @Tobi-bi3lx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir i have a question
    1 : in 1800 which book for physics did people studied at that time .
    2: from which books did Einstein and other physicist studied physics (all major books)

    • @nymathteacher
      @nymathteacher  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm not sure. There is a great biography about Einstein by Walter Isaacson, it has a little about Einstein's influences, but I don't know much about the history of physics, I'm more of a math person and wanted to understand this geometric proof of this famous theorem from physics.

    • @vedanshvedansh844
      @vedanshvedansh844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can see you want to begin your study from those books up and in doing so hope to uncover the greatest mysteries the world has ever heard or seen😅😅.
      Good luck in advance!
      Do tell me when you have identified those books from 1800. Me too curious. #Tobi

  • @Heraclit33
    @Heraclit33 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    tnk you very much

  • @bartholomeosphinx4382
    @bartholomeosphinx4382 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    guraski: Italians pronounce the latin C as chi, but they are wrong, of course :)

  • @bobbyharper8710
    @bobbyharper8710 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wondered the pronunciation of Principia

  • @pilufrog2340
    @pilufrog2340 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even though I may appear pedantic, please note that first name of the Italian scientist is Galileo and the surname is Galilei. So as you don't refer to the English scientist as ISAAC but as NEWTON you should refere to the Italian scientist as Galilei and not as Galileo.

  • @broncojonnes
    @broncojonnes 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    some dodgy editing going on in there yo

  • @DrAyson-eh1ip
    @DrAyson-eh1ip 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    He used the ecclesiastical pronunciation (princhipia) instead of the classical pronunciation (prinkipia) no biggie

  • @KA-0170
    @KA-0170 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I.Newton was a genius

  • @whiteliketar
    @whiteliketar 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think it is pronounced 'prinkipia'? not prinshipia

  • @factorylad5071
    @factorylad5071 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    s s" s'' s'''

  • @brookestephen
    @brookestephen ปีที่แล้ว +2

    just fyi: proportional is ∝