The uploader is oversimplifying the play. In a volleyball volley, the ball is controlled by the volleyer in such a way that the ball changes directions so completely that momentarily it experiences 0 velocity. This is different from redirecting a ball (ricocheting it at an angle as in a deflection) such that it never ceases to move. However, it does appear that the player scored the basket before time expired. Therefore, it may be more accurate to challenge the rulebook's view that a player cannot "control" the ball in under .3 seconds before attempting a shot in regulation than to suggest the refs simply blew the call because they did not follow the rules.
Thanks for commenting! The video is utilizing the definitions and rules of what is provided to make decisions in the game. The combination of definitions and rules paired with the case book (scenarios) is how you determine the proper use of the rule. Your volleyball example is not applicable and actually complicates things which is not necessary. Referencing a completely different sport does not help in these situations. Control is not a black and white call. Basketball has some rules that are black and white and some that are grey. The pairing of casebooks/interpretations with definitions and rules reduces the inconsistency in applications of rules among officials. The original rule on tapping of the ball is clear and has been researched countless times to see how much time is required to make that play. It is called the Trent Tucker rule if you would like to learn more about how the rule came to be and why it is an effective way to regulate shots for under a second.
Please feature the Double Foul FIBA ruling...
Hello! Unsportsmanlike foul is currently being made but I will put double foul as the next video after to complete! Thanks!
That was clearly a basket the referees needed 🤓
The uploader is oversimplifying the play. In a volleyball volley, the ball is controlled by the volleyer in such a way that the ball changes directions so completely that momentarily it experiences 0 velocity. This is different from redirecting a ball (ricocheting it at an angle as in a deflection) such that it never ceases to move.
However, it does appear that the player scored the basket before time expired. Therefore, it may be more accurate to challenge the rulebook's view that a player cannot "control" the ball in under .3 seconds before attempting a shot in regulation than to suggest the refs simply blew the call because they did not follow the rules.
Thanks for commenting! The video is utilizing the definitions and rules of what is provided to make decisions in the game. The combination of definitions and rules paired with the case book (scenarios) is how you determine the proper use of the rule. Your volleyball example is not applicable and actually complicates things which is not necessary. Referencing a completely different sport does not help in these situations.
Control is not a black and white call. Basketball has some rules that are black and white and some that are grey. The pairing of casebooks/interpretations with definitions and rules reduces the inconsistency in applications of rules among officials. The original rule on tapping of the ball is clear and has been researched countless times to see how much time is required to make that play. It is called the Trent Tucker rule if you would like to learn more about how the rule came to be and why it is an effective way to regulate shots for under a second.
Very nice
Cool!
Do you know if St. Olaf appealed?
Unfortunately, I do not!