CSE PRELIMS 2021 || QUESTION DISCUSSION || INDIAN POLITY || SET C || SHUBHRA RANJAN

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 254

  • @SSR3010
    @SSR3010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    Aryan Khan’s drug case helped me to solve the question on Judicial Custody correctly.

  • @fatimaninjabegam875
    @fatimaninjabegam875 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Q1. 4:09
    Q2. 6:11
    Q3. 12:11
    Q4. 13:03
    Q5. 14:25
    Q6. 16:33
    Q7. 18:52
    Q8. 21:29
    Q9. 22:16
    Q10. 23:26
    Q11. 25:09
    Q12. 26:08
    Q13. 27:49
    Q14. 29:03
    Q15. 30:25
    Q16. 33:57
    Q17. 35:00
    Q18. 35:31
    Q19.

  • @BlackWhite-bn5xc
    @BlackWhite-bn5xc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    @34:52 Cabinet Secretariat is directly under the charge of Prime Minister of India. The second statement is correct.

  • @nelsoncordeiro9
    @nelsoncordeiro9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I remember , all topics she discussed here is from her class.. Trust me. She is best for Polity.

  • @RajeshDas-uq1xc
    @RajeshDas-uq1xc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Don't panic guys. Talked to many people who have cleared prelims even earlier. They are scoring in the range of 80/90. V few people scoring high. So my prediction is cut off going to be surprisingly low around 80-85 for general ( 77/78 obc, 72-74 EWS) so start your mains preparation right away. Don't wait till the results.

  • @kumarnachiketa1258
    @kumarnachiketa1258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Mam does preamble represents constitutional status? On 26th Jan 1950 is it like that if secular and socialist words are not mentioned in the Preamble, does it mean that socialist and secular is missing from our constitution?

  • @studyeverything5955
    @studyeverything5955 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shandaar discussion
    Damdaar questions 🙏🙏

  • @soundscapes6914
    @soundscapes6914 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    AND THE LEGEND CONTINUES!!!!! CANT BELIEVE ITS BEEN 10 YEARS SINCE I BECAME HER STUDENT!!!

  • @gauravwatchyoutube
    @gauravwatchyoutube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Subhra ranjan mam is a gem of polity ❤

  • @mayankverma8984
    @mayankverma8984 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ma'am! With all due respect i want to differ on some points-
    1)they asked the constituion status of country not the preamble's status
    2)how we can say that on 26th January 1950 india was neither secular nor socialist, when we had article 25, 26(secular) and 39(b)(c)(socialist)
    3) even we dont have federalism word in our preamble still we are federal in natire as per schedule 7 and rajya sabha itself
    4) if its only about words then word secular is used in artcle 25
    5)a constitution, which has made by dr ambedkar in light of pandit nehru, was neither secular nor socialist. How this can be possible

  • @Boxerr007
    @Boxerr007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    If this is so..
    Then all persons also includes the persons of enemy nation also..
    So, does the Right to Property is available for enemy aliens also?

    • @pradnya3820
      @pradnya3820 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Smart objection tho

    • @siddharthsharmaBelieve
      @siddharthsharmaBelieve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This would complicate issue of Kashmir as well maybe this is why questions was asked.

    • @hannaanmalik2542
      @hannaanmalik2542 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No man, the article clearly mentions, " save by authority of law ." For enemy properties, the act is already there. It will act as an exception in this case.

    • @ayushiparsheera
      @ayushiparsheera 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes enemy property comes under home ministry .. Govt auctions it🤣🤣🤣

    • @parakhp9498
      @parakhp9498 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly answer is 1 only

  • @satyamsinha4693
    @satyamsinha4693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In constitutional status of state wala question ma'am is relying on status of preamble on 26th january, 1950. which was not the question. It asks constitutional status and supreme court in Delhi Transport Corporation v DTC mazdoor Congress has clearly mentioned that "42nd amendment only made Something explicit which was already embedded in Indian constitution" and then they have discussed the next clause of preamble.

  • @aravindgullepelli5031
    @aravindgullepelli5031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Tq madam
    80% of my questions were done right

  • @Ad-sk2ej
    @Ad-sk2ej 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I got confused about the "constitutional status" question because the constitutional was secular from the very first day, it was only explicitly mentioned as so in the 42nd amendment act...

    • @massoneman
      @massoneman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did the same.

    • @Ordinary_vibes.17
      @Ordinary_vibes.17 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Answer will be D

    • @अर्थात्-छ1ष
      @अर्थात्-छ1ष 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anwer will be definitely “D” because he Supreme Court of India in the 1994 case S. R. Bommai v. Union of India established the fact that India was secular since the formation of the republic. Also article 38 has characters of Socialism ab initio.

  • @mr13d34
    @mr13d34 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    With reference to Indian judiciary, consider the following statements :
    1. Any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India can be called back to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the President of India. A High Court in India has the power to review its own judgement as the Supreme Court does.
    2. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
    (a) 1 only
    (b) 2 only
    (c) Both 1 and 2
    (d) Neither 1 nor 2
    Its answer is B (2 only) and Madom said both (Read M.Laxikant 6th edition page no. 26.4)

  • @catdealer9932
    @catdealer9932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Right to property is a constitutional right not a legal right ,UPSC has asked such questions before and they do differentiate between 'legal' & " constitutional"

    • @massoneman
      @massoneman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right to Property is both Constitutional as well as Legal right.

  • @Anjanachoudhary123
    @Anjanachoudhary123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dear Maa'm
    Though you are a renowned teacher but please consider my opinion.
    In the question of retured judge, constitution article 128 provide that CJI can " request" the retired person to sit and act as a judge.
    But upsc question said that CJI can "called back" the retired judge.
    I think both are different things.
    Request need consent but called back means an order and no consent is necessary there.
    If you are right; a person who remember every word of constitututiin may be cheated and a novice student will be true.
    Kindly consider and think for this.

  • @tammyopines2528
    @tammyopines2528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    @30:20 not quoting Montesquieu how can separation of powers be safegaurd for liberal democracy ?? There are separation of powers in many states like pakistan etc I think committed judiciary is the answer !

    • @VishalKumar-xp6gz
      @VishalKumar-xp6gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good..but upsc goes with philosophers

    • @RandomShorts007AP
      @RandomShorts007AP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also think same... Marked the answer with similar logic

  • @nishantphalke5152
    @nishantphalke5152 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Q) 4 repeated from last year's. Options just got elaborated a bit...

    • @abhinav6343
      @abhinav6343 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How many according to your analysis from the entire paper. Could you list topic-wise be it direct or indirect?

  • @mdyaseenbannetti3020
    @mdyaseenbannetti3020 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Play video with 1.5x speed... It helps... Thank you shubhra ma'am for your analysis....

  • @amittyjhkakkmhusingh1421
    @amittyjhkakkmhusingh1421 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    In federal character ... option B might be talking about rajya Sabha...union legislature (ls +rs) has elected representatives from constitute units i.e states

    • @it5617
      @it5617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got the same doubt !!

    • @alankritasingh1940
      @alankritasingh1940 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the same

    • @vansh.vardhanjha
      @vansh.vardhanjha 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      InsightsOnIndia has selected B only. But, even the British Parliament has MPs from it's constituent elements like Scotland. But Britain is not federal. So, B sounds right but, B is wrong.

    • @khumeshchakor8004
      @khumeshchakor8004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Even unitary governments have independent judiciary. It’s B for sure. Hope someone sends representation.

    • @khumeshchakor8004
      @khumeshchakor8004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vansh.vardhanjha members from Scotland represent people not constituent. India’s RS and US Senate represent constituent elements.

  • @tmohitm02
    @tmohitm02 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Ma'am why do we need to interpret "committed judiciary" as being favourable to government, as the context was not india. Judiciary can even be committed to constitutional values, plz Help.

    • @thestoicfella
      @thestoicfella 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly. 👏

    • @VrM913
      @VrM913 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And in Britain there is nothing like exact separation of power, still it uphold liberty casue of committed judiciary

    • @amogsnair10
      @amogsnair10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also, isn’t the fundamental rights the best safeguard of liberty? Aren’t FRs pointless without a committed judiciary and hence article 32 becomes the heart and soul of the constitution?

    • @RandomShorts007AP
      @RandomShorts007AP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Commited judiciary is more logical in my opinion

    • @len897
      @len897 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      20. My opinion.
      What is liberal democracy?
      Seperation of powers is (already) an inherent feature of a liberal democracy. It is something already there. If there were no seperation of powers, the state can't be called a liberal democracy. It's not wanting.
      So, the right choice should be A (committed judiciary- committed to constitution and rule of law).
      Right choice could have been D, if liberal democracy was not specifically mentioned.

  • @shivamrathore1109
    @shivamrathore1109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Regarding right to property, as it has been mentioned any person..can we say refugee have right to property?

    • @catdealer9932
      @catdealer9932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's not "legal" but " constitutional" right. UPSC has asked such questions in past & one can deduce that they differentiate between 'legal' and "constitutional" right. They added the 'any person' part to eliminate any subjectivity , hence the argument posed by Shubhra Ranjan or any other faculty stands invalid. Right answer would be option D. I'm surprised how every institute & academy is stating B as correct answer

    • @AnkitKumar-qx2ve
      @AnkitKumar-qx2ve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or a ENEMY ALIEN during war time

    • @himanimishra1197
      @himanimishra1197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@catdealer9932 completely agree with you. even upsc has asked it earlier . Right option is d

  • @letusreadbhagvadgitawithke2422
    @letusreadbhagvadgitawithke2422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Shubhra mam best polity faculty for IAS

  • @abhishekbhardvaj5687
    @abhishekbhardvaj5687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ma'am my question to u : does gallantry awards also include in Balaji Raghwan case..?

  • @aks_education
    @aks_education 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks mam 🙏
    .
    12 correct 😍
    4 wrong 😬
    2 skipped 🤔

  • @SurajKumar-no6su
    @SurajKumar-no6su 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you so much Ma'am for your valuable analysis of UPSC CSE 2021(Preliminary) Question Paper.

  • @BlackWhite-bn5xc
    @BlackWhite-bn5xc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    @26:31 Article 128 - the "NJAC" requests retired Judge of SC to sit and act as Judge of SC, with previous consent of President. No role of "Chief Justice of India" is mentioned. Hence, the given statement is incorrect.

    • @AbhishekPatel-lg2rk
      @AbhishekPatel-lg2rk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Laxmikant ki book me diya hai and the statement is correct. Please see the book

  • @rjrandomcheck2223
    @rjrandomcheck2223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    3:00

  • @siddeshhm7177
    @siddeshhm7177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Day before preliems, I watched the only headline of the news in kannada, they say aryan will be in judicial custody for some days and he will be in tihar jail, so i eliminated police station option.

  • @MrPrince64
    @MrPrince64 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Maam but the question asks what is the exact constitutional status of india at 26 th jan 1950, and HON SC has time and again mentioned that even though 42 nd CAA added these words secular and socialist the principles were already a part of constitution and were implicitly mentioned what 42 nd CAA did was only mentioned it explicitly.

    • @mayankverma8984
      @mayankverma8984 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly like this federal term is not used in preamble still india is federsl in nature because we have schedule 7.

  • @rajsharma2023
    @rajsharma2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hello shubhra mam, please give a look on my argument regarding the question related to liberty question..... Why it can't be a COMMITTED JUDICIARY to protect the liberty.... Afterall there is no mention of to whom judiciary is committed to ....
    We all know, judiciary is the Guardian of the Constitution.... So, it can be a judiciary committed to uphold Constitution.....
    It is upon judiciary to define basic features of the Constitution.... Like separation of power itself...
    If judiciary is not committed to uphold the Constitution, then the principle of separation of power will itself be at the mercy of legislature.....
    Kindly tell us, what this committed judiciary mean.... Committed to whom?????? 🙏🙏

  • @CR7krchandan
    @CR7krchandan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Ma'am please 🙏 PSIR OPTIONAL का हिन्दी में भी बैच लाए 🙏

  • @harshadjadhav2073
    @harshadjadhav2073 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can state definition be community of persons?

  • @Unknown-en3tg
    @Unknown-en3tg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mam isn't matter referred to const. bench by CJI, that's why he is called master of roster ?

  • @harsh-xu4gx
    @harsh-xu4gx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    N gopalaswamy ayynger committee in 1950s was also formed for recommending on role of secretaries and ministers.....to look into admin reforms....and dopt was in 1970 was placed under cabinet secretariat which is under pm charge....it should be both correct......

  • @prashantyadav5551
    @prashantyadav5551 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Some doubts...and my interpretaions :
    Committed judiciary in true sense should mean the judiciary is performing its duties with due diligence and honesty to uphold/safeguard the constitution and thus liberal democracy feature (implicitly)
    2. Independent judiciary is needed even if a country is not federal nature so it is not unique/essential to a federal structure only. But on the other hand states representees in RS is a depiction of federal feature.
    Therefore more than one answer can be correct in those Qs
    And in that referral to Constitutional bench Q ,,besides what mam said one more point is there...CJI only (not Suprem Court)who refers the case

  • @Open299
    @Open299 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Most precious words from the ma,am 🌹

  • @vishnugandra4283
    @vishnugandra4283 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I found She is one of the best teacher while I search 2021 polity explanation

  • @lyadhkhorvagabond4362
    @lyadhkhorvagabond4362 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does one domicile mean.. we can as indian live any part of India..except the states required ilp

  • @nobodycares3953
    @nobodycares3953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hence proved that Laxmikant is no guarantee for polity prelims.

  • @SunitaKumari-vk5is
    @SunitaKumari-vk5is 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice to understand your discussion mam..really im so appreciate

  • @bhagwansuryavanshi3895
    @bhagwansuryavanshi3895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mam, where can we study these legal amentments made cort?
    As part of current afairs?

  • @chatrathiseshagirirao5574
    @chatrathiseshagirirao5574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very very usefull lecture mam

  • @ambar5971
    @ambar5971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Madam,...
    Devi lal contested three constituencies in same general election it is right.
    But the year was 1991 or 1980?
    Please confirm...

    • @harsh23044
      @harsh23044 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Eci pdf says 1989 me lada..

  • @Ajay_55
    @Ajay_55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    best Analysis thank u maam.👌👌
    Other Channels pe Log Kuch ka kuch bta rahe h ""Google"" ke bharose hai aadhe channel 😡

  • @ranjeetbharti8732
    @ranjeetbharti8732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mam,your voice is very clear.

  • @twotimes_two
    @twotimes_two 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a doubt-
    In case of Retired judge, the constitution explicitly mentions the term “Request” that is, only if retired judge is willing to sit.
    So how can we use the term “Called”, shouldn’t it be requested?
    I ticked (2 only) based on this logic^

    • @harsh-xu4gx
      @harsh-xu4gx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes it should be B.....retired judge consent is also required....

  • @vishalsahu4734
    @vishalsahu4734 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In case of retire judges prior recommendation of that person is too required.

  • @rajshekhar7388
    @rajshekhar7388 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A legal right can be amended by ordinary legislative process ie simple majority of parliament but a constitutional right such as 300A requires constitutional amendment. If 300A can't be taken away by an ordinary legislation then how can it be called as simple legal right?

  • @krishnanchittella9967
    @krishnanchittella9967 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Madam... At 25:00 wonderful explanation for Federal character of constitution...

  • @mahimamishra9162
    @mahimamishra9162 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the judiciary questions- ans is A
    HC has power but not as the sc

  • @shubhamshukla4059
    @shubhamshukla4059 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    26:10
    Ma'am should not the prior consent of the retired Judge be taken too???
    As the statement says "Any" retired judge ...But I think only those retired Judges who give their prior consent.

    • @easylearnwithshekhar3170
      @easylearnwithshekhar3170 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is super obvious. No one can be appointed at any post without the consent of the person.

    • @sachinrathee0611
      @sachinrathee0611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is intrinsic to the statement!

    • @Mdsameer1230
      @Mdsameer1230 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just search article 128.
      U will get the same statement.

  • @politico_energy
    @politico_energy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mam Constitution of liberty is written by Friedrich hayek if I'm not wrong the book written by Montesquieu is sprit of law...

  • @deepakahlawat407
    @deepakahlawat407 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is known as the shield of direct democracy (a) recall (b) plebiscite (c) referendum)(d) initiative.
    Please ma'am give answer with explanation

  • @tobiaz6759
    @tobiaz6759 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aacha hu mam main aapke PSIR k notes padta hu isliye state aur liberal wale questions bana liya ❤️

  • @NavneetSingh-jp6vs
    @NavneetSingh-jp6vs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    mam but in CJI appt. to retired judges with prior recommendation of president. there is also provision that they need approval of retired judge also. so statement 1 may be wrong

    • @platonic543
      @platonic543 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, i have same thought.

  • @AnasKhan-pe1ze
    @AnasKhan-pe1ze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mam you are awesome... The way you teach is just sublime 😍❤

  • @it5617
    @it5617 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mam, is right to property available to enemy aliens also?

  • @pishuchaudhary7920
    @pishuchaudhary7920 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mam PSIR. optional ka Lia muja apka classes join karni h ,. How I can join and fee structure

  • @naruh6502
    @naruh6502 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Please provide PSIR Optional class lectures on TH-cam as well for students who can't afford coaching. My highly request. 🙏🙏

    • @sachinrathee0611
      @sachinrathee0611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They won't. They would lose money if they do so!

  • @rezahmd8682
    @rezahmd8682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Recently Enemy property Act in news where it is mentioned property of enemy will be sold. As per this law, I think Right to property is available only for Citizens only

    • @artwithanu22
      @artwithanu22 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Property of enemy wl b sold means Pakistan. Not of others

    • @saumitrashikhar
      @saumitrashikhar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly, same I thought.
      I was confused between right to citizen vs right to everyone. Did Right to Citizen.

  • @Themes_for_Aspirants
    @Themes_for_Aspirants 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nicely explained 👏 tqu mam😊🙏

  • @amitkumarmonu
    @amitkumarmonu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the position of the Right to Property in India ? Is it available to enemy citizen? because any person encompass all type of Citizen.

  • @zwa022
    @zwa022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic, republic.
    Every feature were indirectly mentioned in our republic Day Constitution. Socialist- DPSP, Secular- FR etc.
    we have added socialist secular through amendment in our preamble. 🤔
    ➡Edited

    • @EDWS478
      @EDWS478 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had the same doubt..they say that it is indirectly included in the original constitution and these terms added in preamble

    • @kumkumkumari2566
      @kumkumkumari2566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Socialist, secular n integrity were added to preamble.

    • @saichandansahoo8416
      @saichandansahoo8416 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have also the same doubt

    • @zwa022
      @zwa022 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kumkumkumari2566ha jaldibaazi me aisa ho gya

  • @ankitaa.baruah3970
    @ankitaa.baruah3970 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the name of the technology / software that Ma'am is using? It is so cool.

  • @adityahaiwanshi2185
    @adityahaiwanshi2185 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The legend of Polity 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @kumararunav3185
    @kumararunav3185 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mam, apka hindi medium notes kai lia kya kare.

  • @studyhigh1776
    @studyhigh1776 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    About the arc question B may be correct, coz it was created under cabinet secretariat but it was asked under prime minister , and cabinet secretariat is under pm..correct me if I am wrong

  • @sanjaysinghyadavriebhu3376
    @sanjaysinghyadavriebhu3376 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice dear 👍 मैम

  • @adityashukla695
    @adityashukla695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice explanation 🙏🙏

  • @abhimanyurai3555
    @abhimanyurai3555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Without SUBHRAMAM PSIR is incomplete🙏🙏

  • @MurariLal-so5ow
    @MurariLal-so5ow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Respected Shubhra mam
    I wish to gain your attention on one issue,is that the
    Contact Number of your coaching center provided in newspaper advertisement
    and on website is either not working or person who responsibility to response is/are not perform his duty well...
    Thanks
    This comment is for information and necessary action

  • @anand1311
    @anand1311 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    MPSC aspirants would have rocked this Polity section!!

  • @bhargavikotapati7108
    @bhargavikotapati7108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please provide analysis for science and tech also mam

  • @ayushiparsheera
    @ayushiparsheera 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    12/19 scored

    • @Bikash_kr
      @Bikash_kr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      18 hi hai polity se 03:00

  • @UmeshKumar-oe6fg
    @UmeshKumar-oe6fg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you mam. You are a great teacher.

  • @aslamkhanbe.d328
    @aslamkhanbe.d328 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok. Thanks

  • @honestylaishramchanu295
    @honestylaishramchanu295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I got the parole ans. Right just because of the movie" The Shawshank Redemption" .

    • @doge3436
      @doge3436 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How did you get that right from the movie? Is it not mentioned in our law book?

    • @AdityaKumaraddicted
      @AdityaKumaraddicted 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here..even I thought of Morgan freeman rejections in the movie.

    • @honestylaishramchanu295
      @honestylaishramchanu295 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@doge3436 Common sense helps. Everything is not there in Laxmikant, which is considered as the Bible of UPSC. But others are wrong for Me.😢

  • @Pragmatickk
    @Pragmatickk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mam..consent of supreme court judge....must be received......
    .plz..revise it 🙏

  • @rishabhdev5468
    @rishabhdev5468 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you so much Mam 🙏

  • @SurajKumar-no6su
    @SurajKumar-no6su 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please provide detailed analysis of other subjects also 🙏🙏

  • @becomemillionaire6788
    @becomemillionaire6788 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks with gratitude mam ji ❤️❤️❤️

  • @bhushankadu965
    @bhushankadu965 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think question 20s answer will be c.just take recent afganistan example.there is a separation of power but not elected government.then afganistan is a most liberal.

  • @अर्थात्-छ1ष
    @अर्थात्-छ1ष 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In question No. 3 the Anwer will be definitely “D” because he Supreme Court of India in the 1994 case S. R. Bommai v. Union of India established the fact that India was secular since the formation of the Republic. Also article 38 has characters of Socialism ab initio.

  • @aleemmainoddin8769
    @aleemmainoddin8769 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    can diabetic patients give UPSC exam or not if they clear the exam after interview medical check up unfit or fit for IAS post

  • @Gurmindersingh-bv4mu
    @Gurmindersingh-bv4mu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Other subject not accessible any reason mam?

  • @AMANKUMARSINGH-yp1qz
    @AMANKUMARSINGH-yp1qz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Art 300A is a constitutional right. 🙄

  • @myarchitecturalview6632
    @myarchitecturalview6632 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ma'am total how many questions were asked from Polity

  • @shivanshmishra1451
    @shivanshmishra1451 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    18 me se 12 sahi h... Thanku mam

  • @thedutchmanflies7878
    @thedutchmanflies7878 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your ans key and explanation is best ma'am 😅

  • @ankitparihar7570
    @ankitparihar7570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I attempted 82 question mam

  • @DevKumar-oc1sc
    @DevKumar-oc1sc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your are great Mam🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @govindgawalipatil1213
    @govindgawalipatil1213 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    मेन्स के फॉर्म भरणे कबसे शुरु होणे वाले है

  • @vineethbalaji1465
    @vineethbalaji1465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the clarity mam

  • @sabeerac.p3642
    @sabeerac.p3642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super class mam

  • @nishkarsh25
    @nishkarsh25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Answer for the question regarding APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED JUDGES is ONLY STATEMENT 2 and hence OPTION B, STATEMENT 1 WRONG.
    Why? It is specifically mentioned under ARTICLE 127 - "Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter CJI may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or WHO HAS HELD THE OFFICE OF JUDGE OF A HIGH COURT and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court.
    Hence answer is OPTION B.

  • @Justakindstranger
    @Justakindstranger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are referred bt supreme court &..... High court

  • @sandeepchouhan
    @sandeepchouhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Prison is a state subject and all states have their own rules 20:50

  • @satishbehra9466
    @satishbehra9466 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very very thanks mam 🙏