This series should have way more listeners. Such good dialogue. A shame that most people just want to talk, when they should actually listen more. Thanks, for the bit of optimism!
Thank you for this topic today. I was always judged as the sitting in the wall person but I've just always saw the grey area and everything has more than just right or wrong. Simply in love with this talk and we need to spread that in so many ways.
The grace of the grey. What a great concept. Instead of holding space for another, it’s holding space for an idea that we aren’t sure what to do next, but that is okay.
I love this and totally agree on the importance of embracing the grey, the I don’t know-ness and the sacred AND! Puts into clear words what I have been feeling for a long time. Awesome! Thank you 🙏
Wow dearest Simon 💘, when we start asking questions about issues that really matter in life, we begin to see how we are connected by the same threads of humanity. No colour, creed nor belief separates or rather differentiate our human nature. We are different from what has been put into us yet we share the same created genetic make up. Great podcast. 🙏 💘Cheers to becoming more honest with ourselves in the Greys of life ❗ 💕.
Simon: Hearing you talk about Maslow, the paradox of me and the group, and the new hierarchy you would create, makes me think that you would really enjoy the work of Claire Graves. Maslow actually commented later in life on Graves’ work that it was probably better than his (Maslow’s) own hierarchy.
Thanks a lot Simon for inspiring us. Just know that you're impacting many lifes in the world with your videos.🙏🏾😊😊 I hope that I'll have the same impact with my French TH-cam channel. Thanks you again.
Yes, we cannot live in a false dichotomy and carry a scarcity mindset. There are multiple shades of gray and we can only make meaning of our choices in retrospect. Reminds me of Steve Job’s Stanford graduation speech way back.
I normally don't have any racial bias and never consider how tan someone is, but because of the riots of late I noticed myself modeling people with dark skin as possibly hostile racist toward me because I'm pale. Making a claim that America is racist actually causes racism. I modeled them based on people grouping themselves arbitrarily by their shade and so because of the group they defined they include everyone of that definition and cause division where there was none before. I modeled people based on the idea that they might identify with a hateful group because that hate group defined themselves by the tanness of the person in front of me. It's a loop that has to end by stoping isolate incidents and moving on and rising up and identifying instead by ideas and actions.
Sometimes we should be careful in dealing with men we do not know. I like to listen when Simon speaks. A lot of interesting topics I learned. Thank you. God bless you more. If you are friend of mine in the instagram please let me know. You are great.
Hello all. Check out the work of Scott Barry Kaufman for a new understanding of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Scott searched but couldn't find where Maslow depicted his thinking in a pyramid. It seems we're misunderstanding Maslow the way we've misunderstood Darwin's survival of the fittest. Listen to Simon's podcast with Adam Grant to hear a different take on that.
It’s very ironic for her to talk about “grey” yet all of her examples are about how anything that doesn’t push liberal/left/democrat talking points, is automatically wrong. If you’re not actually willing to “meet in the middle” then stop putting on this facade. It’s disingenuous and only makes you look worse when people realize it. Entertainment and Silicon Valley only has one opinion that’s allowed to be expressed and anything to the contrary is demonized. If you actually want change, stop rallying against people as soon as they say something you don’t believe. This goes both ways, but democrats currently have the most influence with 99% of news media channels, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley. Yes, the president is republican but virtually every American company (and the rest I listed) push back against him so even holding office doesn’t hold much influence. The constitution doesn’t say “she and her” because “man” was used in reference to “mankind”. As in, *all people*, not specifically the male humans. This is woeful ignorance of history and what words meant when they were written. You can’t read something hundreds of years ago with today’s definitions/interpretations. Plus, even if they had “him and her” you would probably complain it doesn’t have other pronouns that they couldn’t have predicted. That’s why they went with a then (and still is) neutral term, so it could apply to all humans and avoid that problem entirely. The term “humankind” likely wasn’t very common, and the suffix of “human” is “man” so “mankind” still works as a descriptor for all people today.
If anybody had a reason to become a delinquent, to become a criminal, to be angry at the man, to be angry at the white man, to be angry at America, it's my dad, but he did not feel that way at all. Larry Elder
Optimism is a faith and behavior that leads to success. I always choose to be optimistic; it feels better 😊
This series should have way more listeners. Such good dialogue. A shame that most people just want to talk, when they should actually listen more. Thanks, for the bit of optimism!
Thank you for this topic today. I was always judged as the sitting in the wall person but I've just always saw the grey area and everything has more than just right or wrong. Simply in love with this talk and we need to spread that in so many ways.
The grace of the grey. What a great concept. Instead of holding space for another, it’s holding space for an idea that we aren’t sure what to do next, but that is okay.
I love this and totally agree on the importance of embracing the grey, the I don’t know-ness and the sacred AND! Puts into clear words what I have been feeling for a long time. Awesome! Thank you 🙏
great interview 🙏
More people need to take time to hold that mirror up and make the effort to change the things they dont like.
Tq for the discussion Mr. Sinek!💐
Change in always there...it's on us as to how we cope Up!!
Awesome!
Amazing Loved it :D
Finite hates suprises, i will remember that
Wow dearest Simon 💘, when we start asking questions about issues that really matter in life, we begin to see how we are connected by the same threads of humanity. No colour, creed nor belief separates or rather differentiate our human nature. We are different from what has been put into us yet we share the same created genetic make up. Great podcast. 🙏 💘Cheers to becoming more honest with ourselves in the Greys of life ❗ 💕.
Do you have any podcast chanel?
What a wise lady this Jenna Arnold! More women like her!
Simon: Hearing you talk about Maslow, the paradox of me and the group, and the new hierarchy you would create, makes me think that you would really enjoy the work of Claire Graves. Maslow actually commented later in life on Graves’ work that it was probably better than his (Maslow’s) own hierarchy.
Thanks a lot Simon for inspiring us. Just know that you're impacting many lifes in the world with your videos.🙏🏾😊😊
I hope that I'll have the same impact with my French TH-cam channel. Thanks you again.
Yes, we cannot live in a false dichotomy and carry a scarcity mindset. There are multiple shades of gray and we can only make meaning of our choices in retrospect. Reminds me of Steve Job’s Stanford graduation speech way back.
I normally don't have any racial bias and never consider how tan someone is, but because of the riots of late I noticed myself modeling people with dark skin as possibly hostile racist toward me because I'm pale. Making a claim that America is racist actually causes racism. I modeled them based on people grouping themselves arbitrarily by their shade and so because of the group they defined they include everyone of that definition and cause division where there was none before. I modeled people based on the idea that they might identify with a hateful group because that hate group defined themselves by the tanness of the person in front of me. It's a loop that has to end by stoping isolate incidents and moving on and rising up and identifying instead by ideas and actions.
Sometimes we should be careful in dealing with men we do not know. I like to listen when Simon speaks. A lot of interesting topics I learned. Thank you. God bless you more. If you are friend of mine in the instagram please let me know. You are great.
Hello all. Check out the work of Scott Barry Kaufman for a new understanding of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Scott searched but couldn't find where Maslow depicted his thinking in a pyramid.
It seems we're misunderstanding Maslow the way we've misunderstood Darwin's survival of the fittest. Listen to Simon's podcast with Adam Grant to hear a different take on that.
It’s very ironic for her to talk about “grey” yet all of her examples are about how anything that doesn’t push liberal/left/democrat talking points, is automatically wrong. If you’re not actually willing to “meet in the middle” then stop putting on this facade. It’s disingenuous and only makes you look worse when people realize it. Entertainment and Silicon Valley only has one opinion that’s allowed to be expressed and anything to the contrary is demonized. If you actually want change, stop rallying against people as soon as they say something you don’t believe. This goes both ways, but democrats currently have the most influence with 99% of news media channels, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley. Yes, the president is republican but virtually every American company (and the rest I listed) push back against him so even holding office doesn’t hold much influence.
The constitution doesn’t say “she and her” because “man” was used in reference to “mankind”. As in, *all people*, not specifically the male humans. This is woeful ignorance of history and what words meant when they were written. You can’t read something hundreds of years ago with today’s definitions/interpretations. Plus, even if they had “him and her” you would probably complain it doesn’t have other pronouns that they couldn’t have predicted. That’s why they went with a then (and still is) neutral term, so it could apply to all humans and avoid that problem entirely. The term “humankind” likely wasn’t very common, and the suffix of “human” is “man” so “mankind” still works as a descriptor for all people today.
Ugh I wanted to like this so much, and I thought it was terrible.
If anybody had a reason to become a delinquent, to become a criminal, to be angry at the man, to be angry at the white man, to be angry at America, it's my dad, but he did not feel that way at all.
Larry Elder
There’s no good or bad, just lagom, right?