Steve Gregg Refutes Dispensationalist Callers on The Narrow Path 1.30.2025
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- Steve responded to these 3 consecutive questions on January 30th.
Ezekiel Battle Already Taken Place: Disagreeing caller says he takes Ezekiel 38 literally and thinks it is yet to come. [Ezekiel 38].
God Still Favors Israel: How can you say God doesn't still favor Israel? REC: Zechariah verse-by-verse. [Zechariah 14:4, Revelation 16, Ezekiel 11:23, Zechariah 13].
Prophecy "Days Will be Shortened": What is meant by "if the days were not shortened?" [Matthew 24:22].
CALLS pulled from www.matthew713...
Call-in at (844) 484-5737 to The Narrow Path daily radio program, which is hosted by Steve Gregg. Steve takes calls and answers bible questions and questions related to the Christian faith Weekdays from 2-3 pm PT/ 5-6 pm ET. Listen live at / stevegreggvideos , thenarrowpath.app or
thenarrowpath.com. Archived programs also available at all three locations.
CALLS pulled from www.matthew713...
#prophecy #endtimes #dispensationalism #lastdays #eschatology #zechariah #ezekiel #revelation #israel #biblequestions #bibleanswers #thenarrowpath #stevegregg #bibleqa #livestream
Thank you Mr Gregg. Hal Lindsey's Late Great Planet Earth was a distraction to the body of Christ from the seventies right up to this day. The 40 year timeframe from 1948-1988 was when his suggested rapture date should've occurred. We are now 37 years removed from 1988 and we are still awaiting the pre-trib rapture.
Even if, like Dispensationalists, you knew nothing about the Bible, you'd still know Dispensationalists are wrong, from their track record.
I just finished reading The Jewish War by the Jewish historian Josephus
It’s amazing how detailed this historian writes of the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.
A few times I had to put it down, because it is so gruesome to read about the utter depravity of the citizens. I strongly suggest reading it and you’ll find out that everything Jesus predicted to the disciples about the destruction of Jerusalem is fulfilled. And also everything Zechariah wrote about. I got shivers when reading some of the super natural phenomena took place. This was Gods judgement on Jerusalem and the Jewish people for rejecting His Son.
Good on you for reading Josephus’ The Wars of the Jews. I will admit I have not read it cover to cover, but have read quite a bit. It is like reading a historical commentary on the Olivet Discourse and the book of Revelation. Keep in mind if you haven’t heard this, Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 are called the Olivet Discourse. John’s Gospel does not have the Olivet Discourse. However, there is strong reasons to believe and it can be demonstrated with a lot of Scriptural references that Revelation is John’s version of the Olivet Discourse. While Matthew, Mark and Luke take more or less a historical approach with some prophetic signs, John is the reverse, he uses mainly prophetic signs with a mixture of historical events.
God bless your patient teaching. My goodness so many are just brainwashed with Dispensationalism.
Dispensationalist callers are even less articulate than atheist callers. What does that tell us
Refuting a Dispensationalist is like refuting a Flat Earther. Easy, but they don't care that they're refuted.
I am not a dispensationalists, but I am a flat earther
Flat earth dave will give anybody 3 bitcoin if you can prove that flat earth is wrong
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤💯💯💯💯
@ Where can I send a picture, for the reward?
God bless you Steve brother. In my understanding the amillennial view is a sound doctrine.
Steve Gregg is the bomb !
Layer after layer of baseless assumptions. An onion of eisegesis. You have immense patience with these deluded dogmatists.
Dispensationalists give credence to the medieval Catholic attitude towards Bibles in the hands of the common people.
Great work Steve.
Jesus also fulfilled that when He gave the olivet discourse declaring judgment on Jerusalem and the temple.
What is the difference between zionism (z) and dispensationalism (d)? Christians were not historically z, which is a relatively new idea anyway. Many Christians today are still not z. It seems that those Christians who are z got their z from d, even if they disagree with d on other matters, such as eschatology Is dispensationalism the source of (purported) Christians supporting z? Is Christian zionism not a contradiction in terms?
Dispy is infused with Zionism esp. given their flawed understanding of ‘Israel’. IF the nation of Israel is necessary for the ‘End Times’, Zionism is the necessary end. This has led to the modern evangelical church insisting upon the protection of the nation of Israel leading to an unreasonable support for ANY actions taken by Israel; despite any current context.
Dispensationalists are the only people on the planet who believe God restored Israel in 1948. Jews, Buddhists, and Christians (guess who I don't think is Christian) don't believe God had anything to do with it. If Zionism is a religious belief, then Dispensationalism and Zionism are exactly the same thing.
Christian Zionism is a contradiction in terms.
Zionism is a doctrine of the non-Christian religion of Dispensationalism. Religiously speaking, Jews, Talmudists, and Christians are not Zionists.
You can't argue with a dispensationalist in majority of cases. The best you can do is to educate people about the truth and not really try to change their mind. Which is probably the result of most "debates" anyway.
The day of the Lord that comes like a thief in the night, and takes the world by stealth and shocked surprise. I have two simple questions. One is this a dispensational teaching about the coming time of judgment, wrath and tribulation period or not? two If it is did Jesus Christ himself teach dispensational doctrine, yes or no? If the answer is yes to both questions, and it is, then there should never be any doubt whatsoever about dispensationalism as being the sound biblical doctrine and teaching which Jesus AND all the apostles were in agreement on, Darby may have rediscovered but did not in any way invent it as some new heretical unorthodox innovation of doctrine. In fact I think this attempt to twist the scripture so that it's dispensational teaching and doctrine is lost is an attack of the enemy to blind confuse and deceive even(if it were possible) the elect and saved souls and saints of God.
That was hard to listen to lol
of course it is lieral
Can one not understand the Scriptures' relations to the present, and at the same time recognize that history repeats itself? nothing happens just once, but "God seeks out what has faded" "Nothing new under the sun" Ecclesiastes?
How times must Jesus die on the cross ?
Great question here’s a similar one - how many times will Jesus be born of a virgin in Galilee?
Can we know if a scripture has two fulfillments? How do we know? The apostles tell us.
Dispensation is correct and true... This teaching is Archie Bunker !!!!
ObiDaveKenobi5587,
Friend, you make a strong claim without any supporting evidence. That’s not a very strong position from which to ridicule someone else.
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below?
Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary.
God is not now a “racist”. He has extended His love to all races of people through the New Covenant fulfilled by His Son’s blood at Calvary. The Apostle Paul warned against using “genealogies” in our faith in 1 Tim. 1:4, and Titus 3:9.
If the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20 and the Old Covenant is "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13, why would any Christian believe God is going back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
What is the location of the "temple of God" in the Book of Revelation? The answer is revealed in Rev. 3:12 and Rev. 11:19 in heaven, and not in the wicked city found in Rev. 11:8. This temple is located in the same city promised to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:13-16 and also described in Hebrews 12:22-24.
"Mockery is the weapon of those who have no argument."
Thanks to Darby and Scofield we have generations of believers that are capable of only parroting lies they have heard and they are singularly unable to provide any sort of cogent argument.
Literal hermeneutic ? Dispies cannot logically present - much less defend - their flawed beliefs 😢. Man was destined for so much more
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”?
6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
11. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.