TIMESTAMPS: 0:35 - Goals of this video 2:35 - Thanks for voting! 3:20 - Info needed for this video 3:52 - What is a proof? 5:15 - How to use the direct proof method to prove p implies q. 6:11 - Why does this method even work? 8:05 - Tucci's tips for proving shit 10:37 - Definitions needed for this video 14:00 - Example Proof #1 17:50 - Example Proof #2 20:52 - Example Proof #3 24:27 - Example Proof #4 29:20 - Example Proof #5 I spent a lot of time on this video! I hope it shows, and I hope everyone gets the explanation they need! Are y'all interested in seeing more videos like this? Proof by contrapositive? Proof by contradiction? Proof by induction? Let me know! Thanks for the continued support! Keep flexin'!
could you make a series on proofs? I'm teaching myself math and i just finished analysis 1 and im finishing linear algebra, i understand proofs in the books but i want to be able to write some good ones on my own.
Dude I love you so much! I was taking Real Analysis, without having taken any proof class [I am an Economics student], and I am struggling so so much in it. And then I found this, and everything is making sense. I hope that by the time I finish your proof series, I will actually be able to solve a question for Real Analysis. In any case, learning a lot!
@BrainGainzOfficial Thank you for this video and series; I'm an older student getting back into math who never had experience in proof writing, so I very much appreciate your style and flow of presenting this subject.
I am trying as I am in Discrete math for computer science and I tried proving before watching the rest and I keep getting it all wrong. >.< Trying to understand but not getting there yet at all. Dx
Really enjoying your videos! I have a question about example number three. I set both x and y to be 2k+1, then after multiplying and factorising i was left with 4k(k+1)+1. 4k would always be even then multiplying an even by an even or an odd (k+1) would always be an even. Finally adding one would give an odd. Is my method also a correct way to go about this? Thanks!
what if he made two versions of the videos: 1) one in the way he wants, and 2) one in a way that presents the proof with no commentary? Perhaps it's because I'm new to Mathematical proof writing, but I actually appreciated his effort to make this subject approachable, comprehensible, and enjoyable. If I wanted proof writing speed-runs, I'd watch videos by other math TH-camrs, like Math Sorcerer or Wrath of Math.
TIMESTAMPS:
0:35 - Goals of this video
2:35 - Thanks for voting!
3:20 - Info needed for this video
3:52 - What is a proof?
5:15 - How to use the direct proof method to prove p implies q.
6:11 - Why does this method even work?
8:05 - Tucci's tips for proving shit
10:37 - Definitions needed for this video
14:00 - Example Proof #1
17:50 - Example Proof #2
20:52 - Example Proof #3
24:27 - Example Proof #4
29:20 - Example Proof #5
I spent a lot of time on this video! I hope it shows, and I hope everyone gets the explanation they need!
Are y'all interested in seeing more videos like this? Proof by contrapositive? Proof by contradiction? Proof by induction? Let me know! Thanks for the continued support! Keep flexin'!
YES! SHOW US *ALL* THE METHODS!
Very clear..and informative ..Thanks..Cheers
Thank you
Absolute legend. Going over things slowly instead of the other 3 minute videos on YT. Appreciate these videos more than ever man, thank you!
THANK YOUUU MY CONFIDENCE CAME BACK A LITTLE
PhD + Old guy with a beard = Proofs!! LOL this is what I thought too! very informative vid!
Starting it nicely with good 'ol proof methods :)
thank you so much for this!
great stuff, please keep proofing!
Good videos man
Hi saw you on Giilian Perkins channel! Good work!
could you make a series on proofs? I'm teaching myself math and i just finished analysis 1 and im finishing linear algebra, i understand proofs in the books but i want to be able to write some good ones on my own.
xRiccardo - i plan on finishing a series on proofs eventually! Thanks for the positive feedback!
Dude I love you so much! I was taking Real Analysis, without having taken any proof class [I am an Economics student], and I am struggling so so much in it. And then I found this, and everything is making sense. I hope that by the time I finish your proof series, I will actually be able to solve a question for Real Analysis. In any case, learning a lot!
Awesome! Glad I could help :)
“I am stupid “ lol. You’re so great bro 😎
Thank you very much for making this video. It was very helpful 🙏
Love your content, thanks for taking te time to help someone else.
@BrainGainzOfficial Thank you for this video and series; I'm an older student getting back into math who never had experience in proof writing, so I very much appreciate your style and flow of presenting this subject.
Thank you for these amazing lessons! This is awesome , forever grateful😊
Brain Gainz is the best on Proof Writing. Thanks in a MIllion
Great video! Learned a lot. Thanks for such amazing break down
Good explain and I like your way to tell something Real thanks
this is great
first five minutes I could not stop looking at his shoulders
Great Video! Thanks
I'm glad you enjoyed Leo! :D
Great method
Your a G thank you
Make a series on numerical analysis
v good
5 star you are the best
Hello. I'm interested to see how you would prove example 2 by contradiction. Wouldn't it be shorter than a direct proof?
never thought i would study math and laugh at once
Thank u
I am trying as I am in Discrete math for computer science and I tried proving before watching the rest and I keep getting it all wrong. >.< Trying to understand but not getting there yet at all. Dx
PLEASE GO ON WITH THE PROOFS PLEASE
What are the Disadvantages of Direct Proof?
More examples pleaaaaaase
Really enjoying your videos! I have a question about example number three. I set both x and y to be 2k+1, then after multiplying and factorising i was left with 4k(k+1)+1. 4k would always be even then multiplying an even by an even or an odd (k+1) would always be an even. Finally adding one would give an odd. Is my method also a correct way to go about this? Thanks!
14:30 what's my pee and what's my cue 🤨
i like the general content, but i wish you spent less time talking more time doing. i just want to see the problems worked. maybe that's just me
what if he made two versions of the videos: 1) one in the way he wants, and 2) one in a way that presents the proof with no commentary?
Perhaps it's because I'm new to Mathematical proof writing, but I actually appreciated his effort to make this subject approachable, comprehensible, and enjoyable. If I wanted proof writing speed-runs, I'd watch videos by other math TH-camrs, like Math Sorcerer or Wrath of Math.
You digress too much.