Chain and Antichain - Poset and Lattice - Discrete Mathematics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
  • Subject - Discrete Mathematics
    Video Name - Chain and Antichain
    Chapter - Poset and Lattice
    Faculty - Prof. Farhan Meer
    Upskill and get Placements with Ekeeda Career Tracks
    Data Science - ekeeda.com/car...
    Software Development Engineer - ekeeda.com/car...
    Embedded and IOT Engineer - ekeeda.com/car...
    Get FREE Trial for GATE 2023 Exam with Ekeeda GATE - 20000+ Lectures & Notes, strategy, updates, and notifications which will help you to crack your GATE exam.
    ekeeda.com/cat...
    Coupon Code - EKGATE
    Get Free Notes of All Engineering Subjects & Technology
    ekeeda.com/dig...
    Access the Complete Playlist of Subject Discrete Mathematics - • Discrete Mathematics
    Happy Learning
    Social Links:
    / ekeeda_official
    / ekeeda.com
    #PosetandLattice #DiscreteMathematics

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @atharva_513
    @atharva_513 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    this sir is teaching as if its a normal diagraph but its a hasse diagram in which elements are related to each other according to its position in diagram. In hasse diagram all the edges are pointed upwards to show its relation with one another. In first example , according to hasse diagram concept , we can traverse from 'a' to 'b' and 'c' but we cannot traverse from 'b' and 'c' to 'a' , similarly we can traverse from 'b' and 'c' to 'd' but we cannot traverse from 'd' to 'b' and 'c'.
    Therefore the chains and anti chains concept in this example will be:-
    Chains:-{a,b} ,{a,b,d} (in this a and 'd are also chains as we can traverse from 'a' to 'b' and then from 'b' to 'd')
    antichains:-{b,c} (in this we can traverse from 'b' to 'd' but we cannot traverse from 'd' to 'c' because in hasse diagram we show relations between elements in upward manner so here 'd' to 'c' is downward traversing that means there is no relation between 'b' to 'c'
    therefore {b,c} is an antichaun
    i hoped this cleared some doubts....Plz reply if it did

  • @vivek0600
    @vivek0600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    As you included (2,4,..) in first two anti-chain example. How they are not related to each other as 2 divides 4.

    • @_hrutik.king_
      @_hrutik.king_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's exactly what I was going to comment

    • @sypher4735
      @sypher4735 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not every element divides each other.

    • @harshrajsharma5050
      @harshrajsharma5050 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      3 6 9 18 isnt a chain either cuz there is no relation in 6 and 9

    • @General468
      @General468 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@harshrajsharma5050 or maybe there is a relation between 6 and 9 😏

    • @harshrajsharma5050
      @harshrajsharma5050 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@General468 bas yahi sab karo tum padhai chod kar

  • @dhruvilpatel2480
    @dhruvilpatel2480 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    why 2 and 4 take in antichain

    • @SAMEER_99
      @SAMEER_99 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly +1

  • @pranavpurkar9141
    @pranavpurkar9141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Sir , kindly check your examples of antichain i think there are some mistakes in it.

  • @MJF19EEKZNUB22
    @MJF19EEKZNUB22 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Basically for the hasse diagram you came up you could have write all the chains like {},{a},{b},{c},{d},{a,b},{a,d},{a,c},{b,d},{c,d},{a,b,d},{a,c,d} because each pair in the subset are comparable and for antichain in similar manner...

  • @mohitshakya0798
    @mohitshakya0798 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In example c me 8,12 are not related, sab galat padaya h

  • @xyzw1850
    @xyzw1850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please once go through the content(ex. etc.) which you are going to deliver, its my request!

  • @Swan-c3l
    @Swan-c3l ปีที่แล้ว

    That is very interesting. Thank you.

  • @purnimaprusty7219
    @purnimaprusty7219 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought ekeeda is a relaible platform..but was wrong

  • @zeyedetekalign3829
    @zeyedetekalign3829 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi
    Thank you for your presentation. I have a questiin on total ordering or linear... you gave 2,4,8,12 are examples of total ordered elements but 8 and 12 are not related si hiw it could be a member of a part of total ordered

  • @forg_tful6221
    @forg_tful6221 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much Sir

  • @AshishMishra-do6qb
    @AshishMishra-do6qb ปีที่แล้ว

    You have told that a related to d so why b is not related to C??

  • @shubhamrathore7694
    @shubhamrathore7694 ปีที่แล้ว

    6 and 9 do not satisfies the condition for chain as they do not obey the rule of a/b

  • @pantsah4
    @pantsah4 ปีที่แล้ว

    check the example c

  • @gautamkaushik4380
    @gautamkaushik4380 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir you are a good teacher but please don't give incorrect examples

  • @mohitshakya0798
    @mohitshakya0798 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Phle subscribe kar rkha tha , ab unsubscribe kar diya

  • @yamanmishravilogs
    @yamanmishravilogs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Aapko hindi nahi aati kya??

  • @raghavendrakumarsingh4646
    @raghavendrakumarsingh4646 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explantion of the topic

  • @riteshphadtare4211
    @riteshphadtare4211 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wrong

  • @pujakundu2655
    @pujakundu2655 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hasse diagram is wrong ..

  • @AshishMishra-do6qb
    @AshishMishra-do6qb ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What the hell are you teaching