I’m just curious how gas pressure exist without a container. Violates the second law of thermodynamics does it not? Vacuum space is scientifically impossible unless you deny entropy
Watching these reminds you watching those old 50's and 60's Sci-Fi movies where the rocket lands on a planet upright it's science fiction becoming reality.
Omg that's what I thought. I like didn't believe what I was seeing at first. Looks like some planet of the apes practical effect. Can't believe that's what it really looks like.
They had no need because they are finance with the peoples money, ergo they don't care about the money, its not their money. Thats why they are no match when private competition appears.
history is full of naysayers that eventually had to eat their own words. Which I don't understand. When something is amazing, and right in front of you, why would you deny yourself that excitement and wonder? Its just like the people that say the moon landing was faked.. They are deliberately choosing to ignore the evidence just so they can live in an unrealistically shittier, more boring world that they create for themselves. I don't get it
Last one was pretty spot on, clean and fast. Of course the barge landing is amazing because it's on a moving platform. Very impressed! Lets Go Humanity! I keep telling my daughter how we'll be on board something similar in the near future!
@@RevealerOfNow you should be teaching your daughter how big companies have adapted to scamming people out of their money and control, not buying into it.
Yes, that one looked incredibly cinematic. You have this beautiful scene, and then a rocket comes into view and just lands as if it's no big deal. Looked quite like how one might set up a spacecraft landing scene in a sci-fi movie.
@@adamprice9214 What makes you think it's CGI, and not real? And by the way, if it was CGI, it would most definitely not be poor quality, since so many people believe it's real. It's kind of stupid of you to claim that this is "low quality" CGI. lol
@@JoshStPierre sorry to make sheeple like yourselves look nieve.. study research and all with your eyes open and with a critical view.. and soon the truth will set you free
I feel the video where the rocket exploded might have been the most perfected landing. Consider this, experimenting and attempting what you could do, compared with what you know you can do has merit. The pilot was gaining an understanding of the control of the vehicle & in turn developed an understanding that enabled them to complete the task in video 5.
It may might be kinda easy or may be hard to land a rocket, in my opinion because the Falcon 9 1st stage uses Hydraulic pump inside to control the grid fins and uses RCS thrusters inside of the Falcon 9 1st stage.
At 02:19 min. At the head (top) of the rocket, there are (3 or 4) little engines to arrange the vertical line of the rocket. The same as I think about this before.
AMAZING !! I can honestly see how people can call the ' FAKE ' card. I didn't believe it when someone told me about it. It really is incredible how they can do that.
I think people who say it's fake are kinda dumb actually. With all the self stabilizing tech we have like drones that perfectly balance themselves and do insane computer controlled maneuvers. It's not hard to believe at all that you can apply similar software technology to a rocket and just program it for different vectors using the grid fins, side thrusters and vectoring the nozzle. You just program it to conteract forces. Of course the engineering to do this with a rocket is insane, I'm not diminishing it, but anyone who thinks this is too advanced to be believable is a simpleton with no understanding of technology.
@@Q5000 exactly. the conspiracists underestimate current tech so much. they say this is all cgi while holding devices that transmit ungodly amounts of data every moment, devices that allow us to be pretty much anywhere on earth and obtain all known knowledge until this point. like cmon. humans are more technologically advanced than you think
ummm timestamps pls or stfu its cleary not fake. the smoke that is generated by the rockets for this to be in reverse the smoke would have had to be there already and how could that be if the rocket didn't even fire yet
You're joking, right? There have been multiple booster landings at Cape Canaveral, and they're open to the public. Literally just search "falcon 9 landing reaction".
@@garykarr1421 Just look it up on TH-cam.... There are multiple angles. th-cam.com/video/VUFwR364Hq8/w-d-xo.html Here ^^ th-cam.com/video/X_oYc5cEi28/w-d-xo.html
Thank you for your feedback. You will probably also like our compilation on seaplane from around the world. Here is the link : th-cam.com/video/XNQ9hnJMiY8/w-d-xo.html
Landing number 2 and 1 because the rocket landed on the surface and they switched off the engine successfully. Even the one in the ship. That was perfect.
yeah, couldn't have been done by hand and eye - it's up to the very clever tech ( I guess a whole load of gyroscopes linked to the tiny flaps to get it so perfectly vertical just before touchdown - very impressive stuff!
Does the weight distribution of the rocket help direct it vertically during descent? Like an arrowhead. Saw some thrusters on the tail end redirecting the angle in some of these landings.
Bravo to masks team for a terrestrial landing. When I worked at NASA as an engineer, I dreamed of a day one Rockets Woodland like this instead of doing a water splash down. I don't know if this technology is suitable for large Rockets carrying human passengers. But this is truly an amazing accomplishment. Congratulations.
The one question I'm asked most often is, "Did they find any life on the moon that they're keeping secret?" I was not privy to that information. But It seems to me that if there was intelligent life on the far side of the moon, we would have continued flying there and we probably would have built a lunar colony. By the way, I am really pissed off that we never built a lunar colony in the almost fifty years since we first landed. We wasted all those years when we could have learned how to live on another world. What a great training ground it would have been for a Mars colony!
i swear "i can almost see the string" i mean, not really seeing the string, but the way the rocket swaying, to the left and right make me questioning these.. please add up some calculation of the landing, or maybe a footage with cgi to expalin how it works...
i don't think i was trying to be funny... just like "astronauts pull each other string" video on youtube (go search and see).. we've been fooled too often...
This doesn't prove anything one way or another but: I implore you to find one live facebook feed of this happening. Everyone has phones nowadays, and surely someone made a video of this on their phone. But all I can ever find is the same footages, none of which are ever longer than 15 seconds.
1. The Falcon 9 rockets seen in the video are about 70m(230ft) 2. The purpose of landing the booster is for re-usability, to drive down the cost of access to space 3. The funding is secured by private investors and the customers that pay SpaceX to place their satellites into orbit.
Question, when the ticket came in to land did the landing area sink ? Thousands of pounds of force to keep that rocket up, did the platform sink at all?????
although you might think it could sink, that is simply not the case. I don't have a large understanding of how the falcon 9 rockets work, but im sure they lose a lot of weight after MECO. but you have to understand that ships can hold large amounts of weight, and I don't know what its called in physics, but an example are cargo ships-they carry tons and tons of cargo, so just because something is heavy, doesn't mean something on water can't hold it. I understand how it can be a little skeptical to you, but physics is confusing to me too.
Please keep in mind that despite the size of the booster, it's actually not very heavy at landing because It's mostly an empty tank and it already spent most of its fuel during the ascent and therefore the landing platform doesn't sink.
of course they are fake.. .......how much fuel does a rocket need to be able to fly “round-trip”?? AND retro-land!!!! .......how easy is it to recover a WINGED JET PLANE, from a full freefall, combined with rolling, tumbling and flipping in EVERY DIRECTION..??? change that to a tupe with NO WINGS....!!! not only recover, reverse 180 degrees.. slow down, and land!!!!! all on one tank of fuel!!! lol ......anyone who thinks rockets can retro-land.. have NEVER flown even a toy rocket!! forget rockets, why do you think Quad-copter drones are SO FLAT AND WIDE.?? even then, its hard to keep them level.. imagine the drone as a pencil.. and try keeping that baby straight!!!! LOL....now try throwing it so that its flipping in every direction.... NOW RETRO-LAND THAT PENCIL!!!!
well they i think they are real cause if look closely there are thrusters on the the top of the rocket and the bottom thurster is movable it can move in a circle like up to 45 to 70 degrees ac comping with the top one thrusters to balance the rocket while landing and as those rockets are not leaving earth so they dont need extra fule tanks and thursters as the extra thrusters are only needed to increase the speed of the rocket so that it can enough speed to leave earths magnetic field
For all who think ITS fake ,just see it directly from landing area where ITS land , just sit still when burning rocker fuell burn u from above when ITS landing
I am not sure about this. The rockets seem to be coming down at a fair rate of speed & at an angle. Then it slows to next to nothing to land. But how does the rocket correct it’s angle ? I can’t see any side retro booster type things ( I am not sure what they are called )to rectify this. If this is real then it’s very clever, but I have doubts.
There are "grid fins" on the side of each booster, near the top, that it can pivot to steer itself. These provide additional drag. As for how it slows down so quickly - keep in mind that despite the size of the booster, it's actually not very heavy at this point. It's mostly an empty tank, because it already spent most of its fuel during the ascent. It doesn't take much force to slow something down that has very little mass. Additionally, each engine has something called 'thrust vectoring', which means each engine can individually tilt its nozzle to provide thrust in a certain direction, rather than straight down. This is used for fine steering once it's almost at the pad. This is very noticeable in video 4, when the booster is off-course and is trying desperately to correct itself, so it uses every method it has - grid fins, thrust vectoring, and even RCS (reaction control system), the puffs of gas near the top.
I feel bad for you if you are so determined to believe this is fake. Amazing things CAN be done! Besides.. why the fuck would you fake this shit? What purpose would that serve you? Or anyone else for that matter?
jeff, i know it seems like there would be no purpose to fake the space x rocket landings. amazing things can be done, yes. But this is totally fake in every way!!!!!! Jeff, come on brother. Because you asked the question, I know that your subconscious knows already that what you are seeing here is 100%%%%%% FAKE and you are listening to that ask asking a honest question, so I want to give a honest reply: when i look at the rocket at 2:18 , I want to puke. Just look at the outline. LMAO!!!!!!!;D If it was a PLAYSTATION commercial. JUST IMAGINE THAT spaxeX for Playstation 5
I do see what you are talking about the outline of the rocket looking fake. But just because something looks fake doesn't mean it actually is- what appears to be sloppy editing around the edges of the rocket is actually something else- refraction of light due to the hot air that the rocket is descending down into, a second or two behind the thrusters. It is the same effect that you get when you look above the surface of hot pavement on a sunny day- the hot air causes visual distortions in the air. Im sure you know what effect I am referring to.. If someone really wanted to fake a video to convince the masses then they wouldn't have included this visual effect, since it does make the video look fake if you don't realize what you are actually looking at. Besides, it is actually quite easy to make a fake video that looks flawlessly real (Hollywood does it all the time), so to suggest that Space X put out such a lousy fake doesn't really make any sense when you consider all the resources they have.
Ignore the live feed and the eye wittnesses and the workers and the astronaughts. Its all fake right. And space is water and the sky is a dome made by god , thats why we can‘t go to space
0:55 exactly here the engine should gimbal to the right (as seen from the viewer) - this would need more fuel (which maybe wasn't available sadly), but would have saved the core..
The flat earth society is strong in this comment section.
John Doe lol
Hahahah !
Can't agree more !
I’m just curious how gas pressure exist without a container. Violates the second law of thermodynamics does it not? Vacuum space is scientifically impossible unless you deny entropy
The flat earth society believe in space, flat earth research have proven time and time again space is made in a Hollywood basement
The Flat Earth Society is a Fake Flat Earth Site, you morons.
It’s good that people are calling this fake. That means it’s so extraordinary to a point that it’s unbelievable.
We love engineering !
CGI FAKE
@@xpy1hahahah you are an idiot
@@supercarfanatic2078 r/wooosh
@@supercarfanatic2078 it cobblers ..... total bs for idiots to lap up
These literally look like take off videos played in reverse. This is incredible
It's astonishing to say the least. We all love Elon !
Even worse, its cgi. Fakery
Welcome to 21st century my friend!
@@jiiiigsaw LAUGH OUT LOUD .. at you..
@@jiiiigsaw wow ur joking right?
Watching these reminds you watching those old 50's and 60's Sci-Fi movies where the rocket lands on a planet upright it's science fiction becoming reality.
I really cant believe it . Its so cool !
So true and we are yet to see what more is going to become reality in few years time. Maybe like 'Going for a picnic to Mars' xD
We when from landing falcon 9 boosters too landing an actual starship rocket.
I can definitely wait for SkyNet to take over.
Omg that's what I thought. I like didn't believe what I was seeing at first. Looks like some planet of the apes practical effect. Can't believe that's what it really looks like.
From a Former NASA employee.... All were amazing. THIS is what NASA should have been doing all along!... GO SPACEX!..You got my vote!!!
Surely it was more about braking through cultural paradigms than actually doing it right at first place
They had no need because they are finance with the peoples money, ergo they don't care about the money, its not their money. Thats why they are no match when private competition appears.
lol
Every comment is like “look at everyone in the comments calling it fake” but I can’t find a single one
We're 5 years too late
@@flamboyantfootball5511 But it's been 2 years?
@@TheClickbaiterA Aight mate
You gotta press CTRL + F and search for Fake.
You will find many 'Earth is Flat' guys ! :P
@@engineeringworld. Look at this awesome realistic footage from Apollo 17 enjoy👍.
th-cam.com/video/sj6a0Wrrh1g/w-d-xo.html
Why didn't these engineers receive a Nobel Peace prize? Awesome. No one ever thought a rocket could land on a moving barge no less. Awesome! Shalom
because it is a joke and not real...you notice it cuts out as soon as it lands. only shows pieces of it never the full clip. Is that not suspicious?
You can't be serious
He thinks the Earth is flat and they didn't land on the moon also.
history is full of naysayers that eventually had to eat their own words. Which I don't understand. When something is amazing, and right in front of you, why would you deny yourself that excitement and wonder? Its just like the people that say the moon landing was faked.. They are deliberately choosing to ignore the evidence just so they can live in an unrealistically shittier, more boring world that they create for themselves. I don't get it
adreamproductionpwii You can see it in real life. Go check it.
0:52 Perfect landing, which taught us how to become better. 💪
How exactly does that make you better personally?
@@taylorjeremy71maybe if you’d think more critically you’d understand
@@Sol48399 I'm stumped. Please enlighten me 🙏
The CGI landing was the best looking landing. Amazing!!
It was real buddy, grow up
@@reck5132 get your prescription checked...lol...lame cgi...lol
@@BiteMeRightHereu are delusional
Why is it so hard to believe this?
@@BiteMeRightHere lame cgi? I know something that is lame cgi…
*You’re fucking head*
Kudos to all the engineers who create this rocket! Straight from science fiction!
Too good to be true? ;)
Elon musk LETS GOO NEXT UP BIOLOGICAL CAT GIRL!!!!!!!!
That last landing was slick. Now just repeat that 1,000 times in a row and I'll get on board.
It’s cgi homie
@@motchness hey 'homie', get a job, get a plane ticket, and go watch one for yourself...
Last one was pretty spot on, clean and fast. Of course the barge landing is amazing because it's on a moving platform. Very impressed!
Lets Go Humanity!
I keep telling my daughter how we'll be on board something similar in the near future!
We hope your daughter is inspired and motivated enough to become the next successful astronaut ! ☺
Lol you’re lying to your daughter
@@motchnessWe're not all headed to the apocalypse, dream bigger 🍻
@@RevealerOfNow you should be teaching your daughter how big companies have adapted to scamming people out of their money and control, not buying into it.
All outstanding!! The landing on the water craft was my favorite tied with last one. Awesomeness! !
Thank you for your feedback !
Have a wonderful day ! ^_^
It has to be the one that landed on a floating barge. That's absolutely crazy.
I honestly didn’t think that was possible! Very impressed.
All thanks to Elon Musk and team! xD
It's not possible they are still pulling your plonker
@@engineeringworld. 😂😂
1:21 was beautiful the speed at which it was executed and the sound ⚡⚡👌👌
Yes, that one looked incredibly cinematic. You have this beautiful scene, and then a rocket comes into view and just lands as if it's no big deal. Looked quite like how one might set up a spacecraft landing scene in a sci-fi movie.
@@malachiwiens2455Probably because it was
What happened to the Falcon Heavy double booster relanding?
i have been watching rockets take off since the early 60's , this is unbelievable they land those rockets. All yall.
Also amazing is they still use the same drone ships even after all those rockets that exploded on them.
Re-use is the main idea behind the SpaceX space programs in order to keep the missions feasible.
@@engineeringworld. Ya, ok bud. Youre full of shit and you know it
@@mikeeh9611 who pissed in your cornflakes?
@@jon9809 NASA and SPACEX did. At the same time, disgusting.
@@mikeeh9611 Then why you keep eating them?
Olden days: ohhhhh rocket launch wow 🤩
Now: ohhhh rocket landing 🤩
Now: wenhop? 🚀
I don't even know we already have the technology like this. That it was able to landed on ship is pretty damn amazing
We Don't.. instead we have (in this case really poor quality) CGI
@@adamprice9214 What makes you think it's CGI, and not real? And by the way, if it was CGI, it would most definitely not be poor quality, since so many people believe it's real. It's kind of stupid of you to claim that this is "low quality" CGI. lol
@@JoshStPierre sorry to make sheeple like yourselves look nieve.. study research and all with your eyes open and with a critical view.. and soon the truth will set you free
@@adamprice9214 it’s real cause you can go and see it with your own eyes
These landings are as remarkable as the lift offs. Just shaking my head, astounding!
I feel the video where the rocket exploded might have been the most perfected landing. Consider this, experimenting and attempting what you could do, compared with what you know you can do has merit. The pilot was gaining an understanding of the control of the vehicle & in turn developed an understanding that enabled them to complete the task in video 5.
Pip Grace
Its controlled by the Flight Control Systems onboard...
Lol, you think someone was landing it manually? 🤣🤣
The pilot 😂😂😂😂 , they just lost their best pilot in the explosion... Damn, another 3bn to train the next one... Hopefully he's better than the last
Obviously, the most PERFECT landing was the one that exploded!
In a way, it was. You learn more from failure than from success.
Rescue Mei How will you learn from failure when you are NO MORE! 😂
@@fantoxic774 LMFAO YES
@@fantoxic774 there are no people inside fuel tank :)
It’s called CRS6
Beautifull, I remember cartoons the same kind of landing.
Yea or the movies with the toy rockets being lowered by guide wires but still looking awful similar to this
The Adventures Of Tintin - Explorers On The Moon Part 1 and 2 is an example.
They did it in the Bond movie You Only Live Twice and it blew my mind as a kid.
2:15 Why was a superimposed effects shot used in this one? All the other ones before it were real. So why was this one composited?
All of them were real, cause i've been observing SpaceX for nearly 6months, they're doing incredible job, no doubt
All the ones that you have seen were fake:))))
@@mohsenbahremand2877 they're real
@@mohsenbahremand2877 there real
😂🤣🤣
Come on people for christ sakes shake yourselves.. does it look real?? NO.. And that's because ladies and gentlemen it isn't end of!
Amazing
CGI, is amazing
Elon Musk- "And I took that personally"
truely a masterpiece
You should put dirt and water on the moon excellent video.
It may might be kinda easy or may be hard to land a rocket, in my opinion because the Falcon 9 1st stage uses Hydraulic pump inside to control the grid fins and uses RCS thrusters inside of the Falcon 9 1st stage.
Interesting point, what makes you think so?
SPACEX IS AN UTTERLY AMAZING COMPANY, NO WONDER NASA COLLABORATED!
I am amazed at this technology - it is like looking into the future-fantastic engineering !!!!.
At 02:19 min. At the head (top) of the rocket, there are (3 or 4) little engines to arrange the vertical line of the rocket.
The same as I think about this before.
👽 space alien approved 👍
It's a great way to blow the dust off a parking lot.
Man... this is called modern rocket science 🤓
Lmao
Indeed!
That last one was so smooth
Bet you NASA are rubbing their budget after seeing this achievement.
AMAZING !! I can honestly see how people can call the ' FAKE ' card. I didn't believe it when someone told me about it. It really is incredible how they can do that.
It's more incredible that someone landed on the moon 1969 but in 2019 we can't do the same thing
Welcome to the 21st century ! :D
by rotating then 180* digree and open thrusters to reduce velocity elon musk is the greatest man in this centrury
I think people who say it's fake are kinda dumb actually. With all the self stabilizing tech we have like drones that perfectly balance themselves and do insane computer controlled maneuvers. It's not hard to believe at all that you can apply similar software technology to a rocket and just program it for different vectors using the grid fins, side thrusters and vectoring the nozzle. You just program it to conteract forces. Of course the engineering to do this with a rocket is insane, I'm not diminishing it, but anyone who thinks this is too advanced to be believable is a simpleton with no understanding of technology.
@@Q5000 exactly. the conspiracists underestimate current tech so much. they say this is all cgi while holding devices that transmit ungodly amounts of data every moment, devices that allow us to be pretty much anywhere on earth and obtain all known knowledge until this point. like cmon. humans are more technologically advanced than you think
Wow that’s amazing.
Can anyone identify the species of birds that are flying along backwards in 2 of those “landings”.
These species are from SpaceX!
ummm timestamps pls or stfu its cleary not fake. the smoke that is generated by the rockets for this to be in reverse the smoke would have had to be there already and how could that be if the rocket didn't even fire yet
😂😂
Space x: our booster can land
Flat earther: yeah nice CGI
Lol
the engineers did their best.
well done.
"Engineering is the closest thing to magic in this world" :D
Watched it land Sunday night in person in Lompoc, CA. It is very much for real! I was amazing to watch and the sonic boom was awesome!
I’m surprised you haven’t gotten a million comments saying your a troll!
Lol never in a million years is this stuff real all u believers dont really deep down believe this fakery
Amazing. Not one civilian in the whole world with all the cell phones cameras in the world has ever seen one of these landings
You're joking, right? There have been multiple booster landings at Cape Canaveral, and they're open to the public. Literally just search "falcon 9 landing reaction".
@@YttriumtYcLief ive only seen 2 cell phone videos. im open for proof though
@@garykarr1421 Hundreds and hundreds of people saw the First Stages of the Falcon Heavy test flight land in Florida. It was like a picnic
@@angadsingh9314 then why only 2 camera angles with over 100,000 people video taping. smh
@@garykarr1421 Just look it up on TH-cam.... There are multiple angles.
th-cam.com/video/VUFwR364Hq8/w-d-xo.html
Here ^^
th-cam.com/video/X_oYc5cEi28/w-d-xo.html
This is still the coolest thing I've ever seen!
Don’t get me wrong here people but this is satisfying in way in can’t explain
Great compilation :)
Thank you for your feedback.
You will probably also like our compilation on seaplane from around the world.
Here is the link : th-cam.com/video/XNQ9hnJMiY8/w-d-xo.html
That is astonishing! Are they still bringing bodies back from the "other planet" they have visited? OR did they pick them all up already??
Absolutely amazing! They doing the impossible
Perfect art piece of engineering
This reminds me of that gravitar game on Miniclip back in the early 2000's lol
Best landing ??? Every Single One... WOW
0:50 was most perfect landing
Landing number 2 and 1 because the rocket landed on the surface and they switched off the engine successfully. Even the one in the ship. That was perfect.
This comment section can cause your IQ to drop significantly.
Dang I agree Tom Chan they aught to ban Potheads from making comments! This is some amazing stuff!
Indeed
Thank you, I will not enter it.
Tom Chan yeah I always feel stupider after reading your comments
Strongly agree
incredible engineering
the last landing was awesome!
yeah, couldn't have been done by hand and eye - it's up to the very clever tech ( I guess a whole load of gyroscopes linked to the tiny flaps to get it so perfectly vertical just before touchdown - very impressive stuff!
Even we loved it too !
Thank you for your feedback and have a nice day !
Do you mean the last CGI computer animated Landing
just like when I was a kid, now its real wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fantastic, look like elien invasion. Amaizing
“Elon” invasion 😉
Does the weight distribution of the rocket help direct it vertically during descent? Like an arrowhead. Saw some thrusters on the tail end redirecting the angle in some of these landings.
Look closely, it’s cgi
@@motchness look deeper. People have seen this with their own eyes, don’t say shit like they used holograms.
How it does this is that the engine inside moves around, making the rocket turn at different angels, and also it makes the rocket not need fins.
@@motchness cgi u reckon?
I remember when falcon heavy was launched
Bravo to masks team for a terrestrial landing. When I worked at NASA as an engineer, I dreamed of a day one Rockets Woodland like this instead of doing a water splash down. I don't know if this technology is suitable for large Rockets carrying human passengers. But this is truly an amazing accomplishment. Congratulations.
P. S. Sorry about the miss spellings but I'm using an iPad and it does not let me edit.
I guess NASA scientists can't spell or did you sweep floors and empty garbage ?
You should share your experiences being a nasa engineer. I would love to read that!
The one question I'm asked most often is, "Did they find any life on the moon that they're keeping secret?" I was not privy to that information. But It seems to me that if there was intelligent life on the far side of the moon, we would have continued flying there and we probably would have built a lunar colony. By the way, I am really pissed off that we never built a lunar colony in the almost fifty years since we first landed. We wasted all those years when we could have learned how to live on another world. What a great training ground it would have been for a Mars colony!
My eyes are telling me something is off..
Your eyes are lying
Your eyes are cross eyed…
I was arguing with a guy who thought the earth was flat and space is CGI on a livestream it was funny asf 😂
i swear "i can almost see the string"
i mean, not really seeing the string, but the way the rocket swaying, to the left and right make me questioning these..
please add up some calculation of the landing, or maybe a footage with cgi to expalin how it works...
You're a funny guy....lol
i don't think i was trying to be funny...
just like "astronauts pull each other string" video on youtube (go search and see).. we've been fooled too often...
1 simple thing: smaller thrusters on top of the rocket.
is that so..??
no comment about "astronauts pull each other string"..??
VVindowZ So what is your degree in sciences that will help you understand the maths?
Dude the one where it blows up is SOOO amazing!
Bitch shut the hell up bitch you couldn’t land a drone let alone a rocket
you guys realise that people have seen this happen in real life right?
This doesn't prove anything one way or another but: I implore you to find one live facebook feed of this happening. Everyone has phones nowadays, and surely someone made a video of this on their phone. But all I can ever find is the same footages, none of which are ever longer than 15 seconds.
@@onerainywish5556 You literally can find them.... Tens and tens of videos on TH-cam....
1. How big are the rockets
2. What is the purpose of landing the rocket ?
3 . where do they get the funding for these.
This article should be helpful for you.
Link : www.engineeringworldchannel.com/spacex-rockets-landing/
one reason that they can land them is so they are reuseable
1. The Falcon 9 rockets seen in the video are about 70m(230ft)
2. The purpose of landing the booster is for re-usability, to drive down the cost of access to space
3. The funding is secured by private investors and the customers that pay SpaceX to place their satellites into orbit.
@@fiveoh1927 Nasa dude. Nasa funds them the most
The CGI is strong on this one
I remember not to many years ago a rocket landing like that was pure science fiction!
Still is. Never underestimate the general public's gullibility to believe utter tosh.
Its fake the rocket is a payed actor
T H lol
@TheLaughingMan0603 paid actors.
@TheLaughingMan0603 i get paid for this :'(
TheLaughingMan0603 Damn you’re fun
@@beeok3649 wow i wonder where is the stand to launch them up ull say they removed it with photocopy
Question, when the ticket came in to land did the landing area sink ? Thousands of pounds of force to keep that rocket up, did the platform sink at all?????
although you might think it could sink, that is simply not the case. I don't have a large understanding of how the falcon 9 rockets work, but im sure they lose a lot of weight after MECO. but you have to understand that ships can hold large amounts of weight, and I don't know what its called in physics, but an example are cargo ships-they carry tons and tons of cargo, so just because something is heavy, doesn't mean something on water can't hold it. I understand how it can be a little skeptical to you, but physics is confusing to me too.
That ship is the size of a football field.....
Please keep in mind that despite the size of the booster, it's actually not very heavy at landing because It's mostly an empty tank and it already spent most of its fuel during the ascent and therefore the landing platform doesn't sink.
Do you think the landings are fake?
You are fake news
of course they are fake..
.......how much fuel does a rocket need to be able to fly “round-trip”?? AND retro-land!!!!
.......how easy is it to recover a WINGED JET PLANE, from a full freefall, combined with rolling, tumbling and flipping in EVERY DIRECTION..??? change that to a tupe with NO WINGS....!!! not only recover, reverse 180 degrees.. slow down, and land!!!!! all on one tank of fuel!!! lol
......anyone who thinks rockets can retro-land.. have NEVER flown even a toy rocket!! forget rockets, why do you think Quad-copter drones are SO FLAT AND WIDE.?? even then, its hard to keep them level.. imagine the drone as a pencil.. and try keeping that baby straight!!!! LOL....now try throwing it so that its flipping in every direction.... NOW RETRO-LAND THAT PENCIL!!!!
Engineering World completely fake!! They just rewind a video of rockets taking off.
well they i think they are real cause if look closely there are thrusters on the the top of the rocket and the bottom thurster is movable
it can move in a circle like up to 45 to 70 degrees ac comping with the top one thrusters to balance the rocket while landing and as those rockets are not leaving earth so they dont need extra fule tanks and thursters as the extra thrusters are only needed to increase the speed of the rocket so that it can enough speed to leave earths magnetic field
Govan Sossion so that’s how exhaust plume goes back UP the exhaust....yeah, guess again. No one launches from a empty pad. No one
Sheldon would be proud!!!
Ahahaha Hilarious
1:06 Landing, huh.
Number 2 was perfect.
looks alot like CGI in my opinion.
I agree.
It's real
excellent video
Thank you !
“Which was the perfect landing according to you?”
- not #4
Duh that was a crash.
Double booster landing really got me as a number one so far
The amount of people trolling in this comment section lol
It all happens within 10 seconds. These things seem so agile. It’s hard to imagine a big fat starship doing this the same way.
To many trolls in this comment section.
Where are the counter thrusters to control the angle of the rocket when landing?!?
My 8 year boy says he like first landing was awesome. .wow
I personally love the second one because it looks like it's about to fail and manages to correct at the last second. Huge accomplishment there.
Thank you for your feedback Geeta !
Have a great day day ahead !
For all who think ITS fake ,just see it directly from landing area where ITS land , just sit still when burning rocker fuell burn u from above when ITS landing
#3 SOUNDS LIKE A DRAGON BALL FIGHT SCENE🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
I am not sure about this. The rockets seem to be coming down at a fair rate of speed & at an angle. Then it slows to next to nothing to land. But how does the rocket correct it’s angle ? I can’t see any side retro booster type things ( I am not sure what they are called )to rectify this. If this is real then it’s very clever, but I have doubts.
There are "grid fins" on the side of each booster, near the top, that it can pivot to steer itself. These provide additional drag. As for how it slows down so quickly - keep in mind that despite the size of the booster, it's actually not very heavy at this point. It's mostly an empty tank, because it already spent most of its fuel during the ascent. It doesn't take much force to slow something down that has very little mass.
Additionally, each engine has something called 'thrust vectoring', which means each engine can individually tilt its nozzle to provide thrust in a certain direction, rather than straight down. This is used for fine steering once it's almost at the pad. This is very noticeable in video 4, when the booster is off-course and is trying desperately to correct itself, so it uses every method it has - grid fins, thrust vectoring, and even RCS (reaction control system), the puffs of gas near the top.
That's a wonderful explanation. Thank you so much !
Much appreciated!
You can see them poofing out the sides of the top on one of the landings. They also vector the nozzle I believe.
Why do all of these look so fake?
cause it is.
Cause it’s not something you see regularly
boi it isn't fake cuz faking it cost more money and time.
Saltmine true.
because its so real
The most perfect landing isn't present here. It's the one where two rockets land simultaneously in the same picture!
I believe this video is older than that
Taitanz yeah you are probably right. I was glued to the screen today. It was so cool!
I feel bad for you if you are so determined to believe this is fake. Amazing things CAN be done! Besides.. why the fuck would you fake this shit? What purpose would that serve you? Or anyone else for that matter?
no one doubts amazing thing you tard. LOL and it's sad you're on the other side swallowing it all up.
jeff, i know it seems like there would be no purpose to fake the space x rocket landings. amazing things can be done, yes. But this is totally fake in every way!!!!!! Jeff, come on brother. Because you asked the question, I know that your subconscious knows already that what you are seeing here is 100%%%%%% FAKE and you are listening to that ask asking a honest question, so I want to give a honest reply:
when i look at the rocket at 2:18 , I want to puke. Just look at the outline. LMAO!!!!!!!;D If it was a PLAYSTATION commercial. JUST IMAGINE THAT spaxeX for Playstation 5
I do see what you are talking about the outline of the rocket looking fake. But just because something looks fake doesn't mean it actually is- what appears to be sloppy editing around the edges of the rocket is actually something else- refraction of light due to the hot air that the rocket is descending down into, a second or two behind the thrusters. It is the same effect that you get when you look above the surface of hot pavement on a sunny day- the hot air causes visual distortions in the air. Im sure you know what effect I am referring to..
If someone really wanted to fake a video to convince the masses then they wouldn't have included this visual effect, since it does make the video look fake if you don't realize what you are actually looking at.
Besides, it is actually quite easy to make a fake video that looks flawlessly real (Hollywood does it all the time), so to suggest that Space X put out such a lousy fake doesn't really make any sense when you consider all the resources they have.
it looks so fake, it must be real.
the ocean landings.
Nice Job. Always impressed with Space X
The last simulation looked the best. I'd go with that one.
Simulation is the key word
And another person screaming FAKE!!!! 😒
@@carlover5911 because it is fake. It is called cgi. It's just a pre-coneption of what a landing should be like or how ir is expected to be
Ignore the live feed and the eye wittnesses and the workers and the astronaughts. Its all fake right. And space is water and the sky is a dome made by god , thats why we can‘t go to space
It's not a simulation, its a actual footage !
0:55 exactly here the engine should gimbal to the right (as seen from the viewer) - this would need more fuel (which maybe wasn't available sadly), but would have saved the core..
hooman better at drifting than computer
These look seriously CGI !!!
cause they are... but it sure as hell sell though. XD
Danny Ong they aren’t though
Danny Ong: They are for real. Watched it land in person Sunday night in Lompoc, CA.
Because they are just too good for the people to believe.
But sorry to break it you they are actual footage and NOT CGI !
@@dpastor6631 You're obviously a government troll so you would say that wouldn't you!
Красота то какая лепотаааа👍👍👍
First comment fourth view omfg and first like
Aydan Munson amazing
what is no. 3 launch? which rocket was it?
Hey North Korea... TRY THAT 😂😂😂😂
Kim Jong Un be like on the solar eclipse of August 2017, we have technology to block the Sun and the Americans are scared of us.
Hhhhh I am Korean. And I know well about our brother. They dont need this cuz they dont care "next" lol
I thought your profile pic was a hair on my screen