ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- The Supreme Court released new orders Monday, signaling what cases they'll take up in the next term. The justices are also expected to release decisions for several controversial cases later this week. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson has more.
CBS News 24/7 is the premier anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations that is available free to everyone with access to the internet and is the destination for breaking news, live events, original reporting and storytelling, and programs from CBS News and Stations' top anchors and correspondents working locally, nationally and around the globe. It is available on more than 30 platforms across mobile, desktop and connected TVs for free, as well as CBSNews.com and Paramount+ and live in 91 countries.
Subscribe to the CBS News TH-cam channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News 24/7: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mo...
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on X: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/ne...
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus....
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
When you fear integrity and accountability, you are no longer the good guys.
The supreme court is not subject to what you want them to be.
SOUNDS LIKE TRUMP AND HIS CULT
Interesting how you avoided a duscussion of “integrity and accountability” for the Supreme Court. But we all understand why.
@Kevin-hy8ok The Supreme Court aren't Subordinates to the other two branches. They are equals. 4th grade civics class
@@clintongriffin2077 Still no mention of “integrity and accountabilty”. Hmmm. By the way, the other branches of government clearly are. 3rd grade civics class. You might have been out sick.
As long as the Supreme Court continues failing in adopting the same ethical standards placed on lower courts, this court will go down in history as the most distrusted court in our country
Ethical. Nice post DNC.
Look we all know this isn’t about ethics. The left wants to make some vague rules to be able to use them anytime the court doesn’t rule the way they want.
Why do liberals hate it when the Supreme Court rules based on the Constitution?
@@fauxque5057 what case are you speaking of and are you speaking for all liberals?
@sandracl8757 what does the constitution say about federal Supreme Court to be nonpartisan?
Tim Scott re-writing history in groveling view of January 6th 🙄
Good
😂😂😂
Didn't attend the crime, like Charles Manson
Did you know he was cia and they had to lock him up to shut him up
If the federal law on obstruction is too vague, let’s not miss the forest for the trees. Doesn’t common sense dictate if you are trying to prevent the certification of a vote, YOU ARE OBSTRUCTING, even if the law is vague?
If you suppress information that directly affects public opinion regarding an election, you are perpetrating ELECTION INTERFERENCE. The 2020 Election is illegitimate and this illegitimately INSTALLED Administration will go down in history as the Master Stroke in the Destruction of Democracy in Western Civilization.
"Liberalism" is a dangerous mental disorder.
*Those that entered 'open doors' entered broken doors and windows. They knew what they were doing. Stop lying.*
Worse supreme court we could ever have to deal with
"Well, that's like your opinion man" ~ The Dude
It could be better, imagine if we could get rid of the three stooges. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson. It would be paradise.
Going fir trump
Dissolve this illegitimate, captured court and reverse all decisions going back to the beginning of Thomas and Alito’s terms.
For? They've done nothing illegal. Alito has the exact same 1st amendment right to free speech as anyone else. And if Thomas has done anything illegal then you can bet this failed administration would send in their FBI goons to arrest him.
Yeah Brown and sotomayor need to go. They’re activists and not worthy to be scotus.
"Dissolve the court" is surely a mantra which comes from those who genuinely care about democracy and checks and balances.
Didn't the supreme Court say Biden couldn't continue the rent moratorium, and then he tried to do it anyways? We all need to pay more attention to politics and keep our representatives accountable. Unfortunately the majority of people don't have the luxury to spend the time finding the information.
I have NO RESPECT anymore for that court.
It's the conservative judges I have no respect for. None of the 3 liberal justices are perfect, but I do have respect for them. At least their trying.
Ahh so making conservative rulings that you don’t agree with is what made you lose respect I don’t care I don’t have respect for the liberal judges
Oh no... you only like it when your side wins and agrees with you.
@@wawawis So you think it was one of The Conservative Judges who released the draft of The Dobbs Decision?
Typical liberal left ,,, they don’t like the courts ruling so suddenly the court is illegitimate and needs to be reformed.
Funny how the left looses their mind when trump would attack the courts in the same way they are.
Well, if the Extreme Court decides that a president can use Seal Team Six to exterminate political rivals, I guess that means bye-bye Trumpy.
And bye, bye to whomever the next GOP President wants gone, right?
#DonTheCon so deserves to have President Biden immediately order him detained and dispatched to a secure facility for extended Mental health evaluation.
Then if Mr. EX president can find a lawyer to represent him, he can file a writ of habeas corpus and the government can grab Judge Cannon's example and take their sweet time responding
hopefully Biden acts on it and has trump removed and later the supreme court
No, in that world there would never be another Rep president.
@@Genkentech Because Democrats wouldn't allow it?
Fences going up around SCOTUS. Wonder what that means?
That blue cities are about to burn
The majority of the Supreme Court be like, "HMMM. WHOSE RIGHTS SHOULD WE TAKE AWAY TODAY IN FAVOR OF AUTHORITARIAN FASCISM?!"
cope
Supreme is the wrong adjective to describe the majority on this court
cope harder
you walk into your neighbors house because their door is open? I think not.
I have experienced that many times - living in Shelters & my personal home.
City hall is a public area. So is the entire Capitol. People keep rushing into H of R meetings and getting kicked out. Just some common sense versus Nancy Pelosi Treachery
@@michaelanderson3096 and are you comfortable with it?
No.
I suggest you don't try it unless you are Superman and can stop speeding bullets
Doors was only open because they barged in!!!.
The police opened the doors and let everyone in. They asked people to stay in the ropes. I watched it all live streamed on TH-cam.
@@hellogoodbye. you can see everyone being let in at the 3:30 mark of this very video
Not what you think you're seeing.@@Runny117
Roberts Court = MAGA
Yup and it’s wonderful.
@@BVN-TEXAS Wrong. It's anti-American and anti-human. Real Americans don't vote for Trump.
The Court is made up of 9 Justices. 6 who rule based on the Constitution. 3 who rule based on feelings.
The 3 who rule based on feelings should be removed for not following the oath they took to uphold the Constitution
cope
@@BVN-TEXAScope harder bud lmfao
The people who went into the Capitol "because the doors were open" had seen the police block the entrance and they saw members of their group attack those officers. They saw rioters climbing walls and busting through windows. What kind of people would witness that and then think "Well the doors have been busted in, no harm in entering the Capitol."?
They were let in by said police.
@dannyball5515 THANK YOU!!!
Yes, they were. I saw the footage of cap police waving them in and had no barriers. They got rid of that footage. So they went in not knowing they were gonna be marked and tracked for breaking in and labled insurrectionists!!
All set up hit job, I'm thinking NP.
She said NO to extra police that Trump suggested to her. Well, the rest is history. President Trump walked into a hornets nest.
Trump 2024!
By which police officer at what door? Video or officer testimony that proves this would be needed. If an officer willingly opened a door and said come on in, the officer should be fired!
@patricial.6758 it happened many people like me saw the news and that's what happened
They took it down immediately so they could spin it on the nation
I don't follow their orders... ON ANY. THING.🤣
Separation of church and state🎉😂😢
Separation of church and state; begins at home.
Not in the constitution. Read it.
"Separation of church and state" is a metaphor paraphrased from Thomas Jefferson and used by others in discussions regarding the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
The principle is paraphrased from Thomas Jefferson's "separation between Church & State." It has been used to express the understandings of the intent and function of this amendment,
@@danrandall794 Even if that is so, religion doesn't belong in politics, there is no scientific evidence or any facts that back up most religious claims. I'd rather have my rights based on opinions from professional doctors, scientists, and researchers than the people who thought witches were real and they needed to burn them because God said they're evil.
The key is congress shall make no law. Don't care what anyone might have said the constitution is clear and does not say separation of church and state.
Supreme GRIFTERS --- 0% confidence in Robert's court
I got sick just seeing this post because it's never good
Ugh!! Stop skipping the 2A cases. There are at least 4 of them up there.
A failure of the system
More like the un-Supreme Court.
Simply walked in the Capitol because the doors were open?
Absurd
@@nonya.biznessyou haven’t watched all the videos have you ? On the back side of the house the police had opened the doors and were walking tons of people in.
The Capitol was closed to the public, and the demonstrators knew it.
oh no the house of liars and corrupt politicians was semi-ransacked. what a shame.
They were waved in really then cia beefed it up and got it crazy is what they showed the public
Thank you for this report, CBS and Jessica. Informative.
So biased
Is SCOTS so busy that they have to wait the last few days before their summer break to review and make a decision?
Presidents don't have immunity!!
So are they simply denying to take up the J6 case, without saying so
Where's the other Judges voice on the Bump stock and mapping and Starbucks?
Justice Sotomayor wrote a descent saying if it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quakes like a duck, it’s a duck.
The Starbucks case was, from what I can tell, is about an injunction that temporarily halt actions until it’s resolved by a fed labor board. There is a 4 point requirement or a 2 point requirement. The Supreme Court in essence said that the 4 point standard should have been followed. It was sent back to a lower court so the 4 point test could be applied.
theres no case for the bump stock ban. bump stocks do not meet the technical definition of a "machine gun" per the national firearms act. Therefore, the ATF was found to be wrong when they applied a modified definition of "machine gun" to ban bump stocks. Any ban has to come specifically from congressional legislation with a new legal definition of "machine gun". they were right to over turn the ban.
@@theforcedmeme Using your logic .. a car is defined as a motor vehicle with a combustion engine. A electronic vehicle does not have a combustion engine. So if I ran over someone it would not be vehicular manslaughter right?
That being said, I understand your point as far as the right process but . As Justice Sotomayor said, if it walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck …
@@theforcedmeme That was the verdict from the 6 maga judges. No surprise there. Just disgust.
@@CraftyGrandmaDem its not like it actually matters in the age of 3d printable full autos and untracable ghost guns
A fascist court without a doubt.
I hope our maga future isn't as bad a I fear.
We need 10 more justices on the court !! Make that 11 an even 20 ! Can the system find 11 that arent of any political party ??
Your ignorance is on full display!
Wow. Your village know you’re missing?
Your argument is flawed in one way even if you add more justices the court can still get very lopsided one way or the other!
@@dstarrII8442 let’s add ten. So Trump will make it worse?
It's better to have a number that does not divide evenly.
It's the reporters job to report the news not tell people that he thinks it's controversial or not
While I agree with you, that ship sailed long ago. Most,if not all, reporters, journalists, etc. do not hold to that view. Unfortunately.
WHO SAYS FOX FAKE NEWS?
@@gwenniegirl50 EVEN THOUGH YOU THINK YOUR OPINION IS CORRECT, IN REALITY IT MEANS NOTHING, BUT EVERYONE DOES HAS A RIGHT TO THEIR OWN OPINION, EVEN THE UNINTELLIGENT, AT LEAST YOU CAN FORM YOUR OWN
You're right! Incredible how Fox calls themselves news, they're the worst! Bunch of crybabies.
so do not call it news. The episodes would be talk shows with consultants or editorials. 3:23 shows@GRIZZ-sb1zt
No immunity to any president
AMERICA Supreme Court Judges, don't need no STINKING ETHICS! 😆😅🤣 no one to be accountable too is their drug of choice!
When will you stand on your own to feet and not push a specific agenda. No media or politician should make up complete crap and feed it to the American people! There is no excuse. We are all American and want the best for our country! God Bless the USA
Is the court going to keep helping felon Trump just because he got some of them their jobs.
Um, YES!
I am so sad for the Justices like Sonja Sotormayor. A wonderful citizen, and a great justice. Her whole career being clumped into the disgusting views of others with no honor.
Laws have been around from the beginning of time. From are god that said to who ever heard it, we are men that created laws that are broken down For the Richman, poor man,, Beggar man, thefts. Making up the level's are criminal justice. Categories who gets what punishment, for the charges everyone is convicted for. Freedom life in prison, and Death. Don't forget laws respect laws.
FTS
7 of them are paid to rule just sayin so great that only newest justice is not paid off and one has at least recanted the behavior. The others not worth a bucket of spit
Of o yuo
vote all republicans out!! Every bad decision the court makes take it out on the republicans!!
I dont care what they have to say!! 🖕 Im just gonna vote!!
Martha Anne's a beard. Clarence Thomas Frau also
She is a great communicator has a nice voice
Ginnie a beard
Y'all some slipknot frauds
I agree with Tim Scott this political prosecution must end
Sweet for them
👍💖🐰🦄💯👍
The Brunson Case has been kicked around for over a year now….the SCOTUS must do the right thing!!! Trump won 2020!
😂😂😂😂😂🤥🤥🤥
We need to replace them with...
A.I
If programmed correctly - it should enact the laws as prescribed and not be swayed by outside influencer's.
It would not worry about flags, Bump stocks, Rv's, sending relatives to prestigious academies.....
Best Supreme Court ever. Decisions actually constitution based
So basically a nothing story. Great job.
Your right JB has never been a good guy. More like a wolf in sheep's clothes.
As opposed to djt ? Which one ran a fraudulent university? Which one stole money from charity? Which one has told over 300,000 documented lies? Which one who refused to leave office and sold classified documents to foreign countries?
Entrapment
I really like the new and improved Supreme Court. Thank you President Trump.
Scott focuses on 1% of the what happened and ignores 99%. The epitome of totally distorting reality. How do these people get air time??? Lies do not deserve air time.
The supreme court has been doing an outstanding job with its rulings lately, consistent with the constitution and the intentions of our founders.
The court is finally ethical.