ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

H1MIN: OPTICAL RANGEFINDERS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 เม.ย. 2018
  • Optical rangefinders were an essential tool in all forms of artillery.
    This video explores the basic mechanics of how they work.
    If you are interested in learning more, these links below provide fascinating insights. Courtesy to them for their valuable research and insights.
    en.wikipedia.or...
    www.navsource.o...
    mathscinotes.co...
    www.eugeneleesl...

ความคิดเห็น • 199

  • @ThatGuy-vw6gc
    @ThatGuy-vw6gc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +807

    I had always wondered how these types of optical range finders worked, now I know. Thank you.

    • @user-vi2cr9tb3d
      @user-vi2cr9tb3d 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Before i watching this video i though it look like how hammerhead shark see

    • @osanixian1499
      @osanixian1499 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I still dont know

    • @victorponce7238
      @victorponce7238 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too

    • @hamaljay
      @hamaljay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And knowing is half the battle.

  • @EthanDyTioco
    @EthanDyTioco 4 ปีที่แล้ว +333

    THIS.
    When I was learning trig in high school, I thought to myself, "man, i can probably learn the distance of things with trig manipulation." But I couldn't wrap my head around it, and I didn't have a lot of time to muse over it since I'd miss things in class, and also I other things captured my attention.
    But man, it's satisfying to see that indeed, they used trig to do rangefinding back then

    • @theaveragepro1749
      @theaveragepro1749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      its pretty easy math, tan x = o/a where x is the angle, o is the side opposite the angle, and a is the side adjacent to the angle. a would be the length of the rangefinder, o is the distance, so just rearrange to solve for o, tan x * a = o

    • @tobbleboii5988
      @tobbleboii5988 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      well not only back then, when you want to know the distance between you and a sun, you can't throw radar waves at it. Not only will it not work due to background radiation but you'd wait forever. This knowledge is still used today, and it's got so many applications :D

  • @bobbulat1393
    @bobbulat1393 4 ปีที่แล้ว +898

    This is why you need to pay attention in trigonometry class in school

    • @UltraNyan
      @UltraNyan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      bruh they probably had sliders with pre calculated values.

    • @DreadX10
      @DreadX10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      @@UltraNyan They turned a knob, read a number and passed that number on.

    • @r-saint
      @r-saint 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      To travel back to 1918?

    • @thefreedomguyuk
      @thefreedomguyuk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      The range finders were manned by deckhands. Who were deckhands because they did not pay attention while at school.
      Hence the instruments had calibrated scales with the range readings. The sailors did not make the calculations.
      Having said that, paying attention to trigonometry IS a great idea.

    • @thefreedomguyuk
      @thefreedomguyuk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @Sparky Puddins You'll be fine. A criteria when designing military weapons is that they must be useable for uneducated people.
      And yes, I was in the Forces 😉

  • @jack2198
    @jack2198 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I was a OM in the U.S. NAVY and we repaired these rangefinders, gunsights, bino"s and other optical equipment. It was the best rate in the Navy!

  • @micro2108
    @micro2108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    I literally never knew the mk 37 had people in them

  • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
    @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another excellent and concise video. These naval rangefinders were only part of the "hitting a moving target 9 miles away" apparatus. The range calulated from these rangefinders was then fed into a fire control computer which took in all the variables...Range to target....Own ship's course & speed.... Target ships course and speed, being the most obvious, but there were also MANY other variables which had to be taken into account, especially at longer ranges. These computers developed into HUGELY complex mechanical and then electro mechanical machines, which would then spit out the correct bearing (azimuth) and elevation angles for the guns.
    Once a couple of "sighting shots" had been fired, the fall of those shots would then be observed (Left/right of target....Short or over) and corrections fed into the computer , until straddles & hits were obseved on the target.

    • @H1MIN
      @H1MIN  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for your excellent comments and insights. The Ford fire control computer on the Iowa class Battleships are amazing pieces of technology considering they were mechanical.

  • @timhouser
    @timhouser 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you make video THIS is how you do it.
    1. It's short and to the point.
    2. It does not have unnecessary, annoying music covering up the speaker's voice. He can be clearly heard.
    3. It gets into the topic quickly.
    4. It finishes without a plea to subscribe. (It respects its viewers.)
    Oh, and thereby earns my subscription.
    Well done.

  • @Cynthia_Cantrell
    @Cynthia_Cantrell 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I prefer to think of the geometry of range-finding for your gun as... "triggernometry."

  • @thefreedomguyuk
    @thefreedomguyuk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Wow! Even a geek like myself will have to say "Never thought of that".
    Surprisingly simple.
    Great video !!

  • @jatigre1
    @jatigre1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I found out that binoculars can do the same thing by moving the focus. It actually moves the depth of field

  • @kanty12I
    @kanty12I 6 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    I love this short videos, if you could make one about HEATFS like you did with the APFSDS it will be awesome
    (#Subbed)

    • @H1MIN
      @H1MIN  6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Good suggestion, I have started one on HESH, but for HEAT I was thinking about tandem warheads since most modern amor systems use them. Just need more research.

    • @kanty12I
      @kanty12I 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Great!

  • @matasjurevicius7548
    @matasjurevicius7548 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Really good videos explaining interesting topics in military. Keep it up, you deserve a lot more views with videos like that!

    • @melonshop8888
      @melonshop8888 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      THE INVENTOR MAYBE HAVE A LOT TOUGH TIME CREATING IT. :3

  • @TheTallOne890
    @TheTallOne890 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This was a simple, short, informative, but well spoken video. You my friend have earned a new sub P.S really like your not overly enthusiastic/annoying voice, it's a refreshing break from all these other youtubers

  • @neilwilson5785
    @neilwilson5785 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the punk rock military history channel. The info is delivered very quickly and effectively.

  • @bukanmasmentri
    @bukanmasmentri 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I knew it. Just like a 35mm film rangefinder camera focusing. Thanks for sharing.

  • @elijamatt7929
    @elijamatt7929 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    On Spot explanations. So much better than other "history" channels that use 2 mins to advertise pay to win egoshooters and then proceed to name every solider involved in the event because they read that one book. Thank you.

  • @tu-95turbopropstrategicbom55
    @tu-95turbopropstrategicbom55 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very good! I would love to see a video on the Sidewinder and the old spin-scan seekers.

    • @H1MIN
      @H1MIN  6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      This was a great suggestion, after some research I made a video. Sorry it took so long. Thank you! th-cam.com/video/axPJcdvJxLs/w-d-xo.html

  • @sheilaolfieway1885
    @sheilaolfieway1885 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    These videos are great short and straight to the point not like other videos that go on and on around a topic and only actually cover it at the end.

  • @MeThorvald
    @MeThorvald 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Holy cow - didn't think the concept was that simple! Great video !

  • @jishusingh8361
    @jishusingh8361 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What talented lad this. Such underrated channel!

  • @oceanmariner
    @oceanmariner 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice job on the 3d Fletcher class destroyer. I served on 2.

  • @JayRock907
    @JayRock907 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THIS EXPLAINS WHY THEY PAINTED THE SHIPS WITH THOSE ZIG-ZAGTRIAGLE SHAPES!
    omg thanks for the video

    • @grizwoldphantasia5005
      @grizwoldphantasia5005 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes! it was to disrupt rangefinders, not to hide them. They also made it hard to determine the length, or the distance between funnels, masts, and other superstructure, making identification hard, because if you know the ship type, your intelligence services may have described characteristics which help you identify max speed, draft, etc. Fake bow waves were another way to confuse guesses at speed. Some even made it hard to tell the target's relative course.

  • @fureversalty
    @fureversalty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another nice optical rangefinding method is called Stadiametric rangefinding, or just stadia (no, not Google). Lots of Soviet made sniper scopes and weapon systems had this, most notably in the PSO-1 scope. The way it works is by having a set height of your target known, say 1.7 meters for a person or 2.7 for armored targets, and through some clever trigonometry and math, a curve is drawn out according to the distance, often in increments of 100. If I missed anything please let me know

  • @kristijanmedved6066
    @kristijanmedved6066 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Here are some video ideas:
    shells:
    HESH
    APHE
    HEAT
    APCR
    Other:
    Fritz X
    Bunker buster
    Cluster bomb
    MOAB
    Fuel air bomb
    EXACTO bullet
    Love your animations could watch it all day cheers
    Also if you need any information about these shells i can give it to you

    • @edi9892
      @edi9892 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      APHE is pretty lame. APCBCHE is a bit more interesting.

  • @robertsaidel6707
    @robertsaidel6707 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    sounds simple when you hear it in 1 minute but it's brilliant love your channel bloke can't stop watching 👍

  • @kefpull6676
    @kefpull6676 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    was playing From The Depths but didn't know how they work irl, really interesting

  • @spliffy98
    @spliffy98 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact that the Yamato-class had 15 meter size rangefinders is such a flex on that Pagoda Mast bridge.

  • @darielrodriguez6984
    @darielrodriguez6984 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for all this work and research, and editing, and everything

  • @simunator
    @simunator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is absolutely wild. I love the power of math

  • @timg2088
    @timg2088 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is absolutely incredible how they figured that stuff out.

    • @KP3droflxp
      @KP3droflxp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trigonometry?

  • @alexbowman7582
    @alexbowman7582 ปีที่แล้ว

    Presumably trigonometry was used in conjunction with those searchlights pointed at WW2 bombers to find the height to set the appropriate fuse time.

  • @gwaith6666
    @gwaith6666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel is so interesting! Im spreading this videos like crazy to my mates 😘🥰😍

  • @samschellhase8831
    @samschellhase8831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I wonder if they ever used this at night, and after thinking they had it lined up, fired, but instead hit a different ship than intended

    • @AlteryxGaming
      @AlteryxGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      During the 1930s the Japanese developed more powerful optics for use in night battles, so yes, rangefinders can be used at night. The only issue is finding targets to aim at using star shells, moon light, and other means of illumination

  • @turcenoarthurjamil4364
    @turcenoarthurjamil4364 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    we have these maths in my college, I am a Sailor now😊
    love from Philoppines!💕🇵🇭

  • @natthaphonhongcharoen
    @natthaphonhongcharoen ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those are both coincident range finder. Stereoscopic doesn't need alignment but rather the operators read the differences in focus of the overlay inside

  • @oh8wingman
    @oh8wingman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is something worth knowing. Simple and accurate, one could easily build one for their own use for say surveying instead of using a long tape measure.

    • @DreamKalibur
      @DreamKalibur ปีที่แล้ว

      I would like to build one. How would you go about doing it?

  • @Braun30
    @Braun30 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We has similar range finders as mortarmen.
    A bit shorter, light enough to carry around.
    Needed calibration every time we used them, either with a known distance object or by looking for a very distant object like the sun.

    • @DreamKalibur
      @DreamKalibur ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm genuinely interested to know how you would calibrate the range finder by referencing the sun. Did you use some sort of filter to do this?

    • @Braun30
      @Braun30 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DreamKalibur there was a specific filter in the rangefinder.
      You turned a switch that would slide the filter in the eyepiece.

    • @DreamKalibur
      @DreamKalibur ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Braun30 interesting.

    • @DreamKalibur
      @DreamKalibur ปีที่แล้ว

      What was the range on these types of rangefinders?

    • @Braun30
      @Braun30 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DreamKalibur theoretically there was no range limit as the distance was the result of the convergence of two images which were to be superimposed.
      Effectively I presume up to 10 Km.

  • @markzuckerbread1865
    @markzuckerbread1865 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    good ol' mechanical computers, thanks a lot for the great animation!

  • @hienpham1306
    @hienpham1306 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice
    So excited
    Thanks Admin.

  • @Tiagomottadmello
    @Tiagomottadmello 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video !!! 👍👍👍

  • @edi9892
    @edi9892 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make a video on gun stabilizers.
    I think the earliest ones just dampened the swinging of the barrel, once the tank stopped moving.
    The next generation compensated for up and down movements. For shooting while driving, two more planes would need to be taken into account (essentially yaw, pitch, roll).
    I can´t imagine building one of them, let alone without chips, transistors and the like... (the same goes for VT-fuses)

  • @JohnZambarau
    @JohnZambarau 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep it up man you deserve way more attention

  • @HSMiyamoto
    @HSMiyamoto 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can buy hand-held versions for golfers. We had one in my old engineering office when we wanted to know how about far away something without using proper surveying equipment.

  • @MarcusHelius
    @MarcusHelius 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    These videos are great. Thank you.

  • @MrKabDrivr
    @MrKabDrivr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting clips. Soporific narration.

  • @TheShawna1
    @TheShawna1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have one of these types of range finders hand held you look through the sight you see two images adjust a knob when they come together look down at the gauge and you have the distance.

  • @hueban1643
    @hueban1643 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    didn't know rangefinders could be somewhat interesting. good video!

    • @H1MIN
      @H1MIN  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you, I appreciate your support!

  • @edi9892
    @edi9892 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you make a video on Claymore and S-mine?

  • @mauricioriano1
    @mauricioriano1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thaaanks, great animation...

  • @Onobody
    @Onobody 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even practical uses of math is less complicated than one's taught at school

  • @Dog.soldier1950
    @Dog.soldier1950 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The axis never developed radar range finding allowing for first shot hits in all weather. The USN system from mid 43 on was accurate in no visibility situations, using the mk 2 Ford analog computer

  • @PeterWalkerHP16c
    @PeterWalkerHP16c 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Trig is *everywhere* in science and engineering.

  • @fockewulf9518
    @fockewulf9518 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    bru please cud ye show in details how each if the optical range finder types worked in details and what are the equations?

  • @Cyberdactyl
    @Cyberdactyl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This concept is still used in astronomy and called "The Parallax Angle".

  • @SA-xf1eb
    @SA-xf1eb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @edi9892
    @edi9892 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wondered about the strange things on many German WWII-tanks and those double periscope (looking like bunny ears) on artillery. I guess they are smaller versions of it.

  • @Fabrizio_Ruffo
    @Fabrizio_Ruffo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So did the dile give you the range, or did you have to do trig to read the data?

  • @bluewave2536
    @bluewave2536 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remind me of those older film cameras

  • @schuhsuppe7228
    @schuhsuppe7228 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would had become a mathematics expert if math tests would been like "calculate the distance to the enemy battleship" in school

  • @Master-bj8mt
    @Master-bj8mt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    same on Amx-50 Foch, Amx-30 (1972)

  • @dave_xc
    @dave_xc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So a spotter scope works like a miniature one of that on the ship

  • @jarhead565
    @jarhead565 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well we know one thing...that one day, trigonometry and algebra would save our lives.

  • @nickfarni5075
    @nickfarni5075 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i was waiting for the ship in the background to explode but then the video ended

    • @Nikola95inYT
      @Nikola95inYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      *reality is often disappointing*

  • @nursoweilja1487
    @nursoweilja1487 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video

  • @thetreblerebel
    @thetreblerebel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about that huge analog computer on the Missouri or Alabama battleships

  • @VRichardsn
    @VRichardsn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant.

  • @agungh1670
    @agungh1670 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like skestan principle ?

  • @rushedandlost
    @rushedandlost 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We think we are so high tech now.
    We were pretty high tech even then.

  • @militaryfreak4856
    @militaryfreak4856 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    your videos are beautiful are informative :)

  • @user-kj1od5ed7p
    @user-kj1od5ed7p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool I like the video thank you

  • @axeppo
    @axeppo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should make one on fire control systems!

  • @firenzarfrenzy4985
    @firenzarfrenzy4985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me: Miss when will I need this irl?
    Teacher: Yes

  • @imperialstardestroyer712
    @imperialstardestroyer712 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's amazing

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent.

  • @speenlmar9575
    @speenlmar9575 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't know these existed, but thought one could use the principal on a large flat piece of land.

    • @pwnmeisterage
      @pwnmeisterage ปีที่แล้ว

      Use rangefinding measurements and locations on dry flat land?
      That's crazy talk. Only civil engineers and surveyors do such things daily for their jobs.

  • @p24ify
    @p24ify 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did the math teacher not use these as examples?If they did I bet a lot of us would learn much more.

  • @boia9228
    @boia9228 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u

  • @5RoastedPotatoes
    @5RoastedPotatoes 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i am bingining these videos

  • @user.who137
    @user.who137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So their was actually a purpose to knowing that one formula.

  • @Terraqueo22
    @Terraqueo22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow all these studies in Trigonometry Hypotunese in Highschool and they had a Computer in 1933 that find it automatically?

  • @katherinedicks6437
    @katherinedicks6437 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most improvement is the shortest time

  • @imranhazim5434
    @imranhazim5434 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When your parent order you changing radio knob and end up become rangefinder knob operator.

  • @HesFoset
    @HesFoset 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Me: Teacher, what will I do in real life with this trigonometry knowledge?
    At that time Teacher: *Sends me to the navy*

  • @mlgproplayer2915
    @mlgproplayer2915 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, the Optical RangeFinders are not magical artifacts that lost its powers before the electronic ones are created?

  • @damnsonwhereyoufindthis6701
    @damnsonwhereyoufindthis6701 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what software do you use??

  • @forcesightknight
    @forcesightknight 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always thought I was the range finder as the forward observer? This particular type of range finder is for line of sight, obviously, but once those guns are directed on land, the FO has the ball, with eyes on target. Now, they probably have a drone do it.

  • @crooksnchase
    @crooksnchase 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Longer video please.

  • @twasinjunaed6709
    @twasinjunaed6709 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting

  • @biswojitbhuyan8063
    @biswojitbhuyan8063 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this device is telemeter

  • @mpetersen6
    @mpetersen6 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    An optical system cannot be jammed (OK, smoke screens) plus an optical system still has value in a situation where ships are potentially providing naval gunfire support. Drones are valuable but they aren't the only solution. Besides there is the potential for jamming drone communication channels or being shot fown.

  • @frustriert
    @frustriert 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    One minute of condensed no bullshittery knowledge. This really needs respect. Especially on youtube.

  • @Specss
    @Specss 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun fact: you can find the same optical range finder on some WWII french Tank Destroyer

  • @zejalt8608
    @zejalt8608 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    why didn't they use a ruler?

  • @jimmysweat2200
    @jimmysweat2200 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Acquired

  • @Milk-ew4pf
    @Milk-ew4pf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice fletcher rendering

  • @alexbowman7582
    @alexbowman7582 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Earlier in WW2 the Germans had far better optical rangefinders hence the successful hit on the Hood, later in WW2 the allies had RADAR range finding which was far superior.

  • @boenzitem8747
    @boenzitem8747 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe to become the crew, they need someone who passed the complicate math exam, and I wont pass it... lol

  • @themasteryocheese8133
    @themasteryocheese8133 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow

  • @Malaveldt
    @Malaveldt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So dazzle camo would have really messed with getting a reading with a coincidence rangefinder. Huh.

  • @jimmysweat2200
    @jimmysweat2200 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    X marks the spot 🎯