5.2 The Traditional Analysis of Knowledge

A series of lectures delivered by Peter Millican to first-year philosophy students at the University of Oxford. The lectures comprise the 8-week General Philosophy course and were delivered in late 2009.

[@jonas-leopoldvonbismarck-s2113]

Indeed, Philosophers hate it when people say "that's true for you, but not for me"... thank you so much, Peter.

[@MrPemrich]

I wish there was some sort of picture-in-picture running along with this that showed the slides play in the back ground.

[@selfincurred]

5:15 What difference? It's like saying if your notion of truth is identical to mine then you can't not call true what I do. Absurd. Simply privileges one stereotypical familiar 'reality'. Why don't they just admit the conditionality of their notion of truth? Zealots.

[@gorgolyt]

@selfincurred Derp.

[@graemejones4725]

Muddling round in the soup of basic concepts like 'right', 'true' 'knowledge' etc. There is something flawed in the basic building materials, which makes it impossible to build a meaningful construction. - Dogmatic, closed, unenlightened, circular.
If you can't stick it on a bumper sticker, it's not worth knowing.