I don't know if it is still relevant for you, but you can archiv this by using an LFO (shaped as a "pluck envelope") and connecting it to the level of the OSC. If you adjust the speed of this "Envelope-LFO" to the speed of the Arpeggiator-LFO, you'll have a pluck sequenced/arpeggiated.
Maybe Lillian wants to jump in here. But for my benefit, a genuine question: don’t you think an arpeggiator is a subcategory or subfunction of a sequencer? Is it not like calling a car a car instead of a vehicle? Or am I misunderstanding something? Thanks for commenting in any case :) /George
@@Kilohearts I don't agree. Even though a sequencer can ba made to play an arpeggio, a real arpeggiator distrubutes the notes of a chord and so the harmony can be changed at will, even live, whereas a sequencer plays a set patter, even though that can be transposed at will, it's still the same pattern.
@@rogercawkwell5413 Oh that's interesting - I didn't really think of that, but yeah. Cool insight, now you mention it. Thanks! I wonder if we can make a "true" arpeggiator in Phase Plant... A challenge for another video, I guess :) /George
@@rogercawkwell5413 I think you can actually do that by using another LFO attached to the one which works as arpeggiator. At this point, I should disagree with all of you, because a sequecers is an LFO following a pattern that we perceive as a seequence and not as a wave lol.
Ooo thanks for having me y’all!! Phaseplant has been so much fun to play around with! Stoked to keep exploring.
It’s awesome to have you on our channel! Thanks for all the hard work :)
/George
Great presentation.
Cool ! Nice tutorial
Interesting pitch modulating. Can you do this with plucks?
I don't know if it is still relevant for you, but you can archiv this by using an LFO (shaped as a "pluck envelope") and connecting it to the level of the OSC. If you adjust the speed of this "Envelope-LFO" to the speed of the Arpeggiator-LFO, you'll have a pluck sequenced/arpeggiated.
Nice
I liked the "nopes" lol. Horror ftw
3:00 A LFO Editor is something Bitwig needs.
thank you!
cheers!
👏👏👏
🚀🌎✨💫
Hi
Swoopies is going in the dictionary.
🙋🏻♂️🇲🇽
You call it an arpeggiator but really it's a sequencer. Confusing for newbies.
Maybe Lillian wants to jump in here. But for my benefit, a genuine question: don’t you think an arpeggiator is a subcategory or subfunction of a sequencer? Is it not like calling a car a car instead of a vehicle? Or am I misunderstanding something? Thanks for commenting in any case :)
/George
@@Kilohearts I don't agree. Even though a sequencer can ba made to play an arpeggio, a real arpeggiator distrubutes the notes of a chord and so the harmony can be changed at will, even live, whereas a sequencer plays a set patter, even though that can be transposed at will, it's still the same pattern.
@@rogercawkwell5413 Oh that's interesting - I didn't really think of that, but yeah. Cool insight, now you mention it. Thanks! I wonder if we can make a "true" arpeggiator in Phase Plant... A challenge for another video, I guess :)
/George
@@Kilohearts I would so much welcome that!
@@rogercawkwell5413 I think you can actually do that by using another LFO attached to the one which works as arpeggiator. At this point, I should disagree with all of you, because a sequecers is an LFO following a pattern that we perceive as a seequence and not as a wave lol.