ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
The hidden history of DNA - with Gareth Williams
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 มิ.ย. 2023
- Who were the unsung heroes behind the discovery of DNA? From its discovery in pus-soaked bandages in 1868, to the aftermath of Watson's best-seller The Double Helix a century later.
Watch the Q&A here: • Q&A: The hidden histor...
Buy Gareth's book here: geni.us/Ec34Agv
This video was recorded at the Ri on 25 July 2019.
From 2003-8, Gareth Williams was Dean of Medicine at the University of Bristol, where he still teaches on the Medical Humanities and Medical courses. He now writes books for the general reader about the history of medicine and science. The first, the product of a sabbatical year in 2009, was Angel of Death: the story of smallpox (shortlisted for the Wellcome Medical Book Prize 2010). This was followed by Paralysed with Fear: the story of polio (2013) and A Monstrous Commotion: the mysteries of Loch Ness (2015). His book Unravelling the Double Helix: the lost heroes of DNA, was published in the UK by Weidenfeld & Nicolson in April 2019, and by Pegasus (USA) in autumn 2019. Gareth has served as President of the Anglo-French Medical Society, Vice-President of the European Society for Clinical Investigation, and Chair of the Trustees of the Edward Jenner Museum. He is proud to be an Ambassador of the British Polio Fellowship, which supports those living with the legacy of this cruel disease. His main outside interests are music and natural history. He is a keen flautist and saxophonist, playing in orchestras, a wind quintet and various jazz groups.
--
A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
modsiw, Anton Ragin, Edward Unthank, Robert L Winer, Andy Carpenter, William Hudson
Don McLaughlin, efkinel lo, Martin Paull, Ben Wynne-Simmons, Ivo Danihelka, Kevin Winoto, Jonathan Killin, Stephan Giersche, William Billy Robillard, Jeffrey Schweitzer, Frances Dunne, jonas.app, Tim Karr, Alan Latteri, David Crowner, Matt Townsend, THOMAS N TAMADA, Andrew McGhee, Paul Brown, David Schick, Dave Ostler, Osian Gwyn Williams, David Lindo, Roger Baker, Rebecca Pan
--
The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinstitution
and Twitter: / ri_science
and Facebook: / royalinstitution
and TikTok: / ri_science
Listen to the Ri podcast: anchor.fm/ri-s...
Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/e...
Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsle...
Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.
This is the first time I have heard a very coherent account of the "who, what, how, and where" of the discovery of the structure of DNA. Very well presented and rightfully given credit to all those who contributed and those who did not get recognized for such a pivotal piece of the science of life.
Sure
It's complete rubbish
@@enovasia If that's your whole argument you opinion doesn't count.
This was fascinating and understandable for the lay listener. A scientist who can explain so clearly is a real talent, and a gift to the rest of us. Thank you.
Many thanks, Professor Williams. You present your research in such a flowing and interesting approach. And also thanks Ri for your uploads. They are much appreciated.
How serendipitous. I had an interview last week where I had to give a talk on "An introduction to DNA". I ended up doing a fair chunk on the (relatively) unknown history including Mieschler, Levene, Chargaff etc.
I feel somewhat vindicated, even if I don't get the job.
Excellent presentation and gripping storytelling! Thank you!
Oh....it was too much helpful and informative. As a young teenager I'm curious about science and I always get benefited from this platform....I really appreciate the efforts of this platform making such informative videos.......
Sir continue your work, and be the best....
right
Wonderfully presented !! Congrats 😇
Nice video. Thanks for sharing
Pleased to have followed this well explained interesting enlightening talk. Cheers.
I can't see the point of the retrospective 'what if' approach. Undeniably, the links in the chain were all there before Watson and Crick. No-one denies that. But they were the first to form the links into a chain, and to arrive at a molecular structure that accounted for everything in that chain. I find it odd that the speaker talks of W & C rather dismissively as never having done any experimental research. Well, they didn't have to. All the data was there, but NO-ONE before them organized the facts as brilliantly as they did. They deserve full credit for their discovery.
He does say they deserve full credit. He’s just clarifying that their achievement was a theoretical model that explains many strands of data-much like Einstein and Darwin.
John Masson Gulland and colleagues at Nottingham wrote three papers in 1947 that made a big contribution. This was in addition to Creeth's PhD which Crick and Watson probably never saw. Michael Creeth's paper was the most important in that it proved the existence of the hydrogen bonds for the first time. Watson says in the Double Helix that he initially rejected their findings but then got very excited when he realised they were correct after all. It wasn't just the photos from King's College that put him on the right track, and it's possible that the Nottingham papers were even more significant.
Purposely commenting before watching any more (just after the two minute mark) after the initial statements about Crick & Watson. I'm sure over thirty years ago (possible earlier) I watched a documentary about how these two men had almost been like detectives (as well as scientists) and were in 'a race' to collate research (as much as do it) and also the major input made by the woman crystallographer that both produced the quality images & help analysis them. (will continue watching now) ADDED: Ok - watched to the end - and really enjoyed it with a fascinating (and complex) story of personalities, rivalries, missed connections & fate. Great lecture :-)
A brilliant thought- provoking lecture.
Thank you ! 🙂
Fascinating stories, and fascinating to see how personalities affected the rate of progress. But this also seems to be the theme of Watson's book. It is also a good demonstration that Nobel prizes in science are inherently unfair.
For sure, it's time to fulfill my unis biology skipped modules gap.
Can The Royal Institution either get a different set of mics, a better audio engineer, or make sure the speaker always has a glass of water on hand? So many of their lectures are unlistenable for me because of how unpleasant the high end mouth clicky noises are
Remember Rosalind Franklin xray of the double helix
I need to make a small addendum here... The Manhattan Project did not in fact grow out of the Tube Alloys project, they were independent at first; the Brits being so concerned with spies and secrecy that they actually shared little to no information with the American side. Once the governments decided to cooperate, the TA project was actually absorbed into the Manhattan Project because of how much further along they were.
No biggie, he did mention he wasn't that familiar with it.
Lol, I am waiting for logical or scientific proof of explosive nuclear reactions.
@kordelas2514 Does it bother you at all? Are you self-aware enough to realize the people around don't take you very seriously?
@@iambiggus It is irrelevant how anyone takes me as it is not my argument here.
@@kordelas2514 It's very obvious you don't care how people see you. Bye now!
@@iambiggus It's very obvious you don't have valid arguments.
I was hoping for and expecting the actual history of DNA.
You should probably pay more attention to titles, then. Spare you some of that disappointment in the future.
I looked it up on wiki, Erwin Chargaff was born in Chernivtsi, Ukraine (at that time this region was under Austria-Hungary's rule) and immigrated to Vienna at the outbreak of WWI. So I guess his "Lithuanian origin" was the speaker's slip of a tongue? 23:02
What happens at 16.37?
long story short: always question your results, that thing that you think it CANT be? it may be the answer
Great
Please, Royal Institute, fix your Mic Input!!! Everyone speaking here sounds like they're having a dry mouth. We're here to learn and not to be repelled
nice
Very hard to watch/listen with the lip smacking 😵💫
Does Not Apply
Very long story, not cut short for relevance and importance. Cannot believe the book editors did not tell him (the book has all the same faults)
Until 21.56......
is it possible that the helix is made of two electric lines one positve the other negative and that A C G T would be alternernating current 3 phases + N ? there are a lot of buffers in the blood so it is possible to make electrolytes !!!
Isn’t DNA triple helix? Corresponding to human light/spirit, soul and body? The spirit helix DNA somehow got lost. Waiting to be activated! Waiting for a trigger?
Are you being serious or are you trolling?
Hello I am in a quest to find a long lost cousin my cousin was born I was told home for unwed moms a catholic based place or a local hospital but stayed there eight months went to school well I would say in the sixties my guess … it was a girl I hear. …well the r7mor was her name dawn johnson on the day born but again not positive …in search of a way to find her she should be near my age so in her fifties now Arizona Texas California was her residents my aunty never had more children but this girl out there somewhere so any help to start search ty aunties name jerri Johnson her birthdate I believe July 8 th year um I think 1952um maybe
11:50 Friedrich miescher
The Royal Institution should not have given air time for this
How about first watching the video, then making one comment on your thoughts instead of spamming this comment section? That's just intelectually disappointing.
Fun how many of the characters involved are referred to as flamboyant 😅
Is DNA research comparatively flamboyant then ?
Beyond the half way point, no word on how Watson and others were late to the party. This is seriously boring and a wrong interpretation of history. Happy to discuss, my book on similar period is coming out soon
Gareth you must get out of the habit of referring to these as spirals. Spiral and Helix are distinctly different!
"Promosm" 😥
Itne cute gilr reactons mat liya kar yar
Special thanks for the lack of wokery. I was tempted to skip thinking there would be some. Glad that I didn't)
what is woke but a dog-whistle from the right to enact fascist policies?
Searched the comments to see how many praised it for being woke. Saw this instead and decided not to click off. It's like we need a disclaimer of some sort moving forward.
Thank the stars that you didn't skip thinking that there would be any until the end - it must have been difficult to keep up the hunt. Or to put in a leading bracket...
Show me on the doll where the woke hurt you.
@@orionred2489 In fact, in my particular case, pretty much all of the doll, because the woke policies have effectively made me a refugee. Won't tell you the details though, that's private... But even without that, and before that, I would be showing at the brain (let's assume the doll in question has one)...
The speaker claims to set the record straight. Then he launches into the same perpetuation immediately he decries. Rather than the other way round. Very disappointing. The myths continue
The more I hear the more I get annoyed. The approach should have been the reverse. Most of it is literally blah blah blah and detracts from the ultimate point: Watson and el was a minor reinterpretation of the shoulders of giants
Shameless selling of sub standard books
This really should never have been allowed to go ahead. Nothing here is a revelation is new, it's a pure PR effort for a book this is entirely wrong in the first place. So annoying. I expect far more from the Royal Institution and will withdraw my membership in protest. Boring and wrong, and nothing new or relevant. There's a reason that footnotes are footnotes - let them remain so, and not the whole scaffolding for incorrect interpretations. If the thesis was wrong, history was different. It's a whole bunch of what ifs that never would have ended in anything any different
Good riddance.
In summary: murky, misconceived pipe dreams of what if foot notes. The thesis is unfounded and based on scraping of the barrel of footnotes
Almost all of this is irrelevant
Much like your many comments on this video?
Frankly, almost unwatchable
Spamming the comment section with disparaging one-liners says a lot about you. I recommend gently pulling your head out of your rear end.
Really very disappointing intellectually. He sets out a plan and does not follow it
Takes a ridiculously long time via pus soaked bandages to even start to make the essential point, over half the lecture... what a joke
How serendipitous. I had an interview last week where I had to give a talk on "An introduction to DNA". I ended up doing a fair chunk on the (relatively) unknown history including Mieschler, Levene, Chargaff etc.
I feel somewhat vindicated, even if I don't get the job.