The T 55 "King of The Battlefield" - Warno Memes NATO bros.... Is it over....? Music: NATO Anthem Twitch: / bokoen Patreon: / bokoen1 My Discord: / discord Twitter: / bokoen1
There will probably be 1-2 more in this Warno campaign series. When they release more campaigns, would you like us to do those too and see them on the channel?
I'm 99% certain the German stats in this campaign are half what is displayed, because I've experienced the same issues of non-stop misses while the soviets never miss.
its eugen giving all the german units no veterancy while the pact forces are already experienced, in wgrd, each level of veterancy increases accuracy by 8% and reduces stun chance/time, im not sure about the veterancy stat boosts in warno, but if its anything along the lines of wgrd, then yeah, t-55s are gonna outshoot leo 2s bc eugen logic
@@justit1074the stat boosts arent nearly that drastic. Its mostly about your units keeping their cool so they don’t get stressed as easily and stress reduces faster. Stress reduces accuracy, fire rate, and causes routing in game.
@@justit1074which is stupid because the FCS of a Leopard 2 does all the heavy lifting for the gunner. I'm pretty sure the Leopard 2 has a similar FCS to the abrams so all the gunner has to do is lase and fire.
yeah the campaign is horribly balanced and borderline unplayed Mostly because as the german side you lack everything you need for combined arms, and especially against the hard AI, everything from the Pact has max vet. Me and friends actually stopped the campaign as NATO, because it is not winnable without being icnredibly chessy. Add to that the absolutely horrible LOS system and the bad solution for building and you end up with not that much fun.
@@johnclay2716 which is pretty stupid. What is worse, is that when one plays against the HARD AI, it get even worse, to the point where the T55s ATGM has like 70%+ accuracy
and that's with them getting the best possible map (the river one) for NATO back in the first episode, best thing PACT side can do is spam bmp-1 since they got ATGMs and are basically free since they're troop transports
This video just really shows the weakness of the campaign from the German side. One completely lacks good infantry AT, proper AA, and the Veterancy just makes the NATO side suffer. Add to that the horrible LOS system in citys and it really becomes hard to have fun. In the end, they would do way better by giving the NATO sides proper units. One cannot fight in WARNO with just tanks, unless one is the AI.
3:55 Not sure if this is how to works in WARNO but in red dragon low ranked units stun easier and have lower accuracy. And that leo is the one of the lower ranks. skill issue
In WARNO too veterancy has effects on accuracy and resistance to stress but i gotta say, I played multiple games with my german divisions with the highest vet possible on my leo2A3s and they still lost to T64s and T55s. The West Germans got nerfed to the ground lately
@@ANVILD3VILI mean a 2A3 isn't very well suited to fight T55s and T64s. Autoloaders, Low Silhouttes, larger guns, etc. Russian Tanks are kind of epic, NATO tanks have to be used very carefully and sparingly. In this campaign you have to rely heavily on your American Tank Division (which is pretty accurate to what would've happened historically)
@@notapuma russian tanks were and are trash. The T55 had a 100mm gun, the t64 has a 125 and the leos a 120 that should not be enough to make a huge difference in game, also the leo should have a HUGE range advantage which they lost in recent patches
@@ANVILD3VIL You obviously don't understand the implications of a 120mm gun vs a 125mm gun nor that there's more to it than just "a few milimeters" Russian Tanks are also equipped with ERA, and since it's hard to model individual ERA blocks on each individual tank, devs in games usually just give a "healthbar" or a damage resistance effect to said tanks, which allows them to be very "tanky" against chemical rounds until they're not (Red Dragon is a good example) Why should the Leo have a range advantage? It doesn't have a better gun than the T64, it's optics isn't superior, etc. There's no reason to think a leopard is superior to a T64.... unless all your knowledge of tanks is from a certain War Thunder (if you want to play something realistic, try GHPC)
@@notapuma How can you even think a tank developed(by the USSR) in the late 50s/early 60s is better than a tank developed in the early 70s? The fact that german tanks have among the best optics in the world is a well known fact by everyone who opened a book at least once. One more thing all western tanks(with the exception of the brits) have been firing sabot rounds for the past 60 years which ignore the ERA additional armor(wich is efective against chemical rounds)
You really don't no how to play this game lol. Who sends unsupported leopards into enemy positions without any recon, and then keep them in the battle when cohesion gets low
the problem is, that in the campaign you really dont have what you need to "play the game". Your tansk untis dont have infantry, so you need to combined them with your Panzergens units, but you need those early to cover the flank. the only unit that can really fight by itself is the 11 ACR squadron. ALL the german units are almost unplayable.
@@tizi087 It's pretty dumb how that works. All the units are these cohesive figures on the map. That works for east germany since they were meant to be able to operate independantly. But on the western side Panzergrens are not really meant to ever move without tanks.
The skill issue of not deploying smoke against the T-55 ATGMs is certainly something, but love the WARNO campaigns and hope you do the other ones as well.
Having played the campaign myself the german units definetly feel weaker, the atgms are basically the only good things about them (marders are also decent)
The west german infantry are terrible that’s the one thing. Their rocket arty, Marders, leopards, and Gepards are all really good. A big problem is that the leopard units don’t get any mainline infantry requiring actual panzergrienadiers to be slapped with them all the time to be properly useful They have had a very bad time in this game because they have lost so much through the campaign in terms of units.
@@MrCoolguy425 exactly. only having Panzerfaust 44 basically prevents one from setting up ambushes in woods, as one cannot kill any enemy tank with more than 3 sideshots. and if the tank turns your infantry is dead. The marder would be good, but they need tank support, which one doesnt have until very late in the campaign. And fighting only with marder and Jagaurs jsut wont work out for long. The German units are jsut horrible uneven. Either you have infantry, OR you have tanks. You can only have both by combining them, which you cant do until the campaign is almost over. Then add the higher pact veterancy and youa re doomed to fail.
For the side shot from the panzerfaust 44 wiki says that its a recoiless rifle so it probably fires some form of shaped charge and that its warhead size is 67mm so it makes sense that its not the most damaging thing
@@XMysticHerox I mean yeah, but if you engage more numerous cheap tanks in a range where they can actually do damage to you frontally and then stay in the unfavorable engagement, it’s kinda on you, they are going to win by pure mathematics. Eliminating one or two, smoking and then pulling back to regain cohesion is always an option. During one of my first matches I had two T-80BVs destroyed by a group of Leopard-1s even though I was defending and had first shot advantage because I stubbornly refused to pull out of the engagement when it became unfavorable, W. German mechanized infantry then followed and massacred me in the town I was defending.
@@BruhmomentMomentovik The problem is that opportunities to have long range fights are fairly limited on many maps and points. It is always way easier to force a closer range fight with cheap tanks while it is very difficult to force a long range one.
@@BruhmomentMomentovik Also you say this like the 2A3 can be at a range and not be penned by T55s which is just not true. 2A3s are just not worth the 100 extra points. Not even remotely. Which is the main issue with expensive tanks in the game. They cost hundreds more points while only marginally better.
The early Leopard 2s pre-2A4 had a lot of flaws, which were mostly ironed out with the 2A4. The ones in this video were 2A3s. Sure they should still be able to go toe-to-toe with T-55s (and even be better than), at least some can be explained away.
All East German units (or at least all tanks) are veteran veterancy, whereas NATO units are all green or trained. Thats why they miss so little and never seem to stun/lose cohesion/get routed
As much WARNO tries to be realistic...The unit stats for PACT units is just bonkers stupid. We had T-55s survive direct Leopard hits in the side armor. I really want to love WARNO but the PACT biast is showing
Yeah ill be honest the balancing in warno is just kinda a shitshow, they've just constantly buffed T-55s, T-72s, and especially T-80s over and over again, to the point that they're now near unstoppable
T55AM2B have Bastion Atgm which outrange Leo2a3 While T55AM2 doesn't outrange it The tank itself is a big modernization variant this is not normal T55A which doesn't have the same range I feel like people just never played rhe game and see T55 thinking it the basic tank when it more akin to a Sherman getting upgraded with better weapons and armor
There will probably be 1-2 more in this Warno campaign series. When they release more campaigns, would you like us to do those too and see them on the channel?
ya bro
yes
Yes pls
Yes
hell yeah. Also you have to remember because you are NATO as soon as the A-10 reinforcements arrive the Warsaw people wont be able to stop you
The poor NATO tank crews were shaking in fear at facing the dreaded T-55, no wonder they lost.
T-55, the Death Stars of Iraq
Warno is made by communist Frenchmen, of course NATO loses lol
I'm 99% certain the German stats in this campaign are half what is displayed, because I've experienced the same issues of non-stop misses while the soviets never miss.
They most likly nerfed the German tanks.
its eugen giving all the german units no veterancy while the pact forces are already experienced, in wgrd, each level of veterancy increases accuracy by 8% and reduces stun chance/time, im not sure about the veterancy stat boosts in warno, but if its anything along the lines of wgrd, then yeah, t-55s are gonna outshoot leo 2s bc eugen logic
@@justit1074the stat boosts arent nearly that drastic. Its mostly about your units keeping their cool so they don’t get stressed as easily and stress reduces faster. Stress reduces accuracy, fire rate, and causes routing in game.
@@justit1074which is stupid because the FCS of a Leopard 2 does all the heavy lifting for the gunner. I'm pretty sure the Leopard 2 has a similar FCS to the abrams so all the gunner has to do is lase and fire.
yeah the campaign is horribly balanced and borderline unplayed
Mostly because as the german side you lack everything you need for combined arms, and especially against the hard AI, everything from the Pact has max vet.
Me and friends actually stopped the campaign as NATO, because it is not winnable without being icnredibly chessy.
Add to that the absolutely horrible LOS system and the bad solution for building and you end up with not that much fun.
veterancy is such a hilariously important factor in determining fights in warno/wargame
also bo never micros his tanks. most airstrikes can be avoided by just popping smoke and backing up
"Russian bias isn't real guys Warno T-55 can't hurt you"
That D10T cannon round piercing through the Abrams from across the map:
era
It's literally just vet units VS not vet units
A leopard is not impervious to a T-55 cannon and the T-55 has higher vet crews in this scenario
@@johnclay2716 Veterancy doesnt really matter(at least for the germans) my Leo2A3s lost to T64s and T55s even when they had the highest vet possible
@@johnclay2716 which is pretty stupid. What is worse, is that when one plays against the HARD AI, it get even worse, to the point where the T55s ATGM has like 70%+ accuracy
I can't believe he canceled ICBM for this
Never forget what golden did. He can’t hide his love for evenicle and other morally questionable games. Ask him what that ogre did to that girl
Sausage delivering into the bowling ball?
@@jorgejin4840Hey, hey people
@@aaroncabatingan5238many thanks to the members of the merchant guild
can you tell me instead?
@@hanzohattori4078 th-cam.com/video/c5s3jGiJOcE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9DBIVoh7UxseMG_G From 5:12 onwards, I pray for your psyshic
Warno: A game where T-55s outranges Leopard 2A3
I mean they have the same range though thats still dumb.
Warno, a game where a single M1 abrams can take 5 frontal hits from a T-80
It made in France, of course they're shitting on anything German.
JohnLongShlong i mean reality era does its job
@@johnclay2716 i mean..we've seen a bradley beat a T90 into uselessness irl in the last 4 years. more ridiculous things have happened.
That usa tank div is the key to the kingdom on this campaign, loosing it is not a option lol
and that's with them getting the best possible map (the river one) for NATO back in the first episode, best thing PACT side can do is spam bmp-1 since they got ATGMs and are basically free since they're troop transports
and they called shoigu a mad man for calling them up
Every warno video be like:What the fuck counter-battery?? and what the fuck veterancy good no supression?
This video just really shows the weakness of the campaign from the German side. One completely lacks good infantry AT, proper AA, and the Veterancy just makes the NATO side suffer.
Add to that the horrible LOS system in citys and it really becomes hard to have fun. In the end, they would do way better by giving the NATO sides proper units. One cannot fight in WARNO with just tanks, unless one is the AI.
3:55
Not sure if this is how to works in WARNO but in red dragon low ranked units stun easier and have lower accuracy.
And that leo is the one of the lower ranks.
skill issue
In WARNO too veterancy has effects on accuracy and resistance to stress but i gotta say, I played multiple games with my german divisions with the highest vet possible on my leo2A3s and they still lost to T64s and T55s. The West Germans got nerfed to the ground lately
@@ANVILD3VILI mean a 2A3 isn't very well suited to fight T55s and T64s.
Autoloaders, Low Silhouttes, larger guns, etc. Russian Tanks are kind of epic, NATO tanks have to be used very carefully and sparingly.
In this campaign you have to rely heavily on your American Tank Division (which is pretty accurate to what would've happened historically)
@@notapuma russian tanks were and are trash. The T55 had a 100mm gun, the t64 has a 125 and the leos a 120 that should not be enough to make a huge difference in game, also the leo should have a HUGE range advantage which they lost in recent patches
@@ANVILD3VIL You obviously don't understand the implications of a 120mm gun vs a 125mm gun nor that there's more to it than just "a few milimeters"
Russian Tanks are also equipped with ERA, and since it's hard to model individual ERA blocks on each individual tank, devs in games usually just give a "healthbar" or a damage resistance effect to said tanks, which allows them to be very "tanky" against chemical rounds until they're not (Red Dragon is a good example)
Why should the Leo have a range advantage? It doesn't have a better gun than the T64, it's optics isn't superior, etc.
There's no reason to think a leopard is superior to a T64.... unless all your knowledge of tanks is from a certain War Thunder (if you want to play something realistic, try GHPC)
@@notapuma How can you even think a tank developed(by the USSR) in the late 50s/early 60s is better than a tank developed in the early 70s? The fact that german tanks have among the best optics in the world is a well known fact by everyone who opened a book at least once. One more thing all western tanks(with the exception of the brits) have been firing sabot rounds for the past 60 years which ignore the ERA additional armor(wich is efective against chemical rounds)
You really don't no how to play this game lol. Who sends unsupported leopards into enemy positions without any recon, and then keep them in the battle when cohesion gets low
the problem is, that in the campaign you really dont have what you need to "play the game".
Your tansk untis dont have infantry, so you need to combined them with your Panzergens units, but you need those early to cover the flank. the only unit that can really fight by itself is the 11 ACR squadron. ALL the german units are almost unplayable.
@@tizi087 It's pretty dumb how that works. All the units are these cohesive figures on the map. That works for east germany since they were meant to be able to operate independantly. But on the western side Panzergrens are not really meant to ever move without tanks.
@@XMysticHerox exactly!
Gonna be real here, Bo also sending those tanks out in suicide missions lol
6:02 trying to take out the spotter drone? Daring!
MY EARS! Braun is very loud.
I understood that rephrance!
The skill issue of not deploying smoke against the T-55 ATGMs is certainly something, but love the WARNO campaigns and hope you do the other ones as well.
The ICBM game is still cancelled btw
What do u mean?
@@ALV694 he means that they canceled ICBM game for this
Bet they regret that decision, ICBM, especially if everyone agrees to not use certain weapons or tactics that aren’t really fair, is super fun
Having played the campaign myself the german units definetly feel weaker, the atgms are basically the only good things about them (marders are also decent)
The west german infantry are terrible that’s the one thing. Their rocket arty, Marders, leopards, and Gepards are all really good.
A big problem is that the leopard units don’t get any mainline infantry requiring actual panzergrienadiers to be slapped with them all the time to be properly useful
They have had a very bad time in this game because they have lost so much through the campaign in terms of units.
@@MrCoolguy425 honestly for me the leopards didn’t do much but that might just be user error
@@MrCoolguy425 exactly. only having Panzerfaust 44 basically prevents one from setting up ambushes in woods, as one cannot kill any enemy tank with more than 3 sideshots. and if the tank turns your infantry is dead.
The marder would be good, but they need tank support, which one doesnt have until very late in the campaign. And fighting only with marder and Jagaurs jsut wont work out for long.
The German units are jsut horrible uneven. Either you have infantry, OR you have tanks. You can only have both by combining them, which you cant do until the campaign is almost over.
Then add the higher pact veterancy and youa re doomed to fail.
just when I thought I was going to get some shit done bro uploads smh
NATO has some real skill issue
For the side shot from the panzerfaust 44 wiki says that its a recoiless rifle so it probably fires some form of shaped charge and that its warhead size is 67mm so it makes sense that its not the most damaging thing
Is mega Campaign finale possible or no?
That was months ago, the idea is dead sadly
@@SupremeRTSwait, really? Like, did they announce it?
More Warno in general would be great, I’m really enjoying these scripts lately.
If the T 55 is as powerful in the game as it is in war thunder you ain't going to win that one
It isn’t that powerful it’s just skill issue
@@BruhmomentMomentovik Eh it's less the T55 and more that all cheap tanks in this game are kinda OP due to the stunning and routing mechanics.
@@XMysticHerox I mean yeah, but if you engage more numerous cheap tanks in a range where they can actually do damage to you frontally and then stay in the unfavorable engagement, it’s kinda on you, they are going to win by pure mathematics. Eliminating one or two, smoking and then pulling back to regain cohesion is always an option. During one of my first matches I had two T-80BVs destroyed by a group of Leopard-1s even though I was defending and had first shot advantage because I stubbornly refused to pull out of the engagement when it became unfavorable, W. German mechanized infantry then followed and massacred me in the town I was defending.
@@BruhmomentMomentovik The problem is that opportunities to have long range fights are fairly limited on many maps and points. It is always way easier to force a closer range fight with cheap tanks while it is very difficult to force a long range one.
@@BruhmomentMomentovik Also you say this like the 2A3 can be at a range and not be penned by T55s which is just not true. 2A3s are just not worth the 100 extra points. Not even remotely. Which is the main issue with expensive tanks in the game. They cost hundreds more points while only marginally better.
Swimmy Hellquill
At 6:00 were they aiming at me, the audience?
The early Leopard 2s pre-2A4 had a lot of flaws, which were mostly ironed out with the 2A4. The ones in this video were 2A3s. Sure they should still be able to go toe-to-toe with T-55s (and even be better than), at least some can be explained away.
9:15 someone is trying to sing a east german song 😂
God I loved Apollo when it was alive. You never know how shitty it would be today when you got on
I'll be waiting for that essay on moving forwards a few tiles then. LOL.
Things arent bussin Westbros
6:02 RIP the cameraman
rookie veterancy moment
All East German units (or at least all tanks) are veteran veterancy, whereas NATO units are all green or trained. Thats why they miss so little and never seem to stun/lose cohesion/get routed
23 seconds ago is crazy
NATO players where clueless
bo, you gotta let them play ICBM
As much WARNO tries to be realistic...The unit stats for PACT units is just bonkers stupid. We had T-55s survive direct Leopard hits in the side armor. I really want to love WARNO but the PACT biast is showing
When can we see more Gates of Hell?
Please press Q for hunt so you units will stop to engage while moving
Pleaseeeeee more bokoen
5:22 We're so back
I SWEAR some of those in-game voices sound like Bo and co.
EIN WEITERER SIEG FUR DIE ARBEITER UND BAUERN STAAT
what era did they put on those t55s
Yeah ill be honest the balancing in warno is just kinda a shitshow, they've just constantly buffed T-55s, T-72s, and especially T-80s over and over again, to the point that they're now near unstoppable
Having green air is so huge
I’m sorry but u have grouped a lot of your troops together…one can not resist to cluster them brotha bo
He's coping, coping and seething
Somehow dont have air superiority as NATO
Wow, what a skill issue
Singing the Heimliche Aufmarsch is Based 😎
Its crazy how shit leopards are in Warno
Love seeing the russian bias from war thunder is progressively infecting warno
u guys never look at the training level, lamo
44 seconds no views no fell off #swigma males rise up
Are the Warno devs by chance russian?
Hey Bo
Accurate assessment of the Leopard has been applied to the game. It's garbage LOL
Eaw again pls 🙏
Honestly im liking this more then the steel division videos
Hi
Warno watching rules:
Bo dying? Watch. Like. Subscribe.
Bo winning? Don't watch. Ask friend to dislike for me. Unsub again.
T55AM2B have Bastion Atgm which outrange Leo2a3
While T55AM2 doesn't outrange it
The tank itself is a big modernization variant this is not normal T55A which doesn't have the same range
I feel like people just never played rhe game and see T55 thinking it the basic tank when it more akin to a Sherman getting upgraded with better weapons and armor
Very early
fell off, prime bokoen wouldve had 109219291929192 trillion views by now
9th, bokoen's comment section fell off!
So this game was made by russians right
bokoen coping video
Go back to paradox games Map Boy