[EN] Stephen Seiler on Champions, Intensity Distribution & Fatigue Resistance || Episode

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @gregmorrison7320
    @gregmorrison7320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love this, "There are no short cuts, the best short cut is to figure that out quickly, and do the work"

  • @gregmorrison7320
    @gregmorrison7320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you and thank you so much to Dr Seiler for spending so much time to share so many observations, I've searched out quite a few pod casts of his and this has been one of the best.

  • @XX-is7ps
    @XX-is7ps 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brilliant interview/conversation, and you seemed to really get Stephen talking and extending beyond his core/typical topic coverage on the basics of polarization - great stuff. I particularly enjoyed some of the content that I've not seen covered elsewhere, such as the potential use of ventilatory/respiratory monitoring. It also seems crazy that there isn't some existing popularized mehtodology for monitoring it given how core a physiological metric it is, similar to HR/pulse.

    • @Upsidestrength
      @Upsidestrength  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for commenting! I’d recommend my podcast with Andrew Sellars and there will be an upcoming one focused on respiratory testing and training too!

    • @XX-is7ps
      @XX-is7ps 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Upsidestrength thanks! Bookmarked and I’ll be sure to give it a listen 👍

    • @Upsidestrength
      @Upsidestrength  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@XX-is7ps looking forward to your feedback

  • @1Timatin
    @1Timatin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for such useful interview!

    • @Upsidestrength
      @Upsidestrength  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for such a comment!

  • @MarionAntoine
    @MarionAntoine ปีที่แล้ว

    Super échange. Merci à tous les deux !

  • @Saintzel
    @Saintzel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    40:47 Seiler talks about how the internal load is not constant through a workout and that we end up drifting upwards (in zones). What does this mean for workouts in your opinion? I’ve seen a lot of people try to negative split their workouts where every rep, set, or 1st half v 2nd half is faster than previous.

    • @Upsidestrength
      @Upsidestrength  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think it really depends on the goal of the session. Always going faster at the end is not the way to go IMO. Sometimes you need to maybe even slow down in the second half to ensure you maintain the internal environment in a place that matches what you’re trying to achieve.

    • @willway9378
      @willway9378 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From other talks, blogs, and interviews he has said there is no real LISS or that there is no continuous steady state. We experience or see this in increases of perceived exertion and cardiac drift as HR will not remain constant. That point will differ with the conditioning of the individual from an untrained officer worker whose drift may begin quiet early and someone who is an elite athlete on the other extremely or a professional cyclist who may ride for 2-3 hours with little apparent alternation but they are occurring. The body cannot go on forever. So I think he said end zones, but I apologetics if I am wrong, and he refers to a right shift on multiple occasions as blood serum lactate, HR and other metrix shift as we tire and are thus not truly a stead state or condition.

  • @jt.8144
    @jt.8144 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LIFE LESSON. FULL ON!

  •  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great