US Finally Launched Their New Most Advanced Supersonic Jet!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 70

  • @MichM-y3q
    @MichM-y3q หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    If the United States shows off something new, they've already had it for 10 years.

    • @mikehammond7277
      @mikehammond7277 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Gotta love Area 51.🛸🛩️🧑‍🚀

    • @kirkruiz12
      @kirkruiz12 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a joke look up top speeds of the sr 71 and it was quite clear that noise wasn’t a problem flew

    • @kirkruiz12
      @kirkruiz12 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We’re talking about a jet that’s from the 70’s

    • @you2opia
      @you2opia 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nope

    • @MichaelDouglasSkewes
      @MichaelDouglasSkewes 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It flew too high for anyone to hear it! But I grew up in Burbank California in the 60s and we had our windows rattling all the time because they were flying that Sr 71 all the time after the testing in Lancaster ! And the shuttle in the late 70s early 80s were great! People would go outside and clap! We ha e raised a generation of whimps! Makes me sick!

  • @NicholasRodriguez-r9j
    @NicholasRodriguez-r9j 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for letting us look at the jet😊

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Damn I never knew that the nose moved!!! I always wondered how it flew with the nose like that. Well you learn something new all the time
    I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @crazymilitaryaircraft-q9e
    @crazymilitaryaircraft-q9e หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    great video 😍😍😍😍😍

  • @kennethamadu5019
    @kennethamadu5019 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Interesting!!!! Aviation engineering in super hypersonic boom 💥

  • @TheDrRJP
    @TheDrRJP หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The wing configurations of several plane designs keep changing in the video making it hard to follow what's real and what's not. Case in point: the Venus Stargazer M4.
    Also, what's the deal with showing rocket launches along with the Chinese hypersonic aircraft, the Jindouyun, which looks a lot like the SR-71 Blackbird?

  • @fredferd965
    @fredferd965 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Go to 6:45 to begin

  • @DevinAWhiting
    @DevinAWhiting หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We need more of these planes

  • @AnicaundFranzKornek
    @AnicaundFranzKornek 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Mega cool 😉🕊💫✨

  • @Joohnny_C
    @Joohnny_C หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It s only now, 51 years later, we see the Swan s babies! Incredible!

  • @Yenhal7
    @Yenhal7 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Will see

  • @RobertPiper-hr7ly
    @RobertPiper-hr7ly 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Would technology like that also help to get assets into space by making the launch less distance?

  • @LeaMNSU
    @LeaMNSU หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Si ma la testa dell' aereo guarda verso il basso invece dovrebbe essere dritta DONT' LIKE

    • @Charm-313
      @Charm-313 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's only downwards while taxiing. It straightens out once airborne

  • @jkfinney14
    @jkfinney14 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very impressive the material of shell is very mind blowing and sounds like introduction to antigravity more than capability of speed

  • @MeysiaAp56
    @MeysiaAp56 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Utk black pink

  • @kirkruiz12
    @kirkruiz12 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is all old the sr71 was a m5 that’s five times faster then anything and noise wasn’t a problem flew all over

  • @barrerasciencelabuniverse6606
    @barrerasciencelabuniverse6606 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Still not convinced,...

  • @ahmedsalah4508
    @ahmedsalah4508 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ❤❤❤❤❤ ❤ 😇🤩 will don

  • @genobohez6374
    @genobohez6374 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cut the crap and invest in anti gravity buble

  • @rashedpanasang2387
    @rashedpanasang2387 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    We're is chikwa

  • @glcanon
    @glcanon หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Seems to be CLICK-BAIT and fake news. Can't provide any evidence of this one veh, have to keep showing a dozen other images and then revert back to Concorde history. I hate videos like this - waste of time.

  • @mapalanggaon8699
    @mapalanggaon8699 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    US until now presenting a piece of paper while Chinese had real 6th generation.

  • @DavidArcher-x8g
    @DavidArcher-x8g หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ohh my God

  • @788RICKY
    @788RICKY หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A LEGO....?
    😂😂😂😂😂

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Tu-144 was first. And Concorde flew in 1969...

    • @JohanMeischke
      @JohanMeischke หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah the tu 144 was a dog hense it's limited time in service the first true successful supersonic commercial aircraft was unquestionably the concord

    • @rats6136
      @rats6136 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@JohanMeischke you can't discount it just because it's Russian lol

  • @mythbusterthe6749
    @mythbusterthe6749 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who dares to fly in it after Boeing QC and software bugs?

  • @markfischer3626
    @markfischer3626 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Mach 3 B70 Valkyrie Intercontinental supersonic bomber predated Concorde by over a decade.
    To be hypersonic speeds of Mach 5 and greater are required. By the current underdtanding of hypersonic missiles the missile must not only travel at mach 5 or faster, it must be able to detect abd maneuver to evade intercepting missiles. Russia's Kinzhal and Zircon don't qualify. Once their fuel is exhausted they travel an entirely predictable parabolic path. This is why Patriot was able to intercept both of them.
    Right now hypersonic air breathing planes and missiles ate the exclusive provence of military projects. Turbofan jet engines are limited to Mach 2 to Mach 3. Ramjet will get to about Mach 5 and Scramjets to over mach 6. The development of the rotary detonation combustion will increase both power and fuel economy ptopelling planes to Mach 10 and faster. The next generation best fighter jets will have many other never before seen innovations.

    • @kennethamadu5019
      @kennethamadu5019 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only insiders could understand.

    • @Joohnny_C
      @Joohnny_C หลายเดือนก่อน

      You forget the most important thing. The Swan was a passenger plane!

    • @voivode2591
      @voivode2591 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It never has been an engine problem. All of the high mach aircraft including the X15 were skin temperature limited.
      The SR71 did not use full power.

    • @markfischer3626
      @markfischer3626 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @voivode2591 the x15 was a rocket plane. At high speed air can't enter the fan blades

    • @jeffreyseeger2720
      @jeffreyseeger2720 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      SR71 ?

  • @y15vivo67
    @y15vivo67 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👏👏👏🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲💯💯💯🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈

  • @Zulu4impi
    @Zulu4impi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wish the aircraft companies would eliminate ESG verbiage "Environmentally sustainable" but without it multiple capital investment companies won't give a dime for failing to follow the globalists "mantra".
    That said the Hermes project; devoid of ESG capital, have demonstrated an intelligent developmental model on a shoestring budget using proven backbone engines. Halcion looks most promising based on demonstrated performance and timetable development.

  • @bobwelo
    @bobwelo หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @MichaelDouglasSkewes
    @MichaelDouglasSkewes 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Concerd,which is what you are saying AI guy! The fist plane was the XB-70 !Do your homework! I grew up in Burbank California and sonic booms were ! Oops, you got the xb1 ,but it is not the right pictures and was built in early 1960s! Man ,xb70,is what I meant! These videos are crap! Xb1 xb 70 ,get it together!

  • @WaVeTECH-b9z
    @WaVeTECH-b9z หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The angle of the plane's nose appears to be tilted downward; perhaps adjusting it to a straighter position would improve the design. Just a suggestion!

    • @dougbright8120
      @dougbright8120 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Ever look at Concorde?
      The nose angle is variable so that it can be tilted downwards for better pilot visibility during landing and is raised during the transition to supersonic flight.

  • @Thefamgang
    @Thefamgang หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Video all about Concorde so why was it titled so differently…click bait thats why & its unappreciated

  • @changcheng4954
    @changcheng4954 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I hope USA, which was great in the past, will not become an oversized India, talk, talk, talk...but no go.

    • @EmmaJavas
      @EmmaJavas หลายเดือนก่อน

      All what China has is copy of USA initiation.in terms of design and technology.

    • @kleamat38lee74
      @kleamat38lee74 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      what is your point???

    • @kleamat38lee74
      @kleamat38lee74 หลายเดือนก่อน

      for sure, I will not flight any chinese plane.

    • @changcheng4954
      @changcheng4954 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kleamat38lee74 Should you discuss your travel plan with your wife, girlfriend, boyfriend or whoever close to you instead?

  • @Uinsights
    @Uinsights หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    US don't make things failure

  • @kubvaj519
    @kubvaj519 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is just video graphics nothing is come to life yet.

  • @jkfinney14
    @jkfinney14 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That scram jet sounds the jet crying for all the doom it is going to cause

    • @SpinyAnt
      @SpinyAnt หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's over the top, much of what America manufactures, often fail when in prototype form, early in manufacturing history !!!

  • @larrylam2648
    @larrylam2648 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More rewards for human civilization. Engineering achievements. It is cheaper than any cruelty wars.

    • @SpinyAnt
      @SpinyAnt หลายเดือนก่อน

      WHAT !!!

  • @MaribelHernandez-sb4bf
    @MaribelHernandez-sb4bf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    💙💙💙🤍🤍🤍❤️❤️❤️💔💔💔🕓🕓❤️‍🔥

  • @williamthornton5856
    @williamthornton5856 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A bit overhyped; 2025 might see more prototype testing, nothing more. These projects ALWAYS take longer than planned. Even with the sonic boom issue fixed, the cost is still the biggest issue. A subsonic jet will ALWAYS be more fuel effecient and cheaper to operate. No way around that. Also hupersonic commercial travel is still multiple decade(s) later than the return of supersonic commercial flights; which by the way, will be slightly slower than Concorde was. Quieter, but only about 75 to 80% as fast. Your Grand parents, 50 years ago, could still go faster, than you can 10 and 20 years from "now".

  • @supertec2023
    @supertec2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More crappy AI generated videos in the AI narration and it's all crap 👎

  • @nori.mpakdel
    @nori.mpakdel 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    🫀🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇹🇪🇺♥️