The thing is, Adam could be the main lead dev on the satoshi team, but Hal was a big part of satoshi too, otherwise what are the chances of Adam randomly picking the name Satoshi Nakamoto which everyone knows was Hal's neighbor
It actually makes sense: nobody knew what will become of Bitcoin in the beginning so Adam needed a nickname and probably in convo with Hal, Hal said: "lol Adam I have this dude up the street, Satoshi Nakamoto, sounds cool right?"
@@NoCyberwarforgames I am pretty sure Adam was actually not that good at coding, Satoshi btc version is quite rusty, Hal was the one making it better, he was an amazing developer
every computer leaves its own signature while a developer compiles a file, it's not about that he used the GCC linker, i will explain this in a separate video soon. thanks
Even this information only means they used they same machine right? Could of been in the same workspace or possibly even a virtual machine? Most likely a collective of entities not just Adam
nope , this is means both projects has been coded and compiled with a same machine. even Adam confirmed that he was tired of using windows because we had Linux user in this comment satoshihunter1.blogspot.com/2021/09/meet-founder-of-bitcoin-adam-back-aka.html
I saw your blog posts, it was definitely a good read and it could be fun finding out who Satoshi Nakamoto is but it seems like you want to expose him in a harsh way with a bad intent. :|
Hi there, thanks for your comment, this is coming back to my passion for making a better internet, Bitcoin is far from its own promises. A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System that is decentralized and Participants can be anonymous. It's not decentralized because it's controlled by Blockstream and it's not anonymous because they will take your ID to open an account for you. plus I'm getting silenced by tech companies, that's the bad part and I'm going to fight for it :)
@@michaellikes780 plz get one and share your wallet here also its good for you to read this www.theverge.com/2022/3/7/22965605/coinbase-russian-sanctions-address-blocking
Great work, just one question why did you refer to Dan Pena this man is going nuts when talking about bitcoin (dont think you should take him very serious), and why do you think btc will go to 0 if the real founder will be public, i dont think that many people would care.
Adam back wearing a McLaren hat in the max thing threw me off a lot due to that not being his type of style and most people don’t really go out there way to buy a McLaren hat, but they are gifts given to buyers 🤔 I could be overthinking it though
Preprocessing: the preprocessor takes a C++ source code file and deals with the #includes, #defines and The output of this step is a "pure" C++ file without pre-processor directives. Compilation: the compiler takes the pre-processor's output and produces an object file from it. Linking: the linker takes the object files produced by the compiler and produces either a library or an executable file. Every machine and every language uses a certain linker and leaves an unique foot print that can't be replicate by anyone else and as you can see in the video all of Adam's Back projects was coded by a same machine.
@@NoCyberwarforgames so glad you made this; ive been telling people for years now🤦🏽♂️ I thought I was crazy and that people would never know.. but low and behold🤝🍻
@@NoCyberwarforgames I wonder about your mention of being silenced by the community. From what I can see, it seems like there aren’t many people who 1) actually know who Satoshi is and 2) are actively trying to silence them. I think your video and work are both good and interesting, but if we were in a court of law, I’m not sure if this argument would hold up.
I think Adam Back is Satoshi but that explanation is hardly understandable. For example, you claim the first bitcoin version released by Gavin Anderson(actually Andresen) has a different footprint from the one released by Satoshi although they compiled the same source code. But they're not the same source code, after all they're a different version. Hashcash and the first bitcoin versions by Satoshi used the same linker. That's alright but hardly proves anything, since it's used by millions of people. Gavin Andresen said he learned about Bitcoin in 2010 but you found the uninstall file for his first version of bitcoin has been compiled in 2009, that could mean Andresen was lying but again, doesn't have anything to do with Satoshi being Adam Back. I don't see how that is relevant.
Sorry for my late response: Gavin himself said he accessed the source code and he himself said he copied it and worked on it. ::::That's alright but hardly proves anything, since it's used by millions of people. Would you be able to send me five samples of million? ::::Andresen said he learned about Bitcoin in 2010 but you found the uninstall file for his first version of bitcoin has been compiled in 2009, that could mean Andresen was lying but again, doesn't have anything to do with Satoshi being Adam Back. I don't see how that is relevant. that's becuase of those DLL files that Adam used for Bitocin and hashcash, thoese are the one it makes it him satoshi. i'm myself a 20+ C++ enginner and i know the first bitcoin source code wasn't run-able on vc++. you can try it if you like.
I was do lucky to hear from you at the cardano meetings.. I'm intrigued about your research and I want to follow up about your findings when I get a chance... Super interesting
Mr Awesome , i have mentioned Barely Socialable youtube video in my article please read my article first , Barely social it has some theory that Adam Back is Satoshi , this is actual prove that Adam Back is Saoshi based on Comparing two DLL files one from Adam Back's Hash cash project and the other from first Bitcoin Release!
![🔴 ฟุตบอลแชมป์กีฬา 7HD แชมเปียน คัพ 2024 [รอบ 8 ทีมสุดท้าย] - ช่วงบ่าย](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M0S_ReCIkxg/mqdefault.jpg)
Feel free to tweet at me, the footprint is the smoking gun if so but I think that should be better clarified
Why are you harassing Adam Back?
thanks so much , i don't use twitter but you can find my research in my channel , all links etc
i'm working on part 3 and soon people will find out more about this , thanks so much for your support , Nima
here it is satoshihunter1.blogspot.com/2021/09/meet-founder-of-bitcoin-adam-back-aka.html
Please check section 2 of part 1 of my article,
The thing is, Adam could be the main lead dev on the satoshi team, but Hal was a big part of satoshi too, otherwise what are the chances of Adam randomly picking the name Satoshi Nakamoto which everyone knows was Hal's neighbor
if that would be the case then he would act like 6 other bitcoin core developers, Like Gavin or Mike hern. Adam was good on VC++ coding , Hal wasn't.
It actually makes sense: nobody knew what will become of Bitcoin in the beginning so Adam needed a nickname and probably in convo with Hal, Hal said: "lol Adam I have this dude up the street, Satoshi Nakamoto, sounds cool right?"
@@Stno3582 that's pretty much my theory
@@NoCyberwarforgames I am pretty sure Adam was actually not that good at coding, Satoshi btc version is quite rusty, Hal was the one making it better, he was an amazing developer
@@Stno3582 omg lol , it could be i'm working on part 3 and we will review more stuff soon ! stay tuned for more!
Thank you for the information. Many people have named Adam back as Satoshi. However your work is comparable to sherlock Holmes. Really great stuff.
You're very welcome, please do share this video on your social network to make more awareness, thanks so much!
It's total bunkum
@@davidsparks1181 Guys this is Adam's Fake Social Account lol
Why the fact that he used the same gcc linker is proof beyond doubt that he is Satoshi?
every computer leaves its own signature while a developer compiles a file, it's not about that he used the GCC linker, i will explain this in a separate video soon. thanks
he didn't and it's not
no it isnt
hi ,great job. I'm so proud of you and your research. I would like you to interview Adam back(Satoshi).
Thanks so much, please share this video in your network it would help!
Even this information only means they used they same machine right? Could of been in the same workspace or possibly even a virtual machine? Most likely a collective of entities not just Adam
nope , this is means both projects has been coded and compiled with a same machine. even Adam confirmed that he was tired of using windows because we had Linux user in this comment satoshihunter1.blogspot.com/2021/09/meet-founder-of-bitcoin-adam-back-aka.html
@@NoCyberwarforgames Ahh i see sorry im a bit of a noob thank you for the information appreciate it!
Op made it up
lmao nice try adam hahaha, let me tell you about something called Occam's razor
I saw your blog posts, it was definitely a good read and it could be fun finding out who Satoshi Nakamoto is but it seems like you want to expose him in a harsh way with a bad intent. :|
Hi there, thanks for your comment, this is coming back to my passion for making a better internet, Bitcoin is far from its own promises.
A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System that is decentralized and Participants can be anonymous.
It's not decentralized because it's controlled by Blockstream and it's not anonymous because they will take your ID to open an account for you. plus I'm getting silenced by tech companies, that's the bad part and I'm going to fight for it :)
@@NoCyberwarforgames you can get a bitcoin wallet extremely easily without id
@@michaellikes780 plz get one and share your wallet here also its good for you to read this www.theverge.com/2022/3/7/22965605/coinbase-russian-sanctions-address-blocking
@@NoCyberwarforgames Can you expand on how blockstream controls bitcoin?
@@HanroRoos on 2017 Block stream kickout mike hern snf gavin Andresen off the bitcoin project by hiring all bitcoin devs
I have two words "Nicktoshi Szabamoto"
Yep
Great work, just one question why did you refer to Dan Pena this man is going nuts when talking about bitcoin (dont think you should take him very serious), and why do you think btc will go to 0 if the real founder will be public, i dont think that many people would care.
nope it wasn't his
Quote, becasue Bitcoin was a scam that didn't deliver what it promised
@@NoCyberwarforgames Isn't bitcoin better today compared to its original vision?
@@HanroRoos nope, all those forks were just small changes to the core of bitcoin
Can you do this but with a Peter Todd`s early works?
i've check Peter's early codes on GitHub, he is not using MinGW, so he couldn't be Satoshi
Todd was a young Art college kid in 08
@@mueford 😊
Adam back wearing a McLaren hat in the max thing threw me off a lot due to that not being his type of style and most people don’t really go out there way to buy a McLaren hat, but they are gifts given to buyers 🤔 I could be overthinking it though
define "same linker" ? the linker could have been compiled by anyone, no?
Preprocessing: the preprocessor takes a C++ source code file and deals with the #includes, #defines and The output of this step is a "pure" C++ file without pre-processor directives.
Compilation: the compiler takes the pre-processor's output and produces an object file from it.
Linking: the linker takes the object files produced by the compiler and produces either a library or an executable file.
Every machine and every language uses a certain linker and leaves an unique foot print that can't be replicate by anyone else and as you can see in the video all of Adam's Back projects was coded by a same machine.
@@NoCyberwarforgames so glad you made this; ive been telling people for years now🤦🏽♂️ I thought I was crazy and that people would never know.. but low and behold🤝🍻
@@Matt........... You're very welcome , please do share this video as much as you can , we have been silenced by Bitcoin community so far.
@@NoCyberwarforgames I wonder about your mention of being silenced by the community. From what I can see, it seems like there aren’t many people who 1) actually know who Satoshi is and 2) are actively trying to silence them. I think your video and work are both good and interesting, but if we were in a court of law, I’m not sure if this argument would hold up.
@@jaredrose2381 i just release my book "WHO IS SATOSHI NAKAMOTO? The Founder of Bitcoin!" its on amazon
I think Adam Back is Satoshi but that explanation is hardly understandable.
For example, you claim the first bitcoin version released by Gavin Anderson(actually Andresen) has a different footprint from the one released by Satoshi although they compiled the same source code. But they're not the same source code, after all they're a different version.
Hashcash and the first bitcoin versions by Satoshi used the same linker. That's alright but hardly proves anything, since it's used by millions of people.
Gavin Andresen said he learned about Bitcoin in 2010 but you found the uninstall file for his first version of bitcoin has been compiled in 2009, that could mean Andresen was lying but again, doesn't have anything to do with Satoshi being Adam Back. I don't see how that is relevant.
Sorry for my late response: Gavin himself said he accessed the source code and he himself said he copied it and worked on it.
::::That's alright but hardly proves anything, since it's used by millions of people.
Would you be able to send me five samples of million?
::::Andresen said he learned about Bitcoin in 2010 but you found the uninstall file for his first version of bitcoin has been compiled in 2009, that could mean Andresen was lying but again, doesn't have anything to do with Satoshi being Adam Back. I don't see how that is relevant.
that's becuase of those DLL files that Adam used for Bitocin and hashcash, thoese are the one it makes it him satoshi.
i'm myself a 20+ C++ enginner and i know the first bitcoin source code wasn't run-able on vc++. you can try it if you like.
another question how do you know that the real Adam Back commeted under your blogspot post ?
based on his Gmail address! , you can reverse emails address to profile on google blog.
He looks like Gordon Freeman from Half Life
A Looser version of him lol
wow
Wow... I didn't even know anything about computer coding, but this investigate is great!
Thanks so much, Please share this on your social networks for more awareness if you can !
Dude you need to script your videos
Yeah dude you're right i was supper busy, i just released my book on amazon KDP, search "WHO IS SATOSHI NAKAMOTO? The Founder of Bitcoin!"
This puts him in the loop of the three Szabo and Finney. Is Szabo's birthday the same as Dorians?
not sure what do you mean tbh
how about 2001
What are you referring ?
This is childish in the extreme.
The Reality hearts sometimes lol
@@NoCyberwarforgames you're a child looking for attention
This methodology of same linker isn't proven like a bitcoin transaction. The private keys of the first block is the most likely proof.
you don't have the knowledge of that mr "My Email" lol
Y u dox him?
it is what it is :)
Hi Nima... how can we chat?
Please let me know if you have any question , Thanks
feel free to ask any questions here
I was do lucky to hear from you at the cardano meetings.. I'm intrigued about your research and I want to follow up about your findings when I get a chance... Super interesting
@@MarcellodeSales anytime , please let me know if you had any questions.
He has 2.56 because it is 2^8/10^2 not because he is satoshi.
Thank you for piggybacking off of Barely Sociable's 3 part investigation that came out over a year ago. Have a downvote and a dnrc.
Mr Awesome , i have mentioned Barely Socialable youtube video in my article please read my article first , Barely social it has some theory that Adam Back is Satoshi , this is actual prove that Adam Back is Saoshi based on Comparing two DLL files one from Adam Back's Hash cash project and the other from first Bitcoin Release!
@@NoCyberwarforgames sure
Same lnker version was used widely on millions of computers as nowadays too the latest. It doesnt proof shite.
send one file out of Millions to me lol , dont open your mouth when you dont know what are you talking about
I A M N O T
S A T O S H I N A K A M O T O
Bitcoin was created on Windows and not Linux 🤦
It was coded with MinGW; it's a multi-platform tool; however, the first release was only for Windows.