Very interesting and important topic. Today, one year later, what do you think about ChatGpt? Have you find it more useful? And, do you think Copilot is better?
You can't rely on in 100% ! Many times I've tested and given many mistakes! So it won't take jobs from developers! It can't build a complex or even simple / in your example / a web application or just say good luck for the bugs! 😃
You are totally right in saying that! It feeds on data that we have uploaded to the internet, we stop doing that, it will be dated soon, so goes hand in hand
Isn't ChatGPT [going in] a 5GL [direction]? In that respect, you can "talk" to the computer to come up with a solution, however, won't the solution still just be out of the "box"? Anything beyond the "box" will require manual intervention in order to make it to one's desires (as demonstrated) ... Consider this: All of the AI offerings out there are still "pseudo" AI. I may be old school, but I'm still not convinced that this technology will really help make us any smarter. If anything, it will really make the less initiated dumber simply because it "provides" an answer without any understanding. Look at what instant information (the web) has done to IT. You can answer any problem out there, but does it really stick? If you don't have to muddle thru a problem, what have you really learned? At last review, it was at least 10,000* hours to become a master at something. *www.edsurge.com/news/2020-05-05-researcher-behind-10-000-hour-rule-says-good-teaching-matters-not-just-practice#:~:text=You've%20probably%20heard%20of,as%20good%20as%20Bill%20Gates
ChatGPT will help in coding, It is only that developer has to have all concepts crystal clear to make maximum out of it
Chat GPT will be used as a tool by programmers not as a replacement, is that so ?
I totally agree to that,
Very interesting and important topic.
Today, one year later, what do you think about ChatGpt? Have you find it more useful? And, do you think Copilot is better?
You can't rely on in 100% ! Many times I've tested and given many mistakes! So it won't take jobs from developers! It can't build a complex or even simple / in your example / a web application or just say good luck for the bugs! 😃
You are totally right in saying that! It feeds on data that we have uploaded to the internet, we stop doing that, it will be dated soon, so goes hand in hand
@@SameerSainiif you will stop doing that someone else will it’s only going to get better with time.
When i have used it for things it gives me bad code.
When i ask it non code questions like for Jujitsu its dangerously wrong XD
Chatgpt can be great for startup, but to be honest, most of the time, stackoverflow is more reliable that chatgpt😁
Isn't ChatGPT [going in] a 5GL [direction]? In that respect, you can "talk" to the computer to come up with a solution, however, won't the solution still just be out of the "box"? Anything beyond the "box" will require manual intervention in order to make it to one's desires (as demonstrated) ... Consider this: All of the AI offerings out there are still "pseudo" AI.
I may be old school, but I'm still not convinced that this technology will really help make us any smarter. If anything, it will really make the less initiated dumber simply because it "provides" an answer without any understanding. Look at what instant information (the web) has done to IT. You can answer any problem out there, but does it really stick? If you don't have to muddle thru a problem, what have you really learned? At last review, it was at least 10,000* hours to become a master at something.
*www.edsurge.com/news/2020-05-05-researcher-behind-10-000-hour-rule-says-good-teaching-matters-not-just-practice#:~:text=You've%20probably%20heard%20of,as%20good%20as%20Bill%20Gates