Cato: Live Free or Die

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @SmallSpaceCorgi
    @SmallSpaceCorgi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This should be interesting,

    • @TH3F4LC0Nx
      @TH3F4LC0Nx  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I found it to be so. An unjustly, and unfortunately, forgotten gem. :)

  • @mehwhatever9726
    @mehwhatever9726 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well, there is a drastically different perspective on the Cato's role in the downfall of the republic.
    th-cam.com/video/DgD3_eBBn5o/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUTQ2F0byB0aGUgRmlsaWJ1c3Rlcg%3D%3D
    "Cato the Filibuster" I think is a more interesting perspective, because it is highly ironic. And it makes sense that using wrong legal tools that paralyze the senate would only serve to damage its influence/reputation and create a niche for a dictator to fill.
    I can actually recall a lot of cases when attempts to save an institution with wrong methods serves to propell it's degradation.

    • @TH3F4LC0Nx
      @TH3F4LC0Nx  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Very valuable perspective. He definitely hastened the end, although Caesar was probably gonna "cross the Rubicon" (haha) anyway. Weird case of history actually not being written by the victor, I guess. Oh well; he still went out like a G. XD

  • @belaldarder7380
    @belaldarder7380 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Allow me to disagree with you. To die virtuously is easy. To rule virtuously is hard AF. Marcus Aurelius is still the best of the stoics in my opinion.

    • @TH3F4LC0Nx
      @TH3F4LC0Nx  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I dunno; I'm not sure dying is ever easy. I would say it's easier to submit and live than to do what Cato did. Within the parameters of his situation, I would agree that Marcus Aurelius is an admirable figure though.