So, I just started my master’s education in control engineering, and I have to say: "This is the most eloquent and straight forward explanation of the Laplace transform I have ever been presented with". Though I only needed a refresher on sigmas relation to stability I ended up watching the whole series on Laplace - I can’t wait to have a look at your explanation of Fourier series and Fourier transform in the coming days! Thank you for providing incredible content to student!
Thank you very much for your kind words and amazing feedback. I am very happy that you decided to stay and watch the whole series on Laplace ;) Please let me know your feedback on Fourier as well. Cheers!
This is one of the best tutorial videos I've found and I've really scoured this site. I hope more students can find this both to benefit this channel and themselves!
Thank you, I needed that clarification at the end! I was doing a math problem where two functions had three possible regions of convergence, but it wasn’t posed with the required region of convergence contrasting e^(-2t)*u(-t) and e^(-2t)*u(t) made so much sense to me. Thank you so much, Iman!
It took me a few tries before I understood that Re{S}>0 is not "Region of Convergence is greater than zero". I think it would help with understanding to say that "the Region of Convergence is where the real part is greater than zero."
Re{s} is a common notation in signal processing books. In general, when we talk about ROC, the concern is the real part of z not the imaginary part. The imaginary part is the pure oscillation. The real part is the part that dictates the convergence. Cheers!
what is the difference between this definition that goes from -inf to inf and the definition that goes from 0 to inf and why we use the first one here???
So, I just started my master’s education in control engineering, and I have to say: "This is the most eloquent and straight forward explanation of the Laplace transform I have ever been presented with". Though I only needed a refresher on sigmas relation to stability I ended up watching the whole series on Laplace - I can’t wait to have a look at your explanation of Fourier series and Fourier transform in the coming days! Thank you for providing incredible content to student!
Thank you very much for your kind words and amazing feedback. I am very happy that you decided to stay and watch the whole series on Laplace ;) Please let me know your feedback on Fourier as well. Cheers!
I know it's kinda off topic but do anyone know of a good site to stream newly released movies online?
@Decker Immanuel i use flixzone. Just google for it :)
@Jaden Coleman Definitely, I have been using FlixZone for years myself =)
@Jaden Coleman thanks, signed up and it seems to work =) Appreciate it !
Video we’ve waited a long for.
Thank you Iman.
Thank you Yash and sorry to keep you waiting.
@@Kuchdelan Worth every second.
@@JaGWiREE You are awesome, Brian!
This is one of the best tutorial videos I've found and I've really scoured this site. I hope more students can find this both to benefit this channel and themselves!
Hey Zenmo, thank you very much for your feedback and kind words. Hopefully, I will get more views and subscribers in the future. Cheers!
Great approach 👍, thank you. Finally I get to understand the ROC.
Rock on!
Very nicely explained
Thank you so much 🙂
Thank you, I needed that clarification at the end! I was doing a math problem where two functions had three possible regions of convergence, but it wasn’t posed with the required region of convergence contrasting e^(-2t)*u(-t) and e^(-2t)*u(t) made so much sense to me. Thank you so much, Iman!
You again :) Thank you very much for watching all my lectures.
Absolutely great explanation, thank you.
My pleasure!
Glad you’re back! Keep posting good content! Blessings
Thanks a lot my friend.
Looking forward to becoming a ROCstar
Lol! Go for it ;)
great work👏
Thanks ✌️
Wow....as usual iman rocked 🤘🤘 waiting for your next video 😍😍😍
As usual you are very kind and supportive my friend ;)
Amazing as always...
Thank you for your kindness and support!
I was waiting for this series ^-^.
Thanks a lot
Thanks a bunch and sorry to keep you waiting Hossam.
Amazing I’m on my second year studying this and never was I able to prove a negative real pole Insured stability
Pleasure to help!
great video
Thanks!
Great ... Thanks :)
Thank you ;)
11:32 - Regarding the 2nd example: what about when Re{S} = 0?
It took me a few tries before I understood that Re{S}>0 is not "Region of Convergence is greater than zero".
I think it would help with understanding to say that "the Region of Convergence is where the real part is greater than zero."
Re{s} is a common notation in signal processing books. In general, when we talk about ROC, the concern is the real part of z not the imaginary part. The imaginary part is the pure oscillation. The real part is the part that dictates the convergence. Cheers!
what is the difference between this definition that goes from -inf to inf and the definition that goes from 0 to inf and why we use the first one here???
Hey for ILT should the integration variable be ds instead of dt? 4:30
ohhh lol my bad haha 5:33
hello sir actually Fourier transform of e^-at u(t) is exists
Of course, the FT exists as long as "a" is positive
if we're rock star's. you must be Kurt Cobain 🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘
lol, thanks a bunch. Who would you be? :)