A massive drawback is any part or assembly that has model state is not possible to edit in place. Do you can not see your changes in the assembly in real time.
Out of curiosity why are you manually typing in values that you already have as dimensions? Linking them is a far better workflow, shouldn't you be showing best practices?
Hi Richard, linking dimensions through parameters is definitely a great workflow, especially if you are going to be calling on those dimensions multiple times. Linking the parameters so they can be controlled in an assembly is excellent as well. In these examples, we are using them as static models, so it wasn't necessary to link since workflow length would be the same. Thank you!
aren't appearances stored in representations - anything visual is stored in representation - anything affecting geometry/properties is stored in model states?
A massive drawback is any part or assembly that has model state is not possible to edit in place. Do you can not see your changes in the assembly in real time.
Out of curiosity why are you manually typing in values that you already have as dimensions? Linking them is a far better workflow, shouldn't you be showing best practices?
Hi Richard, linking dimensions through parameters is definitely a great workflow, especially if you are going to be calling on those dimensions multiple times. Linking the parameters so they can be controlled in an assembly is excellent as well. In these examples, we are using them as static models, so it wasn't necessary to link since workflow length would be the same. Thank you!
aren't appearances stored in representations - anything visual is stored in representation - anything affecting geometry/properties is stored in model states?