How to play 3 Man Chess
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
- Learn the rules to the 3 player chess game 3 Man Chess quickly and concisely - This video has no distractions, just the rules. The rules are the same as regular chess, except for these changes. For a refresher of those rules, check out this video: • How to play Chess (202...
Para verlo en español, mira este video: • Cómo jugar al Ajedrez ...
Para assistir em português, confira este vídeo: • Como jogar xadrez de 3...
Play chess online for free here:
link.triplesga...
(As an chess.com affiliate we earn from qualifying subscriptions)
Don't own the game? Buy it here:
amazon.com - amzn.to/2UHXBAi
amazon.uk - amzn.to/3hnAeEs
amazon.es - amzn.to/3fR5a26
amazon.de - amzn.to/3Ezw9Jw
amazon.fr - amzn.to/3MnPmQr
amazon.nl - amzn.to/3rDawAv
amazon.se - amzn.to/3ErsIoh
amazon.pl - amzn.to/3Eri3tH
(These Amazon Affiliate links directly supports me)
RULES:
The object of the game is to checkmate both opponent’s Kings. Setup the pieces along the 2 outside rows of the board with each player’s pieces setup in between the green lines. Ensure that all the kings are placed on white spaces. White goes first then play proceeds clockwise with gray, then black.
The center of the board may only be passed through, it is not a space that can be occupied. Pieces may move straight through the center, to the other side. The adjoining vertical squares, through the center, maintain the same color. The Knight will also retain the same color if it moves through the center. To move a piece diagonally through the center, follow the trajectory lines out from the square to the other side. You can capture pieces on the other side of the center or move through it, following the line.
When a piece follows a diagonal trajectory line to the outer row of the board, that piece may not “turn the corner” and continue moving in 1 consecutive move, it must wait until the next turn before it can continue the trajectory.
Pieces may move vertical across spaces and through the center, or horizontally around the board on the same row. When moving a knight through the center, do not follow the trajectory lines. Whenever you move a knight, the knight must move 2 squares vertically then 1 square horizontally, or 1 square vertically then 2 horizontally. This process of movement is necessary to maintain when dealing with moats.
The thick green lines that boarder each team on the outer row are called ‘MOATS’. No piece can CHECK an opponent’s King through a moat, no matter what. No piece may travel across a moat, horizontally OR diagonally, unless the moat is “Bridged”. A piece may momentarily bridge a moat if its move across the moat doesn’t result in the capture of a piece or puts an opponent’s king in check. But, if a player is eliminated, then both of its Moats are permanently bridged for all pieces. Also, once an active player vacates their outer row of all their pieces, even if they bring them back later, then their moats are also permanently bridged.
If either configuration of a KNIGHT’S move would carry it Horizontally across a Moat, without that knight being able to bridge the moat, then that move is illegal and may not be done.
The thinner green lines above moats that run for 2 spaces are called “CREEKS”. Pawns may not capture across a creek on their own side of the board. They must advance to the space beyond the end of the CREEK first, on the 4th row from the outside, before they can capture in that direction. Once a pawn crosses the center, it no longer observe creeks.
A team’s CHECKMATE status is not finalized until it is their turn, unless their King is captured.
If a King’s position is so unfortunate whereas the next team’s move creates a CHECK by the following team, then that following team may capture that King if they wish. If they do, they are then considered CHECKMATED.
When player is CHECKMATED, that player is eliminated from the game but all their pieces remain on the board. These pieces do not move, they cannot check a king, and you may not pass a piece through them. If you wish to occupy a space with an eliminated player’s piece on it, then you must capture that piece.
If a player can not make a legal move, called a stalemate, and 3 players are still in, then that player is considered checkmated and eliminated from the game. If there are only 2 players during a stalemate, then the game is a draw.
Otherwise, the game continued between until only one player remains, then that player is the winner. Also, if you checkmate both opponent’s simultaneously, then you win.
![โรงเรียนตอนตี 2 โคตรหลอน..!! [โรงเรียนไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2MAEMwqVYh8/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally, a new Chess update. I've been waiting centuries for this.
:)
its just a mod
@Eric Lee You take jokes too seriously
@Eric Lee 2014?
@Eric Lee Why centuries, you ask?
Cos it was made ages ago and it's the fucking same in 2021
whoever made this vastly overestimated the number of friends chess players have
LOL
sadly you are right
Comment of the year
This is the most sadly accurate thing I have read in a while.
I know right, I could never find one friend to play chess with (I just resigned) Let alone 2 friends that need to understand this crazy board after a long explanation.
> The rules are the same as regular chess, except for these changes
> 5 minutes of explanation
Sounds pretty regular, tbh.
what about the moats? that needed explanation
@@adamnielson42 it was simple until it got to the moats
@@joratto2833 yup
@@joratto2833 Yeah, that's his point..
Spoon
It's funny that bishops are really overpowered compared to knights on this. Mainly b/c of the center which lets any diagonal moving piece threaten both opponents at the same time.
shows how much power the church had/has 😅
You could probably balance it by requiring bishops to stop at the center, then they can cross on the next tur, so it takes 2 turns to pass through the cemter. (maybe the Queen can be exemot)
Can’t wait for Chess: Battle Royale
underrated
bruh
There is 4 man
100 kings, imagine the size of this board
@@yall_girl_eve only 50x ur standard chest set
Leaks about the next update for chess:
• the number of players will be increased to 5
• Pieces will get more abilities according to their respective types (tank, dps, support)
• Pieces will evolve after a certain number of eliminations
• A stalemate will be resolved by an all out fistfight
Localization file updates
Last rule is already in place in my country, stalemates are decided by who can defeat the oponent in a fistfight.
@@YanYanicantbelievethistakenffs Do you play against kids for this reasone?
@@MouldMadeMind kids and elderly people. I dont dtalemate against the mr buffguy that goes to the gym, if i see a stalemate i REALLLY try to avoid it.
@@YanYanicantbelievethistakenffs that would make the greatest chess battles of all times. When the smart buff guy is trying to force his (literally) weaker opponent to stalemate him...
Bishop's Snipe Potential just got through the roof. Also would love to see chess content creators play 3 man chess and see their reaction of these added rules and circle board
Actually, it has gone down. Diagonals now don't cross the entire board, they are all the same size too.
@@pairot01 It's not the distance that's the important part. It's the fact that it feels like it comes from nowhere. The center means that people won't notice the bishops generally until it's too late.
Bishop sniping is even worse on a Toroidal chess board. {3rd millenium chess+ cylinder chess= True toroidal chess}
As on that board if the opponent King is on white, and you have a bishop and a king on white, move the king to check the opponent [if he does not have any pieces on white]
@@darknessblades you're saying that an unobstructed bishop controls all the squares of its colour?
@@pairot01 Yes. exactly.
as the board is FULLY connected on all sides it would eventually hit the King, if you do enough "loops"
Finally, after centuries of waiting... Chess 2.
The ideas for this are as old as chess itself. There were a lot of variations in former times but just one kind of chess survived.
@Varyu San when a new big bang appears
Skipped a version actually. This is chess 3.
Imagine checkmating two opponents at the same time like a chad. Hikaru would be proud
I presume you're not referring to the protagonist of Ape Escape 2, who is called Hikaru in Europe and is the only Hikaru that I am familiar with.
@@DrRank He is talking about Hikaru Nakamura, a chess grandmaster and a so many times United States champion.
@Fremen In all due respect where re4spect is due, Hikaru is in the top 5 chess players in the world... It's a shame he's such a asshole in real life though. Magnus is still the GOAT and Hikaru cries when he gets beaten by him, and I won't lie, the schadenfreude is real lol.
@Fremen just cause he's asian doesn't mean his parents were mean to him you racist!!! its obvious you get that propaganda from cnn news! stan loona btw
Was thinking it is about "Hikaru Shindo" from "Hikaru no Go" anime.
Knight is nerfed hard, and Bishop and Queens have absolute power here. Seems realistic enough. XD
watching this chessboard is so painful
ikr I can barely understand the original chess rules
black hole
@@krunken_isok Feels like this board was made for Sherlock Holmes
@@JonatasAdoM I guess I'll never understand Chess and Cricket
Even the 4 players chessboard is more understandable than this xD
I just need to wait another decade until there's enough people that can understand this game including myself enough to be called a pro player
Start today be a Pro tomorrow 🤩
Is that FBK in your pfp?
@@Eternal_Sufferring Yes it's her
This was already out back in 2006. So not gonna happen.
Me with a Hexagon-shaped board: look what they need just to mimic a fraction of our power.
HeXaGoNs ArE tHe BeStAgOnS
I see a CGP Grey fan here.
@@lailoutherand I know that video, but I got the board before watching it.
@@lailoutherandah, yes, all hexagons are a cgp grey reference. /s
CGP Grey is a fraud, triangles are the best figure to exist
@@thebookless3381 n o
I thought of a 3 player chess board but using either a triangular or hexagonal board. In such a board, the squares become triangles. So now pieces move all in three axis. And a diagonal move is done by traversing to the triangle connected just by a vertex.
imagine how many openings, gambits and variations there can be
The Sicilian Vienna English London Caro Kann Italian Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Queen's King's Gambit Declined: Tennison Scandinavian King's Pawn Queen's Pawn Variation
@@pyramidteam9961 Is that Bosnian Ape Society reference?
@@alvianekka80 yes it was :)
None, theory is banned from this game
The six knights game!
3-Man Chess: For when you're smarter than the smartest person in the room and you need him to know it.
Lol imagine you ally with another to beat the best chess player first
And the best player check mate you both
@@lerbronk That would require a pretty immense difference in skill. In most games, the best player won't be able to defeat a team that has twice as many pieces as him and gets twice as many turns as he gets.
@@Tzizenorec well I think Magnus Carlsen can do it
@@RoyalLegend1000 Depending who he's playing against. He could probably beat you and me working together, but not a pair of IMs.
@@Tzizenorec those two people called you and me:
I can very easily imagine pawns being a part of some serious orientation problems with this set up
Ah yes, Chess but with politics, my favorite game
White = USA (because moves to attack first 😉), black = USSR, gray = Nazi Germany
P.S.: Would really surprise me if this comment didn't get auto-deleted. 😏
@@Dowlphin visible
@@normanclatcher Yeah, it is unpredictable.
Might even still vanish later.
@@Dowlphin more like White is Allied Forces... 😂😂😂
@@Dowlphin nah it's still here, you're good
Ok, but how exactly does a knight move across the middle? When counting the spaces, does the middle count as a space, or do you skip it? How do you tell what spaces are perpendicular to the one used to enter the middle? Very confuse
I believe the middle space doesn't count. For example, if the knight is two spaces away from the middle, it can move those two spaces, jump the middle to the opposite square, and then move a single space to the right or left.
That seems like the most logical option, but the way they talked about it made it seem like it counted as a space, just not one you could land on. If you or anyone else stumbles across the rules somewhere, link it.
@@crackerjaq9974 doesnt he say at some point that the middle doesnt count as a space, therefore no piece can moove on it? Sound for me like it doesnt count
Now the real question is how does this scale to n-player chess by expanding the circle?
Probably not well, because the board becomes longer so you'll be dimishing the value of short ranged pieces. The games would be longer not only because there are more players, but because you need more time to get in a confrontation.
Discord chess?
the neat part is you shouldn't
The power of rooks, bishops and queens increases exponentially as the board expands, obviously - before long, you're launching bishops at pieces that are "unseen over the horizon".
@@arcadiaberger9204 Chess 3, where we launch intercontinental ballistic bishops at unseen players across the great chessboard. Nobody is sure how many are even playing, simply that they must win.
I want a 5 man chess so my whole family can enjoy.
I don't think that would be a very enjoyable experience
Memorizing the rule of 3 man chess is already a headache, imagine 5.
me who seen the vat19 version and finnaly seeing tripple s games reviewing it:
oh yeah, it's all coming together.
solitare chess in vat19 he repeated the same thing
bruh
This is gonna blow up just watch this is really entertaining
Good luck making a perfect AI for this
Strangely, it might actually be easier to do that. More restrictions = less space to search = easier to find the best moves.
@@bastion8804 But it has to account for the 3rd player's moves
2 < 3 mafhs
@@FenrizNNN for a very limited number of turns, yes. I'd still say it's much easier.
It's actually simple with machine learning, this isn't 1990 anymore no need to do alpha beta pruning to find the best move with point heuristics, simply define check mating as the best result and capturing important pieces as positive, define losing any piece negative with being checkmated the worst and let it play a billion games against ever improving versions of itself.
Since there's no opening move book and no theory studied for thousands of years the computer will be world champion with very likely the first version to come out of this process.
@@blueplayer6197 No matter for how long you train the AI, it still isn't perfect.
A perfect chess "AI" is one that knows every possible move, and how to best react to it.
It feels like an inter dimensional war through a portal….. and it give the chess a whole new straegic sense!!
As interesting as this is, it is quite a bit more complicated than my "chess for three" board I purchased 20 years ago. In that case the squares weren't actually Square, they were warped to allow things to line up and the 3 starting territories were nested out.
That all said, this is still interesting and I would probably pick this one up as well.
I think the chessboard would be better if you put two ranks of 8 squares that interface at each player’s part of the outer circle, with gaps between each player.
Thus you can avoid the problem of moats.
Imagine how long something like 'chess royale' or 100 player chess would take to finish 1 match, or how expensive it will be
I mean, it could be done digitally
Last player is fucked.
He gets his turn 100 moves later than everyone else, half of his board wiped in 2 sets of turns
"Sir, are you _sure_ we should reccomend him this?"
"Eh, they'll watch anything at this point."
Now cross it with 5D Chess with Multiverse Time Travel.
Imagine it.
Three player 5D Chess with Multiverse Time Travel.
No
What about Quantum Chess?
Three Player 5D Quantum Chess with Multiverse Time Travel.
@@novelseeker4410 What about Multiverse cluster chess, where one cluster of universes play with fellow jackass cluster.
Oh no, I think my brain would explode no joke
LMAO
Capturing a King.
My eyes bleed.
The game looks nice btw
Imagine what theory would look like in this.
All nice and good. Very interesting piece of art as well.
Just one thing that bothered me during the explanation: Why does the pawn next to a creek have to advance to the 4th row before he can capture?
Looks to me as if from row 3 he might just be clear of that old creek already, when advancing diagonally?
Commenting here if someone answers. I thought the same thing
I am so glad you aren’t doing a monopoly or Uno this video! Great video, keep up the great work.
Thanks! (Although there will be more monopoly and uno videos coming in the future…)
Triple S Games oh come on... it’s just different art most of the time ;) but those non Uno and monopoly videos have been refreshing. I love that random poker shuffling procedure video. That was great.
@@TripleSGames LOL
@@TripleSGamesWhy does knights move 2 squares vertically then 1 square horizontally or 1 square vertically then two squares horizontally but not 2 squares horizontally then 1 square vertically?
Thanks for your explanation.
If I learn this I might forgot how to play chess lol
Imagine the last two players. One running away and the other chasing him through-out the board. It's never going to finish.
Couldn’t you pin him against a moat?
@@gargoyles9999 nope. There's no pining in chess.
oh sh*t you're right
Two players chess easier to understand. Of course opinions can vary.
You are right, Captain Obvious.
nah B)
how tf do someone would think that 3 players are much more easier to understand than 2. This is created just to add new variation to the original game
me when 1 player chess
I’ve got to agree with you, this is way too confusing, and I’ve been playing since I was a kid…
This seems unironically really well thought out
Remember when you missed that bishop in the corner who take your piece in normal chess ..
This will be really a problem here
Thanks for the helpful tutorial!
I remember when Sheldon Cooper played three player chess!
3 man chess you mean?
Yuh ..but he played it
It was CHESS IN THREE DIMENTION
Sheldon also played 3 person chess alone in an episode
@@showmickkar7793 wouldn't chess in 3 dimensions be a regular chess bored with 2 players
4:40 Also, if you checkmate both opponents simultaneously, you are an absolute chad
pawn - nerf
knight - balanced
bishop - buff
queen - buff
rook - balanced
king - nerf
Wow, this Three Houses demake is amazing!
Imagine the chess magicians played this
And watch the board blow up
1:03 I mean... They drew the trajoctory lines on the board and if those are the rules then those are the rules,
but isn't this counter intuitivly to actual chess? If a straight moving piece like the rook would go through the center and end up on space with the same colour it would make sense, that a bishop, which normal movement retains it's colour throughout its whole movement would end up on a space after moving through the middle, that wouldn't match it's colour (in contrary to straight moving pieces as it is in normal chess).
Nevermind. It is fine (as I said: Rules are rules and it doesn't matter, what rules and logics of another game are saying and it probably helps to balance the game) but the movement of the bishop seemed very off from those trajectory lines.
In the example 1:03 I would intutivly say, that bishop would need to end up 3 field clockwise upwards were it would end up if the inital movement would go upwards end it would end up on a black field (as the logic of normal chess would dictate: Straight moving pieces end up on different colored space if moved by one space, diagonly moved pieces on a different if moved by one space).
Please 3 player chess get big the plays look so hype
yeah
Finally, I can checkmate with stalemates. I love this update.
If now there is 4 player chess. Then just imagine how many players would be able to play in the future year 2200.
4-player 5D Chess With Multiverse Time Travel is when it’s really at.
@@AstraIVagabond 3 man 5D Hexagonal Progressive Tic Tac Strato Martian Cannibal Solitare Viking Monster Atomic Diplomat Unbound Bughouse Penultima Giveaway of War without Stress Horde Benedict Checkers Chessplus with Multiverse Time Travel and your Kids of the Hill
I didn't know this existed but im happy that it did and now im gonna learn it.
In 2 player chess itself we make so many blunders and mistakes in this 3 player chess I don't know how many blunders and mistakes we will be making while playing on this round big board with so many lines and trajectories etc
A couple questions-
1. if a pawn would take a piece across the center, would it follow the trajectory line? I assume the queen would do that too?
2. Do other pieces apart from the pawns cross creaks (and take pieces)? Or are they closed for other pieces just like the moats?
3. Is En passant a thing in this game and if so, how?
wow. we played this in Egypt centuries ago, but with some variation.
Chess champions must be crazy on this new game update
Vat19 invented that version. I'm glad you bought that.
I love that you tuber
actually it was invented by George R. Dekle Sr. in 1984
Personally I like the one where's its just 3 half chess boards melded in together. I don't like addition of more rules with moats
@@zachnado69, what you mean is the concept was invented.
lol
"If you checkmate both opponents at the same time; then you win." Isn't that a pretty obvious statement? Is it: if you put both opponents kings in check at the same time then you win?
This is really cool. I mean I’ve seen the 4 player chess, but that doesn’t have the cool circular board and whatnot.
Me seeing the thumbnail: you know i can just kill the rook for free and checkmate them?
Me watching the video: Dang it
We have finally reached 69-D Chess
no theres not 69 D rows
Imagine if there was 20 man chess that took up an entire dining room table.
We need to see Levy and Hikaru play this
I also would like to see those 2 people play the 3 player version of the 2 player game they play ;)
Cool concept, good explanation, still confusing
Been tryin to save money lately....
But screw that! I want three person chess!
What about the ultra rare event, that is possible on this board called a Triple stalemate?
What would the rules be then?
I guess that would be a draw
this is probably the most confusing chess ever
This game reminds me of that scene in pirates of carribean when multiple people were pointing guns on both hands to each other.
I'm waiting for the 6 players chess with hexagonal squares.
Perfect! Now I'm just waiting for the single player campaign update
In my opinion, they should add a couple more rules to enhance the experience and add its own unique gameplay to it.
1. No bishop/rook/queen can check through the circle; It'd make strategic advancements much more entertaining and rewarding (More info in my 3rd rule suggestion).
2. Promoting to a piece in the center will be possible. However, doing so will render the piece *vulnerable*. Which will allow other's enemy pieces to capture the center at will. If an enemy piece did in fact capture the piece, it will still not be allowed to check from inside the circle. Hence, turning it *passive* instead.
To activate the center piece, it must exit the circle (in any In any enemy direction, you shall not return your piece to your side). It will only allow the piece to cross the circle border; You must first cross the border, then your piece is free to roam.
3. The player can refuse to promote to a queen and place their pawn in the center, doing so will allow the player to advance the pawn two spaces forward in the direction of either enemy territories (similarly, the piece must not return to its original side). By advancing your pawn off the center, en passant will be viable in your opponent's next turn.
These will make 3 player chess become more entertaining add its own unique flavor to the game-mode.
For instance, by combing the 2nd rule and the 3rd, I can make use of my pawns to shield the vulnerable queen. Punishing my enemies for not controlling crucial spaces in the process.
My brain can’t comprehend this well explained info 😅
Imagine a chess game where the types of moves you make determine how you are dynamically changing the rules of the game with them.
This makes more sense than that 5D chess with time travel and parallel universes I saw on Steam. But then, I don't think I've yet to encounter anything that doesn't make more sense than that 5D chess with time travel and parallel universes I saw on Steam.
do : 3 players strato chess
okayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
The New chess update is fire🔥🔥🔥 been waiting so long for it
Imagine learning 3 player chess when you don't even know the normal one.
Black and White: trying to focus on not dying
Grey: *Player 3 has joined the game*
This rule very hard to learn
I don’t know if this is the greatest or most terrifying things I’ve ever seen.
Let Hikaru review it
sounds interesting and fun! but it also sounds a bit complicated hehe would probably take a long time to figure out the strategies
TSG: “you can go through the thing or move horizontally (circular
Rook: UNLIMITED POWER
All the other pieces:*mace windu screaming *
Lol! 😂
@@TripleSGames is a rook allowed to stay in it's own square if it goes all around the circle?
“Hah! Checkmate”
That one bishop on J11:
How to play 4 Player Chess
It is coming….
@@TripleSGames wow
Imagine explaining this to your friends before playing and they say they don't wanna play
This hurts my brain
To move a knight through the center : Pray
The moat is too confusing, just make it always impassable
This is super cool.....almost Star Trekian. I will look for one of these boards
There's literally a game called chess empire, and its 4 way chess. I remembering playing it with my friends and aost always you had people gang up on eachother 😂
finally sheldon cooper can play this with his friend
The beashop's movement is giving me chills
Imagine this. 3D 3 person chess. Combining 3D chess and 3 person chess. I can just imagine how crazy that would get.
I'm pretty sure we already live in 3d
@@garrysmith1029 Have you not heard of 3D chess? If not, look it up.
@@proudamerican183 I have but idk why they call it 3d chess when we live in 3d already
@@garrysmith1029 Because it has multiple levels. It isn't flat(2D) but instead has depth to it(3D).
I’m in my 20s and I remember seeing a lot of these boards in the late 90z early 2010s
My head hurts just listening to the instructions.
You know someone sit and think up how can I make this already complicated game more complicated.
And thought they had more than one friend.
I mean who would like to get beaten constantly in a game of chess let alone two people beating you at the same time.
Pixy: 'Cipher, do you see any borders?
Cipher: *>Yes* >No
Pixy: 'That's why V2 is for'
Procceds to nuke the Round Table.
So may you do a video on how to play 4 player chess?
this is good , if you lose you can always say that, these two played together against you! hahah awsome !
3:40 Whatever the opposite of "Get down Mr. President" is, that move embodies it.