Conditional Probabilities, Clearly Explained!!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2024
  • One the most fundamental concepts in Probability, Statistics and Bayesian Statistics is Conditional Probability. In this StatQuest, we walk you through what Conditional Probabilities are and how to calculate them using raw data as well as unconditional probabilities. BAM!!!
    For a complete index of all the StatQuest videos, check out:
    statquest.org/video-index/
    If you'd like to support StatQuest, please consider...
    Buying my book, The StatQuest Illustrated Guide to Machine Learning:
    PDF - statquest.gumroad.com/l/wvtmc
    Paperback - www.amazon.com/dp/B09ZCKR4H6
    Kindle eBook - www.amazon.com/dp/B09ZG79HXC
    Patreon: / statquest
    ...or...
    TH-cam Membership: / @statquest
    ...a cool StatQuest t-shirt or sweatshirt:
    shop.spreadshirt.com/statques...
    ...buying one or two of my songs (or go large and get a whole album!)
    joshuastarmer.bandcamp.com/
    ...or just donating to StatQuest!
    www.paypal.me/statquest
    Lastly, if you want to keep up with me as I research and create new StatQuests, follow me on twitter:
    / joshuastarmer
    0:00 Awesome song and introduction
    1:11 Filling in a contingency table
    4:45 Calculating conditional probabilities from counts
    8:00 Calculating conditional probabilities from unconditional probabilities.
    #StatQuest #Probability #Bayesian

ความคิดเห็น • 370

  • @statquest
    @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    NOTE: Conditional probabilities can be written two ways: a "long" version and a "short" version. In this video I use the long version (because it's easier for me to read)...
    P(A and B | B) = P(A and B)/P(B)
    ...however, the short version is commonly used...
    P(A | B) = P(A and B)/P(B)
    Both mean the same thing, in other words: P(A and B | B) = P(A | B). The short version implies the "and B" part.
    Support StatQuest by buying my book The StatQuest Illustrated Guide to Machine Learning or a Study Guide or Merch!!! statquest.org/statquest-store/

    • @exploringdiversity572
      @exploringdiversity572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Your version is much easier for non-statisticians like me :)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@exploringdiversity572 bam!

    • @chandrashekar316
      @chandrashekar316 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      omg this cleared up so much confusion i had from reading my text book where they were using the shorthand

  • @pomegranate8593
    @pomegranate8593 2 ปีที่แล้ว +163

    I love how I need a video that seems designed for 7 year olds to understand my uni course.
    Great vid thanks

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @BulbasaurLeaves
      @BulbasaurLeaves ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I like the style. It's fun and nostalgic

    • @TheRedCubeYT
      @TheRedCubeYT หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is secondary school level maths

  • @asrao3788
    @asrao3788 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    In India due to competition for engineering entrance exam teacher majorly focus on question types rather than concept in depth. Im glad there is a place where people learn for fun not just for competition, also appreiciate teachers like you who can turn subjects into magic. Keep up the good work! From now on I'm permanent on this channel. You are the best!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you very much!

  • @shinej11
    @shinej11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    I always thought I was incapable of learning math, but it had always intrigued me. I just discovered what was missing; a good teacher. Thank you very much.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      bam!

    • @PastryDonut
      @PastryDonut ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm in the same boat as you man, love this channel

  • @pkmath12345
    @pkmath12345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Very nice video for sure. Conditional prob is one of the topics students feel the most difficulty when they start studying for stat! Great job!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! :)

  • @jacob.9664
    @jacob.9664 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Soda and Candy > Mechanical engineering degree. Thank you it was very helpful!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      BAM! :)

  • @mikejohns1347
    @mikejohns1347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I "stumbled" upon the contingency table method many years ago when trying teach myself the basics of probability. This approach is really the only approach for developing a solid understanding of conditional probability, as well as joint and marginal probability. I've never seen anyone present it this way and I'm so glad to see it here! Just more evidence that Josh Starmer is an absolute master instructor.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      BAM! Thank you very much! :)

    • @endahfajarwati8336
      @endahfajarwati8336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you know, me too.

    • @Ash-bc8vw
      @Ash-bc8vw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey this table reminds me of confusion matrix from a ML classification problem

  • @azinkhodadadi7912
    @azinkhodadadi7912 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I should of paid you instead of my useless lecturer at university! This is so much more useful thank you!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad I could help!

  • @buihung3704
    @buihung3704 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    A 6 years old can understand this. That's genius

    • @statquest
      @statquest  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks!

  • @turtle3341
    @turtle3341 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    this is how i wish people taught stuff, i really hope these ways of learning statistics get the recognition they deserve! please keep it up !!!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you!

  • @HardikBhakhar
    @HardikBhakhar หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never thought that to understand conditional probabilities is this easy … thanks prof 🎯

    • @statquest
      @statquest  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      bam! :)

  • @rejithmadhavan5735
    @rejithmadhavan5735 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Logical explanation, precision and genuineness - your way of teaching exemplifies these essential qualities. Thanks so much Josh for these great lessons. Invaluable effort!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, thank you!

  • @phuctran4679
    @phuctran4679 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you Josh & the team. I'm so grateful I've found your channel. You make me truly love statistics!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you enjoy it!

  • @jacktaylor1516
    @jacktaylor1516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is one of the best explanations of absolutely anything I've ever seen and heard. Well done. Subscribed.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome, thank you!

  • @onurkrmz9206
    @onurkrmz9206 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Today I discovered your channel and it is truly a gem. As a EEE student who tries to make sense of subject of probability and neural network stuff, I believe I will benefit a lot from your work and be thankful for rest of my life. Especially statistics is challenging as things get messy a lot and scary/unintuitive equations with confusing notations start to appear. I did not look at all of your videos yet, but I hope that you did statistics less scary for those like me. My best regards

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome! Here's a page that lists all of my videos (and playlists etc): statquest.org/video-index/

  • @leandroimail
    @leandroimail 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love these classes. They are so easy to understand. Thks you for sharing with us!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @dizetoot
    @dizetoot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    THANK YOU! I've really been struggling to get an intuitive understanding of conditional probability and this has helped so much!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it helped!

  • @AndrywMarques
    @AndrywMarques 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video!
    I never saw the "long version" to write conditional probabilities before but it's better to understand. Very intuitive!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I like it more, too.

  • @fatimajahara4871
    @fatimajahara4871 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love how the videos comprehend complex topics with easy-to-understand explanations. Thanks for all your effort :)

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome!

  • @arpitkakkar2780
    @arpitkakkar2780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome. I always come here to get my doubts clear. Love the way you teach. Lots of BAM!!!

  • @colinirvine757
    @colinirvine757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great job Josh!!!!! This is such a clear and precisely laid out video perfect for my students.

  • @vavy5652
    @vavy5652 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are literally saving me from my statistics exam! Thank you so much, your explanations are brilliant and you are really making me focus with your simple and funny ways. Thank you again!

  • @amribrahim7850
    @amribrahim7850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome explanation. Thanks to you and Triple Bam members

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you liked it! BAM! :)

  • @Florithepenguin
    @Florithepenguin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Struggled with this topic literally for years! You solved my problem within just 10 min.! 🎉

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bam! :)

  • @ivlivs.c3666
    @ivlivs.c3666 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Incredibly well-explained. Thank you!

  • @Regular.Biceps
    @Regular.Biceps ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Exceptional explanation... I'm Completely in love with your teaching style

  • @baqirhusain5652
    @baqirhusain5652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are a GOD of simple explanations

  • @Nakameguro97
    @Nakameguro97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you SO MUCH for clarifying that AB = A and B, when A and B are events. I get confused because XY is literally multiplication when X and Y are random variables. It can be doubly confusing because both events and random variables (even though they are different types) can be passed into P(), the probability function. Function overloading is a thing in computer programming, but I’m shocked to see it in math. Also, the implied A and B in P(A | B) is a lifesaver, many times over. BTW, understanding the tables in this video is pivotal in grasping marginal distributions, Baye’s Theorem, and joint probability distributions - it feels like I’m getting the other three concepts for free!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Triple bam!!! :)

  • @talentlancer1358
    @talentlancer1358 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you so much! This is the best video on conditional probability on internet.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @anthonyrinna1305
    @anthonyrinna1305 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    First, I'll admit I had "Do you love orange soda?" from Keenan and Kel in the back of my mind. That said, this video has been immensely helpful, thank you!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      :)

  • @jerryquid4057
    @jerryquid4057 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're incredible. You make everything seem so easy

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, thank you!

  • @tyt03538
    @tyt03538 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the best video explaining conditional probability. Hands down.

  • @jacktrimboli2857
    @jacktrimboli2857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I get a dopamine rush every time this man says bam

  • @swarnachoppella388
    @swarnachoppella388 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you! Great content always🤩

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My pleasure!

  • @Oliver-cn5xx
    @Oliver-cn5xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hi Josh, I am a long time fan of your channel and all of the shameless self-promotion has guilted me into buying one of your study guides (LDA). They seem great, a nice supplement to your videos. Though I think you would benefit greatly from stripping down the ordering process, I mean for online purchases almost noone asks for complete addresses, phone numbers and names anymore. I fought very hard with myself to finish it and parting with that information, and I succeeded simply because of being so grateful for the videos you provide.
    You'd probably sell a lot more of these if you just ask for an email. Like most. Cheers

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the advice! I'll see what I can do to simplify the ordering process.

  • @vinodliyanage4128
    @vinodliyanage4128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best explanation ever. Thank you! ❤️

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! :)

  • @rishikeshpillay
    @rishikeshpillay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this explanation.....It really help me to grasp this topic....

  • @yujan9103
    @yujan9103 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well explained. Bit long but makes the concept clear as possible. A big THANK YOU Josh.

  • @user-lc4nv3qy4i
    @user-lc4nv3qy4i 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was amazing and fun. Thank you!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @charmkeysy
    @charmkeysy 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    i love you this actually helped so much

    • @statquest
      @statquest  27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks!

  • @sillyfarmerbilly8872
    @sillyfarmerbilly8872 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "statsquatch" I love it 😂
    Also I guess I never put together that you could use the probabilities to calculate conditional probabilies, super helpful

  • @gabrielasantana3809
    @gabrielasantana3809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And BAM! I subscribed….such a clear explanation

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome, thank you!

  • @zaf3153
    @zaf3153 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super easy ti understand! Thanks alot

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it helped!

  • @ShashwatAgarwal007
    @ShashwatAgarwal007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Happy Guru Purnima Sir, So blessed that this channel exists. ❤️🙏

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! And thank you for supporting StatQuest! BAM! :)

    • @tomr03status99
      @tomr03status99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ❤️❤️

  • @anashaat95
    @anashaat95 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot. Clearly explained as you stated.

  • @ramprakash7872
    @ramprakash7872 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Conditional probability : Decoded. BAM !!! Tbh Some of your videos ( Very few actually. For example p-value 😁) were not very clear to me ( Well that's just me ! ) in the first instance but I digested through them somehow. But with little study & focus or just give a break for a while, the 2nd or 3rd look at your video makes the concept super clear to me and I don't need to look elsewhere. Thanks for making such videos and making statistics/probability easier.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you are able to understand the concepts.

  • @janiceoou
    @janiceoou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was looking for sth like this recently, thanks for somehow read my mind XD (I guess some kinda probability?? BAM!

  • @ceseb23
    @ceseb23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, perfect explanation, marvelous song, as always :D
    I would love to see a video about Generalized Linear Models( other than logistic).

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks and I'll keep that topic in mind.

    • @tomr03status99
      @tomr03status99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      👍👍👍

  • @dyles1832
    @dyles1832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The people demand a Montecarlo Simulations StatQuest!!!

    • @justinwhite2725
      @justinwhite2725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That would be nice.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll keep that in mind. We may get to something like it when I cover bayesian statistics.

    • @tomr03status99
      @tomr03status99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That could be nice

  • @surendrabarsode8959
    @surendrabarsode8959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very well explained as usual!! BTW, do you have any plans for making videos on stochastic calculus topics like Brownian motion, Ito integral, martingale measures etc. If so, I am looking forward to them.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'll keep those topics in mind.

    • @tomr03status99
      @tomr03status99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍👍👍👍

  • @sigmakings7285
    @sigmakings7285 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's a great one.thank you😊

    • @statquest
      @statquest  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you liked it!

  • @uvofsam
    @uvofsam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Bam!! , what a bam person to explain everything about statistics so bamly!!

  • @josevaldes7493
    @josevaldes7493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amazing googleplex BAM! Man you did it again. BRAVO

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, thanks!

  • @AbcdAbcd-ol5hn
    @AbcdAbcd-ol5hn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    😭😭😭😭thanks a lot😭😭😭god bless you, u are doing a noble job, may you get all the riches, love and happiness in the world

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much! :)

  • @shahf13
    @shahf13 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job josh you are my favorite teacher !! , can you think about making a video about Multicollinearity? bam

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll keep that in mind.

  • @simonroques8579
    @simonroques8579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video..again ! So good to be hit by the triple bam !!! 😁

  • @sleepydev4700
    @sleepydev4700 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hundred Bam!! Great explanation as always
    Could you put the playlist link in the description, it will help us a lot, thanks.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which playlist are you asking about?

  • @between_the_lines6173
    @between_the_lines6173 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You're the statistics buddha! The analogies and the calming voice!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks!

  • @BARAKABLESSING
    @BARAKABLESSING ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This helped understand c prob. I am taking a mandatory into to stat class with no math experience and passion. Thanks

  • @pratyushkashyap849
    @pratyushkashyap849 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Incredible lecture!! Bamm😀

  • @shamsulazhar
    @shamsulazhar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Finally, I understand this. BAM!!!!

  • @qwerty11111122
    @qwerty11111122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Josh! I've been working with DEseq2 a lot. Is dispersion shrinkage on your TODO list for statquest? I realize it's a little more of a niche topic for bioinformatics than broadly applicable tho

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'll keep it in mind.

  • @RaceyBeats
    @RaceyBeats 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So bloody good!

  • @EngRiadAlmadani
    @EngRiadAlmadani 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    BAMMM!!!!
    Great work
    Can you make video about bayesian classifier because it's depending on conditional probability

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've already done that. Here's the link: th-cam.com/video/O2L2Uv9pdDA/w-d-xo.html

  • @sanjeevsingh-zz2hg
    @sanjeevsingh-zz2hg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your way of teaching ! Bam!

  • @faiazrummankhan5589
    @faiazrummankhan5589 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This channel is the bible of " Making 'Understanding Statistics' Easy !"

  • @kayhankashi9970
    @kayhankashi9970 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SUPERB explanation... BAAAM !!!!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks!

  • @SarahFeng92
    @SarahFeng92 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your channel is amazing, I wish I had discovered it earlier! Would you ever consider making the slides available for sale? I would absolutely buy them.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have some of them for sale here: statquest.org/statquest-store/

  • @durgeshkshirsagar116
    @durgeshkshirsagar116 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow. Great explanation with nice song ❤️❤️

  • @kensarmoreto1863
    @kensarmoreto1863 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    although that i calculate conditional probability during college, i cannot get the concept of it leaving a gap in my stat knowledge...
    i stumbled in your video and i have a basic understanding about it. im just need a more examples regarding conditional probability to fully master this concept...
    Thanks Josh for your videos and hoping for more topics about stats and data analysis.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad my video was helpful! :)

  • @joshuaperling2985
    @joshuaperling2985 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amazing! the best!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! :)

  • @fabianarodriguez.
    @fabianarodriguez. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I GET IT NOW THANK U SO MUCH

  • @dhendroid2373
    @dhendroid2373 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is how every tutorial should be!

  • @piruthuviraj5903
    @piruthuviraj5903 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much...Now I cleared. 😁🥰🥰

  • @sumonmiah8957
    @sumonmiah8957 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great!
    Which software have you used to make this video(especially animation)?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I give away all of my secrets in this video: th-cam.com/video/crLXJG-EAhk/w-d-xo.html

  • @LukaszWiklendt
    @LukaszWiklendt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's interesting notation that you keep the superfluous condition on the left side of the pipe. I.e. using p(c=0 and s=1 | s=1) instead of p(c=0 | s=1). Do you find students understand it better this way?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. To me it is much clearer.

  • @yonatanaquinteror2989
    @yonatanaquinteror2989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome! BAM!!!

  • @shangauri
    @shangauri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good one Josh. Any plans of making videos on "Time series Models" ?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One day! :)

  • @fabriciomagalhaessena2289
    @fabriciomagalhaessena2289 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for this video! It saves my life hahaha

  • @sudhamjayanthi
    @sudhamjayanthi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you, uncle bam!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My pleasure!

  • @angelgamboa5902
    @angelgamboa5902 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amazing!!!!

  • @avrilduck8326
    @avrilduck8326 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After 4:40, I cried "that's enough" because it was relentless!!

    • @statquest
      @statquest  หลายเดือนก่อน

      bam

  • @catherinele8417
    @catherinele8417 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi ! I really like yours graphics and pictures ! What tool do you use ?

  • @ahmadatta66
    @ahmadatta66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "I hate using abbreviations"
    And I love you for that

  • @sampathkumar3405
    @sampathkumar3405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Josh , Please start a series for mathematics concepts for machine learning. Such as probability, linear algebra, statistics, calculus etc.. It'll great help for us.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a bunch of statistics videos here: statquest.org/video-index/

  • @micahdesign6657
    @micahdesign6657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    best video ever !

  • @animelife9351
    @animelife9351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Because of you, I knew this Concept "BAM" 😹😸

  • @kekahazra9769
    @kekahazra9769 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bam! I like the way you teach.....keep up!....Bam Bam!😅

    • @statquest
      @statquest  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you very much! BAM! :)

  • @RajSARAF495
    @RajSARAF495 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautiful ❤

    • @statquest
      @statquest  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you! :)

  • @jbetanco7733
    @jbetanco7733 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good job

  • @levine1886
    @levine1886 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any chance you could post a video on when to run regular linear regression vs. time series ARIMA?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll keep that in mind.

  • @graningfire1776
    @graningfire1776 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quadra BAMMMM ! ITS now clearly cleared in my mind

    • @statquest
      @statquest  หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not clear? What time point, minutes and seconds, was confusing?

    • @graningfire1776
      @graningfire1776 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@statquest sorry sir , I wish to write now but due to my mistake it become not .

  • @jackfrost8969
    @jackfrost8969 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent excellent excellent

    • @statquest
      @statquest  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Many many thanks!

  • @CW-vl9zd
    @CW-vl9zd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good video that cleared up a lot of my questions. Only thing I'm confused now tho is 9:20 let's say we are given all the probabilities. How do I know if a probability is p(not love c and loves s | loves s) or p(loves s | not love c and loves s)? Confused because we know both the numerator and denominator. Thanks

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, the second one, p(loves s | not love c and loves s), really doesn't make sense to calculate at all. This is because the conditional part, "not love c and loves s" is only a subset of "loves s", and thus, the conditional part does not give us any useful information about the larger "loves s" population.

    • @CW-vl9zd
      @CW-vl9zd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@statquest Thank you!

  • @sumailsumailov1572
    @sumailsumailov1572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So cool!

  • @hiidf
    @hiidf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    does it applies to all questions of conditional probability or any conditions?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm pretty sure it does.

  • @nagainu
    @nagainu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    love it

  • @incameet
    @incameet 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would love to see a video about KL divergence.

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too and I hope to cover it sometime soon.

  • @swarupghadei3590
    @swarupghadei3590 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Josh , how do we proceed if we have 3 variables ?(Soda Candy and Wafers) ?

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The same way, we just end up with a more complicated table.

  • @Darkev77
    @Darkev77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This might sound like a silly question but, shouldn’t one expect that P(A | ~A) = 0, and vice-versa? However this conditional notation doesn’t encompass that

    • @statquest
      @statquest  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually, it does. What you are asking is "The probability that someone loves candy AND does not love candy given that we know that they love candy". This results in the equation p(loves candy & does not love candy) / p(loves candy) = 0 / (6/14) = 0.

    • @Darkev77
      @Darkev77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@statquest thanks a lot prof for your clarifications!